A Manya Propagandist'sSelective Outrage: Zakir Kamboli's Deafening Silence
A Typical ManyaSycophant'ss Blatant Hypocrisy
We've recently been forwarded the above screenshot - a passionate message from none other than Zakir Kamboli—yes, brother of the notorious, scandal-ridden penny-shop molvi, a besty and associate of Suhail Manya (see video below of the thug in action at Bolton DU). Let’s briefly revisit Zakir Kamboli’s exact words from last year:
"Molana Ilyas taken out for what?? You gave the name 'Restructure' u bloody jokers!!!! You really think people were born yesterday?? Ever thought of removing the evil committee and Trustees under the name of 'Restructure' who have done fraud and taken the members money under the name of qarz (loan). You disgusting animals!!"
Strong words indeed! This fiery rhetoric was hurled when his comrade, dopey Darbar, was removed from his post, ostensibly under the guise of "restructuring"—a term Kamboli found laughable.
Fast forward to today—two committed, diligent young ulama, with impeccable records of teaching and service, have been abruptly dismissed. The reason given? Again, "restructuring."
The glaring question for Zakir 'my wife is an influencer so take me seriously' Kamboli now is—where has your passionate outrage vanished? Where is your loud condemnation of injustice? The same injustice that angered you last year is happening right now under your very nose. Your silence today is not just deafening—it’s a blatant revelation of your hypocrisy and double standards.
Furthermore, Mr. Kamboli, what happened to your bold allegations of fraud and embezzlement? Suddenly, after your mentor Manya and his cohort of sycofants took control, these severe accusations evaporated without a trace. The supposed mountains of evidence you claimed to possess and intended to expose are nowhere to be seen.
Wake Up Call for Parents: Protect Your Children's Faith fromManya'sFailed Madrasa
The two young Ustaads that were shamefully sacked, will easily,Insha'Allah, find opportunities in far better-run institutions, but the real loss here is for Tauheedul Madrasa and your children. What remains at Bicknell is simply dead wood—unmotivated, incompetent, and protected by nepotism.
Tauheedul Madrasa has become an utter embarrassment, hijacked by power-hungry tyrants like Manya, Desai, Darbar, and Wadiwala, whose eyes see nothing but pound signs. To the parents of the remaining 60% children at this failing institution (parents of approximately 40% children have wisely transferred their kids elsewhere to safeguard their children's imaan and Islamic education ever since Manya exposed his vile colours in the past 12+ months)—it’s time to deeply reflect on what you're allowing your children to endure. Their spiritual education is being tossed around like a worthless rag, a mere casualty in the political games and greed-driven agendas of these so-called "leaders."
With numerous high-quality madaris available locally, it's time you took a serious look at alternatives. Do you genuinely wish your children's imaan and education to be entrusted to penny-shop molwis who neglect their teaching duties, idling away their time in frivolous chatter while pocketing your hard-earned fees? Worse yet, they dismiss dedicated teachers without reason simply to sustain their own inflated salaries as funds dwindle, fueled solely by personal vendettas and nepotism.
Parents, it's crucial you seriously consider removing your children from this now failed institution, which has stagnated and deteriorated over the past two decades under the tyranical arrogance of Manya.
Consider the youth who have passed through its doors—they leave without basic Islamic knowledge, disengaged from the masjid, and absent from worthy deeni activities like spending time in Jamaat, but instead you will see them visible in late-night venues and activities far away from the deen.
Contrast this with thriving madaris in the vicinity: Mufti Maaz’s excellent work at Maryam Musalla, Maulana Amin Desai’s impressive leadership at Masjid Vali, and the committed scholars at Masjid Taqwa, Masjid Irfan, Masjid Bilal, Lammack Musalla and many more. Mufti Hanif, entrusted wisely by the Issa brothers with running the flourishing establishment at Masjid Vali, epitomises effective Islamic education. These institutions continuously evolve, refine their curricula, and produce children with outstanding tajweed and solid Islamic education.
In stark contrast, Bicknell under Manya remains trapped decades in the past, stubbornly refusing to learn, evolve, or improve. Manya's disastrous tenure at Bolton Darul Uloom—marked by repeated scathing Ofsted reports and police involvement due to his and Darbar's disruptive influence—is now replicated at Bicknell.
The current decline of the madrasa is a direct result of Manya's arrogance, jealousy, and insatiable greed. His envy towards successful institutions and respected ulama such as Blackburn Darul Uloom, Mufti Abdul Samad, Maulana Rafik Sufi, Mufti Hamid, Mufti Hanif, Maulana Munir, Maulana Talha and many more, has sealed his disgrace in the eyes of Allah. He didn't even leave out insulting one of the most respected ulama in the current age, Shaykh-ul-Islam Mufti Taqi Usmani - who Manya had the gall to mock with a filthy disparaging remark. One scholar sat next to him overheard this and he later writes (see earlier blog post) that on hearing this, he was assured that Allah will finish Manya for this slander against a friend of Allah. And as night follows day, so it happened. Manya has become a pariah, no masjid, ulama or any respected institution wants anything to do with him - his utter zillah is complete. There is no return for him. Manya destroyed Bolton Darul Uloom, damaged the respect Tauheedul Masjid once held, and is now actively sabotaging your childrens spiritual future. If he shows ZERO respect for our scholaraly fathers, then what chance will he show any respect towards protecting your childrens faith and deeni knowledge ?
We urge you to objectively compare your child's current progress in tajweed and Islamic education with students from any reputable madrasa nearby - in fact from anywhere in the North West. The truth will speak for itself.
One has to give credit to the Issa brothers and Hafiz Zuber of EG, who, free from prejudice - and the blessed tarbayyah of their late father Vali Issa ر - recognise and nurture young scholars, allowing them to flourish. This is in stark contrast to Manya's toxic insecurity, which stifles talent and innovation, ultimately harming your children’s Islamic education and spiritual wellbeing.
As mentioned yesterday, two committed teachers, alim graduates from our esteemed Jamiatul Ilm Wal Huda, have been abruptly dismissed from their roles without any valid explanation. The superficial narrative presented by the current leadership is simply that "your services are no longer required."
However, the situation becomes particularly troubling when compared to the case of Ilyas Darbar.Darbar was dismissed using the same phrase, but only after clear evidence showed his active efforts to harm the institution’s reputation and deliberately disrupt the Islamic education of over 1,000 children. Unlike Darbar, these two recently dismissed teachers have maintained exemplary records, having contributed positively and selflessly to the educational environment of the madrasah.
Their true 'crime' appears to be nothing more than their association with Jamiatul Ilm Wal Huda. It is an open secret that tyrant Manya has harboured deep-seated jealousy and animosity towards the Blackburn Darul-Uloom, primarily driven by envy of its outstanding success and exceptional reputation within Islamic and secular education. Rather than acknowledging and celebrating the DU's valuable contributions to Islamic scholarship, Manya has consistently viewed it as competition (especially during his abysmal failing tenure at the Bolton DU), letting his personal insecurities drive him to unjustified actions against its graduates.
This disturbing pattern is likely to continue. Other esteemed educators linked to the DU or those associated with the respected Manubari family will also face unwarranted dismissal. This systematic targeting, rooted purely in envy and insecurity, threatens not only the stability of our madrasah but also the future of Islamic education for the children entrusted to our care.
Manya’s Madrasa Meltdown: Protecting Loyal Lapdogs, Purging Dedicated Scholars
The troubling developments are never ending under the zulm of Manya and Mirza Desai. The Madrasa is spiralling into further chaos under these two enormous buffoons The dismissal of two young respected alim teachers—both graduates of Darul Uloom Blackburn and renowned for their years of dedicated, selfless service—highlights once more a disturbing trend of blatant favoritism and unjust governance.
These two scholars (Maulana Usama and Maulana Tahir), whose sole aim was the nurturing of young hearts and minds, have been disgracefully dismissed without valid justification, proving how wretched Manya has become in his running of the madrasa. In stark contrast, those loyal lapdogs whose incompetence directly contributes to the institution’s decline, such as Asim Wadiwala and Ilyas Darbar, remain inexplicably protected. Ilyas Darbar’s persistent neglect of teaching duties, coupled with his habitual idleness in the office, epitomises the dire deterioration of the madrasa's educational standards.
Other staff members, observing this unchecked negligence, have begun emulating these shameful practices, abandoning their responsibilities in pursuit of personal comfort, thereby betraying both the trust of the community and the sacred amanah placed upon them.
This selective targeting of committed and sincere educators signals not only a failure of leadership but also foretells a grim future for the institution. Under Manya's autocratic rule, the madrasa appears to be on an unstoppable path toward educational oblivion, undermining decades of hard-earned trust and respect within the community.
May Allah safeguard Bicknell Madrasa from further harm, protect it from internal fitnah, and restore its noble mission of serving the ummah with sincerity and justice. May He remove the zalimoon that have bought the institution to such a desperate level. Aameen
The EXPLICITHARAM nature of the Khanjras £2,000,000 10%RIBA earning preference loan
Limited Risk Sharing:
Unlike equity shareholders, who directly participate in the company's profits and losses, preference shareholders have a limited risk profile. They receive a predetermined fixed interest dividend, which is not directly tied to the company's overall performance. This structure means they do not fully share in the risks and rewards of the business (this is a fundamental shari'i principle)
Loan-Like Characteristics:
The preference share arrangement, with its fixed interest dividend and priority in capital return, resembles a loan. Preference shareholders effectively provide capital to the company, and in return, they receive a guaranteed interest return (the dividend). This capital, like a loan, must, at some point, be returned to them, especially in liquidation. Therefore, the preference holders are not true equity holders but are lenders.
Priority in Liquidation:
Similar to creditors and loan holders, preference holders have a higher claim on the company's assets in the event of liquidation. They are paid before common equity shareholders, reinforcing their position as having a debt like quality, and protecting their investment, just like a loan.
Taking their own loan instrument of 2,000,000 preference shares, a nominal value of £1 each, and a standard dividend of £0.10 per £1 share :
This is how Manya's beloved funders and sugar daddy, Khanjra's,Riba consumption off Preference Shares Works
Scenario:
2,000,000 preference shares outstanding.
Nominal value: £1 per share.
Standard dividend interest : £0.10 per share (10%).
Profit Threshold: £1,000,000
Year 1:
Company profits: £3,000,000 (above £1,000,000).
Interest Dividend per share: £0.10
Total Interest paid: 2,000,000 shares * £0.10/share = £200,000.
O believers! Fear Allah, and give up outstanding interest if you are ˹true˺ believers. If you do not, then beware of a war with Allah and His Messenger! But if you repent, you may retain your principal—neither inflicting nor suffering harm. - Quran 2: 278,279
Those who consume interest cannot stand [on the Day of Resurrection] except as one stands who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they say, "Trade is [just] like interest." But Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden interest. So whoever has received an admonition from his Lord and desists may have what is past, and his affair rests with Allah . But whoever returns to [dealing in interest or usury] - those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide eternally therein. - QURAN 2:275
The Prophet ﷺ said: "There are seventy degrees of interest, the least of which is equivalent to a man having intercourse with his mother." (SUNAN IBN MAJAH Vol #3, Hadith #2274)
PROPHET ﷺ said: "A dirham which a man consumes as riba knowingly is worse before Allah than thirty-six acts of zina (adultery/fornication)." (MUSNAD AHMAD Hadith #21450) (SAHIH AL JAMI Hadith #3375)
Narrated: Jabir ؓ "The Messenger of Allah ﷺ cursed
1) The one who consumes Riba (Interest) and
2) The one who pays it,
3) The one who writes it down
4) And the two who witness it,"
And he ﷺ said: "They are all the same."
The Prophet ﷺ said: "There is no one who deals in interest a great deal (to increase his wealth) but he will end up with little (i.e., his wealth will be decreased). (SUNAN IBN MAJAH Vol #3, Hadith #2279)
The Prophet ﷺ said: Avoid the seven great destructive sins.
1) To join partners in worship with Allah;
2) To practice sorcery;
3) To kill the life which Allah has forbidden except for a just cause; 4) To eat up Interest (Riba), 5) To eat up the property of an orphan;
6) To give one's back to the enemy and fleeing from the battle-field at the time of fighting and
7) To accuse chaste women who never even think of anything touching chastity and are good believers.
The Prophet ﷺ , said: "A dirham of riba which a man receives knowingly is worse than committing adultery thirty-six times"(narrated in Musnad-eAhmed and Ad-Daruqutni). Bayhaqi has also reported the above hadith in Shu'ab al-iman with the addition that "Hell befits him whose flesh has been nourished by the unlawful."
Narrated by Abu Hurayrah ؓ :
The Prophet ﷺ said: "On the night of Ascension, I came upon people whose stomachs were like houses with snakes visible from the outside. I asked Gabriel who they were. He replied that they were people who had received interest."
Narrated by Abu Hurayrah ؓ :
The Prophet ﷺ said: "Allah would be justified in not allowing four persons to enter paradise or to taste its blessings: he who drinks habitually, he who takes riba, he who usurps an orphan's property without right, and he who is undutiful to his parents."
____________________________
Manya’s principle: Condemn Riba loudly, but quietly accept its fruits when convenient.
Manya conveniently overlooks the fact that his sugar daddy Khanjra's business empire is deeply entrenched in interest-based transactions. For example, they provided a loan of £2,000,000 to their own company (Khanjra International Foods). Rather than structuring this as an interest-free loan or even an equity investment, they issued it through Cumulative Preference Shares valued at £1 each, bearing a guaranteed annual interest of 10% (link to accounts, page 14 onwards). If the interest isn't paid in a given year, it accumulates or accrues until the company is capable of paying (hence the term 'Cumulative'). Never-the-less it gets paid, on time or accrued - this is the founding principal of interest based lending - the lender get's his percentage on time or later. This is what Islam condemns in the most harshest of terms. In other words, the Khanjras have secured an assured 10%return annually on their £2,000,000 loan, guaranteed via cumulative preference stock. Using differing terminology, instead of saying it's a interest bearing loan of 10% doesn't make it halal. Would changing a particular wine's name to Vimto make it halal ? Preference share lending / earning is no less than interest based lending / earning - both one and the same in principle. It is haraam as it yields definite returns - in this case 10% on £2,000,000. If it isn't paid in one year, or more, it gets accrued (accumulates) - the preferential loan holder will get paid - just like in an interest bearing loan.
Therefore, the Khanjras not only generate but also consume what turns out to be £200,000 of pure Riba (interest) every year (whether they are paid in time or it's accrued). According to Sharia, both lending with interest and accepting it are unequivocally Haram, with the Quran explicitly declaring a state of war from Allah and His Messenger ﷺ against those who indulge in Riba-based practices.
Despite preaching passionately against the sin of Riba, Manya shows no discomfort benefiting directly from this wealth. He is evidently careful not to bite the hand that generously funds his campaigns and court cases. Manya's so-called charity, Hope and Help, operates from premises owned by the Khanjras, relying heavily on their financial backing. Clearly, his charity serves as nothing more than a facade. He conveniently avoids any criticism of his benefactors’ involvement in Riba, maintaining a cozy silence and ignoring the severe consequences promised in the Quran for such dealings.
Those who align themselves with such vile enemies of Allah and His Prophet ﷺ will be judged as though they too are involved in the same sin. Just as Allah and His Messenger have declared war against those who are involved in Riba, so too will they incur the same wrath and punishment.
If anyone is still in doubt about it being absolutely haraam:
Wa 'alaykum as-sal@m and greetings to our favourite lactose-intolerant philosopher!
The infamous "Dhoodh" strikes again! Your emails are truly the gift that keeps on milking—er, giving. Reading through your latest literary masterpiece was like trying to milk a chicken—bizarre, utterly pointless, yet weirdly entertaining.
Let’s unpack your moo-sings point by point, shall we?
"The Truth Hurts"
Indeed, your version of "truth" is definitely painful—painful for grammar, painful for logic, and painful for anyone who finished primary school. Trust us, our ribs aren't hurting from truth, they're hurting from laughing so hard.
"Illogical Thrash"
Thank you for raising the bar of literary criticism. Who knew that beneath your cream-coated wisdom lurked a literary critic who confuses "thrash" with "trash"? Perhaps a little less milk and a little more dictionary might help your next attempt.
"100 Volume Stories on Rustom"
Looks like someone's auditioning for Netflix! We eagerly await your blockbuster saga, "Milk Wars: Revenge of the Lactose-Intolerant."
"HMRC Never Came!"
Right, and cows also jump over the moon. Keep grazing in that field of denial, pal—it clearly keeps you nourished.
"Jhotto, LADO and Illegal Election"
You’re throwing around names and acronyms like a toddler tossing spaghetti—messy, nonsensical, but admittedly amusing. Sorry, no Oscars for best screenplay here.
The two names you keep bringing up—we have nothing to do with them or even know them, but if you’ve got an ounce of bravery left from your mother’s milk (since you clearly can't get enough), stop hiding behind fake email addresses, face them directly, and sort out your confused nonsense.
"Fatwa Coming Soon!"
Goodness gracious, we tremble at the thought. Can we request an almond milk version for those of us allergic to nonsense? Extra foam, please.
"Meet me at Marks and Spencer at 3pm"
Marks & Spencer? Seriously? You're challenging us to a showdown at M&S—home of quality underwear and overpriced meal deals? Did the dairy aisle at Tesco reject your advances? Never mind, guess we’ll skip afternoon tea today, we wouldn’t want to interrupt your intense stare-down with Percy Pig.
"Another Dose of Cow & Gate"
Honestly, we've never encountered someone so fascinated by baby formula. We're starting to worry about you (just a tiny a drop)—maybe call a hotline or something? We're sure they accept reverse charges from Milk.com.
So, dear "Dhoodh," next time you feel like sending us another frothy email full of milk analogies, please ensure you at least pick up some cookies on the way. It's the least you can do if you're going to keep delivering this cream-filled entertainment.
Until then, stay lactose-tolerant and keep us laughing!
Warmest regards,
Team Milkshake 🥛🍪
PS Remember folks, what Ian Rush said,
if you didn't drink lots of milk, when you grow up you'd only be good enough to play for Accrington Stanley
યાદ રાખો મિત્રો, ઇયાન રશે શું કહ્યું હતું, જો તમે ઘણું દૂધ ન પીતા, તો જ્યારે તમે મોટા થશો ત્યારે તમે ફક્ત એક્રિંગ્ટન સ્ટેનલી માટે રમવા માટે પૂરતા સારા હશો.
لوگوں کو یاد رکھیں، ایان رش نے کیا کہا، اگر آپ نے بہت زیادہ دودھ نہیں پیا، جب آپ بڑے ہوں گے تو آپ صرف ایکرینگٹن اسٹینلے کے لیے کھیلنے کے لیے کافی ہوں گے۔
تذكروا أيها الأصدقاء، ما قاله إيان راش، إذا لم تشرب الكثير من الحليب، عندما تكبر لن تكون جيدًا بما يكفي للعب إلا مع فريق أكينجتون ستانلي.
"Alhamdulillah. May Allah reward our elders. They gave us a legacy to be proud of, each one of us.
If we are honest with ourselves and we really reflected on what we have and what we were given, then you will be forced to make dua for them.
But my question is, what are we leaving behind? For our children, for our grandchildren? For what have we invested? What have we prepared? What have we done?
Very little. We are just living off what our elders did for us. We have seldomly or done very little for our generations to come." Manya, 2023
Listening to Manya'sheartfelt plea from 2023, one might momentarily be moved. He eloquently praised our elders for their invaluable legacy and asked pointedly, "What are we leaving behind for our children and grandchildren?" An inspiring sentiment, indeed—until you consider that the speaker himself has since dedicated his every breath to dismantling exactly that legacy!
"May Allah reward our elders." Yes indeed, Manya, because if the reward depended on you, there would be little left to speak of. Your elders built a community on unity, humility, and trustworthiness. You, on the other hand, have single-handedly orchestrated division, hostility, and an unprecedented atmosphere of suspicion within the same community.
"They gave us a legacy to be proud of."
Your legacy, Manya? Squandering £150k in ego-fueled lawsuits, reporting your own mosque to HMRC out of sheer spite, and bringing Tauheedul's finances to the brink of collapse—is this the proud inheritance you preach about?
"If we are honest with ourselves..." Honesty from the mouth of the man caught withholding a resignation letter (amanah) for three months? A man found guilty in a damning HR report for creating violent confrontations in Allah’s house, inciting hostility against fellow Muslims? Irony just got a new definition.
"What have we prepared? What have we done? Very little."
Correction, Manya—you’ve done plenty. You've planted seeds of division, nurtured a culture of blind fanaticism, and harvested a bountiful crop of chaos, lawsuits, and distrust. Your self-righteous preaching about legacy-building is laughable considering the toxic trail you leave behind.
"We are just living off what our elders did for us."
Indeed, and no one embodies this better than you. Our elders built mosques and institutions to promote unity and taqwa, yet you've managed to weaponise these very same spaces for your personal vendettas and tantrums—remember the infamous car-blocking fiasco?
Legacy Checkmate
If you truly believed your own words, you'd have stepped down long ago. Instead, your followers—like nodding sheep—applaud your every hypocrisy and contradiction.
So, next time you're on the pulpit, perhaps begin your speech honestly:
"Dear Congregation,
Ignore my previous talks—I certainly have."
Your message, steeped in a dangerous misinterpretation of Islamic truths, reveals a جاهلية/ ignorance of both Islamic history and basic common sense. You fools claim allegiance to a proven deviant individual whose teachings incite division and disregard for established authority, all while cloaking your extremism in pious rhetoric. Let's dissect your flawed assertions:
You assert that believers should not "take hypocrites as allies." This simplistic, black-and-white view ignores the nuanced reality of social interaction and the very actions of the Prophet ﷺ. The Prophet ﷺ, in his wisdom, engaged with individuals of varying degrees of faith, even those who harboured doubts or opposition. He made treaties with non-Muslim tribes, recognising the necessity of peaceful coexistence and strategic alliances. To suggest blanket rejection of anyone deemed "hypocrite" is to contradict the Prophet's ﷺ own example (نَعُوْذُ بِاللهِ)
Your claim that believers should rely solely on Allah and disregard all worldly authority, such as "C.C or the Police," is a recipe for chaos and societal breakdown. Islam, while emphasising reliance on Allah, does not negate the importance of established order and just governance. The Prophet ﷺ himself established a legal and social framework in Medina, demonstrating that faith and civic responsibility are not mutually exclusive.
You conveniently quote verses about relying on Allah's will, yet ignore the countless examples of the Prophet ﷺ and his companions taking practical steps to protect themselves and their community. Did the Prophet ﷺ simply sit and wait for divine intervention during the Battle of Uhud? No. He strategised, planned, and led his forces, demonstrating the importance of taking action while trusting in Allah. Did Umar ibn al-Khattab (r), when faced with a plague, simply rely on Allah's will? No, he famously retreated, saying, "We are fleeing from Allah's decree to Allah's decree." This demonstrates a deep understanding of reliance on Allah that includes taking rational precautions.
Examples that directly contradict your foolish thinking:
Treaty of Hudaybiyah: The Prophet ﷺ made a treaty with the Quraish, who were at that time non-Muslims and staunch enemies. This act showcased that making alliances with non-believers for the greater good of the muslim community is acceptable.
The Constitution of Medina: The Prophet ﷺ created a document that outlined the rights and responsibilities of all residents of Medina, including Jews and other non-Muslims. This clearly shows the prophet's ﷺ acceptance of a structured society with rules, and interaction with those of other faiths.
The appointment of non muslims in roles: The prophet ﷺ , and the Sahaba, would sometimes appoint non-muslims to roles in which they were experts. Showing that expertise and practical help, is not something to be ignored because of faith.
The stories of the Sahaba: The Sahaba, when faced with issues, would take practical measures to solve issues, and then put their trust in Allah. They did not just sit and wait for Allah to fix everything.
Your pir's rhetoric, like yours, promotes a dangerous isolationism and disregard for established authority, creating a breeding ground for extremism. True faith is not about blind obedience to a self-proclaimed authority, but about understanding and applying the principles of Islam in a way that promotes peace, justice, and societal harmony.
Your "[email protected]" email address, seemingly innocent, hides a poisonous ideology. Reconsider your allegiance and seek knowledge from reputable scholars who uphold the true spirit of Islam both in knowledge and in practise, not from penny shop ones who will sell your soul to save their own hide.
When some cry, “Only Allah has power—not the Charity Commission or the police,” one has to wonder: where was this same conviction when the masjid was reported to HMRC? Where was the tawakkul (trust in Allah) then?
Let’s not forget—it wasn’t “the enemies of Islam” who brought HMRC, LADO, or the Charity Commission to the mosque’s door. It was those from within—those who now parade pious slogans, yet quietly filed complaints to secular authorities.
If the belief is that “Allah alone is in control,” why weaponise state institutions? Why lodge complaints to HMRC about wages while claiming "we rely only on Allah"? You can’t demand divine trust and simultaneously reach for the red tape when it suits your agenda.
And if courts are so distasteful to our faith—as was once so confidently preached from the minbar—why were they used to the tune of £150,000 ? Why summon non-Muslim lawyers to fight fellow Muslims over positions of power, then later lecture about “only Allah having power”?
It’s selective piety at best. Weaponised religiosity at worst.
Tawakkul is not a slogan to silence critics. It's a spiritual station—one that requires consistency, not contradiction. Our beloved Prophet ﷺ trusted in Allah fully—yet still consulted companions, planned strategies, prepared for battles, and exercised accountability. When he saw injustice, he didn't hide behind slogans. He acted with wisdom, transparency, and sincerity.
So when the public asks for transparency and integrity—they’re not challenging Allah. They’re challenging hypocrisy.
Allah is the one with the power not the C.C or the Police
“Allah forbids His believing servants from taking the hypocrites as allies...”
Wow. Straight from the "Cut-Paste-Takfir-101" playbook. No context, no fiqh, no evidence — just a slow, lumpy stew of half-baked Ayahs and conspiracy memes blended into one soupy sermon.
The essence of this Moo-slim's message is simple: * “Ignore the Charity Commission.” * “Dismiss the police.” * “Manya is oppressed. Trust me. I’ve read half a translation of a Hadith once in a WhatsApp forward.”
So, apparently, Allah’s entire legislative system now operates via random anonymous cow-themed emailers. So divine decree now gets delivered via [email protected]?
Let’s get serious.
🥄 Spoonful of Facts for the Milky-Headed
The Prophet ﷺengaged in treaties with non-Muslims, including the Constitution of Madinah, which was legally binding — he didn’t say “Forget governance, Allah is sufficient for us.”
Sayyiduna Umar ibn Al-Khattab (ra) appointed governors and set up justice systems with checks, balances and accountability — not “Moo-lvi-led mini cults” with dodgy property games.
Sayyiduna Yusuf (as) took a post in a non-Muslim government to ensure justice — because action, not slogans, matters.
The Prophet ﷺ himself He sought protection and support from secular authorities — including Mut’im ibn ‘Adi, a non-Muslim — for safe passage after being rejected in Ta’if. If your logic were correct, he wouldn’t have needed that.
Sayyiduna Umar ibn al-Khattab (ra) He famously held even himself accountable and was open to being corrected by an ordinary woman in public when she challenged his decision. Accountability wasn’t seen as an insult — it was part of leadership.
None of the Sahaba said “Ignore wrongdoing because tawakkul.” They used tawakkul after they’d done their due diligence and taken action.
Why was £150,000 spent dragging fellow Muslims through the very legal system they now claim holds no weight? Why resort to the courts—especially ones that you own leader called “kufr courts”—when the shoe was on the other foot?
When some cry, “Only Allah has power—not the Charity Commission or the police,” one has to wonder: where was this same conviction when the masjid was reported to HMRC? Where was the tawakkul (trust in Allah) then?
This isn’t theology—it’s theatre. Quoting verses selectively while sidestepping basic questions of accountability is not piety; it’s evasion.
Where was this “tawakkul” (reliance on Allah) when court applications were being filed? When thousands of pounds—community donations—were spent on lawyers instead of education, da’wah or support for those suffering in Palestine?
These inconsistencies reveal one thing: it’s not about principle, it’s about convenience. The verses of the Qur’an are used not as sincere guidance, but as shields to deflect criticism when it gets too close to home.
If we truly believe in Islamic principles, then those principles should guide us in all matters—especially in leadership, accountability, justice, and use of public funds.
And if people demand answers—not slogans—it’s not because they lack faith. It’s because their faith doesn’t permit blind obedience.
🐮 Dhoodh Bhai, A Question:
If the police or CC uncovered child abuse, financial fraud, or abuse of power — would you still say “Allah will deal with it, bro”? Or would you run to them for justice?
Because that’s what this is about.
You think Manya being exposed for:
Lying
Withholding resignations
Instigating fights in the Masjid
Misusing charity funds
Causing national-level investigations into a once-respected Masjid
…should be swept under the musalla because your little “pir” muttered something about Palestine last week?
Yes, Allah is the one with all power — that is the core of Tawheed. But what’s missing from this idiot's argument is the understanding that Allah has placed systems of justice in the world, and we are commanded to use them to stand up against oppression and wrongdoing.
No one is replacing Allah with the Charity Commission or the police. Rather, holding accountable those entrusted with religious and financial amanah, using the very avenues that exist to prevent abuse — just like the Prophet ﷺ taught.
🔸 So ask yourself: Would you still say “don’t involve authorities” if your money went missing from a masjid fund? Or if someone harmed a child in a madrasah? Would you just “trust Allah” and let it go?
Tawakkul doesn't mean burying your head in the sand. It means doing our part with the means Allah has given — then placing our trust in Him.
Let’s be real: This message isn’t about Allah. It’s about deflecting justice to protect your cult leader. You’ve mixed your aqeedah with your emotions, added a few spoons of takfiri syrup, and served it to the gullible like it’s fresh theology.
🚨 URGENT: MIRZA DESAI UNDER PRESSURE FROM CHARITY COMMISSION –
SERIOUS QUESTIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE ANSWERS 🚨
Word is swirling that Mirza Desai and his seven nodding donkeys have been slapped with new correspondence from the Charity Commission (CC), demanding immediate responses on the catastrophic mismanagement of Tauheedul and the reinstatement of Suhail Manya – an issue that refuses to go away, no matter how hard they try to bury it.
🔴 Why the silence, Mirza?
🔴 Why hasn’t this latest demand been addressed with the musallis?
🔴 Why are the congregation being kept in the dark about the severity of what’s at stake?
At the last CC meeting, Desai was torn apart, with the Commission outright questioning his competence as President—not once, but FOUR times! Let’s not forget the jaw-dropping moment when the Charity Commission demanded minutes of meetings, and Desai’s legendary reply:
💬 “The previous committee didn’t teach me how to write minutes.”
Are you serious? You gleefully became “President” of a decades old reputable institution, yet claim ignorance on how to record a simple meeting? The CC aren’t buying it, and neither is anyone else.
But now comes the real question: What happens next? The CC has escalated their scrutiny, and other governmental bodies are circling (including the Police), waiting to act. This isn’t just about incompetence anymore—this is about the survival of Tauheedul as a functioning institution.
💥 Does Mirza think ignoring the problem will make it magically disappear?
💥 How long before the congregation wake up and demand answers?
💥 Does he seriously believe his excuses will hold up when the CC comes knocking next time?
The reality is clear—Desai’s sham presidency is crumbling, and the authorities know it. When the house of cards falls, who will be left holding the blame? Certainly not the previous committee.
Once upon a time in a quiet village, there stood a grand pasture with a strong wooden gate. The pasture was overseen by a sly and cunning fox named Malik. He had ruled the land for years, convincing the other animals that he was their wise leader and only he knew what was best for them.
In the village, there lived two goats, both named Sufi. One was strong and independent, unafraid to challenge the fox’s authority. The other was timid and obedient, following every command of the fox without question.
One day, a terrible storm swept through the village, and the strong wooden gate broke. The fox, always looking for an opportunity, gathered the animals and declared, “This is an outrage! Who allowed this to happen? Who is responsible for this disaster?”
With a glint in his eye, he pointed at the independent Sufi’s home. “It was his fault! He has been careless, he does not respect the laws of the pasture!” The fox gathered his followers and howled in anger, demanding that the independent Sufi be punished.
The animals, fearing the fox’s wrath, followed his command. The independent Sufi was cast out of the pasture, blamed for a crime he did not commit. The fox sat back, satisfied. He had eliminated a challenge to his rule.
Days passed, and another storm came. The gate broke once again. This time, the weak Sufi was to blame—his cart had rolled into the gate and shattered it.
But did the fox gather the animals in anger? Did he cry out for justice? No. He simply smiled and said, “Oh, dear Sufi, mistakes happen. Let us all move forward.”
The other animals watched in silence. Some realized the truth—that the fox did not care for rules or justice. He only cared about his own power, punishing those who opposed him and excusing those who served him.
And so, the pasture remained under the fox’s rule, but fewer and fewer animals trusted him. One by one, they began to leave, knowing that a leader who bends the rules for his friends but punishes his enemies is no leader at all.
Moral of the story: A leader who enforces rules only on his enemies, but pardons his friends, is no leader—he is a tyrant in disguise.
Noor 'Munchkin' Manya's Desperate and Delusional Comparison:
Equating His Brother's Luxury with an Indian Village Imam’s Poverty
It seems Noor Manya, Bicknell's very own Rumpelstiltskin, is scraping the bottom of the barrel in his latest attempt to salvage the wreckage of his brother’s tarnished reputation. Sharing an audio of Shaykh Abdul Rashid Ajmeri’s talk in India, where the Shaykh was addressing the abysmal financial conditions of poverty-stricken Imams in small Indian villages, Noor wants to somehow equate that with Suhail Manya’s situation. Our Muslim brethren are among the most impoverished minorities in India, with many living below the extreme poverty line of $1.90 per day. This harsh reality extends to the imams who serve these destitute villages.
Let’s pause and reflect for a moment, and acknowledge the sheer absurdity of Noor’s disgraceful attempt at comparison.
A Tale of Two Imams: One in India, One in Luxury
The Indian village Imam struggles to feed his family, lives in crumbling conditions, and receives wages that barely cover his most basic needs. He likely walks to the masjid or rides a worn-out bicycle, wearing simple, often patched-up clothing, with no prospect of ever owning a car—let alone a top-end, luxury model. Leads Salah and educates children year-round, enduring the sweltering heat and relentless mosquito-infested monsoon seasons.
Now, let’s turn to our local "oppressed" Imam, Manya.
🔹 Luxury Car Enthusiast – Manya drives around in top-end luxury vehicles, which alone would cover the yearly wages of multiple village Imams.
🔹 Affluent Lifestyle – He jets off to the "fahsha capital" of the Middle East whenever he pleases for his lavish getaways.
🔹 Designer Everything – From his spectacles to his watch, from his shoes to his perfume—everything reeks of indulgence. Let’s not forget, his perfume collection alone could sustain an entire Indian Imam’s family for months.
🔹 Mortgage-Free Home – He lives in a £250k+ property in an affluent area, away from the community he supposedly serves—unlike the humble village Imam who lives among his people, sharing their struggles.
🔹Working in the lap of comfort—climate-controlled surroundings, heating at the push of a button, and cooling at one’s convenience.
Yet, NoorMunchkin Manya expects the community to pity his charlatan of a brother and equate him with struggling scholars in India?
The Desperation is Showing
Noor needs to wake up and smell the designer oud—his brother is no underpaid, mistreated scholar. If anything, he has been the one exploiting the masjid,draining funds, fleecing the community, and burdening the masjid with legal fees because of his reckless behaviour.
This pitiful attempt at drawing moral equivalence is a new low in the Manya camp’s propaganda. Instead of trying to misuse the words of a respected scholar to shield a disgraced, power-hungry fraud, maybe Noor should reflect on the actual suffering of those Indian scholars—and see just how far removed his luxury-loving, power-obsessed brother is from them.
Respected by Who? Certainly Not the Scholars
Let’s also not forget—Shaykh Ajmeri, whose words Noor is trying to weaponise, refuses to even step foot into Tauheedul anymore. The very ulama that once used to visit Tauheedul have distanced themselves from Manyabecause they see him for what he truly is—an ego-driven, dunya-obsessed charlatan.
If Noor really wants to paint his brother as a "victim," maybe he should start by addressing why so many respected scholars want nothing to do with him anymore.
But then again, he’s too busy clutching at straws—hoping no one notices how badly this little PR stunt has failed.
"The devil's pride. Who is anyone to tell me ? Who is anyone to tell me ? If anyone has then courage, tell me ? If someone tells me, I will fight with him. Brother, fight with your own ego. Fight with the devil. Do not like to fight with your Muslim brother. This pride in the world will deprive you. Such people will not be blessed with the kalimah at the time of death. May Allah protect."
The words of Suhail Manya in this snippet could almost be mistaken for a moment of self-awareness—if only they weren’t dripping with sheer hypocrisy.
Manya’s talk about pride and arrogance would be laughable if it weren’t so tragically hypocritical. In this snippet, he warns against ego, fighting, and arrogance, yet his own actions, as documented in the damning HR report, expose him as the living contradiction of his own words.
“The devil’s pride. Who is anyone to tell me? Who is anyone to tell me? If anyone has the courage, tell me?”
Manya should know all about the devil’s pride—after all, it was his own unchecked arrogance that led to the destruction of Tauheedul’s unity, the breakdown of its governance, and the toxic culture of intimidation that his leadership fostered. When told by the trustees, committee, and even external HR consultants that his behavior was unacceptable, he dismissed every warning, ignored every protocol, and reinstated himself in blatant defiance of governance.
“If someone tells me, I will fight with him.”
And fight he did—but not with his ego, not with his desires, and certainly not against the devil. He fought with trustees, committee members, teachers, and musallis. He instigated altercations, provoked physical fights, and created an atmosphere of hostility inside the very House of Allah.
The HR report explicitly found that Manya aggressively confronted two congregants in the mosque, shouting:
🔹 "Now say it, I’m no longer fasting. Go on, say it again.”
🔹 “You want to fight me? Why don’t you fight me now?”
His provocations led to a physical altercation, with shoving and pushing in the masjid, completely disregarding the sanctity of the place he claims to serve. Even his own son assaulted a musalli in the Masjid. Instead of de-escalating tensions as an Imam should, he actively incited violence and division. This wasn’t just poor leadership—it was Gross Misconduct in the eyes of employment law and above all the Akhlaq (character) of someone who claims to be the Imam of the masjid.
“Brother, fight with your own ego. Fight with the devil. Do not like to fight with your Muslim brother.”
So where was this "brotherhood" when he was bullying, intimidating, and physically provoking members of the congregation? Where was this humility when he was plotting behind the scenes, manipulating Mirza Desai and his 7 nodding donkeys to reinstate him against all ethical, legal, and Islamic standards?
“This pride in the world will deprive you. Such people will not be blessed with the Kalimah at the time of death.”
Perhaps the only truthful part of his speech—except he’s too blind to realize he’s describing himself.
🔹 Who refused to acknowledge their wrongdoing?Manya.
🔹 Who rejected every attempt at reconciliation and instead fueled animosity?Manya.
🔹 Who stood at the pulpit week after week, condemning arrogance while basking in his own delusions of grandeur?Manya.
The truth is crystal clear: Manya is nothing more than a walking contradiction, a man who preaches humility while practicing tyranny, a self-styled Imam whose actions reek of arrogance, violence, and self-importance.
For his few remaining blind followers—wake up. Your so-called leader has been exposed by independent investigations, his own actions, and his own words. You can parrot his speeches all you like, but the facts remain: this is not a man of deen, but a man of ego, an enormously fragile one at that.
If anyone still needed proof that Manya has created an extremist cult, Mirza Desai and his fellow imbeciles have kindly provided it on a silver platter.
Back in October, we had Lookman "I'm the Chairman" Desai trying to stir up the zealots, pushing for a Fatwa of Kufr against a Trustee—simply for daring to question about one of Manya’s deranged outbursts from the pulpit. Imagine that! A simple request for guidance, and the response? “Get a Fatwa to Declare him a Kaafir!” That’s the level of lunacy we’re dealing with.
Fast forward to last Saturday, and we have yet another Lukman—the ever-loyal Matadar—elevating his sycophantic stupidity to new heights. Rising from his seat, perhaps believing himself to be divinely inspired, he posed a question to his overlord:
“Should we call those who complained about your speeches Kaafir?”
And what was Pir Manya’s wise response? A smug, knowing smile—as if to say, “Ah, my dear obedient servant, you already know the answer.”No correction. No education. No attempt to rein in this rising wave of dangerous extremism. Just silent approval, watching as the cultism festers.
But hey, maybe Lukman Matadar is onto something. Maybe those who complain against a ‘Moulana’ are automatically Kaafir.
If that’s the case, then by their own idiotic logic, we must also declare Manya himself, Ilyas Darbar as Kaafir ?—after all, they complained about the House of Allah to the Charity Commission and HMRC, right? Let’s not forget the six court applicants who dragged the masjid to court—surely they must be Kaafir too?
But there’s a twist! They only complained about individuals, not the Masjid—so that makes it okay, right? Even though the judge ruled that trustees and committee members weren’t liable for costs?
So let’s get this straight—complaining about Manyais equivalent to challenging God Himself, but taking the House of Allah to court over personal grudges is perfectly fine?
This isn’t just hypocrisy. This is the full-blown birth of an extremist Khawarij like cult, right in front of our eyes.
Manya’s Selective Morality: Preaching for the Masses, Pardons for His Sugar Daddy
Pardoning His Patron - The Profiteers of Israeli-Endorsed Goods
The Manya-led clueless sheep have truly perfected the art of blind loyalty, falling hook, line, and sinker for the oldest trick in the book—divert, deflect, and deceive. Every time their fascistic leader’s crimes, sins, and sheer corruption are laid bare, his cult-like followers quickly pull out their favourite red herring: "What about Palestine?"
This blatant nifaq (hypocrisy) is most evident in Manya’s prime funders—none other than the Khanjras, Qawwali KingYakub and his Tommy Robinson son, Altaf. These are the same shysters who gorge themselves on £200k of RIBA every year (10% interest per year on £2m loan from themselves to the company)—yes, that’s right, the very thing that Manya himself has thundered against in his many pompous sermons, reminding people of the declaration of war from Allah and His Messenger ﷺ against those who indulge in it. Yet, when it comes to the Khanjras, Manya conveniently loses his voice.
But it doesn’t stop at their love for riba. The same Khanjras, especially the Bruce Forsythe tribute act, Altaf Khanjra now parade themselves as the self-appointed saviours of the Palestinian cause, rake in millions from selling products that have been categorically named by the BDS movement as complicit in Israel’s genocide and illegal occupation. Some of the very brands the BDS movement calls to boycott, but which the Khanjras gleefully stock to pad their already overflowing pockets, include:
And the list goes on (click image on the right to see above and more products on the boycott list). Yet, Manya—who is supposedly so concerned about Palestine—has no issue being financially propped up by these riba-loving, Zionist-supporting traders. But of course, what applies to the rest of the ghafileen (heedless masses) doesn’t apply to Manya's beloved sugar daddies.
Manya has gladly and without hesitation made the Khanjras his sugar daddy, allowing them to prop up his faux charity, 'Hope and Help' (more like Hopeless and Hapless). He has no qualms about being bankrolled by these riba-loving, money-grabbing merchants who have no issue selling Zionist entity related products. After all, Manya’s fiery sermons are meant for the masses—not for his elite backers. For them, his pir status—like the pirs of old—grants them a free pass and a convenient halalization of the haram.
The most glaring proof that none of them actually care about the Palestinian cause? Their absolute waste of £150k on futile phowti and bhowti court cases—filling the pockets of Zionist-aligned lawyers (yes, their own lawyers have actively worked on cases for clients in Israel). Imagine the immense aid that £150k could have provided for the people of Gaza, yet these hypocrites chose to burn it away in legal fees just to massage their egos.
So, next time you hear Manya pontificating about the Palestinian cause or receive a WhatsApp message glorifying Manya's supposed gham (concern) for Palestine, take a moment to ask yourself what he and his corrupt backers have actually done—beyond empty words and self-righteous rhetoric. Because while genuine Muslim charities walk the walk, Manya & Co. are too busy running their mouths and lining their pockets.
Mirza 'the Village Idiot' Desai: The President Who Didn’t Know How to President 🤡
The Never-Ending Farce of Tauheedul’s “Leadership” – A Gift That Keeps on Giving. Ladies and gentlemen, gather around, for today we present you with a tale of unparalleled buffoonery starring none other than Mirza Lookman Desai, the president who apparently needs a lesson on how to recall things that happened in a meeting and write them down—otherwise known as "taking minutes." 🎭
The scene? A high-stakes meeting with the Charity Commission (CC), the very people looking into the disastrous governance failures of Manya’s loyalist regime. On the agenda:
Why did Mirza Desai blatantly ignore the damning HR report on Manya and reinstate him like a medieval king pardoning his court jester?
Why had he not responded to multiple emails from the Charity Commission?
And where, oh where, were the minutes of committee meetings?
Now, one would expect a dignified leader to muster up some semi-intelligent excuse, maybe even fabricate some bureaucratic nonsense to worm his way out of it. But not our Mirza. No, no, this intellectual heavyweight, this gold-smuggling genius—with all the gravitas of a confused toddler—gave what is possibly the most jaw-droppingly ridiculous response in the history of leadership:
“The previous committee didn’t teach me how to write minutes.”
Let that sink in for a moment.
This "president", this self-declared guardian of the masjid, openly admitted to being too incompetent to document what was said in a meeting, and, in an Oscar-worthy performance of deflection, blamed the previous committee for not providing him a crash course in Basic Common Sense 101.
Even his loyal donkeys—those who usually nod in unison like bobbleheads on a car dashboard—were struggling to hide their embarrassment. As for the seven sane members (who later resigned in sheer frustration), they were on the verge of breaking into uncontrollable laughter, exchanging looks of utter disbelief. Had they really just heard what they thought they heard?
The CC, unimpressed by Desai’s village-level excuse, responded with the ultimate verbal smackdown:
“Are you sure you are fit to be president?”
A question that hung in the air like an anvil over Desai’s already-crumbling credibility.
But oh, it gets better!
As the meeting went on, and Desai continued to stumble through his nonsensical responses, the CC found three more golden opportunities to twist the dagger. On three separate occasions, they pressed him again:
“Are you really sure you are fit to be president?”
And each time, Desai, jittery and nervous, fumbled out the most pathetic response ever muttered by a so-called leader:
"I am, I am fit to be president... I am…"
If you closed your eyes, you could almost mistake his quivering voice for a cross between Apu from The Simpsons and a homeless wino getting shaken awake by a park warden after a long night of guzzling cider on a bench.
Delirious. Deranged. Utterly unfit for leadership.
🔹 The man who didn’t know how to take minutes is in charge of a religious institution.
🔹 The man who couldn’t answer simple governance questions is deciding the fate of a masjid.
🔹 The man who nervously croaked out his own defense like a beaten-down drunkard is Manya’s frontman.
So, dear Manya worshippers, tell us again: is this really the best you could come up with?
If Mirza Desai’s incompetence was a Shakespearean play, it would be a tragicomedy of epic proportions. 🎭
Manya’s Dwindling Audience: A Pulpiteer Without a Flock
A picture speaks a thousand words, but this one only needs a few: Manya, mid-rant, weaving his usual pulpit gymnastics, addressing a ‘crowd’ of about 40 or 50 souls—half of them children who likely had no choice but to sit through the spectacle. All of this was captured in a series of pictures sent to us, showing the post-Tarawih fire and brimstone talk by megalomaniac Manya indulging in his usual gibberish-laden rant.
Compare this to the days before his mask slipped, when the masjid would be overflowing during Ramadan talks, even when they ran past midnight. When genuine scholars and leaders spoke, the walls of Tauheedul would struggle to contain the sheer number of attendees. That legacy stretched back six decades, to the days when the masjid was just a humble gathering across the road on Altom Street. It was a time of sincerity, respect, and true leadership. Even Manya revelled in the sight of a packed congregation as he fine-tuned his oratory gimmicks - before he was exposed as the charlatan penny shop molvi he really is.
But what do we have now? The aftermath of Manya’s self-inflicted destruction. His arrogance, deception, and power-hungry antics have bled the masjid dry—not just financially, but spiritually. The congregation that once filled every inch of space now barely covers a few rows. The community that once stood united now crosses the road to avoid him. The people who once sat eagerly for post-Tarawih discourses now have no interest in listening to a man who has been exposed as a fraud, a charlatan, and a courtroom jester.
And those who remain? The last few worshippers of Manya Pir Saab, the deluded handful who will eventually wake up, just as the rest have. When that happens, he’ll be left with nothing but an empty pulpit and the echoes of his own hollow rhetoric.
Message: I came across your site, after speaking to my mum. I don't live in Blackburn anymore, but grew up there, going to Bicknell Mosque and Madrasah until I was 18. I could have told you at 14 that Suhail Manya was unfit to be any sort of leader, let alone teacher. He was a bully, a thug, and a coward. Verbal and physical intimidation and abuse was regular and accepted. If delivered by his hand, it was automatically assumed that it was deserved and appropriate. It is great to see this come out into the light, finally. You are doing a great service. Jazakallah.
_________________________________________
This message serves as yet another damning testament to the reality of Manya the Menace. An old acquaintance, now long removed from Blackburn, reflects on a truth that so many have known for years: Manya was never fit to be a leader, let alone an imam or teacher.
A bully, a thug, a coward—his methods of “teaching” weren’t rooted in knowledge, compassion, or wisdom, but in intimidation, abuse, and brute force. The worst part? It was all accepted. His misplaced authority was never questioned, his actions blindly justified, and his victims left without recourse. The sheer fact that even a 14-year-old could see through him speaks volumes.
And yet, here we are, decades later, with his worshippers still clutching to the illusion of his so-called “leadership.” But the truth can only be buried for so long. Now, finally, it is seeing the light.
For those still in denial, how much more proof do you need? For those who suffered under his tyranny, vindication is long overdue.
To the sender of this message, Jazakallah khair for your courage in sharing. And to the rest of the community—wake up, before more damage is done.
Among the Countless Messages Received, This Recent One Strikes a Chord on the Subject of Manya’s Gravitation Towards Like Minded Crooked Charlatans
Message: I think it’s time we tell people that this PhD goon who likes to take secret videos and pictures of people (some would say like someone with a sick voyeuristic disorder) is a thief. A thief who has stolen money from a poor sole and member of our community. Yes, that’s right… he owes thousands of pounds after borrowing money and not paying it back. But, that’s fine because what’s more important is the fact that he has a PhD and likes to call himself Dr as though it gives him some particular kind of social class which is above others. Once a thief, always a thief… can’t trust a single word that comes out of this goons mouth. He should be thinking about how he’s going to pay the thousands of pounds he’s borrowed but never given back.
_________________________________________
It seems that even a PhD can’t teach basic morality. While some would assume higher education comes with higher ethical standards, in this case, it appears to have just inflated the ego of a man who sees himself above accountability. This sort of behaviour isn't just exclusive to those that spend 5 to 6 years in a seminary (see Manya for details).
A PhD doesn’t absolve one from being a debt-dodging swindler—especially when the money in question belongs to a struggling member of the community. But, of course, his self-proclaimed elite status gives him the apparent right to conveniently "forget" his financial obligations while he parades around as some sort of intellectual superior.
And let's not overlook the disturbing fascination with secret videos and pictures—a voyeuristic tendency that should set off alarm bells. What kind of person fixates on capturing others in secret? Some would argue it’s the behavior of someone with a deeply twisted disorder, one that reeks of hypocrisy when they claim to be upright and virtuous. What would his employers (Birmingham Newman Uni) make of all this ?
This PhD-wielding fraud should be more concerned about repaying the thousands he owes than playing pretend aristocrat. The reality is simple: once a thief, always a thief. If he can shamelessly steal from a fellow community member, why should anyone trust a single word that drips from his deceitful tongue?
The Rise of Manya-Worship: A Bid'ah Our Scholars Warned Us About
شخصیت پرستی
Back in the 70s and 80s, our esteemed scholars tirelessly warned us about the dangers of pir-worship and blind following—a disease that had long plagued our Barelwi cousins. They cautioned against the culture of treating religious figures as infallible, where no criticism could be made, no matter how blatant the wrongdoing. The Deobandi maslak prided itself on purity from such corrupt practices, ensuring that scholarship and leadership remained rooted in accountability and adherence to the Qur'an and Sunnah.
But as time has passed, and as those scholars have returned to their Lord, it seems that their warnings have been buried along with them. What’s even more ironic? While our Barelwi brethren have, in many ways, moved away from the extreme pir-worship of the past, the same bid‘ah and ghulu (exaggerated reverence) have now crept into our own community—except this time, it’s disguised under the fraudulent cloak of "Deobandi loyalty."
Just look at the mob surrounding Manya. They cling to him like infallible saint-worshippers, refusing to accept any evidence of his gross misconduct and corruption, even when it’s laid bare in black and white. Even those who claim to be “educated,” some even boasting PhDs, have abandoned basic critical thinking and objectivity. If their academic training has taught them anything, it should have been the ability to assess facts—but instead, they’re the very ones devising ways to shield Manya’s deception from scrutiny. They prove that their PhDs hold no value when it comes to upholding basic moral and ethical values and implementing them in every day life. Their PhDs are just a means to garner and accumulate wealth and power - nothing more.
Where are the "principles of Deoband" that they so loudly claim to follow? When did defending a corrupt imam at all costs become a tenet of our maslak? The reality is these goons have become today’s pseudo-Barelwi pir-worshippers, blindly following a man who has torn apart a masjid, destroyed unity, broken trusts, and repeatedly deceived the community.
The same bid‘ah our elders fought so hard to prevent has now taken hold among the very people who claim to be "true Deobandis." But unlike the past, this cult doesn’t gather at graves—they gather at the feet of Manya, shielding him from accountability, making excuses for his corruption, and attacking anyone who dares to speak the truth.
Manya's Blatant Breach of Trust & Deception (Khiyanah)
Manya'sKhiyanah:
Withholding Marhoom Hafiz Desai’sر resignation letter for three months —a blatant betrayal of trust.
Failing to act with transparency and integrity while in a position of trust.
Concealing key information from the masjid committee and community.
Evidence:
Qur’an: "Indeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due..." Surah An-Nisa: 58
Tafsir Explanation: Ibn Kathir explains that this verse directly commands believers to return Amanah (trusts, responsibilities, or obligations) to their rightful owners, and that violating a trust is a great sin.
Qur’an: “Indeed, We offered the Trust to the heavens and the earth and the mountains, and they declined to bear it and feared it; but man [undertook to] bear it. Indeed, he was unjust and ignorant.” Surah Al-Ahzab (33:72)
Tafsir Explanation: This verse highlights that Amanah is a huge responsibility—even the mountains refused it! Only a corrupt or ignorant person would betray it.
___________________
Hadith: "When a man speaks a lie, the angels distance themselves from him a mile because of its stench." (Tirmidhi)
The Prophet ﷺ said: “When a man deceives those who trusted him, he will have a flag placed next to him on the Day of Judgment, and it will be said, ‘This is the betrayal of so-and-so.’” - Sahih al-Bukhari (34:403)
“A hypocrite has three characteristics: when he speaks, he lies; when he makes a promise, he breaks it; and when he is entrusted with something, he betrays it.” - Sunan Abi Dawood (3565)
Scholarly Explanation: The Prophet ﷺ has explicitly linked breaking an Amanah with hypocrisy (Nifaq). Such a person is considered among the worst of the hypocrites.
The Prophet ﷺ said: “There is no faith for one who cannot be trusted, and there is no religion for one who cannot keep his promises.” - Sahih Muslim (262)
Scholarly Explanation: Imam Nawawi, in his commentary on this hadith, categorises breaking an Amanah as a major sin and says that a person who consistently does so is in grave danger of falling into disbelief (Kufr).
___________________
Fiqh: The Shariah is clear that withholding an amanah (trust) is a major sin (kabirah). The failure to disclose crucial information regarding Hafiz Desai’s ر resignation constitutes a betrayal of trust (khiyanah), which, according to the Hanafi school, is grounds for removal from leadership.
The four major schools of thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, Hanbali) all agree that breaking or withholding an Amanah is a major sin (Kabirah).
🔹 Imam Al-Dhahabi in Kitab al-Kaba’ir (The Book of Major Sins) lists Betrayal of Trust (Khiyanat al-Amanah) as one of the seventy major sins.
🔹 Imam Al-Ghazali in Ihya Ulum al-Din states that withholding an Amanah is a form of financial and moral corruption and can destroy one’s akhirah.
Hanafi Fiqh (Radd al-Muhtar 5:381) -If a person withholds an Amanah knowingly, it is categorised as theft (sariqah), deception (ghish), and betrayal (khiyanah), making it a major sin.
Maliki Fiqh (Bidayat al-Mujtahid 2:273) - A person who withholds an Amanah will be held accountable on the Day of Judgment like a thief.
Shafi’i Fiqh (Nihayat al-Muhtaj 4:130) - The betrayal of trust is a form of oppression (dhulm) and is prohibited by clear texts.
Hanbali Fiqh (Al-Mughni 4:308) - Betrayal of Amanah is an act of major transgression (fisq) and leads to severe punishment in the Hereafter.
Question for Manya’s Cultists: ➡ If your beloved “Sheikh” is such a paragon of virtue, why did he effectively withhold a resignation letter and keep it hidden? Is that the “Amanah” of a true leader?
___________________
Manya’s Betrayal of Trust is a Major Sin
Withholding Marhoom Hafiz Desai’s ر resignation letter for 3 months is a blatant betrayal of Amanah.
Lying to the community about it only compounds the sin.
According to Qur’an, Hadith, and all four Madhabs, this is a major sin (Kabirah).
For Manya’s Pir Worshipping Cultists:
➡ Are you willing to stand behind a man who has committed a sin equivalent to hypocrisy and theft?
➡ If he was trustworthy, why did he hide a resignation letter from the masjid?
➡ If you claim to follow Islam, why do you defend someone who openly violates one of Islam’s fundamental principles?
Question for those who still read salaat behind him : With the overwhelming evidence before you, do you still believe your Salah will be rewarded when performed behind a flagrant sinner? Imagine standing on the Day of Judgment, only to find the column for Reward for Salah behind Manyamarked "ZERO!". Regret and remorse will be futile. Instead, you will be questioned: Why did you knowingly follow a major sinning fasiq, despite the undeniable proof of his treachery (khiyanah) that was laid bare before you? Will you have an answer then?
Manya’s Gormless Cult: Silent on His Crimes, Loud on Whataboutism
Here’s just a partial list of the damning misconducts and scandals surrounding Manya, which his blind followers conveniently ignore. Instead of responding to these serious allegations, they deflect with pathetic attempts like "What about Palestine?"—as if that erases the corruption, lies, and destruction he has caused.
Just Some of Manya's Long List of Misconduct & Crimes
1. The HR Investigation – Proven Misconduct
🔹 Instant dismissal recommended due to serious breaches of conduct. 🔹 Withheld Marhoom Hafiz Desai’s ر resignation letter for three months—a clear act of dishonesty and betrayal.
🔹 Manipulated and gaslit the committee, creating division and mistrust.
🔹 Encouraged hooliganism and thuggery from his mob to get his way. Including fitnah in the Masjid.
2. Financial Crimes & Corruption
🔹 Attempted to transfer Bolton Darul Uloom’s charity assets into his own newly created charity—was caught and removed.
🔹 Whistleblowing Tauheedul to HMRC on staff wages, causing financial chaos and near bankruptcy.
🔹 Wasted £150k on futile court cases instead of using those funds to actually help the Palestinian cause he pretends to care about.
🔹 Fleeced Tauheedul of over £50k, because of the court cases, draining the mosque’s finances for his own ego-driven battles.
3. Betrayal of Teachers & Staff
🔹 Backstabbed the very teachers who supported his reinstatement, forcing the madrasah into chaos.
🔹 Campaigned against the previous committee for teacher pay, then left them in an even worse situation once he got power.
🔹 Introduced "voluntary" unpaid work at the madrasah, further exploiting staff, while doubling his pay.
4. Destruction of Community Unity
🔹 Turned brothers, friends, and families against each other—something never seen before in the masjid’s 50-year history.
🔹 Created a clique of power-hungry goons who make all decisions before meetings, rendering other committee members powerless.
🔹 Caused lifelong fractures in the community through his deceit, arrogance, and manipulation.
5. Hypocrisy & Selective Religious Principles
🔹 Claims to follow Deoband, yet never invited notable Deobandi scholars like Mufti Saeed Palanpuri ر or Shaykh Yunus Jawnpuri ر 🔹 Declared photography and video recording haram, yet invited a scholar with an active YouTube channel.
🔹 Preaches against beardless men leading prayers, yet committee members (his own lackeys) openly shave.
🔹 Preaches against TV and images, yet carries a top-end smartphone—what’s on there, Manya?
🔹 Proclaimed in his sermons that "Masjid is for Dhikr, not announcements", yet ran into the jamaat khana, in RAMADHAN, shouting about his car being blocked.
6. Mafia-Style Governance
🔹 Removed elected committee members simply for disagreeing with him.
🔹 Installed a fake trustee board, knowing full well it holds no legal standing.
🔹 Excluded other committee members from decision-making, ruling Tauheedul like a personal fiefdom.
🔹 Turned Tauheedul into a ghost town—from a thriving, packed masjid to empty halls and deserted taraweeh.
To Manya's Cultists:
Where is your response to any of these? Instead of parroting "What about Palestine?", how about answering for:
❓ The financial ruin he has caused?
❓ The corruption and deception?
❓ The destruction of community unity?
❓ The betrayal of teachers and masjid members?
❓ The blatant hypocrisy in his so-called "principles"?
Manya is not a leader—he’s a fraud, a liar, and a disgrace to the legacy of Tauheedul. Keep worshipping your false idol, but know this: he’s bringing you all down with him.
HR Report's Recommendation of Manya’s Instant Dismissal Had Nothing
to Do with His Speeches – A Desperate Diversion Tactic
As per a very astute observer's anonymous email has informed us, let’s set the record straight :
Manya’ssummary dismissal conclusion in the HR Report had absolutely nothing to do with any of his bayaans or speeches. The HR report that sealed his fate made no mention of his fiery rhetoric from the pulpit. Yet, his loyal goons are scrambling to rewrite the narrative, falsely claiming that his downfall was due to his outspoken sermons on Gaza.
This is nothing more than a pathetic attempt at misdirection. The reality? The Charity Commission (CC), Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO), and HMRC didn’t just show up at Tauheedul by accident. They were brought in because of serious concerns, concerns that had nothing to do with his speeches but everything to do with his corrupt actions.
And let’s not forget how Ibrahim Akubat (the glorified PE Dr) conveniently concealed the safeguarding allegations from the CC notes. Why? What was he covering up? The truth is coming, and it’s going to be damning beyond belief. Dr Akbubat, what will be your employer's reaction (Birmingham Newman Uni) when they discover that one of their staff members has been concealing safeguarding evidence from the CC ? And heading a campaign to protect an imam that has been independently judged of committing Serious and Gross Misconduct ?
Manya has already ripped apart the unity of this community, but his biggest crime is yet to be revealed. When it does, the irreparable damage he has caused will become painfully clear.
To those still blindly following him—be very careful. He will drag you all down with him. He has no loyalty, only greed and ego. If you’re standing anywhere near him when the next bombshell drops, you’ll be caught in the wreckage.
Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve received yet another batch of deranged ramblings from what appears to be a single Manya-worshipping lunatic—or perhaps a tag team of two equally unhinged individuals, both seemingly nursing a bizarre fixation with "mothers' milk." If Freud were alive today, he’d be rubbing his hands in delight at this textbook case of unresolved childhood trauma.
The level of incoherent rage and obsession in these messages would make a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorist blush. Apparently, the best defense of Manya's documented corruption, hypocrisy, and community-wrecking leadership isn’t a single shred of evidence or logical argument—it’s threats of divine wrath, nonsensical wailing, and repeated demands that we "grow a pair." (because true bravery is blindly following a charlatan into the abyss.)
Let’s take a moment to appreciate the greatest hits from Manya's fan club:
🔹 "Mothers' milk" obsession – Someone call a therapist. This deep-seated fixation on dairy-based childhood nostalgia has us all deeply concerned. What’s next, accusations of being weaned too early?
🔹 "May Allah deal with you" prayers – the classic "let's invoke divine punishment because we have no real argument" approach. Sorry, lads, but rage-fueled du'as won’t make the truth disappear.
🔹 "You will be deafened, blinded, and burned in your grave" – We hate to break it to you, but this kind of fire-and-brimstone rhetoric belongs in the script of a bad horror film, not in a civil discussion about mosque governance.
🔹 "I know who you are" – "Zoinks !!".. as Shaggy would say in sheer panic. Not to forget, Ooooh and spooky! Is that a threat? If so, you might want to have a word with your buddy Noor "Baseball Bat" Manya and the goon squad. Because intimidation only proves how desperate you really are.
🔹 "Your stories are less believable than nursery rhymes" – Of course, because the HR report on Manya, the missing £150k, the legal documents, and Manya's own recordings aren’t evidence at all. Just fairy tales, right? If so, we must have found the long-lost brother of the Brothers Grimm.
🔹 "Manya is innocent! But also, Gaza!" – When all else fails, let’s throw in a completely unrelated humanitarian crisis as a shield for Manya's failures. Never mind that he and his cronies wasted £150k on ego-driven court cases instead of using it for Palestine relief.
And then we have the self-righteous tantrum of someone clearly having a meltdown:
“You're nothing but a clown! Carry on with your lies! You will never win! Curse of Almighty be on you!”
In the famous yell of Velma, "Jinkies !!". Someone get this guy a stress ball before he pops a vein.
Note to the Anonymous Keyboard Warrior(s):
We get it. You’re angry. Your idol is being exposed, and you don’t know how to process it. So instead, you lash out with childish threats, bizarre dairy-based insults, and nonsensical rants. Maybe instead of foaming at the mouth, take a moment of reflection. Or better yet, ask Manya himself—why hasn’t he answered a single allegation? Why is he hiding behind mindless followers like you?
And by the way—if you're trying to sound tough, maybe drop the “crying for tissues” act. It kind of ruins the effect. 🤡
P.S. – If you’re looking for a new insult, might we suggest something fresh? "Mothers' milk" is getting old.
Manya Cult's Concern for Gaza: £150K Wasted on His Ego While Palestinians Suffer
Manyaand his worshippers are now shamefully using the tragedy in Gaza as a shield to cover his extreme failings. Emotional blackmail and cheap diversion tactics—because when faced with the mountain of evidence exposing their master’s corruption, deceit, and destruction of the community, they have nothing else to say.
If Manyaor his dwindling fan base truly cared about the Palestinians, why did he and his riba consuming (£200k/year) chief funder Khanjra, and their band of crooks waste £150K on pointless court battles to massage (Khanjra's expertise) their fragile egos? Imagine the life-saving aid that could have been provided to Gaza with that money. Instead, they burned it all away in legal fees while draining Tauheedul of £50K+, leaving the masjid near bankruptcy.
And what has Manyaactually done for the Palestinians? Where is the money he shamelessly took from our mothers and sisters? What tangible aid has he provided? Real Muslim charities deliver action—Manya delivers bombastic empty words. Yet his brain-dead worshippers still parade his meaningless rhetoric like it’s some grand achievement. Pathetic.
So spare us the sanctimonious lectures about Gaza. The reality is, for Manya and his cronies, the suffering of Palestinians is nothing more than a convenient tool to deflect attention from their crimes. A shameless, disgraceful, and cowardly tactic from a so-called ‘imam’ and his brainwashed cult.
Manya’s Worshippers Exploit Gaza to Shield His Failures—Shameful & Desperate
Shamelessly Exploiting Palestinian Suffering To Shield Manya's Gross Misconduct
It seems that when Manya’sblind followers have no defence left for their master’s failures, corruption, and disgraceful conduct, they resort to the lowest tactic of all—exploiting the suffering of the people of Gaza.
A video is circulating on social media where Manya’s supporters are shamelessly using the tragedy of Gaza as a shield to deflect from his countless failures and corrupt leadership. Instead of addressing the damning HR report, his lies, deceit, division, and destruction of the masjid, they have resorted to emotional blackmail.
The Real Questions They Should Be Asking:
🔹 What exactly has Manya done to help the people of Gaza?
🔹 Where has all the money gone that he collected from our sisters and mothers?
🔹 How much aid has actually reached Gaza from his so-called ‘efforts’?
Genuine Muslim charities walk the walk—they provide real, tangible help to the oppressed. Like everything else he preaches from the pulpit, Manya only talks the talk, and his foolish supporters think that’s something to be proud of. Where’s the accountability for the money? Where’s the proof of real aid?
Exposing Their Cowardice
When faced with undeniable proof of their leader’s disgraceful conduct, these cowards don’t have the backbone to respond. Instead, they play the Gaza card, trying to falsely paint those who hold Manya accountable as somehow being against the Palestinian cause.
This is the hallmark of a cult mentality—when their leader is exposed, they deflect and divert rather than confront the truth. Gaza deserves genuine support, not to be used as a cheap excuse to cover up Manya’s crimes.
If his followers had any real concern for the Ummah, they would be demanding: -Transparency on where all collected funds have gone.
-Accountability for his divisive and destructive leadership. -A leader who actually serves the community, instead of ruining it.
But instead, they worship their leader like an infallible saint, using tragedy to manipulate emotions because they have no logical argument left.
This is not about Gaza—this is about Manya’scorruption, lies, and destruction of our masjid.
Using the suffering of our Palestinian brothers and sisters as a political shield to protect a failed leader is nothing short of disgusting.
If you truly care about Gaza, support real relief efforts, demand transparency, and stop using their struggle as a deflection tactic.
REPORT ON THE INDEPENDENT HR INVESTIGATION INTO THE CONDUCT OF SUHAIL MANYA
(click the image on the left to download the full pdf report)
This is the damning report that Suhail Manya and his band of spineless cronies have done everything in their power to bury. They knew that if the truth came out, their charade of piety and righteousness would crumble, exposing Manya for what he truly is—a deceitful charlatan and a liar of epic proportions.
To those still viewing him as some kind of demigod, wake up. He is leading you to the depths of ignorance. If you still believe your salaah behind him will be rewarded, then you are no better than the blind saint-worshippers of old. The evidence against him is overwhelming, and this report is just the final nail in the coffin.
One of the most damning findings? Manya deliberately withheld Marhoom Hafiz Desai’s ر resignation letter, keeping it in his possession for three whole months instead of delivering it to the masjid as was his duty. This was an amanah—a sacred trust from a dying man—yet Manya had no problem violating that trust, proving beyond doubt his utter dishonesty and lack of integrity.
And what of Mirza Lookman Desai and his brother Sajid Desai? These two cowardly men should hang their heads in shame for providing cover and support to the very man who betrayed their own father’s trust. Manya withheld their father’s final words from the masjid, and yet they still stand by him, spinelessly allowing him to continue his reign of deceit.
This report lays it all bare. Read it, and then ask yourself: How much longer will you remain blind to the truth?
We have summarised the report below :
Background
Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam commissioned Peninsula Face2Face to conduct an independent disciplinary hearing into the conduct of its employee, Suhail Manya, who was employed as an Imam since March 1, 2004. The investigation was initiated following a series of allegations against him, leading to his suspension. Despite being given the opportunity to present his case, Manya failed to attend the hearing and did not provide a written response.
Key Findings
1. Abuse of Authority and Breach of Trust
The investigation revealed that Manya deliberately withheld critical information from the Executive Committee, including the resignation letter of the President, Hafezi Desai, for nearly three months. This act of deception caused unnecessary confusion and disorganization within the committee. The investigation concluded that such conduct amounted to Serious Misconduct, displaying gross negligence in fulfilling his role.
2. Incitement of Violence and Aggressive Behavior
One of the most alarming findings of the investigation was Manya’s involvement in instigating aggressive confrontations within the mosque premises. It was established that he engaged in an altercation with two congregants, aggressively confronting them and shouting provocations such as:
“Now say it, I’m no longer fasting. Go on, say it again.”
“You want to fight me? Why don’t you fight me now?”
This led to a physical altercation where a crowd gathered, with shoving and pushing taking place. As an Imam, his primary responsibility is to promote unity and peace; instead, he was found guilty of fueling division and hostility within the mosque. This behavior was classified as Gross Misconduct.
3. Intimidation and Threats Against Mosque Officials
Manya was also accused of attempting to intimidate an Executive Committee member, Faruk Bharucha, by demanding a private meeting at his charity office, Hope and Help. When Bharucha refused, Manya allegedly threatened him by stating, “If you don’t attend this meeting now, I will bring 200 people outside your house later tonight.”
Though the investigation found no direct evidence of this phone call, the recurring pattern of similar intimidation tactics corroborated by multiple witnesses led the investigators to believe that Manya engaged in such behavior. As a result, this was classified as Serious Misconduct.
4. Disruptive Behavior Inside the Mosque
On May 15, 2024, after leading a prayer, Manya deliberately created chaos by making public demands to meet the Trustees, causing a scene inside the mosque. His aggressive outburst led to a large crowd gathering, forcing the police to be called to diffuse the situation. The investigation found that his actions endangered the safety of attendees and caused disorder within the mosque. This was determined to be Gross Misconduct.
5. Breach of Confidentiality and Defiance of Suspension
Following his suspension, Manya was explicitly instructed not to discuss the matter with congregants. However, he openly shared his suspension letter, which led to disturbances inside and outside the mosque. Additionally, despite his suspension, he continued to lead prayers and make public announcements in defiance of his disciplinary terms. These breaches were substantiated with witness testimonies and CCTV footage, leading to a final charge of Gross Misconduct.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The investigation unequivocally determined that:
Manya’s repeated acts of deception, aggression, and intimidation have caused irreparable damage to the mosque’s governance and reputation.
His conduct was found to be grossly inappropriate for someone in a senior religious position, where ethical integrity and moral leadership are paramount.
His behavior breached both the Islamic and legal standards required of an Imam, leading to a total loss of trust and confidence in his ability to continue in his role.
Given the severity of the findings, the investigation recommended immediate dismissal without notice. Additionally, it was suggested that the mosque undertake a full governance review and consider implementing stricter policies to prevent similar issues in the future.
Final Remarks
The independent HR investigation leaves no doubt that Suhail Manya’s tenure has been marred by dishonesty, intimidation, and complete disregard for his responsibilities as an Imam. His continued presence at Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam has not only fractured the community but has also compromised the sanctity of the mosque.
The findings of this investigation should serve as a wake-up call for the mosque’s leadership and the wider community. A person of such conduct should never again be entrusted with a position of religious or community authority.
Mufti Yusuf Mangera explains that anyone who possesses any of
these five flaws, weaknesses, or deficiencies is incapable
of guiding or benefiting others in any meaningful way.
Dr. Shaykh Mufti Abdur-Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera is one of the earliest graduates of the Darul Uloom Bury
He later earned his ifta (mufti) license at Mazahir ‘Ulum Saharanpur, India (the institution of the most esteemed Shaykh Zakariyyah Khandalwi ر)
He has a BA from the University of Johannesburg. An MA and PhD in Islamic Studies from the SOAS, London.
Mufti Mangera in the above audio, is basing his discussion on the famous writing, The Hikam (Wisdom) of the illustrious Sufi master, Ibn `Ata' Allah al-Iskandari ر, which has long been recognised as a timeless and foundational masterpiece in the Islamic tradition of true leadership and spiritual enlightenment.
And by that very measure, Manya falls woefully short. A man who masquerades as a scholar, yet embodies every flaw that disqualifies a person from guiding others.
🔹 Ignorance of the Deen – The very basics of what is halal and haram seem beyond his grasp. His rulings, decisions, and actions reflect not the sacred law, but his own whims and interests. A true scholar aligns with the Qur'an and Sunnah, not personal vendettas.
🔹 Violating the Sanctity of Believers – How many have suffered from his arrogance? He insults, ridicules, and ostracizes members of the community, turning the masjid into a playground for his ego rather than a sanctuary for worshippers. A true leader unites; Manya divides.
🔹 Engagement in Vanity and Redundant Pursuits – His time isn’t spent on community welfare or self-purification. Instead, he obsesses over controlling the masjid, chasing influence, and fighting petty political battles. His deeds serve himself, not Allah.
🔹 Following Personal Whims Over Shariah – Decisions made before meetings even take place, pre-agreed with his clique, rubber-stamped without consultation. This is not governance by Islamic principles, but by dictatorship and deceit.
🔹 Bad Character with a Careless Attitude – A man whose temper, arrogance, and lack of humility are well known. A true scholar, even in moments of weakness, acknowledges his faults and seeks to improve. Manya, however, doubles down—unapologetic, unrepentant, and utterly oblivious to the damage he inflicts.
This is the so-called leader of the masjid? A man who fits every disqualifying trait Ibn Ata’illah ر, warns about? He is no guide, no scholar, and no leader. He is an obstacle, an agent of division, a test for the community.
Dignity vs. Deceit: The Principled Seven vs. Manya, Mirza Desai, and Their Shameless Clique
In an era where power often takes precedence over principle, it is truly refreshing to see individuals who place the well-being of the community and the sanctity of the masjid above personal gain. The decision of these former committee members to step down is not an act of surrender but one of immense courage and integrity. It speaks volumes of their moral fiber and deep-rooted commitment to justice, unity, and righteousness.
Rather than be complicit in the corruption and divisiveness perpetuated by Manya, Mirza Desai, and their nodding clique, these individuals have taken a principled stand—choosing to walk away rather than lend legitimacy to a leadership that operates more like a mafia than a masjid committee. Their resignation is a testament to their refusal to partake in the sins of injustice, deceit, and mismanagement against Allah’s house and the very people it is meant to serve.
Their insight into the destruction caused by these eight individuals is critical. They have highlighted what many in the community already recognise—that Manya and his followers are not acting in the masjid’s best interests, nor are they striving for reconciliation. Their motives are fueled by vendetta, manipulation, and a blatant disregard for governance and Islamic principles. Their agenda is entirely self-serving, bearing no connection to serving Allah’s Deen, His house, or the community. These individuals epitomise what our Deen condemns as fajiroon and fasiqoon—shameless frauds disguising themselves as servants of Islam while, in reality, engaging in political games for their true master, Manya, whom they revere in every way except literal prostration. How else can one explain their complete neglect of the community’s needs, their disregard for the House of Allah, and their pre-arranged decisions—crafted in secret with Manya—rubber-stamped in meetings where the voices of the seven who resigned were never meant to be heard?
By stepping down, these former committee members have preserved their integrity and sent a powerful message: the masjid belongs to the people, not a corrupt elite seeking to exploit it for their own ends. They have not abandoned the masjid; rather, they have removed themselves from a toxic environment so they can continue serving in a capacity that aligns with justice and accountability.
It is clear that the masjid is at a critical crossroads. Without the intervention of respected senior ulama, rather than self-serving opportunists, the downward spiral will only continue. The looming threat of Charity Commission intervention is a stark warning—if the current leadership refuses to act with transparency and sincerity, external forces will step in to restore order, at the cost of the masjid’s autonomy.
To those who have resigned: your actions have not gone unnoticed. The community recognises and appreciates your sacrifice. True leadership is not about clinging to power—it is about standing firm for what is right, even when it comes at a personal cost. May Allah reward your sincerity and efforts, and may He guide the masjid back to the path of righteousness. Ameen.
A Masjid Held Hostage: The Mafia-Style Rule of Manya & Co.
The latest mass resignation (click image on the right) from the Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam committee is yet another damning indictment of the disastrous, dictatorial rule of Manya, Mirza Desai, and their seven nodding donkeys. For decades, this Masjid was governed with fairness, transparency, and respect for its constitution. Now, it has been reduced to a fiefdom run by a gang that operates with all the integrity of a backstreet mafia outfit.
The letter from the resigning committee members lays bare the utter shambles that this so-called leadership has created. What was once a democratic body, elected to serve the community, has become a rubber-stamp council, where real decision-making is controlled by Manyaand his cronies, who meet in secret, pre-plan outcomes, and render other committee members powerless.
Governance in Shambles
Let’s break down the stunning failures listed in the resignation letter:
A Sham Election of Office Bearers
The appointment of the Chairman and office bearers was arranged through a hastily called meeting, ensuring certain members were absent. This is how despots operate—rigging the system before anyone has a chance to challenge them.
The Unlawful Reinstatement of Manya
Manya, under investigation for gross misconduct, was reinstated in record time, without due process or any consideration of the serious allegations against him. Apparently, safeguarding and accountability mean nothing when it comes to their dear leader.
Decision-Making Monopoly
The "select group" of eight puppets arrives at meetings with decisions already made. No room for discussion, no input from the wider committee—just a dictatorship in full force.
Transparency? What’s That?
Agendas, minutes, and key documents are deliberately withheld from the other members, ensuring they are unable to prepare or participate meaningfully in meetings. If there is nothing to hide, why all the secrecy?
Suspensions Without Due Process
Trustees have been suspended arbitrarily, without any clear reason or procedure. This is governance at its most corrupt, where personal vendettas dictate decisions rather than rules and regulations.
Why Did They Resign?
The answer is simple: they were excluded, sidelined, and treated like outsiders—because they refused to be part of a rigged, corrupt system that only serves the interests of Manyaand his lackeys. The very men who once accused the previous committee of lacking transparency are now running the Masjid like a private club, hiding financials, blocking oversight, and trampling over constitutional procedures.
Where Are the Monthly Accounts?
For over two decades, Masjid financial accounts were displayed every month for all to see—a perfect example of transparency. But since this circus took over? Silence. Apparently, those who can't string together a grammatically correct sentence are also unable to produce a simple financial statement.
The Bitter Truth
The sad reality is that Manya and his cohorts are unfit to run a corner shop, let alone a Masjid. Their inability to govern with fairness and transparency has led to mass resignations, a divided community, and a financial black hole. This was never about serving the Deen; it was about power, control, and personal gain.
The community must now ask: How much longer will we allow these illiterate, power-hungry frauds to tarnish the legacy of our elders and destroy what was once a light of Islamic unity?
Lo and Behold the wisdom of Manya ! The same Manya who, in his grand, arrogant and pompous style, declared (2023) :
💭 “I swear in the name of Allah, It pains me when I hear disruption in the mosque.”
💭 “Announcements of cars parked incorrectly are against mosque etiquettes.”
A man of principles, right? A man who believes the masjid is only for Allah Allah and not for mundane matters like parking announcements... until, of course, his own car gets blocked!
And lo and behold, Ramadan 2024—witness the grand U-turn of the century! Who comes storming into the jamaat khana in a huff? None other than Manyahimself, hijacking the microphone to make an urgent parking announcement. Why? Because his car was blocked.
So, dear congregation, is he now part of security? Or was this his own personal version ofAllah Allah in the masjid? Or perhaps a new fiqh ruling where parking issues only count as mosque disruption when they don’t involve him?
The hypocrisy is so thick, you could spread it like butter on naan. And the community has noticed.
👀 The Laughing Stock of Blackburn Manya'santics have done what even the biggest Eid sales couldn’t—brought the entire community together... in finally seeing Manya's grand hypocrisy :
📱 Youngsters have bookmarked the website, treating it like their new Netflix series—“The Chronicles of Manya.”
💬 Women are discussing and sharing the updates with the same enthusiasm as their Insta and Snapchat stories.
📲 The website link is spreading faster than Eid Mubarak messages on WhatsApp.
🎭 Jamaats between youngsters, from different towns are laughing at his expense, calling the website creator a “genius.”
And while Manya'sMixlr talks struggle to find listeners, the website’s stats are tallying past them faster than Manya's wage hike.
The irony? Manya did this to himself. No one forced him to contradict his own grand speeches, no one told him to make a mega fool of himself in front of the whole masjid. But, as the idiom goes, when arrogance meets incompetence, the results are always comedy gold.
So, what’s next for our penny shop molvi? Perhaps a talk titled:
"Hypocrisy in the Masjid—But Only If It’s Not Me Doing It!"
Stay tuned, folks. Manya's masjid misadventures never disappoint! 🎭
The Collapse of Bicknell Under Manya – A Self-Inflicted Curse
For past 30 years, Qari Abdul Rashid Ajmeri, a senior Naqshbandi alim, has graced Bicknell Masjid every Ramadan, offering his wisdom, guidance, and uplifting bayaans to the musallis. His presence was a staple of the mosque’s spiritual atmosphere, a key part of the sacred days of Ramadan.
But this year? He refused to attend.
Instead, he blessed the Markaz, delivering an inspiring talk after Fajr, uplifting the hearts of those present—as is expected of a true scholar.
Why Did He Refuse? Why did he break his 30-year tradition and not set foot in Tauheedul this time?
One reason: Manya.
Manya is a cancelled figure—no reputable mosque or institution wants anything to do with him. His reputation is in tatters, and he is now a liability wherever he goes.
The reality is plain for all to see:
Bicknell is a ghost town—the musallis have left.
His talks are devoid of both substance and audience—only a handful of his deluded followers cling to the wreckage of his failed leadership.
Iftar time is lifeless—a stark contrast to the vibrancy of the past 40+ years.
Other masaajid are thriving—Masjide Taqwa, Masjide Vali, Maryam Musalla, Eldon, even the humble Lammack Musalla is bursting with activity — all these places full, all bustling with worshippers.
The Bicknell Boycott is Real
People have taken a firm stance—they will not return until Manya is gone. What one is seeing at Bicknell is uniquely unpresented. A Ramadan where it doesn't feel like Ramadan. For over 50 years, this month brought a true sense of barakah, noor, and unity—yet for the first time, those who have visited, even on rare occasions, describe it as feeling like being at a graveyard.
This masjid was once a fortress of worship, built through the blood, sweat, and sacrifices of elders like Marhoom President Haji Adam Fansiwala ر—a man whose intervention and meeting with the Qatari Amir secured the millions that funded the very building we see today. And yet, the same masjid that Manyanow presides over is the one he has spent years cursing and defaming the very man who made it possible.
What kind of shameless ingrate bites the hand that built the house he stands in? It was Haji Adam ر, dedicated committees, and sincere Muslims who toiled tirelessly to establish this masjid—a masjid that Manya has shown nothing but contempt for.
But in typical fashion, Manyahas destroyed it all. Just like he did with Bolton Darul Uloom, he has now dragged Bicknell into ruin.
It’s not an accident. It’s his nature.
The question remains—how long will this failed experiment continue? How long before the community rises up and reclaims Bicknell from the clutches of a man who has turned it into an empty, lifeless shell of what it once was?
When Illiterates Run a Masjid: A Masterclass in Grammar and Spelling Disasters
"In a whole" - they certainly are !!
When a masjid is entrusted to the hands of the illiterate, the results are both tragic and comical. A recent notice, supposedly an official communication, is riddled with spelling errors, grammatical disasters, and a sheer lack of basic writing etiquette. From butchering common phrases to starting with the nonsensical "In a whole" and concluding with an anonymous "let me conclude," this shambolic piece of writing is a testament to the incompetence of those now running the affairs of the masjid. If they can’t even string a proper sentence together, how can they be trusted with managing a religious institution? Let’s dissect this linguistic catastrophe and expose the intellectual bankruptcy of Manya’s loyal band of fools.
1) "AWW"
Issue: This is an improper and lazy abbreviation of "Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh."
Correction: The full greeting should be written out properly instead of using a casual, disrespectful shorthand.
2) "Alhamdulillah Allah SWT has granted us another Ramadan to reap the benefits from it."
Issue: Awkward phrasing; "reap the benefits from it" sounds unnatural.
Correction: "Alhamdulillah, Allah SWT has granted us another Ramadan to reap its blessings."
3) "As many of you are aware we try to provide a wholesome experience for all attending our Masjid."
Issue: Missing comma after "aware"
Correction: "As many of you are aware, we try to provide a wholesome experience for all attending our Masjid."
4) "From the first Salaat of fajr to Tarawih the Masjid is occupied with spirituality and Khidmah throughout the day and also not forgetting additional programmes over the weekend for the youth and our families."
Issues:
"Salaat" should be "Salah" (consistent spelling)
"fajr" should be capitalised ("Fajr")
The phrase "also not forgetting" is clumsy and incorrect.
Correction: "From the first Salah of Fajr to Tarawih, the Masjid remains engaged in spirituality and Khidmah throughout the day, along with additional programs over the weekend for the youth and families."
5) "This all has not been possible without the relentless Khidmah from all of us near and far"
Issue: "This all has not been possible" is incorrect English.
Correction: "None of this would have been possible without the relentless Khidmah from all of us, near and far."
6)"In a whole the Masjid cannot succeed without our members and all the volunteers who take out their personal time and effort for the betterment of the community."
Correction: "As a whole, the Masjid cannot succeed without our members and all the volunteers who dedicate their personal time and effort for the betterment of the community."
Issues:
contains an incorrect usage of "In a whole."
Incorrect phrase – "In a whole" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase should be "As a whole" or "On the whole."
Clunky sentence structure – The sentence is poorly structured and lacks clarity.
7) "We can’t list individually all the kindness, goodness and without any pride that individuals and also families have provided for the masjid and the betterment of the community."
Issues:
"We can’t list individually" is awkward.
The phrase "goodness and without any pride" is incorrect in structure.
The word "masjid" should be capitalised for consistency.
Correction: "We cannot individually list all the acts of kindness and generosity that individuals and families have contributed to the Masjid and the betterment of the community."
8) "You can also stay in touch with the masjid via the livestream & website that has been operating for the last 10 years alhamdulillah another great success for our masjid by volunteers."
Issues:
"masjid" should be capitalised.
"livestream & website" should be "livestream and website" for formal writing.
Missing punctuation before "Alhamdulillah."
Correction: "You can also stay in touch with the Masjid via the livestream and website, which has been operating for the last 10 years. Alhamdulillah, another great success for our Masjid by volunteers."
9) "Our Masjid provides an open-door policy when it comes to Services we provide"
Issue: "Services" should not be capitalised.
Correction: "Our Masjid follows an open-door policy when it comes to the services we provide."
10) "We are aware many of our members do not live within the locality and find it difficult to attend, but please a humble request is come and join us and share an iftar with your family, friends and community."
Issues:
"but please a humble request is come" is completely incorrect grammar.
Correction: "We are aware that many of our members do not live within the locality and find it difficult to attend, but we humbly request you to join us and share an iftar with your family, friends, and community."
11) "We need to carry on and keep contributing to the welfare of our community whether its for the young old and sick and also not forgetting the huge charity work and contribution this community has done over the years, and we can all agree our masjid and community has never fallen short on that."
Issues:
"whether its" should be "whether it’s" (missing apostrophe).
"young old and sick" should be "young, old, and sick" (missing commas).
"not forgetting" is informal and awkward.
Correction: "We need to continue contributing to the welfare of our community, whether it’s for the young, old, or sick. Additionally, we acknowledge the immense charity work and contributions this community has made over the years, and we can all agree that our Masjid and community have never fallen short in this regard."
12) "Let me end on a humble request to all, Ramadan is a time for giving in whatever Capacity one can give physically, spiritually, financially, please carry on and whatever rewards we are reaping now from the sacrifices of the past we will see the same for our coming generations."
Issues:
"Capacity" should not be capitalised.
The sentence is too long and lacks clarity.
Correction: "Let me conclude with a humble request to all. Ramadan is a time for giving, whether physically, spiritually, or financially. Please continue to give, and whatever rewards we are reaping today from past sacrifices, we will see the same for future generations."
13) Errors & Omissions in the Notice:
No Mention of the Author
The notice ends with a personal pronoun: "Let me conclude..." but nowhere does it state who the author is.
This is a lack of accountability—who exactly is speaking on behalf of the Masjid? Why is the writer hiding behind anonymity?
Disjointed Writing Style
The shift from a formal announcement to a personal appeal using "I" and "me" is abrupt and unprofessional for an official notice.
If an individual is making a personal plea, their name should be mentioned.
Otherwise, it should maintain a formal tone representing the entire committee rather than an unnamed, faceless writer.
Suspicious Lack of Transparency
Who is actually begging for donations here?
Is this Manya? Is this Desai? Or one of the nodding donkeys?
Why not sign off with an actual name? Are they afraid of accountability for the desperate state of affairs they’ve created?
Correction:
A proper announcement should either:
Maintain a neutral, committee-based tone without personal pronouns like "I" or "me."
OR clearly state the author’s name and position instead of this vague, anonymous plea.
This omission is not accidental—it's a deliberate attempt to avoid responsibility while guilt-tripping the community into handing over their money.
General Observations:
Sloppy Writing & Laziness – The letter is riddled with errors that show a lack of professionalism, effort, and literacy.
Casual and Lazy Abbreviations – Using "AWW" instead of a proper greeting is disrespectful and shows a lack of sincerity.
No Mention of "Bismillah" – Failing to start with the name of Allah in a formal Masjid statement is a disgrace.
Desperation for Money & Attendance – The entire message reads like a desperate plea for both financial donations and attendance.
Contradictions – They speak of community generosity in the past, yet are openly begging for funds in a way that was never seen before in Tauheedul’s history.
This notice is a poorly written embarrassment that reflects the total incompetence of the individuals running the Masjid.
Financial Transparency or Just Plain Incompetence?
For decades, Tauheedul has operated with complete financial transparency—monthly accounts, detailed breakdowns of incomings and outgoings, all displayed for members to see. No secrecy, no hidden figures, just accountability and integrity.
Enter Manya, Mirza Desai, and their band of inept, illiterate goons—and suddenly, all of that disappears. No accounts have been displayed for 2+ months. Why? Because these clowns have neither the ability nor the honesty to prepare them.
Where Are the Accounts, Mirza?
The same committee that threw baseless accusations at the previous committee, claiming accounts weren’t handed over (only to embarrass themselves when it turned out they actually were), now can’t even muster the basic competence to put up financial statements.
Could it be that:
They simply don’t know how to prepare financial records? Let’s be honest—if they can’t string a grammatically correct sentence together, how do we expect them to handle numbers?
They are hiding the reality of the mosque’s financial collapse? Let’s not forget that it was Manya and Darbar/Patel’s own complaints to HMRC that led to an unsustainable wage bill and the masjid’s financial ruin.
Funds are being mismanaged, and they don’t want anyone to see it? This is a valid concern, considering the total absence of any financial accountability since these buffoons took over.
The Treasurer & President —Missing in Action?
Where is Iqbal Manya, the so-called treasurer? Where is Lookman ‘Mirza’ Desai, the self-proclaimed President ? What exactly are they hiding?
For decades, every committee before them upheld transparency, allowing members full access to see where their donations were going. But now? Silence. Excuses. Lies.
If there is nothing to hide, then why are the accounts not displayed?
If there is nothing suspicious, then why are they violating the constitution by failing to show members where their money is going?
Members, Demand Answers!
Every single member has the constitutional right to view the masjid’s books. Demand to see the accounts. Ask:
Where is the money going?
How much has been lost due to their disastrous governance?
Why has financial transparency suddenly disappeared under their leadership?
It’s beyond clear—Manya and his puppets have no clue how to run a masjid. Their ignorance, arrogance, and dishonesty are now on full display.
So Mirza Desai, Manya & Co., where are the accounts? Or are you too busy polishing Manya’s throne while the masjid drowns in the financial chaos YOU created?
More baseless facts have been stated about Ml Suhail Manya. Our very financial stability and ability to pay bills are under attack – and it’s all thanks to our beloved leader himself! Those who oppose him just don’t understand the nobility of his actions. This is the man who took it upon himself to report the masjid to HMRC over minimum wage, ensuring the Ustaads got what they "deserved"—which, of course, resulted in the near collapse of Tauheedul’s finances. Truly, a stroke of genius! 💰💸
But wait, there's more! Manya’s phowti and bhowti court adventures have left the masjid with a hefty legal bill draining nearly £50,000 in precious funds. Yet, his loyal flock continues to sing his praises. Why let something as trivial as financial ruin get in the way of blind devotion?
This week, let's forget about those who used to love and support this masjid and instead rally behind the man who single-handedly turned it into a sinking ship. Greet him, shake his hand, and thank him for his selfless service in bringing Tauheedul to its knees. This man has endured years of not getting his own way, so naturally, his revenge tour was justified. Now that he and his cronies have hijacked the masjid, let’s show our appreciation for his destructive leadership and world-class ability to blame others for his own mess.
Tauheedul is on its Knees, Begging for People, Begging for Money, Begging just to Survive.
First, they begged for people to attend the masjid—because the once-thriving institution has been driven into the ground by Manya, Mirza Desai, and their 7 nodding donkeys. The masjid that once stood as an envious example of unity and strength is now a ghost town, abandoned by the very people who built it.
And now? They are begging for money. Because after months of financial mismanagement, corruption, and arrogance, they have run the masjid into a financial black hole.
Where Are Manya's Big-Spending Shayateen Now?
When it came to court cases, backstabbing, and bringing Tauheedul to its knees, the money flowed like a river. Tens of Thousands upon thousands wasted on legal battles—to fuel Manya's fragile ego and his gang’s thirst for power and revenge.
So, where are those “generous donors” now?
Where are the Khanjras—who emptied their pockets to fund lawsuits but now run a mile when the masjid needs financial help?
Where is Kovariwala, Talha Bhikhi, Maaz Golita, Darbar, Noor Manya, the glorified PE Dr. etc — who were happy to take part in the destruction of Tauheedul but can’t be seen when it comes to supporting Allah’s house?
These people had deep pockets when it came to destroying the masjid—but now, when the same masjid needs support, they vanish like rats from a sinking ship.
The Hypocrisy Is Blinding
They fought tooth and nail to bring Manya back.
They poured money into court battles to bring chaos to Tauheedul, at the same time draining it of precious funds.
They spent like kings to fuel their ego-driven vendettas.
And now? Not a single penny for Allah’s house.
Manya's Masjid of Hypocrisy
This isn’t Tauheedul anymore. This is Manya's Masjid of Hypocrisy—where money flows freely for vindictiveness and power grabs, but when it comes to the masjid’s survival, silence.
So here we are. Begging for people to come. Begging for money. Begging to survive.
What a humiliating and pathetic legacy for Manya and his cronies. May Allah disgrace those who put their egos above His house.
Tauheedul’s New Low: Begging for People, Begging for Money, Begging for Survival
Never before in the history of Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam has the community witnessed such an outright, shameless financial plea. The latest message from the so-called executive committee—or rather, Manya, Mirza Desai, and their 7 nodding donkeys—is nothing short of a desperate attempt to cover up their catastrophic mismanagement.
For decades, Tauheedul was built and maintained through the quiet sacrifice of sincere elders, and mosque goers voluntary donations, who gave from their own pockets without resorting to public begging. Those men and their households—who toiled day and night to establish this institution—would be in utter despair to see the state of affairs today. These were people of dignity, honour, and sincerity. They didn’t need to hold out the begging bowl like Oliver Twist whimpering, “Please sir, can I have some more?”
The Depth of Their Ignorance is Astounding
If ever proof was needed of the sheer incompetence and jahiliyyah of those now running (or rather, ruining) this masjid, look no further than this letter. They don’t even have the courtesy to properly write the Islamic salutations! Instead of greeting the community with "Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh," they lazily scrawl "AWW" as if the masjid were now being run by a group chat of teenagers too idle to type a few extra words.
And it doesn’t stop there. Where is Bismillah? Every righteous act begins with the name of Allah. In fact every matter of importance that is not begun with the praise of Allah will be left deficient (Ibn Majah), yet in their thirst for wealth, Allah’s name and His praise was conveniently forgotten. This isn’t an accident. This is a sign from Allah, for all to see, exposing the true state of these so-called leaders. These are godless people running Allah’s house—empty souls who see Tauheedul not as a masjid, but as a cash cow to be milked.
A Desperate Masjid, A Dying Institution
The masjid they inherited was financially stable—a pillar of the community. What changed? What does this letter actually reveal?
It screams of a collapsing institution. When was the last time Tauheedul had to resort to such open-handed begging especially when nothing new is being developed ?
It exposes the committee’s utter failure. Their policies, arrogance, and power-hungry tactics have driven people away—and now they have no choice but to grovel.
It confirms the dire state of Manya’s leadership. This masjid was once respected. Now? They’re rattling the donation tin like street-side beggars.
The Real Message Behind the Words
This isn’t an invitation to Ramadan generosity—it’s a financial SOS signal. This is Manya, Mirza Desai, and their cronies admitting they have run the masjid into the ground. Their destruction is so thorough, so complete, that now the only solution left is to fleece the same community they divided.
And the funniest part? They’re pretending nothing is wrong. Asking for donations while hiding the real reason why they even need them in the first place.
Tauheedul wasn’t built by beggars. But under Manya and his cronies, it has now been reduced to a desperate, outstretched hand.
If you are considering donating to the masjid, don’t be fooled into thinking your money is going towards the actual running of the masjid—because it isn’t.
Instead, your hard-earned donations are being siphoned off to cover the financial catastrophe created by Manya and his gang of incompetents.
Where Will Your Donations REALLY Go?
🔴 100% Pay Rise for Manya – While teachers were forced to work for free, Manya doubled his salary overnight. Your donations? Straight into his pockets.
🔴 Covering the Black Hole in the Masjid’s Finances – Created by none other than Manya and his goons, who shamelessly reported the masjid to HMRC regarding National Minimum Wage, forcing a wage bill explosion. Now, they expect YOU to pay for their betrayal.
🔴 Paying for Their Own Incompetence – The reckless mismanagement by Manya and the 7 nodding donkeys has pushed Tauheedul into financial ruin.
Instead of taking responsibility, they are passing the bill onto the community.
Selective Piety & Double Standards: The Hypocrisy of Manya's Committee
So now the official excuse for barring a young Hafiz from leading Taraweeh is that he trims his beard? If that’s the benchmark for disqualification, then let’s apply it across the board and see where the chips fall.
If a Trimmed Beard Disqualifies, What About Manya’s Known Fasiq and Fajir Level Sins?
If leading prayers requires a spotless religious record, then let’s scrutinize Manya himself—the man who stands in front of the congregation despite his catalog of sins and corruption:
Hooliganism, thuggery, and disruption of the masjid
Dividing the community with his personal vendettas
Spreading falsehoods from the pulpit
Fraudulent dealings, deceit, and treachery
Caught red-handed trying to transfer Bolton DU assets into a fake charity
Orchestrating court cases that drained the masjid of its funds
Causing innocent teachers to be thrown into financial hardship
So, if a young Hafiz is deemed unworthy because he trims his beard, then how does Manya—who has committed blatant sins in the open—qualify as an Imam?
What About the Committee? The Beardless “Leaders” of the Masjid
The very people enforcing these so-called “pious” standards don’t even meet them themselves!
There are committee members who not only trim their beards but completely shave them off—and they still sit on the masjid leadership.
If a beard is the criteria for leading prayers, then why is it NOT a requirement for being part of the committee?
Why is their beardlessness ignored when it comes to making decisions about the masjid and the community?
Remember last year, President Mirza Desai's brother, Sajid Desai put a notice up on the board for everyone to see in regard to committee members not having beards, and how this was against Islamic practices. He even posted a fatwa in relation to this also under “ehlai sunnah wal jammat”. So what happened to that demand and condition ?
This hypocrisy exposes the real agenda—it has nothing to do with Deen. It’s about petty politics, personal grudges, and childish power games.
And What About Watching TV? Manya’sOwn Hypocrisy on Image-Making/Viewing
Manya has declared watching TV and taking and viewing still and moving animate images as haram.
According to his own rulings:
Viewing or taking images - still or moving - of animate beings is forbidden.
This includes photography and video.
Hence, that not only includes TV but devices such as smartphones and any device were they can be viewed - all are off-limits.
Yet, what does Manya himself carry with him at all times?
A top-end smartphone, where he regularly views images and photography of animate beings—both still and moving.
No doubt owning a smartphone means he views photos, videos, receives and sends pictures, and interacts with animate content he himself deemed impermissible. Otherwise, why have a smartphone ?
So, shouldn’t he be disqualified from leading as well?
If a trimmed beard disqualifies a Hafiz, then surely Manya's own self-proclaimed “haram activities” should disqualify him first!
The Reality: This Isn’t About Deen – It’s About Power
This entire fiasco isn’t about religion—it’s about control and revenge. The young Hafiz isn’t being stopped because of a beard, he’s being stopped because of who his father is.
If they were truly sincere, they would first apply the same strictness to themselves and their own committee.
But because they need to keep power, they pick and choose Islamic rulings to suit their agenda.
The hypocrisy couldn’t be clearer. If they really followed their own rulings, half the masjid leadership—including Manya—wouldn’t even qualify to stand on the front row, let alone lead.
Bottom Line: Drop the Beard Excuse – We See Right Through It
If a trimmed beard disqualifies a Hafiz from leading, then:
Manya's open corruption should disqualify him from being Imam.
Beardless committee members should resign immediately.
Manya's smartphone usage should make him unfit to lead.
But, of course, rules only apply when they want them to. This isn’t about Islamic principles—it’s about power, hypocrisy, and personal vendettas.
Mirza Lookman Desai, the self-proclaimed president, has once more shown he is nothing more than a glorified errand boy for his master, Manya. The obedient little House Nigger to the House Master. In yet another brazen display of dictatorship, two elected committee members—Ilyas BT and Sufyan Copper—have been unceremoniously suspended. Their crime? Daring to think for themselves and questioning the decisions of the Manya-controlled regime. The same Manya whose fragile ego and overwhelming inferiority complex cannot handle even the slightest challenge, crumbling into tantrums at the mere hint of questioning.
This is not governance; this is a witch hunt.
Ilyas BT, a man who has given six years of service to Tauheedul, has been discarded like yesterday’s garbage—with no explanation, no due process, and no regard for his contributions. Meanwhile, Sufyan Copper has been suspended for the grave sin of daring to ask questions. Imagine that—accountability is now a punishable offense under Mirza Desai’s proxy rule!
And where does this all stem from? Manya, of course—the puppet master behind the scenes. After years of deceit, Manya has never wavered from his true nature. His history speaks for itself. Look no further than Bolton Darul Uloom, where his reckless leadership nearly drove that institution into the ground. Now, he’s running the same playbook at Tauheedul, discarding anyone who dares to challenge his corrupt empire.
A Pattern of Tyranny
Manipulate the system to seize control.
Surround yourself with loyalists who will nod to your every whim.
Eliminate those who dare to speak against you.
This latest purge is simply a continuation of Manya's long-established pattern—suppress, intimidate, and rule by fear. He has done it before, and now he is doing it again.
For those still blinded by his deception, how much more will it take for you to see the truth? How long will you allow this corruption to fester? The man you so blindly follow is not leading a masjid—he’s leading a coup, one that is tearing this community apart.
It’s time to wake up. This is not the leadership in Islam. This is the leadership of power-hungry charlatans.
Manya’s Shab-e-Bara’at Talk: What Happened to all the the Preaching on Forgiveness ?
Message received via Email :
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh,
We pray this message finds you in the best of health, and that Allah (SWT) grants you peace and blessings.
It is with heavy hearts that we, the concerned members, share the sorrowful news that some of our children from the madrasah have been denied the honour of leading Taraweeh prayers this Ramadan. This decision has been deeply upsetting, and we believe it is rooted in ongoing issues within our Masjid. We fear that such actions only serve to deepen division and sow animosity within our beloved community.
- Ml Hishams son (affiliation with Darul-Uloom)
- Hafiz Dawood’s son (as he is a Holding Trustee)
- Qari Idris full class
Our children (no matter who their parents / family are) are the hope and future of our Ummah. They should not be made to bear the weight of disputes and discord. Every effort they have made to memorise the words of Allah (SWT), to honour His guidance, should be recognised and celebrated, not hindered by matters that have no place in the hearts of the faithful.
It is our sincere belief that there should be a fair, transparent, and just process in place (free from conflicts of interest) —one that allows every child who has dedicated their youth and efforts to the words of the Quran to fulfil their rightful dreams of leading prayers in their own Masjid.
These children are the future of our mosque and our community. We should be offering them our full support, encouragement, and love, helping them to realise their potential in a spirit of unity.
M.Suhel has been questioned and stated this was a committee decision.
If this is the decision of the Committee? Then we demand to see the criteria and minutes from the meeting for such decisions.
We pray that Allah, the Exalted, softens our hearts and brings harmony to our community. May He remove the barriers that divide us and replace them with the bonds of brotherhood and sisterhood. May He guide us all towards what pleases Him.
Noorani Bawa of Deceit: Manya’s Blessing for Fraud and Corruption
The following is based on an email received from an anonymous individual who claims to be an extended relative of the Manya family.
Over 15 years ago, the hot-tempered, angry little Rumpelstiltskin of a brother, Noor Munchkin Manya, decided to try his luck in the murky world of accident and injury claims. His office, conveniently located on Preston New Road—right opposite the electrical shop and diagonally opposite the petrol station—became a hub for exaggerated and outright fabricated injury claims. His entire (short-lived) business model revolved around sweet-talking clients into overplaying their injuries or, in many cases, making them up entirely, all in the pursuit of hefty insurance payouts. A dishonest scheme where both sides—fraudster and claimant—prospered at the expense of integrity and legality.
But who gave him the green light for such brazen deceit? Who else but his ever-corrupt, ever-complicit big brother, the self-anointed Hadhrat of Hypocrisy, Suhail Manya. Noor, the ever-loyal lackey, consulted his so-called "penny shop maulwi" brother about whether engaging in fraudulent practices to milk insurance companies dry was permissible. And Manya, with all the wisdom of a penny-shop preacher, gave his stamp of approval with the classic guidance of a crook: "Yeh, do it—but keep it quiet."
This is the same Manya who stands on the pulpit, leading prayers, delivering lectures on morality, and pretending to be the beacon of piety. This is the same Manya who thunders about honesty and righteousness while privately endorsing dishonesty, fraud, and deceit. This is the same Manya who, despite his well-documented corruption, still has people blindly following him as if he were some Noorani Bawa—a saintly, infallible spiritual guide.
This is why you will see the ones who latch onto him are those who want cover for their own illicit and haraam dealings. Manya seeing these same ignorant fools, with deep pockets, as an opportunity - quid pro quo type ones. What you have seen in the past year is Manya calling his 'something for something' card, from those he gave green light to their haraam wheeling and dealing.
What does this say about those who still defend him? The eight goons in the committee who nod along to every decree, the five extra minions conveniently added to give bluster and backing to the 8 elected buffoons, and then the remaining brain-dead zombies who see him as some sort of divine saviour, despite the mountains of evidence proving his complete and utter lack of integrity.
These people pray behind him, convinced their salah will be accepted while standing behind a fasiq and fajir who has repeatedly betrayed the very essence of Islamic morality and ethics. This is the reality of Tauheedul under Manya —a congregation led by a fraudster, surrounded by thieves, upheld by liars, and followed by the gullible.
If this is their idea of leadership, then they too, will sink with the ship of corruption they have so blindly boarded. In this world, and the next.
Manya's Self-Appointed “Hadhrat” Title – Arrogance on Full Display
There are two types of people who are referred to as Hadhrat in the Islamic tradition:
The Pious & Righteous – Those whom Allah bestows honour upon through their taqwa, sincerity, and knowledge, earning the respect of the Ummah over time.
The Self-Declared Charlatans – Those who inflate their own ego, demand titles, and crave recognition to mask their own insecurities and inferiority complex.
Guess which category Suhail Manya falls into?
It’s one thing when renowned scholars—true servants of Islam—are affectionately referred to as "Hadhrat" by the Muslim Ummah as a mark of respect. It’s a completely different matter when a man self-appoints himself with the title, plastering it across posters, announcements, and promotional material as though it were divinely mandated.
“Hadhrat” By Whose Command?
The question we must ask is: who exactly conferred this title upon Manya?
Was it:
✅ The senior Ulama? – No, they reject him and want nothing to do with him.
✅ The public? – No, they’ve seen through his corruption, deceit, and ego-driven antics.
✅ His minions and sycophants? – Yes! The very same yes-men who worship the ground he walks on, those who blindly follow without question, and those who need a "leader" to validate their own misdeeds. The same Islamically illiterate goons who would not be able articulate basic tenants of aquidah even if their life depended on it. Such illiterate fools are the ones charlatans like Manya targets and very easily manipulate, charm and snarl into his deceit. As those with a modicum of morality and deeni know how, would see through Manya's craving for power and capital.
But the most dangerous part of all this is that Manya himself approves of this self-anointment. If he had any humility, he would reject it outright. Instead, he basks in it, thrives off it, and enjoys seeing his name glorified with a title he has not earned.
The Height of Arrogance & Pride
Rasulullah ﷺ said: “No one who has an atom’s weight of pride in his heart will enter Jannah.”(Sahih Muslim 91)
So what, then, of the one who elevates himself to Hadhrat status, despite having neither the knowledge, respect, nor credibility of a true scholar?
This is a man who:
Spews hatred from the minbar against those he dislikes.
Calls people khinzir, munafiq, and worse simply for opposing him.
Destroys the unity of the community for his own selfish ambitions.
Thrives on power, control, and manipulation rather than sincerity.
Cannot accept his own mistakes, let alone seek forgiveness for them.
Caught red handed in attempted fraud
Yet he and his cronies believe he deserves the title of Hadhrat?
What Does It Say About a Man Who Accepts Such a Title for Himself?
Would Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwiر, Maulana Rashid Ahmed Gangohiر ,Maulana Qasim Nanotwiر ,etc have printed posters calling themselves"Hadhrat"?
Never !!
Yet here we have a two bit, penny shop clueless maulwi, a man so desperate for recognition, so obsessed with his own self-importance, that he relishes being called Hadhrat—not because he is worthy of it, but because his inflated ego cannot survive without it.
The Conclusion: A Self-Proclaimed King With No Kingdom
Manya's self-glorification is nothing but a reflection of his desperation. The more he loses the respect of the community, the more he clings to superficial titles to maintain the illusion of grandeur.
But titles mean nothing when the actions behind them are corrupt, hypocritical, and insincere.
You can print Hadhrat a thousand times, but if the heart is full of arrogance, the title is just an empty decoration.
And on the Day of Judgment, when Allah asks about sincerity, “Hadhrat Manya” will have nothing to show for it.
The Divine Delusions of Mirza Lookman Desai: When the Village Idiot Found His Calling
Last year, in a moment of sheer intellectual brilliance (read: catastrophic stupidity), Mirza Lookman Desai, the soon-to-be godly chosen messiah, stood up in the masjid and delivered a masterclass in proving Mark Twain’s timeless wisdom:
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
And oh boy, remove all doubt he did.
With his brain working overtime—which, for Desai, meant a staggering increase from 1% to a mind-blowing 2% output—he boldly declared:
"No one needs to say anything! No trustees! No committee! Committee resign! Trustees resign! God will run the mosque!"
What a profound statement. A revolutionary concept! Who needs structure, leadership, or governance when the heavens can simply take over?
But, of course, what Mirza Desai conveniently forgot to mention was that there would, in fact, be a committee—a handpicked team of seven of Manya’s most obedient and spineless goons, ready to nod their heads at every one of Manya’s whims. And naturally, who would be their supreme leader?
None other than "President" Mirza Desai himself!
As for the "no trustees" nonsense?
Well, that hit a minor legal snag (otherwise known as reality). But did that stop Mirza Desai? Absolutely not! He simply installed his pretend trustees—because if you can’t change reality, just live in delusion.
So, what happened to the grand declaration of “No trustees! No committee! God will run it!”?
Well, turns out "God’s divine plan" involved Mirza Desai seating himself on the throne as "President," with a puppet committee and a pretend board of trustees. Funny how that worked out, isn’t it?
And thus, on that fateful day, Mirza Desaiofficially earned his rightful place in the annals of Bicknell Street’s newly crowned village idiot—a post many were capable of filling, but only Mirza Desai proved himself truly worthy of.
Fasiq Manya’s ‘Night of Forgiveness’ – A Masterclass in Hypocrisy
It seems that irony is truly lost on Manya. Here we have a man who has left a trail of destruction, abuse, and sheer thuggery, now preparing to lecture the community on Shab-e-Barat—“The Night of Forgiveness.” If only he practised what he so passionately preaches.
Let’s take a moment to reflect on Manya’s own history of ‘forgiveness’:
🔴 The elders he’s abused? No forgiveness. Instead, he’s disrespected and humiliated them, discarding their decades of service to the masjid like yesterday’s trash.
🔴 The mayhem he caused in the masjid? No forgiveness. The disruption, the chaos, the bullying tactics—his signature move. But when it comes to his own wrongdoings, suddenly it’s all forgotten?
🔴 The physical assault by his own son on a musalli in the house of Allah? No forgiveness. No accountability. Instead, silence. If it were anyone else, Manya would have screamed from the minbar, demanding their immediate removal.
🔴 The vile attacks from the pulpit towards reputable scholars? No forgiveness. His unhinged rants have targeted scholars far more knowledgeable than him, simply because they refuse to bow to his ego.
🔴 Attacks on institutions that are thriving? No forgiveness. If an institution prospers without him, he will attack it out of sheer spite and jealousy, desperate to see others fail while he clings to power.
🔴 Labeling people ‘khinzir’ (pigs), ‘munafiq’ (hypocrites), and worse, simply for disagreeing with him? No forgiveness. These weren’t slip-ups; they were venomous, intentional slurs hurled at anyone who dared to challenge his dictatorship.
And yet, here he is, standing on the pulpit, speaking about Shab-e-Barat and the importance of seeking forgiveness. How convenient! Where was this mercy when he was leading a campaign of intimidation? Where was this kindness when he and his goons were tearing apart a masjid built on decades of sacrifice?
Manya’s version of ‘forgiveness’ is simple—everyone should forgive him, but he forgives no one. It’s not about deen, it’s about saving his own skin. His lecture on Shab-e-Barat should come with a disclaimer: "Forgiveness applies only when it benefits me."
The community should see through this charade for what it is—yet another attempt to wash away his sins without facing the consequences. But true forgiveness starts with admission of wrongdoing, with genuine remorse, and with reparations/accountability and consequences for the damage done. And until that happens, Fasiq Manya’s words will remain as hollow as his integrity.
Where Are the Protests Now? The Silence of Manya’s Mob
The hypocrisy of Manya, Darbar, and their band of gullible followers has reached peak levels. The very same individuals who whipped up a storm last year, instigating protests, spreading propaganda, and demanding "justice" for teachers, are now nowhere to be seen when those very same teachers are being ruthlessly betrayed by the men they fought to reinstate.
Let’s rewind to last year—Noor Mohammad Manya, the pint-sized rabble-rouser, was leading a chorus of outrage over madrasah fees. Protests were orchestrated, WhatsApp groups flooded with rage, and even sisters and mothers were shamelessly used as pawns in this campaign of deception. Women were being called upon to picket outside the masjid, chanting for Manya's reinstatement. Where is that same righteous indignation now?
The reality? Manya and Darbar —whose very statements to the court backstabbed the institution by complaining to HMRC about "financial irregularities"—are now at the helm, bleeding the madrasah dry while teachers are either forced to work for free or shown the door. The so-called “defenders of teachers” have left them in the lurch.
A Few Questions for the ‘Useful Idiots’
Noor Manya, munchkin brother of Manya, you led the protests against the fee hikes—where’s your grand speech now?
Zakir Kamboli, you claimed, “All will be revealed.” Well? What’s been revealed, other than the sheer incompetence and corruption of your dear leader?
Farzana Waka, you were so quick to call the previous committee thieves—where’s your evidence against Mirza Lookman Desai and his band of crooks?
Taz, you screamed about the masjid holding millions in assets and urged legal action. Where’s that energy gone now that Mirza Desai and Manya now that they are demolishing an institution built over 5 decades of mujahidah by our elders ?
Munira Apa, you wept for your "beloved Imam"—how do you feel now, seeing him engineer this financial disaster?
Talha (Mol Abdullah’s son), you demanded to know why fees went up. Are you still asking, or has reality hit yet?
Mona, your constant moaning was a staple of last year’s fiasco—where is your voice when the actual betrayal unfolds?
The Bitter Truth
Manya and Desai have done exactly what the previous committee was falsely accused of—only worse. The fee hike was inevitable, the madrasah is on life support, and teachers are being discarded like trash. The same teachers that forfeited wages in a show of loyalty towards the then-suspended Manya and demanded his return. You must feel like absolute useful and gullible idiots ? If not, then you are lost cause !!
So, where is the protest now? Where are the placards, the furious WhatsApp messages, the self-righteous speeches? Now that your own golden boy has revealed his true colours, you’ve all conveniently disappeared into the shadows.
Congratulations, you were played—used as foot soldiers in Manya's personal war for power. And now, the very same man you fought for is laughing all the way to his double-pay salary while you sit in silence, licking your wounds.
Manya's betrayal isn’t just of the teachers—it’s of every single one of you who believed in him. Let that sink in.
Betrayal at Its Finest – Manya, Mirza Desai and Darbar’s Backstabbing of Their Own Supporters
The foundation of the madrasah was laid in the late 60s by sincere individuals who selflessly dedicated their time and effort to Islamic education. Over decades, this institution flourished, producing thousands of Huffaz and scholars, becoming a benchmark for Islamic learning in the Western world. However, under the disastrous leadership of Manya and Darbar, the madrasah is now in complete disarray, with 20% of students already withdrawn due to the sheer incompetence and sinister motives of those in charge.
The very same teachers who blindly supported Manya, fought for his reinstatement, and even returned their wages as a gesture of loyalty now find themselves stabbed in the back. First, they were coerced into volunteering for free, then pushed toward "voluntary" redundancies, and now they are being systematically forced out through mandatory redundancies.
This is the final insult—the so-called ‘justice seekers’ of last year are now the victims of the very tyranny they helped install. Manya and Darbar weaponised their trust, using them as pawns to achieve their own selfish agenda. These teachers, who were once encouraged to fight for fair wages and "justice," are now being discarded like used tissues, with no concern for their livelihoods.
The same Manya who cried crocodile tears about fairness and justice now sits comfortably with double the pay, while the very teachers who supported him are being thrown to the wolves. And Desai, the spineless enforcer, is executing this betrayal like a loyal lapdog, ensuring Manya remains untouched while the teachers face the consequences.
Where is the justice now?
Where are the grand speeches of fairness?
This is the brutal reality of aligning with fraudsters and hypocrites—when they have used you for their cause, you are disposable. Let this be a lesson to all who still think Manya and his cronies are in it for the community. Their only loyalty is to their own pockets and power.
The Dopey Duos Final Gamble: Sinking Together in Desperation
Manya has been summoned by the Charity Commission (CC), and the panic is palpable. This latest round of desperate maneuvering by Desai and his clique of crooks is nothing more than an attempt to shield Manya from the inevitable consequences of his actions.
We've seen this pattern before—whenever Manya's position is at risk, his mob ramps up their aggressive tactics. Desai, who never cared to engage with the trustees before, suddenly sought an urgent meeting with them on 29/01. Why? Because the CC specifically wants to talk to Manya about Manya—and that’s a conversation he desperately wants to avoid. The trustees, sensing the ploy, told Desai to put his request in writing, detailing an agenda - as per legal protocol. Predictably, Desai, ever the coward, failed to do so. Instead, he resorted to his usual deceptive tactics, including deliberately spelling his name wrong on the fraudulent trustee dismissal letter and installing a set of "new trustees" that hold no legal authority.
At its core, this entire charade is Manya clinging to relevance. Knowing his time is running out, he has doubled down on sinking the entire ship with him. This forced “trustee change” is nothing but a petty, ego-driven move—an illusion of power to make it seem like he has won. But the truth is clear: it means absolutely nothing. The trustees remain legally in place unless they themselves appoint new ones. Manya and Desai are fully aware of this, and so is the entire community.
As for the four newly "appointed" trustees, welcome to the puppet show—you’re simply the latest props in Manya’s tragicomic downfall. The real question is: when Manya finally falls, will Desai go down with him?
The Never-Ending Con of Manya & His Hapless Henchman Mirza Desai
If history has taught us anything, it is that a fraudster will always find new ways to reinvent his deception. And in the case of the fasiq fraudster Manya, the script has remained exactly the same—just a new stage and a fresh set of gullible fools to manipulate.
Manya’s track record of fraud, deception, and power grabs started long before his hostile takeover attempt at Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam. His Bolton DU scam serves as a blueprint of how he operates:
He infiltrates religious institutions by charming his way into positions of trust.
He isolates and removes strong leadership under false pretenses.
He eyes up the institution's financial assets for his own use.
He manipulates weaker-minded individuals to do his dirty work.
When cornered, he uses legal loopholes and intimidation tactics to create chaos.
The Bolton DU Playbook – Rewritten for Tauheedul
At Bolton DU, Manya infiltrated by flattering influential figures like Yusuf Bhailok, pretending to be a selfless scholar. Once he had Bhailok's trust, he turned on the principal, Qari Nanji, and forced his removal.
With the real leadership gone, Manya then set his sights on the trust board and its financial assets. When Yusuf Bhailok wouldn’t hand over authority easily, Manya worked behind the scenes to engineer a restraining order against him, eliminating his biggest threat.
His next target was Ahmed Bhai, another trustee. When he refused to grant the fajir Manya access to the Charity Commission portal, Manyacreated a duplicate charity with his own hand-picked trustees and physically barred Ahmed Bhai from entering trustee meetings. For clear cut evidence of his fraud Click Here
But justice caught up with Manya. The teachers at DU, lead by Bhailok, finally seeing through his deceit, stood up against him and ousted him, forcing on him an ultimatum, leave or face a criminal trial of attempted fraud - knowing he was caught red handed, he had to walk away in utter disgrace.
Now, He’s Doing It Again – With Desai as His Puppet
At Tauheedul, Manya has been obsessed with removing the trustees, as he knows they are his final obstacle to full control over the institution’s assets.
Since March 2023, Manya has been plotting ways to oust the trustees, first through inciting riots in Ramadhan, then by manipulating his clueless lapdog Desaiinto carrying out his dirty work.
The recent "vote" to remove the trustees is a complete legal farce. Manyaknows it holds no legal standing, but in desperation, he has convinced Desai to put his neck on the line by issuing illegal letters and fraudulent public notices.
Mirza Desai: The Ultimate Fall Guy
If Manya's modus operandi is fraud, Desai’s is sheer unadulterated stupidity. Despite zero legal authority, zero constitutional basis, and zero understanding of charity law, the gormeless Desai has blindly followed Manya's orders, thinking that issuing a letter on headed paper magically makes it valid.
But here’s the real kicker:
If this goes to court, it won’t be Manya on the line—it will be Desai.
Manya, like a slippery snake slithering for cover, distanced himself, using dopey Mirza Desai as the frontman for these illegal actions.
If the Charity Commission intervenes, shit for brains Mirza Desai will be the one held responsible for signing off on fraudulent removals.
The Inevitable Collapse of Manya’s House of Lies
Manya and Desai's actions are not just morally corrupt—they are legally fraudulent. The trustees remain legally recognized, and this latest stunt only exposes the sheer desperation and idiocy of Manya and his sycophants.
Like at Bolton DU, the walls are closing in. The only difference this time is that Manya is letting Desai take the fall.
The question is:
How much longer will Desai continue being Manya’s pawn?
And when the clueless wonder Mirza Desai is finally thrown under the bus, will he finally realise he was just another gullible fool in Manya’s long con?
Lookman Desai: A Man of Many Names, But No Backbone
When Lookman Desai (or should we say "Lukeman Yusuf" today?) signed off the bogus committee vote letter attempting to oust the trustees, one thing stood out—he didn’t even have the courage to sign his real name.
Instead of signing as Lookman Yusuf, the name he has used officially for years, he conveniently changed it to "Lukeman Yusuf"—a pathetic, village-level attempt at distancing himself from legal repercussions when (not if) his illegal stunt backfires.
Where did he learn this amateur trick? None other than his House Master, Suhel Adam Master aka Suhel Master aka Suhel Manya aka Suhail Manya! The very same Manya who:
- Signs different names on documents to avoid liability.
- Uses "Suhel Adam Master" on some papers, "Suhel Manya" and "Suhail Manya" on others—thinking it will shield him legally.
- Did the exact same thing with the Hope and Help charity (click here), playing with multiple names to dodge accountability.
So here we have it—Mirza Desai, the self-proclaimed President, hiding behind an alternate spelling like a frightened schoolboy caught cheating on a test.
If he really believes in what he’s done, why not sign with the name everyone knows him by?
Simple: Because he knows this is illegal.
Only a coward tries to rewrite his own name when facing potential legal fallout. And only a bigger coward follows the lead of a fraudster like Manya.
Proof That He’s a Penny-Shop Self Proclaiming Maulwi With Zero Knowledge
To Manya's blind followers, take a moment and ask yourselves this:
If some who are now suggesting that Mirza Desai is suggestingthat his house master, Manya instructed him or gave approval to use the istikhara excuse for his blasphemous ‘divine instruction’ claim, THEN what does that say about Manya?
What does that say about the so-called ‘Maulwi’ Manya, who parades around in apparent holy garb, acting like he’s some spiritual authority—yet has absolutely NO CLUE about basic aqidah issues?
Think about it:
This is not some minor issue.
This is not a difference of fiqh opinion.
This is aqidah—an issue that separates Iman from Kufr!
For a so-called "Maulana" to encourage or approve to a man like Mirza Desai to utter statements that are clear-cut outside of sharia, it proves beyond any doubt that Manya is devoid of any depth of deeni knowledge.
He swaggers around as if he’s some grand Islamic authority, a self anointed 'Hazrat'
He fools the gullible with trash talk and empty rhetoric,
He thrives off shallow fancy words that impress the ignorant,
But when it comes to core Islamic knowledge—he’s an absolute disaster.
If he was a genuine bona-fide scholar, he would have immediately shut downMirzaDesai’s lunacy.
Instead, he either instigated it, encouraged it or was too pig-ignorant to realise the limits of executing divine inspirations (personal use only).
If he claims he had nothing to do with Mirza Desai's istikhara unveilings - then where is the reprimand from him ? He loves to castigate, from the pulpit, anyone that he has a grudge against but nothing when it emanates from his cronies.
So you sycophants, how can you blindly follow such a penny-shop Maulwi on any other matter?
His depth of knowledge is non-existent.
His understanding of Deen is as dead as a dodo.
He is nothing but a Wikipedia Maulwi, scraping together whatever information sounds impressive to an audience of Deen-illiterate yes-men.
Analyse his talks and you’ll quickly see the truth—he is all fluff and no substance - at best, self-opinionated clap-trap
And yet you still follow him?
If he doesn’t even understand core aqidah, how can you trust anything else he says?
For your deeni success here and the life to come - wake up before it’s too late !!
Mirza Lookman Desai - Remember What You Demanded At Waheed's Last Year ?
His Call for a Takfir Fatwa to be Served from Waheed's Buffet Menu
Last year at Waheed’s (Randal St), a closed-door meeting of Manya’s worshippers was hosted by none other than the glorified PE Teacher Ibrahim Akubat. This wasn’t a gathering for Islamic education or community betterment—it was a propaganda session designed to rile up Manya’s fanatical supporters.
Akubat, in a bid to deflect from real issues, centered his entire presentation around an alleged anti-Semitism complaint that he claimed was made by a trustee.
What was the purpose of this? Why was this ONE issue magnified and turned into a public witch hunt? Why were Manya’s goons so conveniently outraged at this, but not at their own treachery, theft, and deceit?
It was, of course, a red herring—a classic distraction technique to turn the attention away from Manya’s failings and the lies of his cronies.
But one incident from that night stands out as truly ironic:
Mirza Desai’s Fake Outburst
At one point, Mirza Lookman Desai—Manya’s loyal and blind foot soldier—faux angrily interjected and shouted to the effect:
"We should get a Mufti to issue a fatwa of kufr on this individual!"
The room, filled with Manya’s loyalists, erupted in agreement.
The mob mentality was in full effect.
The manufactured outrage was working.
The goal? To destroy opposition through public humiliation.
Fast forward to today, and Mirza Desai is now the one claiming divine direction to remove trustees.
So here’s a question for Mirza Desai :
Should we now get a Mufti to issue a fatwa of kufr on YOU?
Because unlike the anti-Semitism distraction you used at Waheed’s, your divine istikhara/inspiration claim is an undeniable violation of Shariah.
You have crossed the line of shariah.
You have challenged the finality of revelation.
You have claimed Allah instructed you to remove the trustees—this is a direct affront to the beliefs of ahlul-sunnah wal-jamah.
By your own logic, shouldn’t you now be the subject of the fatwa you so eagerly wanted on others?
Or does the "Mirza Desai Rulebook" only apply to those who challenge Manya?
Or is it that you’re hoping people are too blind to notice your double standards?
The hypocrisy is so overwhelming, it’s cringingly embarrassing.
Mirza Desai—it’s time to hold yourself to the same standard you apply to others.
And if you really believe in Muftis issuing fatwas on kufr, maybe you should be the first in line to receive one ?
It seems that some desperate supporters of Lookman Desaiare now trying to justify his outrageous claim that he was instructed to overthrow the trustees or to that effect by arguing that he did istikharah before taking action.
Let’s be absolutely clear: this is not how Islam works.
Using personal ‘inspiration’ as a justification for governance is a grave violation of Shariah—and crosses into outright kufr.
1. Governance is Based on Shariah, NOT on Divine Instruction
Islamic governance is not based on:
❌ Istikhara dreams / inspirations ❌ Feelings and emotions ❌ "God told me…" statements
It is based on the Shariah.
Allah has already revealed all laws necessary for governance through: -The Qur’an, -The Sunnah of Rasulullah ﷺ, -The rulings of the Fuqaha (Islamic jurists)
Governance and decision-making must be rooted in these sources, not in personal divine experiences.
If personal instructions from God were a valid justification for governance, then every dictator and false prophet in history could claim divine backing for their rule.
___________________
2. Only Wahy (Divine Revelation) Can Be Used for Governance—And Wahy Has Ended
Allah says in the Qur’an (5:3):
“This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favour upon you and have approved for you Islam as your religion.”
This means everything required for governing the Ummah has already been revealed.
❌ No one after Rasulullah ﷺ has the right to claim direct communication with Allah for governance.
❌ No istikhara, no dream, no personal "feeling" can override the laws of Shariah.
___________________
3. Claiming ‘God Told Me…’ or the like for Governance is Either Insanity or Kufr
Islamic scholars throughout history have unanimously ruled that anyone who claims direct divine instruction for leadership or decision-making falls into one of two categories:
A) The Person is Mentally Unfit
If someone believes that he was divinely instructed, they are to be considered mentally unwell and unfit for any leadership position.
Such a person should be removed from any role of governance immediately.
B) The Person is a Deceiver and a Liar
If someone uses divine instruction (eg Istikhara) as a justification for power, or wielding governance, they are committing a dangerous deception.
They are effectively overriding the Qur’an and Sunnah by making their personal experiences superior to Shariah.
This is clear-cut kufr because it challenges the finality of divine revelation.
The Hanafi madhab and all four schools of thought are unanimous on this issue.
- Imam Abu Hanifa (رحمه الله) ruled that anyone who claims to receive divine instruction after the Prophet ﷺ is a liar and a fraud.
- Imam Ibn Abidin (رحمه الله) in Radd al-Muhtar states that anyone who rules based on "personal divine inspiration" instead of Shariah is guilty of major deviation from Islam.
Surah Al-An’am (6:93) warns against those who claim false revelation:
“And who is more unjust than one who invents a lie about Allah or says, ‘It has been revealed to me,’ while nothing has been revealed to him…?”
These rulings apply directly to Mirza Desai.
___________________
4. Mirza Desai’s‘Istikhara’ is Meaningless
Istikhara is NOT a means of receiving divine commands.
It is a dua seeking guidance from Allah in matters that are personal and permissible.
It is NOT a replacement for Shariah.
It does NOT give anyone the authority to override governance matters.
It does NOT allow anyone to make up their own rules and claim divine backing.
Mirza Desai and his supporters are now treating istikharah as if it is divine instruction—which is completely false and dangerous.
Istikhara is NOT a tool for governance.
It is NOT an excuse for removing trustees.
It does NOT override the constitution, the law, or the principles of Islam.
If Mirza Desai’s"istikharah" allows him to ignore the law, then what’s next?
Will he hold a new istikhara to appoint himself as life-long leader of the masjid?
Will he get "divine inspiration" to start collecting funds directly into his own pocket?
Will he claim further "messages from God" to justify every ridiculous decision he makes?
This is how false prophets and tyrants operate.
___________________
5.Mirza Desai’s Supporters Must Reflect: Are You Following Islam or Blind Loyalty?
The same people who are defending Mirza Desai’sabsurd claim of divine instruction need to ask themselves:
Would you accept this if someone else had said it?
Would you tolerate another leader standing up and saying they were given divine instruction ?
Would you accept this kind of behaviour from any sane person?
If not, then why are you making excuses for Mirza Desai ?
History is filled with people who blindly followed corrupt leaders who made outrageous claims in the name of religion.
And history also tells us how those people ended up.
Are you willing to risk your Hereafter by defending Mirza Desai's dangerous delusion?
Desai Must Be Removed Immediately
There are only two options:
Mirza Desai is mentally unwell and must be removed from leadership immediately.
Mirza Desai is a fraud and must be exposed for his deception.
Either way, he is not fit to lead.
The Shariah is clear—governance is based on Qur’an, Sunnah, and Shariah, NOT on personal divine messages.
Subject: Compliance with Point 13 in Light of Breach of Ahlus Sunnah Beliefs
To : Lookman Desai,
In light of your explicit claim of governing through divine instruction ("Allah told me"), it is imperative to address the serious violations this entails against the established beliefs of Deoband Maslak, Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama‘ah and the Shari‘ah.
The scholarly consensus (Ijma‘) of the four madhhabs and authoritative fatawa from classical texts—including Fatawa Hindiyya, Radd Al-Muhtar, Al-Mudawwanah, Al-Umm, Al-Mughni, and Majmu‘ Al-Fatawa—unanimously declare that:
Claiming new divine instruction in governance constitutes apostasy (irtidad).
Ruling or legislating based on personal divine inspiration (ilham) invalidates governance.
Such an individual must be removed from power and legally addressed.
Your stance contradicts the explicit rulings of the Shari‘ah, particularly (as stated on the blog and double checked by myself):
Fatawa Hindiyya (Vol. 2, p. 276): "A person claiming direct divine guidance in governance is guilty of apostasy (irtidad). If he persists, legal action must be taken."
Radd Al-Muhtar (Vol. 4, p. 223): "If he acts upon this claim in governance, then his rule is invalid."
Majmu‘ Al-Fatawa (Vol. 35, p. 150): "Anyone who says 'Allah told me' in legislation is either a liar or deceived by devils."
Given this clear and unanimous verdict, the question remains: when will you comply with Point 13 and expel yourself, as your own standards demand?
It is evident that not only have you deviated from the Maslak of Deoband and Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama‘ah, but you have also violated fundamental principles of Islamic aqueedah, governance and jurisprudence. If you truly adhere to the principles of accountability, then it is upon you to act in accordance with the dictates of your own legal framework and remove yourself from any authority you claim.
If you cannot put into practice the code yourself, then neither you nor any member of the committee has the right to judge and expel others for any sort of violation, especially when your own violation is of a gravely and extremely serious nature in terms of faith (Iman).
Mirza Lookman Desai - The Kufriyat of Governing Through "Allah told me.."
What the Shariah has to say about such "false Prophets" ?
Fatawa Hindiyya (Al-Fatawa Al-Hindiyya)
Volume 2, p. 276: "If a person claims that he receives revelation from Allah or that he is directly guided by divine command* in governance or legislation, he is guilty of apostasy (irtidad). He must be called to repent. If he persists, legal action is taken against him."
This ruling is consistent across the Hanafi school, which does not recognise any form of revelation after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
Radd Al-Muhtar (Ibn Abidin, d. 1252 AH)
Volume 4, p. 223: "A person who claims that Allah speaks to him directly and instructs him in religious or legal matters* must be judged according to his claim. If he asserts that this is revelation, then he is a disbeliever (kafir). If he insists it is ilham (inspiration) but contradicts Shari‘ah, then he is misguided (dal). If he acts upon it in governance, then his rule is invalid."
Al-Mudawwanah Al-Kubra (Imam Sahnun, d. 240 AH)
Volume 4, p. 246: "If a person claims that Allah has commanded him to perform actions outside of the known laws of Islam*, such a person is either deluded or deceitful. He is not to be obeyed, nor is his claim to be considered in any legal judgment."
Ash-Shifa (Qadi Iyad, d. 544 AH)
Volume 2, p. 109: "Anyone who claims that he has received knowledge of the unseen through divine communication* and uses it to influence others is a liar. If he legislates with it, he is to be legally punished, as his action is equivalent to claiming prophethood."
Al-Umm (Imam Al-Shafi‘i, d. 204 AH)
Volume 7, p. 283: "Ilham (inspiration)* is a personal matter and has no weight in Shari‘ah. No person’s inner experiences are proof against others, nor can they establish a legal ruling. Only Qur'an and Sunnah determine divine instruction."
Fath Al-Bari (Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani, d. 852 AH)
Volume 13, p. 290: "If a ruler claims that his governance is based on divine commands* received outside of Shari‘ah, he must be opposed, for this is a violation of the established principles of Islamic law."
Al-Mughni (Ibn Qudamah, d. 620 AH)
Volume 10, p. 156: "No legal decision can be based on inspiration (ilham). A person who claims divine instruction in governance*must be removed from power, for he has introduced falsehood into the religion."
Majmu‘ Al-Fatawa (Ibn Taymiyyah, d. 728 AH)
Volume 35, p. 150: "Anyone who says 'Allah told me' in matters of legislation is either a liar or deceived by devils. The final revelation was completed with the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, and no new command exists outside of Qur'an and Sunnah."
Imam Al-Ghazali (d. 505 AH) in Al-Mustasfa fi Usul al-Fiqh
Volume 1, p. 103: "Only revelation can establish law. Ilham (inspiration) is subjective and not binding on anyone. If a person enforces rulings based on his own inspirations*, he is a tyrant."
Al-Bahr Al-Muhit (Imam Al-Zarkashi, d. 794 AH)
Volume 3, p. 67: "Legal judgments require dalil shar‘i (evidence from Qur'an or Sunnah). No person’s personal inspirations* or dreams can be used as a basis for governance."
*eg "Allah told me.."
Ijma' (Consensus) of Scholars
The classical scholars of all four madhhabs agree that:
Anyone claiming new revelation (wahy) after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is an apostate (murtadd).
A person who rules or legislates based on their personal "divine" inspirations must be removed from power.
Ilham (spiritual inspiration) is only valid for personal practice and has no authority in governance or law.
Scholars must expose and warn against those who claim divine guidance outside of Qur'an and Sunnah.
The overwhelming consensus from Qur'an, Hadith, and Fiqh literature is that:
Divine revelation ended with the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
Personal inspirations (ilham) are not binding and cannot be used in legal or political decisions.
Anyone claiming divine commands in governance is either a fraud or misguided and must be rejected.
Those who follow or agree with him are just as guilty as he is—both in terms of their faith and its consequences
Mirza Lookman Desai’s Divine Delusion: When Wannabe Prophets Run Masjids
It seems history is repeating itself—and not in a good way.
When someone stands up and claims divine inspiration for their actions, it usually doesn’t end well. At best, they're mocked as lunatics. At worst, they become dangerous cult leaders—and we all know where that road leads.
Mirza Desai’s ‘Mount Sinai’ Moment
On 31st January, in a move that even the most delusional of charlatans would hesitate to attempt, Lookman Desai declared himself the chosen one—claiming that Allah Himself had commanded him to overthrow the trustees.
Yes, you read that right (do a double take if you wish)
Mirza Desai didn’t cite the constitution. Mirza Desai didn’t reference any legal process. Mirza Desai didn’t even pretend to have a logical reason.
No.
Instead, he went full-blown "Prophet Mode," claiming to have received divine orders.
One can only wonder:
Has he started receiving ‘revelations’ in his sleep?
Does he think a burning bush is giving him instructions?
Or is it just Manya whispering from the office, telling him what to do?
History’s Warning: Where Does This Lead?
Mirza Desai is walking a very dangerous path—one that has been tread by charlatans and fraudsters before him.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani started off making "divinely inspired" claims, before he outright declared prophethood and led thousands astray.
Musaylimah al-Kadhdhab claimed divine guidance and ultimately met his end at the hands of the Sahabah.
Others have claimed ‘visions,’ ‘divine instruction,’ and ‘inspiration’—and every single one of them either faced mockery, exile, or death.
And now we have Mirza Desai, standing in a masjid, making eerily similar claims.
History tells us exactly where this road leads.
The ‘Four Chosen Apostles’ of Mirza Desai
Not satisfied with just playing prophet, Mirza Desai has now appointed his own ‘Sahaba’ to execute his divine mission.
Meet The Four Handpicked Saints of the New "Deen":
Juneyd Karka – A millionaire through insurance claims, because nothing says piety like dodgy payouts.
Hanif Sherpuri – A man well-acquainted with bankruptcy, which makes sense since Mirza Desai entire leadership is financially and morally bankrupt.
Zuber Taj – A dedicated pound worshipper, who believes that money is the true path to salvation.
Yasir Matadar – Less concerned with spirituality, more concerned with passing his immigration test.
These are the 4 ‘chosen’ ones, the أربعة مبشرہtasked with guiding the masjid forward. No reputable scholars, no people of integrity, no individuals of Deen—just a collection of opportunists and yes-men.
Reality Check for Mirza Desai: The "Mountain" is Just the Masjid Stairs
Unfortunately for our self-proclaimed Moses, every time he thinks he’s climbing Mount Sinai, he’s actually just trudging up the mosque stairs.
And every time he assumes he’s receiving divine instructions, it’s actually just Manya’s voice coming from the next room.
Let’s be real—if Mirza Desai was truly divinely chosen, why does he still need Manya to tell him what to do?
Wake Up, Mirza Desai !
Before you go full Qadiani, maybe take a moment to reflect:
If Allah had really chosen you, why do you need rigged votes and illegal meetings?
Why do you need fraudsters, bankrupts, and puppets to prop you up?
Why is your ‘divine mission’ aligned perfectly with Manya’s desperate power grabs?
The Ummah has seen these delusions before.
And just like those who came before him, Mirza Desai will be remembered not as a leader, but as a laughingstock—one who was played by Manya, manipulated into making a fool of himself, and ultimately discarded when his usefulness ran out.
Mirza Desai, you aren’t a prophet or someone whom Allah speaks to.
You aren’t a leader.
You’re just Manya’s puppet, too blind to realize the strings are being pulled.
Mirza Desai is Not the Messiah - He's a Very Naughty Boy.
Desai and Manya’s Fake Deobandi Allegiance: A Code of Conduct Built on Lies
Manyaand Desai, in their latest sham of credibility, have rolled out their new ‘Code of Conduct,’ proudly claiming that Tauheedul operates according to the teachings of Deoband.
Oh really?
If that’s the case, then Manya, answer this one simple question:
In the past 20 years, how many notable Deobandi scholars have YOU invited to Tauheedul?
Mufti Saeed Palanpuri رَ . Chief mufti of Darul Uloom Deoband, one of the greatest Deobandi scholars of this century. Taught at the DU for over 50 years. Passed away during covid.
A true polymath. An expert in all the Islamic disciplines and authored extensively on each.
A man who wrote commentaries on the six major hadith collections and even a voluminous seminal commentary on Shah Waliullah’sرَ Hujjat Allah al-Balighah, a book so intricate that even seasoned ulama struggle to grasp its depth (don't ask Manya to provide an explanation, he'll suffer a stroke)
A scholar who visited the UK year after year, and was regularly invited to Blackburn Darul Uloom to share his wisdom.
How many times did Manya invite this towering Deobandi giant to Tauheedul?
Answer: ZERO. May be for Manya he wasn't Deobandi enough ?
_____________________________________
And the same goes for:
Shaykh Yunus Jawnpuri رَ, a star pupil of Maulana Zakaria Khandalwi رَ, an esteemed muhaddith at Saharanpur, the very institution where Shaykh Zakaria رَ, taught. Shaykh Zakaria رَ personally chose Shaykh Jawnpuri رَ as his successor in teaching Bukhari at Saharanpur
He regularly visited the UK and was welcomed at Blackburn Darul Uloom.
How many times did Manya invite this respected Deobandi muhaddith?
Answer: ZERO. May be Manya felt he wasn't worthy of giving a talk at the super deobandi Tauheedul ?
_______________________________________
Then there's the esteemed :
Mufti Ridha' ul Haq Sahib, Sheikh al Hadeeth for 25 years at Darul Uloom al-Zakariya, Lenasia, South Africa (30 miles from Azaadville)
A student of Allama Sayed Muhammad Yusuf Binnori رَ.
Is among the world’s leading Ḥanafī jurists whose fatwa collection named Fatāwā Darul Uloom Zakariyya has widespread acceptance
He has made regular trips to the UK on invitation. And guess which institution invited him in Blackburn ?
Again, it was Blackburn DU.
Did Manya follow likewise ? Of course NOT.
How could he ? Shaykh Ridha' ul Haq Saab just didn't pass his Deobandi meter test.
_____________________________________
This is the same Manya who now parades around pretending to be the torchbearer of Deobandi teachings. The same empty vessel cronies who scream about being "true Deobandis" but never once invited scholars from the very institution they claim to follow.
Tauheedul Before Manya’s Dictatorship
Before Manya’s ego-driven reign of ignorance, Tauheedul was a hub of true Deobandi scholars, where the greatest minds of our maslak were invited to share their wisdom. Unlike Manya, these were true scholars of Islam—ulama of substance, not shallow performers.
Here’s a small glimpse of the luminaries who graced Tauheedul before Manya’s self-obsessed tenure:
Shaykh al-Hadith Allama Rafique رَ (and his son) Jalalabadi
Maulana Asad Madniرَ (Mohtamim of Deoband, from the family that founded Darul Uloom Deoband)
Maulana Arshad Madni (Mohtamim of Deoband, from the same illustrious family)
Shaykh al-Quran Ghulamullah Khan Saab رَ -Student of Maulana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi رَ - a torch bearer of the founding fathers of Deoband.
Ghulam Habib Pir Saab Naqshbandi رَ, a towering figure, a student of Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi رَ
Maulana Qari Abdul Majeed Nadeem Shah Saab رَ
Maulana Tariq Jameel Saab - no introduction needed
Multiple Deobandi scholars from Darul Uloom Deoband during Ramadan
Colonel Amiruddin Saab رَ
Shaykh Riyadh ul-Haq Saab - student of Mufti Mahmood Hasan Gangohi رَ and Shaykh Yunus Jawnpuri رَ
Maulana Jamshed Ali Khan Saab Jalalabadi رَ - Student and tarbayyah under Hakim-al-Ummah Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi رَ -
Maulana Yaqub Qawi Qasmi Batley رَ - student of Shaykh al-Islam Mawlānā Ḥusayn Aḥmad Madanī رَ and close friend of Mawlānā Yūsuf Kāndhelwī رَ (son of Maulana Mohammad Ilyas رَ )
And many many more… So, What Changed?
Manya happened.
Manya single-handedly shut the doors on true Deobandi scholarship at Tauheedul, because he feared being exposed.
He knew that if these scholars came, people would realise how utterly shallow and mediocre his knowledge truly is.
He knew that inviting real ulama would show his own inferiority. He has an enormous inferiority complex
He knew that his power-hungry grip on Tauheedul depended on keeping the masses ignorant.
He knew that the more exposure people had to true Deobandi scholars, the less they would tolerate his egotistical, half-baked nonsense.
So instead of surrounding himself with true scholars, he surrounded himself with yes-men and sycophants. Instead of inviting people of knowledge, he shut out those who could challenge his ignorance.
Manya’s Masquerade of Scholarship
Now, after two decades of excluding the very ulama he pretends to represent, Manya and his cronies have the audacity to put Deoband’s name on their "Code of Conduct."
What a joke.
If Manya had even an ounce of sincerity, he would have spent the past 20 years bringing in scholars from Deoband, rather than isolating himself in his delusional self-importance.
This so-called ‘Deobandi’ allegiance is nothing but a desperate, last-ditch lame attempt at removing anyone that Desai and Manya, and the rest of donkeys judge as being not inline with Deobandi thought.
The true scholars of Deoband wouldn’t even recognise Manya as one of their own—because he has spent his entire career shutting them out.
So the next time Manya or his blind followers chant about "being Deobandi," ask them:
Where was Mufti Saeed Palanpuri رَ in all these years?
Where was Shaykh Yunus Jawnpuri رَ ?
Where were the true scholars of Deoband?
And when they can’t answer, then you’ll know—
Manya’s ‘Deobandi’ act is nothing but a fraud, just like the man himself.
Imtiaz VU: The Inland Taipan of Tauheedul – A Master Manipulator Exposed
Imtiaz VU—a name that oozes deception, opportunism, and betrayal in equal measure. If there was ever a human embodiment of the Inland Taipan—the world’s deadliest snake—VU would be it.
Let’s break down the slippery, fork-tongued scheming of this charlatan, who somehow slithered his way into the masjid’s affairs, despite initially refusing any real responsibility.
1. VU’s Grand ‘Vision’ – Just One or Two People Running MTI?
During Manya’s illegal meeting on March 30th, VU boldly declared that a committee was unnecessary—claiming only "one or two people" were required to run MTI.
Yet, somehow, five illegal committee members were conveniently added just before the CC meeting in December—handpicked stooges, loyal only to Manya. If just "one or two" people were enough, why the sudden need for five more Manya worshippers?
Simple. Those additions were nothing more than pawns in a rigged chess game, placed strategically to reinstate their corrupt master.
2. VU’s Loyalty? Bought and Paid For
Let’s not pretend Imtiaz VU has any real convictions. His "concerns" about the masjid didn’t stem from a place of sincerity—his loyalty is dictated purely by who can offer him the most personal gain.
Last July, VU, in his infinite wisdom, summoned Ali Bhai Vika for a private meeting. But Ali Bhai, having been bitten by enough snakes in this community, refused to meet him alone, instead opting for all trustees to be present.
That’s when VU revealed his so-called ‘master plan’—a genius-level (read: idiotic) solution to ‘control’ Manya.
Yes, you read that correctly. He genuinely thought that putting one of Manya’s own power-hungry lapdogs in charge would somehow tame the beast.
The trustees, who actually have life experience and functioning brains, LAUGHED in his face. They saw right through his manipulation and sent him packing.
And just like that, VU was exposed as nothing more than a backdoor dealer, scheming and maneuvering for his own interests.
4. The Shameless Orchestrator of Desai’s ‘Vote’
Fast forward to January 31st, when Desai held the farcical vote to ‘remove’ the trustees. Who was the loudest, most aggressive, most desperate voice in the room?
None other than Imtiaz VU.
He shouted.
He demanded.
He insisted that the trustees "must go."
He ignored the constitutional processes.
He dismissed the reality of Charity Law.
All because he needed to clear the way for Desai’s ridiculous, legally irrelevant ‘vote.’
And why the sudden desperation? Why is VU so invested in Manya’s mission?
The answer will be revealed in Part 2.
_____________________
Imtiaz VU – A Man Without Principles
VU is not a man of principle. VU is not a man of sincerity. VU is a man of self-interest, deceit, and spineless loyalty to whoever benefits him most.
He refused a role when it was actually being offered to him, yet now he acts like the most passionate defender of Manya’s corrupt reign.Why? Because now it serves him.
He’s the perfect example of how low and dirty Manya’s circle has become—a web of snakes, opportunists, and manipulators, each fighting for their own slice of the pie.
But no matter how much they scheme, how many sham votes they hold, and how loudly they shout—
👉 The law doesn’t change.
👉 The constitution doesn’t change.
👉 And the community will never forget who these people truly are.
Imtiaz VU, you may have played your hand, but everyone sees the snake that you are.
صحيح البخاري كتاب المظالم انصر أخاك ظالما أو مظلوما2444
Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or is being oppressed.” It was said, “O Messenger of Allah, we help the oppressed, but how do we help an oppressor?” The Prophet said, “By seizing his hand.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2444
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
Messenger of Allah ﷺ said :“He is not one of us who calls to clanship*. He is not one of us who fights for the sake of clanship..."
Sunan Abī Dāwūd 5121
* siding on the basis of nepotism, tribalism, ethnicity, allegiance etc
There was a time when this community was built on bonds stronger than blood. Years of friendship, of brotherhood, of families intertwined—not just by name, but by shared memories, struggles, and joys. We were a people who looked out for each other, who took pride in standing together, helping one another, and preserving the values passed down through generations.
We played together as children—galli danda in the streets, flatees in the alleyways, football, cricket, marbles in the parks. We ran through these same roads with carefree laughter, knowing that the friendships forged in youth would last a lifetime.
But look around now.
Those same childhood friends, who once stood shoulder to shoulder, now avoid each other’s gaze. The warmth has turned to cold indifference. People who once welcomed each other into their homes without hesitation now cross the road rather than exchange a simple salaam.
Why?
Because of one man.
One man who, in his insatiable greed for power, has poisoned the hearts of the people. One man who, with his whispers, his schemes, and his deceit, has turned brothers against brothers, friends into enemies, and a united community into a fractured shell of what it once was.
Oh, Manya, the so-called Alim—was this your goal?
Was your knowledge meant to unite the Ummah, or has it only served to be an oppressor and tear us apart?
Was your role as a leader to guide people toward truth, or was it simply to feed your own ego, no matter the cost?
And oh people, ask yourselves—was this what you wanted?
Did you ever think that the same hands you shook in friendship, the same brothers you prayed beside, the same people who were once part of your everyday life—would now be strangers?
That we would come to a point where we would rather change our path than face someone we’ve known for years? That the brotherhood of decades could be discarded so easily—over lies, over greed, over power?
This is the reality Manya has created.
A community once known for its love, unity, and respect now lives in shadows, avoiding each other like enemies. A masjid once built on trust and sacrifice is now a battleground of division and hate.
And for what?
For one man’s arrogance. For one man’s hunger for control. For one man’s ego.
But know this—power fades, and truth always prevails.
One day, the same people who divided this community will have to answer for it. And when they stand before the only Judge who truly matters, they will have no more lies, no more votes, no more deception—only the truth of their actions.
Until then, let the world see what has been lost. Let them ask themselves: Was it worth it?
"You will be numerous that day, but you will be scum like the scum of a torrent."
Sunan Abi Dawud 429
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
Where are you scum now? The same lying, threatening, bullying thugs who ran Manya’s campaign with deception and intimidation—where have you disappeared to?
You played your part in demolishing over five decades of sacrifice, the blood, sweat, and tears that went into establishing and maintaining the House of Allah and imparting sacred knowledge to thousands of children. You cheered, you shouted, you bullied, you threatened—all to get your demigod, Manya, into power.
Now, when the masjid is in ruins, the madrasah is on the brink of collapse, and the teachers you pretended to care about are being crushed—where is your voice? Where is your disgust? Where is your so-called outrage at injustice now?
Why aren’t you calling out Manya, Desai, and the other seven crooked, vile cronies who have done the exact opposite of what you were promised?
Where is your rallying cry for accountability?
Where is your outrage for the teachers being treated worse than ever before?
You are nothing but low-life cowards, spineless goons who don’t have an ounce of morality or Deeni character between you. You marched behind Manya like blind sheep, because he is as corrupt as you are. He legitimises your own corruption and haram activities—because he himself is drowning in it.
Your fake piety, your false sense of justice, your hollow moral outrage—it was all a lie, just like Manya’s leadership. You fought not for Deen, but for dunya. You fought for power, status, and self-interest, and now that your master has been exposed as a fraud, are you too ashamed to speak ?
And you blind lemmings have been snared by Manya's fancy faux garb, lifestyle and forked tongue. He is leading you to destruction in this world and next. He is among those that Allah's messenger ﷺ foretold : “The majority of the Hypocrites of this Ummah [Muslims] will be its alims ” [Musnad Ahmad no. 10/123]
May Allah’s wrath be upon those who serve their own egos instead of the Deen. May He disgrace those who aligned themselves with a deviant, wannabe leader. May they and their corrupt master perish in disgrace, both in this world and the Hereafter.
Desai’s Ethics Code: Selective Enforcement or Just Spineless Hypocrisy?
The ever-evolving comedy of Desai’s so-called leadership—where rules apply to some, but not to the chosen ones.
Just days ago, our dear Lookman ‘Igor’ Desai rolled out his grand "Code of Conduct," preaching about respect, ethics, and accountability. And yet, here we are, watching Faisal Wadiwala—one of Manya’s seven boot licking nodding donkeys—openly behave like a thug, threatening to settle disputes with a fight.
Where is the mighty Desai and his moral high ground now?
Where is the swift action to revoke Wadiwala’s membership?
But wait, we see the problem.
Desai is only "brave" when it comes to silencing dissent, but when it’s one of Manya’s handpicked stooges causing chaos, suddenly the rules get conveniently forgotten.
A violent altercation inside the masjid premises? No problem, as long as it’s from one of Desai’s own cronies.
Open aggression at an EC meeting? Ignore it, pretend it didn’t happen.
Violation of the very code of conduct Desai just introduced? Silence. Absolute silence.
This is a masterclass in spinelessness.Desai is too scared to apply his own rules when it means standing up to the people who actually prop up his sham presidency.
What’s worse? Manya himself is no stranger to causing disruption. Let’s not forget the brawls he instigated, the chaos he helped unleash, and yet here he is, his House Negro is lecturing over 1000 members on ethics while shielding his own goons from accountability.
So why hasn’t Wadiwala’s membership been revoked?
Because Desai’s Code of Conduct was never about ethics—it was about control.
Wadiwala is one of Manya’s butt kissing donkeys, and Desai is too much of a coward to cross his house master.
Like a good little House Nigger, the slave must obey the Master
This isn’t governance. This isn’t ethics. This is pure, pathetic cowardly hypocrisy.
Manya’s Titanic is Sinking—And He’s Scrambling Like a Rat on a Hot Tin Roof
How the mighty fools have fallen! Manya, once a man with some standing, is now nothing more than a desperate, flailing mess—repeating the same failed stunts, issuing meaningless decrees, and scraping the bottom of the barrel in an attempt to hold onto power that is crumbling beneath him.
This latest circus act, where he and his brain-dead cronies pretend they have the power to remove trustees, is nothing but a sad, pitiful rerun of the farce they pulled last March.
Back then, they declared the trustees dismissed,
Set some ridiculous deadline for keys and passwords to be handed over,
And then? Nothing happened. Just rolling tumbleweed and sound of crickets
The trustees remained exactly where they were, because Manya's decrees hold as much legal weight as a scribbled note on a napkin.
And yet, here he is again, peddling the same nonsense, as if repeating a lie will somehow make it true.
The Absolute Desperation of Manya
The fact that he’s trying this again, knowing full well that it failed miserably the first time, shows just how desperate and pathetic he has become.
He knows the law doesn’t allow it.
He knows the constitution doesn’t permit it.
He knows that no vote from his handpicked circus of yes-men can change reality.
And yet, he still tries.Why? Because his delusions of grandeur won’t allow him to admit defeat.
This is not leadership—it’s the flailing of a man who has lost control and is now just throwing anything at the wall, hoping something sticks.
Like a rat on a hot tin roof, he is jumping from one absurd scheme to another, each more ridiculous than the last, desperately trying to salvage his sinking Titanic.
And speaking of the Titanic...
Desai and His Seven Donkeys: The Violin Players on Manya's Sinking Ship
Let’s not forget Desai and the Seven Nodding Donkeys, who continue playing their violins as the ship goes under.
Desai, the spineless puppet, scribbling letters on letterheads, thinking paper and ink will override legal reality.
His seven nodding donkeys, clapping along, too stupid to realise they’re going down with him.
You’d think after last March’s humiliation, they’d have learned their lesson. But no—here they are, once again, trying to do the impossible, embarrassing themselves in the process.
The Reality They Refuse to Accept
The trustees aren’t going anywhere.
They are protected by law.
No procedure for their removal exists.
Manya and his circus have ZERO authority to dismiss them.
This is a textbook example of insanity—doing the same thing twice and expecting different results.
If anything, this latest pathetic stunt only proves that Manya has reached the end of his rope.
When a so-called leader is resorting to repeating his past failures, you know the game is over.
The only question left is: when will Desai and his donkey orchestra realise they’re playing music on a ship that has already hit the iceberg?
House Negro Desai’s Delusional Decree: Because a Letterhead Makes It Legal… Right?
Letter So Serious, That Even He Was Too Scared to Sign It
What the letter really should have said :
Subject: An Utterly Meaningless Attempt to Fire Trustees (Because House Master Manya Said So)
Dear Trustees,
I trust this letter finds you as amused as I was while writing it. As per the imaginary powers I think I have, I am formally informing you that you are hereby removed as trustees of Masjid-E-Tauheedul Islam. Why? Because Manya told me to do it, and I never question my master.
This decision was made through a completely pointless vote by the Executive Committee, a group that—just to remind you—has absolutely no legal power to remove trustees whatsoever. But hey, if I print it on letterhead and use serious words like “formally advise,” maybe people will believe it’s legit!
We believe this is in the "best interest of the organization", meaning it aligns with Manya's personal ambitions of controlling all assets, and as usual, I am blindly following orders without considering reality, legality, or basic common sense.
Now, because I enjoy playing pretend, I kindly request your cooperation in handing over everything, including keys, documents, and digital access—as if a poorly written letter from me actually has the power to enforce such a demand!
Please ensure you comply by Friday, 7th February 2025, by 7 PM sharp—because in my fantasy world, setting arbitrary deadlines makes my nonsense seem more official.
Lastly, on behalf of myself and my fellow legal dunces, we thank you for your contributions (even though we have absolutely no right to remove you) and sincerely hope you take this pointless attempt seriously, despite it having no legal standing whatsoever.
JazakAllah Khair (because throwing in Islamic phrases makes my nonsense sound more credible),
Lukeman Yusuf (Desai) Chairman (Only in Title, Not in Power) Masjid-E-Tauheedul Islam (Now Under Manya’s Personal Ownership, Apparently)
Final Notes
🔹 Desai, you do realise this is legally meaningless, right? You don’t have the authority to remove trustees, no matter how official you try to sound.
🔹 Trustees don’t just vanish because you “vote” them out in a backroom meeting with Manya whispering sweet nothings in your ear.
🔹 This is not a dictatorship (though you and Manya wish it were). If you want trustees removed, you need to go through actual legal channels, not fantasyland decrees.
Honestly, this letter should be framed as a testament to your gullibility. You actually believe that writing things down and stamping them with a fancy letterhead magically makes them legal. The stupidity is almost impressive.
Now, run along and tell Manya you’ve done his bidding—just don’t be surprised when the trustees completely ignore this nonsense and laugh you out of the room. 😂
Desai: The Spineless ‘President’ Who Serves as Manya’s Hunched-Over Igor
Lookman Desai - the so-called 'President' of the masjid—but let’s be honest, does anyone actually believe he’s in charge? This man carries himself with all the authority of a timid butler, permanently hunched over, awaiting Manya’s next command like Igor from some low-budget horror film.
A president, you say? More like a glorified errand boy.
Manya barks, Desai obeys.
Manya schemes, Desai nods.
Manya orders, Desai scrambles to make it happen—no matter how illegal, illogical, or outright ridiculous.
This is not leadership—this is servitude. The man who claims to be at the helm of the masjid has less backbone than a garden slug and is so desperately dependent on Manya’s approval, he has zero ability to act independently.
A real leader stands up for what is right. Desai? He cowers, submits, and carries out Manya’s every whim without question.
The only presidential thing about Desai is the title—because in every other way, he is nothing more than Manya’s Igor, a mere tool, a spineless lackey who does what he’s told and asks no questions.
And for that, he deserves nothing but ridicule.
Desai, Is This Really the Legacy You Want?
Lookman Desai, let’s cut to the chase—is this really how you want to be remembered? As Manya’s obedient lapdog, his spineless yes-man, the so-called "President" who has zero authority and even less self-respect?
You had a chance to lead, to leave a mark, as a man of principle—but instead, you’ve chosen to play the role of Manya’s submissive assistant, following his every command like a loyal butler, nodding and obeying like a trained pet.
Where is your masculinity?
Where is your backbone?
Where is your dignity?
Where is your Ghayrah (غَيْرَة) ?
A real president leads.
A real man stands on his own two feet.
But you? You scurry behind Manya like a frightened housewife, waiting for his approval, too afraid to make a single decision without his say-so.
When history remembers you, will it be as a leader or a lackey?
Will it be as a man of conviction or Manya’s obedient footstool?
Right now, you are nothing more than Manya’s Igor, hunched over and awaiting orders, too weak to think for yourself.
But here’s the thing—Manya will drop you the moment you’re no longer useful. And when that day comes, your name will be a joke, your so-called "presidency" will be mocked, and the only legacy you’ll leave behind is that of a spineless puppet who danced to Manya's tune.
Manya’s Magical Thinking: How to Remove Trustees with a Make-Believe Vote
(click images to enlarge)
The sheer comedic brilliance of Manya and his merry band of legal illiterates! Apparently, in his alternate reality, all it takes to remove trustees is a quick show of hands from his handpicked goons, and poof!—problem solved! Who needs actual legal authority when you have wishful thinking, right?
Manyareally thinks that by ordering his house negro Desai to hold a meaningless vote, he can magically erase legally appointed trustees—as if this is some playground game where he can make up the rules as he goes along.
Let’s break down the absurdity:
1️⃣ The law is clear—Trustees cannot be removed by a simple vote from Desai’s gang of head-nodders. That’s just not how legal governance works.
2️⃣ The constitution is clear—There is no provision allowing the executive committee to remove trustees. Not a single one.
3️⃣ Reality is clear—This sham of a vote holds no weight, except in the fantasy world inside Manya’s head - Desai's controlling pimp.
Why the Desperation?
Manya'snot interested in governance. He’s interested in assets. The trustees stand between him and the buildings, and that’s the only reason he wants them gone.
He drained the masjid’s money? No problem, let’s sell off the assets!
He made sure teachers are unpaid? Easy fix—just liquidate properties to cover his mess!
He wants free reign to do whatever he likes? Just remove anyone who stands in his way!
This isn’t about the masjid or the community—it’s about Manya securing his grip on power and wealth before the whole thing collapses.
Desai: The Willing House Negro Puppet
And then we have Desai, the loyal servant with a spine made of jelly, blindly carrying out Manya'simpossible orders, as if the force of his sheer incompetence will override actual legal structure. Why is Desai so spinelessly and pathetically subservient to Manya, as if Manya was his pimp ?
Someone should really pull him aside and hand him a copy of the law, because playing pretend doesn’t make something legally binding.
The Reality Check
🔹 Manya and Desai's vote means nothing. It has no legal power and will not remove a single trustee.
🔹 The trustees aren’t going anywhere—unless they die, resign, or are removed through actual legal procedures.
🔹 Desai is walking straight into a legal disaster—one that the Charity Commission is already watching closely.
This entire episode is a masterclass in stupidity. Watching Manya and Desai try to rewrite governance laws with their own imaginary rules is like watching a child try to change Monopoly rules mid-game—embarrassing, desperate, and utterly meaningless.
Manya, your dictatorship fantasy isn’t working. The trustees remain, the buildings remain, and your grip is slipping. No amount of fake votes, backroom scheming, or legal nonsense will change that.
Khanjra: The Business Mogul Who Got Played Like a Fool
There’s something truly spectacular about watching a man who thinks he’s a master strategist get played like a complete idiot. Enter Khanjra, the self-proclaimed business mogul, the big shot wheeler-dealer, the man who prides himself on being smarter than everyone else—and yet, when it came to Manya and Darbar’s sweet-talking con job, he fell harder than a toddler on roller skates.
Manya and Darbar must have been giggling behind closed doors when they reeled in their biggest fish yet. All it took was some butt-kissing, a few fluffed-up promises, and a well-rehearsed sob story about the evil committee and trustees, and boom—Khanjra was sold.
"Take them to court," they whispered. "We have a rock-solid case." "Don’t worry, you’ll recover every penny from them personally."
And just like that, Mr. Business Genius Khanjra, the man who boasts about his shrewd mind, jumped headfirst into one of the dumbest financial blunders of his life.
How to Make a Business Tycoon Look Like an Amateur
For a man who parades himself as a sharp businessman, you’d think he’d do some basic due diligence. But no, Khanjrawent all in, throwing cash at a court case he was convinced would make him richer.
Here’s what he failed to consider:
Lawsuits aren’t waged on WhatsApp forwards and Manya’s bedtime stories.
Courtrooms don’t care about your emotional tantrums or Manya’s conspiracy theories.
There’s a reason why Manya and Darbar never put their OWN money on the line—they needed a sucker to do it for them.
And guess what? That sucker was Khanjra.
Fast forward to the latest court case disaster—and reality has slapped "Big Brain Khanjra" right across the face.
His golden dream of recovering costs? Gone.
The financial hit? He’s taking it alone.
The “trusted” advisors Manya and Darbar? Nowhere to be seen.
For a man who loves to show off his wealth, it turns out that money doesn’t buy intelligence. Because while Manya and Darbar played him like a cheap violin, Khanjra was too busy believing his own hype.
The Aftermath: A Fool and His Money Are Soon Parted
Now, the dust has settled and reality has set in.
Manya and Darbar are laughing in the shadows, untouched, consequence-free.
Khanjra, the “big businessman,” is left licking his financial wounds.
And the masjid? More broken than ever—because of his sheer stupidity.
So, what have we learned?
Being rich doesn’t mean being smart.
Manya’s greatest skill isn’t leadership—it’s making gullible fools believe he’s a leader.
Khanjra is living proof that arrogance and stupidity are a dangerous mix.
The biggest joke in all of this? Khanjra actually thought HE was using Manya… when in reality, he was just another disposable pawn in Manya’s grand con.
So congratulations, Mr. Business Genius! You’re now officially the biggest fool in Tauheedul history.
Manya’s Master Plan: The Bolton DU Scam, Now Repackaged for Tauheedul
Members, stay on guard. The modus operandi of Manya is exactly the same as what he attempted at Bolton Darul Uloom—and he and his dopey minion Darbar were caught red-handed.
Their Bolton DU scam was simple:
Create a new charity under his control.
Transfer Bolton DU’s assets into the new charity to steal them from their rightful ownership.
Seize total control, robbing the community of its wealth and resources.
When they were caught in the act, they were rightfully booted out. But like any crooked schemer, Manya has not changed his ways—he has simply found a new hunting ground.
Now, he is applying the same tactics at Tauheedul.
The Constitution Exposes His True Intentions
Manya's goal? Dissolve the current charity, transfer all the masjid’s assets into a new charity under his sole control, and claim ownership of Tauheedul’s decades of assets.
The constitution makes it clear:
The Association can be dissolved with a three-fourths vote at a Special General Meeting.
If the active membership drops significantly, the committee can declare it unsustainable.
Upon dissolution, all remaining property must be transferred to a charity with similar objectives.
How Manya Plans to Exploit This Clause
Manufacture a Crisis – Create chaos, financial instability, and community division to justify dissolving the masjid’s current structure.
Declare Dissolution Necessary – Push his cronies in the committee to claim that Tauheedul can no longer function under its current structure.
Divert Assets to His New Charity – Once dissolved, Manya's personal charity will suddenly become the "only suitable" recipient of Tauheedul’s assets.
Seize Total Control – The entire masjid, madrasah, and all its properties will be under Manya's grip, forever.
His Thieving Reputation Precedes Him
This is not speculation—this is a proven pattern of behavior.
He attempted this exact same scheme in Bolton and was thrown out when he got caught. Now, he has learned from his mistakes, and instead of being direct, he is playing the long game at Tauheedul.
Stay Vigilant!
Do not let this fraudster repeat his scam in our community. His track record of deceit, theft, and manipulation speaks for itself.
Demand financial transparency.
Refuse to let the masjid’s assets be transferred or dissolved.
Expose his tactics before he finalizes his scheme.
Manya is a thief in religious garb, a crook masquerading as a leader, and a fraud who has never built anything, only destroyed - he cannot help but deceive and steal. Tauheedul must not become his next victim.
Manya and Desai's Kangaroo Court: Members, Know Your Rights!
The new so-called "Code of Conduct" pushed by Manya's rubber-stamp committee of Desai and 7 other nodding donkeys is nothing more than an attempt to bully, silence, and control members of the masjid.
Take Point 13, where they arrogantly declare that they have the "right to sanction anyone as they see fit", including the cancellation of membership—as if they can act as dictators, removing whoever they dislike at will.
Let’s be clear: this is nonsense.
The masjid’s constitution explicitly protects members from arbitrary expulsion. According to the EXPULSION OF MEMBERS clause:
A full inquiry must take place before any member can be expelled.
The accused member must be given the right to present their case in writing before any decision is made.
If the committee is still not satisfied, the member has the right to a hearing before any expulsion.
A written notice must be issued before any expulsion is finalised.
This means: Manya and his cronies CANNOT just throw people out on a whim! They are bound by due process, no matter how much they want to rule like dictators.
What This Really Means
Point 13 of their "Code of Conduct" is nothing more than a scare tactic to silence dissent. They want members to think they have absolute authority, but the constitution says otherwise. They cannot expel you without a proper process.
If you ever receive a threat of expulsion:
Demand a written explanation.
Request the full inquiry process as outlined in the constitution.
Insist on your right to a hearing.
Call them out for violating their own rules.
Manya and his committee of enforcers are trying to operate like a dictatorship, but the constitution was written to protect the masjid from exactly this type of tyranny.
Do not be intimidated. Do not let them trample over your rights. Hold them accountable!
The Hypocrisy Manifesto: Manya's Mob Preaches Morality After a Year of Mayhem
Priceless, what a noble and pious declaration! A "Code of Conduct"—as if this committee, handpicked from Manya's choir of sycophants, suddenly discovered ethics, discipline, and akhlaq.
Where was this moral high ground last Ramadan, when Manya and his mob turned the House of Allah into a battleground, unleashing chaos, screaming abuse, and physically intimidating musallis? Was this "code of conduct" buried under Manya's ego back then?
Let’s take a closer look at their pearls of wisdom and examine them against their own disgraceful track record.
1. Respect? Like the Respect Shown When Manya's Son Strangled a Musalli?
And yes, let’s talk about “respect.” Was it in effect when Manya's own son put a musalli in a stranglehold inside the masjid? Where was this glorious code of conduct when that thuggish act of aggression took place in the Jamaat khana ?
Where was it when Khanjra and his goon squad ran riot, treating the masjid like their personal wrestling arena?
This committee has the audacity to preach respect while its own ringleaders have acted like hooligans?
2. Adherence to Islamic Principles? Like Taking the Masjid to Court?
So now, suddenly, everyone must adhere to Islamic principles as understood by Darul Uloom Deoband?
Where was this principle when Manya and his cronies dragged the masjid through the High Court, wasting community donations on frivolous legal battles instead of Deeni work?
And let’s not forget the selective shariah compliance—court cases were haram when others considered legal action, but when Manya needed to remove his opponents? Suddenly, phowti and bhowti legal recourse became completely halal.
3. Modesty and Decorum? Like Manya's Mob Threatening Families at Their Homes?
Modesty and decorum? What a joke!
Where was this when Manya's hit squad—led by Tommy 'Khanjra' Robinson and his baseball bat wielding brothers turned up at people’s homes, hurling abuse and intimidation tactics ?
Where was the "decorum" when Desai and his cronies were slandering respected figures in the community, whispering behind closed doors to destroy reputations?
This “modesty” clause exists only to control others—because clearly, it does not apply to the king and his court jesters.
4. Cleanliness? Like the Mess They’ve Made of the Masjid’s Reputation?
Yes, cleanliness is key! Except when it comes to cleaning up the financial and moral filth that Manya's gang has left behind.
Where’s the "cleanliness" in their actions when they stained the masjid’s history with scandal, corruption, and deception?
Where’s the "cleanliness" in the money trail, when donations vanished into murky, legal expenses while Manya enjoyed a 100% pay rise?
5. Silence During Prayer? Except When Manya's Goons Were Shouting in the Masjid!
So now silence must be maintained during prayer times? Where was this deep respect for tranquility when Manya's hooligans were shouting, arguing, and causing anarchy inside the masjid last year?
This is the same crowd that had no problem turning the house of Allah into a boxing ring, and now they want to enforce "silence"?
The hypocrisy stinks.
6. Conflict Resolution? Funny, They Had No Problem Resorting to Violence
"Any disputes or conflicts should be resolved amicably and in accordance with Islamic principles."
This is sublime !! Like when Manya threw one big childish hissy fit, during the blessed month of ramadan, all because his precious car was blocked by another vehicle - leading to his cronies causing mayhem in the masjid ? And not to forget, like when Manya's mob physically assaulted people, pushed them around, and led their campaign through threats and intimidation?
And now they want to lecture everyone else about "amicable conflict resolution"? Spare us the sanctimony.
7. Breaching the Code of Conduct? Where Were These Rules When Manya's Side Did It?
Let’s get to the real kicker:
"The executive committee reserves the right to sanction anyone who breaches this code of conduct with any sanction they see fit."
This is the crux of it all, their modus - the final stroke of authoritarianism! An excuse to rule like fascist dictators.
Not only have they failed at running the masjid, now they are threatening to remove anyone who questions their corruption.
Where was this “code” when Manya was causing fitna inside and outside the masjid?
Where was this sanctioning when his mob was behaving like street thugs?
This isn’t a code of conduct—this is a code of hypocrisy, a desperate attempt to silence anyone who dares to expose their failures.
Final Verdict: A Pathetic Attempt to Mask Their Corruption
This so-called Code of Conduct is nothing more than a tool to protect Manya and his cronies from accountability and silence and even remove anyone who dissents. It is not about ethics, respect, or Islamic principles—it is about controlling the masjid while ignoring their own crimes.
To all those who once sided with these fraudsters, thinking they were the righteous ones—do you see the reality now? Do you see how they have made a complete mockery of Islam, of the masjid, and of the community?
A code of conduct? The only code Manya and his gang follow is the code of deception, self-interest, and power-grabbing.
Confirmed: Manya Dragged the Mosque to Phowti and Bhowti Court —
Not the Other Way Around!
Well, well, well… Guess who officially made history? Manya and his band of merry traitors! After all the drama, court case 3 has been dropped, but not before exposing the grand scam—Manya did take the mosque to court, no more hiding behind weak excuses. The whole setup was a desperate PR stunt to shift blame onto trustees and the committee. Too bad for them, the truth always wins.
In a hilarious turn of events, their own solicitor actually understood Charity Law (unlike his clueless client). Just as All Daft Khanjra was basking in his "1/3 victory" (yes, apparently losing 2/3 is something to celebrate now), he smugly declared:
“Amey to ajun bo case karvanach.”
(Translation: “I’m still going to push more court cases.”)
Oh, the irony! Turns out, if they continued, they’d have pinned the financial liability on Desai, which—oops—would’ve made the mosque itself responsible. So much for their genius masterplan.
Not to be left out, Harun Janab threw a tantrum in December, dramatically accusing the other side of stealing charity money. The reality? The only thief here is Manya, who burned through £54k of the community’s hard-earned money just to stroke his own ego. And the legal ruling? It’s now official—Manya took the mosque to court, not the other way around.
So what’s next for Manya and his sinking ship of crooks? More sneaky backdoor moves? More shameless lies? One thing’s for sure—the mask has slipped, and they’ll forever be known as traitors. Stay tuned, the circus isn’t over yet! 🎪🔥
Manya’s Fall from Grace: When Even a Hifz Completion Ceremony Rejects Him
There was a time when Suhail Manya was granted izzah (honour) by Allah, where people once looked up to him, where his presence at events symbolised recognition and respect. But today, at Masjid Tauheedul Islam, a Hafiz completed his final recitation of the Quran to memory and received his Sanad (certificate) of completion—one of the most profound milestones in a believer’s life. Yet, the one demand from the Hafiz and his family was clear: Manya must have no part in it.
This moment, meant to be one of blessed celebration and barakah - not only for the community but for all muslims and especially the honoured parents - became an undeniable testament to how far Manya has fallen. Not too long ago, he would have been the one officiating such events, presenting certificates, addressing the congregation, and being the face of the masjid. Today, his presence is unwelcome. Anyone but Manya was the request.
Instead, the honours were done by Qari Idris—may Allah bless him and increase him in goodness. A man of sincerity, knowledge, and integrity—qualities that Manya once had but squandered in his obsession with power, deceit, and control.
This is what happens when one's arrogance and corruption overtake sincerity. Allah removes honour from those who betray the trust of His Deen. Manya is now a man people avoid, not a man they seek guidance from. His fall is not because of his enemies—it is because of his own actions. And this is only the beginning.
The Degenerates of Tauheedul: A Roll Call of Betrayal and Corruption
Adam Manya
Ahmed Wadi
Altaf Khanjra
Arif Ramadan
Aziz Bargit
'Chickoo'
Faizul Wadiwala
Farzana Waka
Gulam Bux
Harun Janab
Ibrahim Akubat
Ibrahim Umpire (Bold St)
Idris Manya
Ikram Joroh
Ilyas Akubat
Ilyas Blackie Kavi
Ilyas Darbar
Imran Kowariwala
Iqbal Matadar
Irfan Chatti
Javid Laundry
Lukman Desai
Maaz Golita
Mehbub Khanjra
Mohsin Desai
Mulla Abdullah
Mulla Muzafarnagar
Noor Manya
Saeed Koli
Safraz Kamboli
Sajid Desai
Salim Khanjra
Salim Table
Salman Onli
Salman Patel Son Of Salim Palmer
Suhail Akubat
Talha Bhiki
Umar Matadar
Usman Matadar
Yakub Khanjra
Yunus Waka
Zakir Kamboli
These are the very individuals who will be held accountable before Allah for their disgraceful role in destroying the masjid and sabotaging the sacred mission of imparting Islamic knowledge to generations of children. Their lies, deceit, and thirst for power have turned a house of worship into a battlefield of ego and greed.
They sold out the Deen for dunya. They backed a fraud, fueled division, and orchestrated the downfall of an institution built on the blood, sweat, and sacrifice of true believers for over five decades.
May Allah’s wrath be upon those who turned His house into a playground for corruption.
Manya & Desai's Leadership Disaster: Cutting Teachers to Cover Their Own Failure
To the teachers of Tauheedul Madrasah, what you have just received is not a letter of appreciation, nor is it a sincere consultation update—it is a pre-written death sentence for your roles, wrapped in flowery Islamic language and insincere platitudes. This is Manya and Desai's final insult—a blatant attempt to push you out while pretending to be grateful for your “sacrifices.”
Let’s dissect this pathetic, manipulative, and deceitful letter for what it really is.
1. The Fake Gratitude: A Sugar-Coated Betrayal
"We extend our heartfelt gratitude for your participation, valuable insights, and unwavering support…”
How dare they? How dareManya and his cronies pretend to thank the very teachers they are trying to kick out? You have given your time, your energy, and your dedication to this madrasah, and now they have the audacity to act as if this was a friendly discussion rather than a calculated plan to strip you of your rights?
Make no mistake: this was never a "consultation." The decision was already made long before you walked into that meeting. Your concerns were heard, but they were never going to be considered.
2. “Volunteering” = Forced Unpaid Labor
"We deeply appreciate this spirit of dedication… However, we also acknowledge that some concerns were raised regarding the volunteering proposal.”
Translation: We tried to manipulate you into working for free, and when you refused, we had to pretend like we care.
Teachers, do you understand what they are doing? They are making you the problem. Not their financial mismanagement. Not their pathetic leadership. Not Manya's 100% pay raise. No, according to them, you are the issue because you refused to work for free.
Would Manya or Darbar ever work for free?
Would they volunteer their time to save the madrasah?
Of course not! They will continue to pay themselves handsomely while asking you to sacrifice your livelihoods.
3. The Biggest Lie: “Restructuring” for Sustainability
"In light of the feedback, we have decided to proceed with a restructuring exercise to ensure the long-term sustainability of the madrassah."
This is the biggest lie of all.
They are not restructuring for sustainability—they are slashing staff salaries to cover their own incompetence and financial mismanagement. Let’s not forget:
Manya doubled his own salary.
The madrasah’s financial collapse was caused by Manya, Desai, Darbar, and their cohorts idiotic complaints to HMRC, forcing an unaffordable wage bill.
The masjid and madrasah's funds were wasted on legal battles instead of education.
So now, rather than fixing the disaster they created, they are shifting the blame onto teachers and calling it “restructuring.”
This isn’t sustainability. This is daylight robbery.
4. The Insulting “Exit Plan” Request
"To assist in this planning, we kindly ask that any staff members who are considering leaving their positions in the near future notify us…"
The final knife in the back. Not only have they bullied teachers into unpaid work, not only have they deliberately mismanaged finances, but now they want you to voluntarily walk away and save them the trouble of firing you.
They expect you to do their dirty work. They are hoping you’ll just leave quietly so that they won’t have to take any responsibility.
5. The Ultimate Hypocrisy: Where Was This Concern for “Sustainability” When…?
Manya gave himself a 100% pay rise—where was the financial concern then?
Manya and Desai wasted tens of thousands of pounds in legal battles—where was sustainability then?
Manya allowed his cronies to siphon funds from the masjid—was there an emergency meeting then?
No. The only time "sustainability" matters to them is when it’s time to cut the wages of the hard-working teachers.
Final Verdict: Manya and Desai Must Go
The letter is nothing but a carefully worded insult to the intelligence of the madrasah staff. It is a shameless attempt to blame teachers for the financial ruin that Manya, Darbar, Desai and the clique that supported them created, and a desperate move to keep their own positions while cutting salaries elsewhere.
The only restructuring that should happen is the immediate resignation of Suhail Manya, Lookman Desai, and their entire committee of 7 sycophants.
Teachers, do not be bullied. Do not let these frauds manipulate you into leaving quietly. Force them to answer for the mess they created. Demand:
Financial transparency: Where has the madrassah’s money gone?
Equal accountability: If staff salaries must be cut, Manya and Darbar should be the first to lose their wages.
A leadership change: These frauds have had more than enough chances—they must resign.
This isn’t a consultation.
This isn’t sustainability.
This is a scam, and the culprits must be exposed.
Manya'sMadrasah Mayhem - Turning It Into A Sanctuary for Hypocrisy,
and A Graveyard for Integrity
Manya & Desai's Hypocrisy and Manipulation at Tauheedul Madrasah
Manya's 100% Pay Raise – While teachers are forced to work for free or leave, Manya conveniently secures double his salary for "covering an additional role."
Money for Manya, But Not for Teachers – Despite claiming financial struggles, there’s always money for Manya's wages, but not for the hardworking teachers who actually run the madrassa.
Desai's Shameless U-Turn – First, he pressured teachers to work voluntarily under the guise of sincerity. Now, facing scrutiny from the Charity Commission (CC), he asks them to leave instead.
Unsigned Letter Trickery – Initial meeting notices had no letterhead or signatures, allowing Desai and Manya to deny responsibility later if needed. But when it came time to push teachers out, an official, signed letter suddenly appeared.
Guilt-Tripping Teachers – The committee emotionally blackmails staff, citing a £540,000 salary bill, while failing to explain why Manya's wages keep increasing.
Next Step: Mandatory Redundancies? – Teachers were first unpaid, now being nudged out. The likely next move? Mass redundancies under the guise of ‘necessary restructuring.’
The Great Deception – The so-called leadership at Tauheedul has turned into a self-serving financial scam, enriching Manya while exploiting teachers and deceiving the community.
Who Really Needs to Leave? – Before a single teacher resigns, Manya, Desai, and their entire committee of fraudsters should step down first.
Final Verdict: A Circus of Hypocrisy
Manya preaches sacrifice while pocketing double pay, Desai flips positions when caught, and the committee enables financial and ethical fraud. This is not leadership—it’s a money-making racket disguised as a madrasah.
A Poignant Lesson from Shaykh Sajjad Nomani (Alma Mater : Deoband and Nadwat-al-Ulama)
Son of Maulana Manzoor Nomani reh - Student of Maulana Anwar Shah Kashmiri reh
میں صحابہ کے باتیں نہیں کر رہا ہوں، میں نبیوں اور پیغمبروں کے باتیں نہیں کر رہا ہوں۔ میں اُن کی باتیں کر رہا ہوں جن کو ہم اور آپ سب جہنمی سمجھتے ہیں۔ اور ایک لمحے کے لئے بھی نہیں سوچتے کہ جن کو ہم جہنمی سمجھ رہے ہیں کہ دنیا میں ترقی کا راز کیا ہے۔ اللہ تعالیٰ یہ نہیں کہتا کہ یہ جہنمی ہے، اس لئے اگر یہ ایماندار ہیں تو میں دنیا میں بھی اِس کو نہیں کینے دوں گا یہ اللہ کا قانون نہیں ہے۔ یہ مسلمان کی تمنہ ہے اللہ کا قانون نہیں ہے۔
ایک انسان ٹوکیو میں سوار ہوا جاپان کے کیپیٹل میں ایک ٹیکسی میں اور اُس کے ٹیکسی ڈائیور سے اُس نے کہا کہ مجھے یہاں کا جو بڑا ہسپیٹل ہے اُس کے قریب فلانسٹیٹوٹ ہے وہاں جانا ہے۔ وہ سمجھ گیا ٹوٹی پوٹی زبان میں، ٹیکسی ڈائیور نے احترام کے ساتھ بٹھا لیا۔ آپ کو حیرت ہوگی یہ بھی کہ وہاں کے اِس ٹیکسی ڈائیور کا ایک کلچر ہے کہ جب آپ ٹیکسی روکتے ہیں اور اُس پر بیٹھنے کی بات کرتے ہیں تو ڈائیور پہلے آپ کے سامنے تعظیم کے سر جھکاتا ہے۔ تب ٹیکسی میں بٹھاتا ہے موسٹ ریسپیکٹ فولی، سر جھکانا یہ وہاں کے کلچر میں داخل ہے
تھوڑی دیر کے بعد اُس شخص نے دیکھا کہ ٹیکسی ڈائیور نے ٹیکسی کے میٹر کو بند کر دیا۔ بہت حیرت ہوئی، لیکن کیونکہ زبان نہیں جانتا تھا تو کوئی زیادہ کچھ پوچھ پاچھ نہیں سکا، سمجھ نہیں سکا۔ تقریباً دو ڈھائی کلومیٹر چلنے کے بعد پھر اُس نے میٹر آن کیا۔ تو جب وہ مسافر اپنی منزل پر پہنچا تو وہاں مقامی لوگوں نے جو استقبال کیا وہ سب وہی کے لوگ تھے وہاں کی زبان جانتے تھے۔ تو اس مسافر نے اُن مقامی لوگوں سے کہا کہ ذراں ڈائیور صاحب سے پوچھئے کہ اس نے راستے میں دو ڈھائی کلومیٹر تک کے لیے میٹر بند کیوں رکھا۔
میں تو پورا پیمنٹ کرنا چاہتا ہوں اس نے میٹر درمیان میں بند کیوں کیا۔ تو اس ٹیکسی ڈائیور کا جواب تھا کہ اصل میں مجھے جہاں سے مرنا تھا میں ذرا سے چھوک گیا اور میں وہاں سے آگے بڑھ گیا۔ تو دو ڈھائی کلومیٹر پہلے وہاں سے کوئی ٹرن نہیں تھا تو جو مسافر میں نے اپنی غلطی سے بڑھائی اُس کے پیسے میں مسافر سے نہیں لے سکتا۔ نہ اُس نے چلہ لگایا تھا نہ وہ نماز پڑھتا تھا نہ وہ کلمہ پڑھتا تھا نہ اُس کے داڑھی تھی نہ جبہ تھا نہ ٹوپی تھی نہ پگڑی تھی مگر ایمانداری تھی۔ ہمارے پاس یہ سب ہے اور ایمانداری نہیں۔ بن نوٹ شاہ کا مشہور جملہ ہے کہ میں نے یورپ میں اسلام دیکھا اور مسلمان نہیں دیکھے اور میں نے عرب ملکوں میں مسلمان دیکھے اور اسلام نہیں دیکھے۔ ہم مسلمان تو ضرور ہیں مگر اسلام ہمارے پاس نہیں ہے۔ مجھے صاف کہنا دیجئے کہ ہمارے پاس اسلام نہیں ہے۔ اسلام پگڑی کا نام نہیں ہے۔ اسلام پرتے پجامے اور داری کا نام نہیں ہے۔ اسلام سچ بولنے کا نام ہے۔ اسلام ایمانداری کا نام ہے۔ اسلام صحیح ناپنے اور تولنے کا نام ہے۔ اسلام وعدہ پورا کرنے کا نام ہے۔ اسلام وقت کی پابندی کا نام ہے۔ اسلام اس کا نام ہے!
________________________
I am not talking about the companions (Sahaba), I am not talking about the Prophets (Anbiya). I am talking about those whom we consider destined for Hell, and we don’t even think for a moment why those we consider bound for Hell have achieved success in the world. Allah does not say that just because they are destined for Hell, even if they are honest, I will prevent them from succeeding in this world. This is not Allah’s law; this is the wish of Muslims, but it is not Allah’s law.
A person got into a taxi in Tokyo, the capital of Japan. He told the taxi driver that he wanted to go to a certain institute near a large hospital. The driver understood, in broken language, and respectfully invited him to sit in the taxi. You will be surprised to know that it is part of their culture that when you stop a taxi and talk to the driver, they bow their head in respect before inviting you into the taxi. This is part of their culture.
A little while later, the passenger noticed that the taxi driver had turned off the taxi meter. He was very surprised, but since he didn’t know the language, he couldn’t ask much or understand the situation. After traveling about two or two-and-a-half kilometers, the driver turned the meter back on. When the passenger reached his destination, the local people who were receiving him, at the request of the passenger, asked the driver, in their language, why he had turned off the meter for those two-and-a-half kilometers ?
The passenger wanted to pay the full amount and wondered why the driver had turned off the meter. The taxi driver’s reply was, ‘Actually, I missed the turn where I was supposed to take you, and I went ahead by mistake. Since there was no turn for two-and-a-half kilometers, the extra distance I drove due to my mistake should not be charged to the passenger.’ That taxi driver hadn't done 40 days. did not wear a turban, he did not pray Salah, he did not recite the Kalima, he did not wear a long robe or a cap, nor did he have a beard—but he had honesty. We have all these things, but we don’t have honesty. There is a famous saying by George Bernard Shaw: ‘I saw Islam in Europe but no Muslims, and I saw Muslims in Arab lands but no Islam.’ We are Muslims, but we do not have Islam.
Let me say this clearly: We do not have Islam. Islam is not just wearing a turban. Islam is not just wearing a long shirt (kurta) and pajama, or having a beard. Islam is about speaking the truth. Islam is about honesty. Islam is about weighing and measuring correctly. Islam is about fulfilling promises. Islam is about being punctual. That is Islam !
Manya is the living embodiment of someone who personifies outward religiosity while being devoid of the very essence of Islam: honesty, integrity, and character. Wrapped in the garb of piety with his beard, kurta, and carefully curated public image, he likes to project himself as some sort of pir. But scratch beneath the surface, and you find a character as crooked as a boomerang—always coming back to serve his own interests, never walking a straight path of truth or justice.
The True Measure of Islam
Islam is not just about appearances. It is not about a turban, a beard, or flowing robes. Islam is about akhlaq (good character), honesty, and fulfilling promises. The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:
'Allah does not look at your appearance or your wealth, but He looks at your hearts and your deeds. ' - Muslim, al-Birr wa'l-Silah, 4651
and
“Verily, the people with the most complete faith have the best character, for good character reaches the level of regular fasting and prayer.” - Musnad al-Bazzār 7445
and he would supplicate, saying “O Allah, I seek refuge in You from discord, hypocrisy, and evil character.” - Sunan Abī Dāwūd 1546.
He emphasised these qualities repeatedly, warning against the dangers of hypocrisy and dishonesty. Yet, Manya's actions starkly contrast with the principles of Islam he claims to uphold.
When we hear stories like the one about in the audio, narrated by Shaykh Nomani, about the honest Japanese taxi driver who turned off the meter because of his mistake, we are reminded of what true integrity looks like. This driver didn’t do 40 days, pray Salah, wear a turban, or claim to follow divine guidance (be a muslim), yet he displayed a level of honesty that many so-called religious figures, like Manya, fail to achieve. Islam teaches us that honesty is a cornerstone of faith, yet evil doers like Darbar, Desai, the wage thieves in the committee and lead by Manya, their record is riddled with deceit, manipulation, and self-serving behaviour.
A Legacy of Deceit
Manya's leadership is marked by behaviour that would make any true believer cringe. Instead of fostering trust, unity, and accountability, he has built a reputation for hypocrisy, lies, corruption and duplicity:
Manipulating Religion for Personal Gain:Manya uses the pulpit to posture as a moral authority, condemning others while conveniently ignoring his own misdeeds and those of his cronies. He weaponises Islam to settle personal scores, not to guide the community.
Broken Promises and Lies: The very foundations of Islam—honesty, fulfilling promises, and speaking the truth—are absent in Manya's dealings. Whether it’s financial mismanagement and attempted fraud (Bolton DU), manipulating madrasah funds, or turning a blind eye to the riba-fueled practices of his supporters, his actions betray the principles he preaches.
Empty Outward Piety: His carefully curated image of religiosity is nothing more than a façade. Outward appearances cannot mask a crooked heart, and Manya's crookedness is evident in his inability to uphold even the basic tenets of honesty and integrity.
The Boomerang of Hypocrisy
Manya loves to point fingers, denouncing others for not living up to Islamic standards. But when it comes to his own actions and those of his inner circle, he suddenly goes silent. His hypocrisy is as blatant as it is shameless. How can a man who presents himself as a leader of the deen ignore the dishonest practices within his own administration? How can he rant about moral principles while trampling over them at every turn?
This selective morality, this refusal to hold himself and his close allies accountable, exposes Manya for what he truly is: a man who uses Islam as a cloak to hide his crooked ways. Like a boomerang, his every act of deceit comes back to serve his own interests. He is not a leader of integrity but a master of duplicity, wrapping his selfishness in the garb of religion.
Islam Beyond the Outer Shell
The story of the Japanese taxi driver is a eye opening lesson of what honesty and integrity look like in practice. A man with no Islamic symbols or outward religiosity displayed a quality that is central to our faith. Yet figures like Manya's, who flaunt the outward trappings of piety, fail to embody these basic principles.
Islam is not about the length of your beard or the flow of your kurta. It is about truth, honesty, fulfilling promises, and treating others with justice. As George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950) famously observed, “I saw Islam in Europe but no Muslims, and I saw Muslims in Arab lands but no Islam.” In Manya, we see a man who wears the outward appearance of Islam but embodies none of its spirit - devoid of any akhlaq the defines an upright muslim.
A Warning to the Community
Manya is a warning sign for the Muslim community: beware of those who wear the garb of piety but lack the character to match it. One needs to stop being deceived by appearances. Manya is no pir—he is a man driven by personal vendettas, self-interest, and an insatiable hunger for power and capital. His outward religiosity is as shallow as a puddle, and his crookedness runs as deep as the roots of a tree.
The likes of Manya have damaged the trust and unity of the community by presenting a hollow shell of religiosity while abandoning the core principles of Islam. True leadership requires more than outward appearances; it requires honesty, integrity, and a commitment to justice.
Many's actions are clear evidence of a betrayal of these principles. His hypocrisy is an enormous billboard for anyone who dares to look past his façade.
“Noble character is among the deeds of Paradise.” - Ṭabarānī 6675
“Two virtues are not combined in the hypocrite: good behavior and understanding of religion.” - Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2684
“He does not have any manners taught by the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, or his tradition. How can he be given authority?” - Shu’ab al-Imān 10414
“Verily, the most beloved and nearest to my gathering on the Day of Resurrection are those of you with the best character. Verily, the most reprehensible of you to me and the furthest from my gathering on the Day of Resurrection will be the pompous, the braggarts, and the pretentious.” They said, “O Messenger of Allah, we know the pompous and the braggarts, but who are the pretentious?” The Prophet said, “The arrogant.” - Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2018
The latest communication from the Masjid Tauheedul Islam madrasah committee, urging parents to pay fees immediately under the veiled threat of teachers not being paid, is nothing short of manipulation. For years, parents dutifully paid fees on time, accepting the low-cost, below-standard education provided by the madrasah. Yet now, under the current leadership of Manyaand his fasiq enablers, parents are being scapegoated for the financial chaos created by their incompetence and self-serving decisions.
A Manipulative Threat
The letter sent to parents is clearly a threat—a cynical attempt to guilt and coerce parents into covering for the financial mismanagement of Manyaand his committee. For decades, the madrasah functioned adequately, providing education to children at low fees without jeopardizing standards or facilities. Yet now, with fees skyrocketing under Manya'stenure, parents are being told that the madrasah cannot function without their immediate compliance.
The reality is stark: fees have risen due to the reckless decisions of Manyaand his cronies, particularly their complaints to HMRC and the Charity Commission. By triggering these investigations, they forced the madrasah to comply with National Minimum Wage (NMW) regulations, despite knowing that it would strain the institution’s finances. Instead of taking responsibility, the committee has shifted the blame onto parents, demanding they bear the burden of their failures.
Declining Standards Despite Rising Fees
What’s most insulting to parents is the clear decline in the quality of education. Despite significant fee increases, the madrasah’s teaching standards are nowhere near the level they boasted two decades ago. The recent writing exam, for instance, used the same outdated questions that have been recycled for over 15 years. Children continue to be force-fed Urdu lessons, yet after years of instruction, they are unable to read or comprehend the language properly.
This is not an issue of fees but of leadership. The principal, Manya, has demonstrated no commitment to improving the syllabus, updating teaching methods, or raising the overall standard of education. Instead, his focus remains on consolidating power, fostering division, and ensuring his own financial gain.
Double Standards in Pay and Accountability
The committee’s hypocrisy is glaring. While teachers are being asked to work voluntarily, Manyahas doubled his own salary, citing his additional responsibilities. This tiered system of payments, where Manyaenjoys inflated wages while teachers face financial uncertainty, is an insult to the hard-working staff who keep the madrasah running.
The lack of transparency further erodes trust. Parents and members have repeatedly asked for a breakdown of financial accounts, including:
Details of rent received from madrasah properties.
Wages paid to ustads and the imam.
Clarification on whether there is a tiered payment system.
Yet, the committee continues to stonewall these requests, hiding behind vague justifications and refusing to engage with the community openly. The same committee that demands payments from parents must first take accountability for its own failings.
Before issuing manipulative threats to parents, Manya'sstooges in the committee must first issue an apology. An apology for the reckless decisions that led to this financial mess. An apology for the fee increases imposed without any corresponding improvement in standards. An apology for failing to address the concerns of parents who have watched the madrassa deteriorate under their leadership.
Once an apology is made, the committee must engage the community transparently, providing detailed financial accounts and a clear plan for how they intend to fix this mess. Simply demanding money without addressing the root causes of the problem is not only unjust but a dereliction of their duty to the community.
Holding Fussaq and Fujjar Manya and Darbar Accountable
The root of this crisis lies in the actions of Manya and his accomplices, Darbar. The same wreckless fasiqs that brought Bolton DU to its knees. Their reckless complaints to HMRC and the Charity Commission triggered the financial strain now threatening the madrasah’s survival. Their decisions were not made with the madrasah’s best interests in mind but were motivated by personal vendettas and power plays.
The committee must hold these individuals accountable. They cannot continue to demand financial sacrifices from parents while allowing Manya and his clique to escape scrutiny. Transparency and accountability are non-negotiable if the madrasah is to regain the trust of the community.
The community deserves better than a leadership team that prioritises self-interest over the welfare of children and teachers. The madrasah is not the personal playground of Manya and his cronies; it is a sacred institution entrusted with the Islamic education of future generations.
Parents must demand change. Demand transparency. Demand accountability. And if the current leadership is unwilling or incapable of addressing these issues, demand their resignation. The time for manipulation and mismanagement is over. It is time to put the interests of the madrasah and its students first.
Manyaand His Sycophants Neglecting Children's Future
The recent exodus of parents from Tauheedul Madrasah has exposed the glaring incompetence of its leadership— Manyaand the committee, headed by Lookman Desai and his seven sycophantic supporters. While the committee claims that parents are withdrawing their children due to increased fees, the truth is far more damning. A survey of over 120 parents revealed a sobering reality: it is not the fees driving parents away, but the complete lack of quality, commitment, and leadership within the madrasah.
What was once an institution of Islamic learning and character-building has been reduced to a dysfunctional and poorly managed shell of its former self. The blame lies squarely on the shoulders of Manyaand his 8 incompetent committee underlings, who have collectively failed to uphold the trust and responsibility placed upon them.
The Parents’ Verdict: A Broken System
The survey results are nothing short of an indictment of Manya's leadership:
Substandard Teaching: The teaching standards are shockingly low. Parents have expressed frustration over the lack of professionalism and commitment from ustaads, who often arrive late and spend more time in the madrasah office than in the classroom.
Neglect of Students: Children are being left unattended while ustaads waste time on personal matters, neglecting their primary duty to educate and nurture the students.
Outdated Syllabus: The madrasah continues to rely on an outdated syllabus that fails to prepare students for the challenges of the modern world while retaining Islamic values. Despite increased fees, there have been no meaningful improvements to the curriculum.
Failed Urdu Program: After a decade of instruction, children still cannot read or understand Urdu properly, highlighting the ineffectiveness of the teaching methods.
Lack of Leadership:Manya, acting as Principal, has shown no commitment to improving the madrasah. Instead of focusing on raising standards, he spends his time gossiping and backbiting, dragging the institution further into chaos.
This neglect has driven parents to enrol their children in other madrasahs, even those with significantly higher fees. Clearly, the fee increase is not the issue—it is the lack of quality, leadership, and vision.
Manya’s Tenureship : A Total Disgrace
Manyahas proven time and again that he is unfit to lead an institution as vital as a madrasah. His tenure as Principal has been characterised by laziness, arrogance, and a complete lack of accountability. Rather than addressing the concerns of parents or working to improve teaching standards, Manyaseems more interested in preserving his position and silencing criticism.
Manya's indifference to the madrasah’s decline reflects his failure to grasp the gravity of his responsibilities. As a leader entrusted with the Islamic education of children, his primary focus should be on ensuring that students receive the best possible education. Instead, he has chosen to bury his head in the sand, leaving the madrasah to deteriorate under his watch.
The Committee: Enablers of Failure
The committee, led by Lookman Desai and 7 more of Manya’s lickspittles, is equally complicit in the madrasah’s downfall. Their unwillingness to hold Manyaaccountable or address the concerns of parents demonstrates their blind loyalty to him rather than to the community they claim to serve.
This committee has proven itself to be a rubber stamp for Manya's staggering incompetence, failing to implement any meaningful changes or improvements. Instead of listening to parents and addressing the real issues, they dismiss legitimate concerns as baseless, hiding behind the excuse of fee increases.
The Real Reason Parents Are Leaving
The committee’s claim that parents are withdrawing their children due to fee increases is a blatant attempt to deflect blame. Parents are not leaving because of higher fees—they are leaving because of the abysmal quality of education and leadership.
If the madrasah leadership truly cared about the students and their future, they would address the root causes of this dissatisfaction:
Improve teaching standards and hold ustaads accountable for their performance.
Update the syllabus to make it both relevant and effective.
Address the glaring gaps in the Urdu program, ensuring that students actually learn the language.
Replace the arrogant and inept Principal and his fawning committee members who have failed the community with individuals who are committed to excellence and accountability.
The deeni education and upbringing of our children are too important to be entrusted to individuals who have demonstrated nothing but incompetence and arrogance.
Parents have the right to know where their fees are being spent and why the madrasah is failing to deliver on its promises.
The current shambles of a Principal and his 8 committee minions have proven themselves incapable. They must step down and make way for individuals who prioritise the children’s education and the madrasah’s future.
Raise these issues directly with the committee and demand real solutions. Do not be silenced by fear of backlash— the children’s deeni education is at stake.
صحيح البخاري كتاب البيوع باب قول الله تعالى يا أيها الذين آمنوا لا تأكلوا الربا أضعافا مضاعفة 2083
Abu Huraira رَ reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “An era will surely come to people in which a man will not care from where he acquires his wealth, either lawfully or unlawfully.”
مسند أحمد بن حنبل مسند العشرة المبشرين بالجنة 3799
المحدث أحمد شاكر خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح في مسند أحمد 5/309
Abdullah ibn Mas’ud رَ reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Allah has cursed the one who consumes usury, its client, its witness, and its recorder. Usury and adultery do not become widespread among people but that they will become vulnerable to the punishment of Allah Almighty.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 3799
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
For nearly two decades Manyahas made a compulsive habit of delivering fiery sermons from the pulpit, often ranting and pontificating on topics that he has chosen via his cognitive bias. For example, the severe prohibition of riba (interest) in Islam. With his characteristic fire and brimstone rhetoric, he condemns those involved in any form of interest-based dealings, warning of divine wrath upon both the giver and receiver. Yet, as with many of his tirades, there is a transparent double standard. While he passionately denounces riba in theory, he conveniently avoids addressing the interest-bearing financial dealings of those closest to him—for example his own brother, Noor Mohammad, and his wealthy benefactors, the Khanjras.
The Rumpelstiltskin Brother’s Riba Connections
Noor Mohammad, the so-called "Rumpelstiltskin" of the Manyaclan, has been instrumental in supporting Manya's personal campaigns of chaos. Yet Noor operates his garbage recycling business, MV Recycling, under the shadow of an interest-bearing mortgage. Secured against his recycling site and assets, Noor’s business survives by secured mortgage with the HSBC Bank (click for details of mortgage), a blatant afront to Manya's fire-and-brimstone sermons on riba.
Despite this open contradiction, Manyahas never uttered a single word of condemnation against his brother’s actions. No public shaming, no fiery denunciations from the pulpit. His silence speaks volumes, exposing a hypocritical double standard. When it comes to those within his inner circle, Manya turns a blind eye, reserving his self-righteous anger for those he begrudges or envies.
The Khanjra's: Sugar Daddy with Interest-Bearing Loans
Manya's hypocrisy becomes even more evident when examining his relationship with the Khanjras, his primary benefactors and patrons. The Khanjras have played a pivotal role in funding Manya's illegitimate campaigns, including the court case that drained the masjid of its liquid assets. Altaf Khanjra, the so-called "Tommy Robinson" of Manya's clique, has been at the forefront of his campaigns of disharmony and hooliganism. As part of the Khanjras, he has become Manya's financial backbone.
“O you who believe! Fear Allah and give up what is still due to you from Ribaa if you are truly believers.” (al-Baqarah:278)
And then He WARNS :
“And if you do not do it, then take a notice of WAR from Allah and His Messenger.” [al-Baqarah:279]
Yet, Manya conveniently ignores the fact that the Khanjras business empire thrives on interest-bearing loans. For instance, the Khanjra's gave a loan of £2,000,000 to the company they run (Khanjra International Foods). Instead of it being an interest free one or even an equity investment into their own company, they opted to lend the money in the form of Preference Shares of £1 / Share attracting 10% interest per annum per share - if interest is not paid on the this riba loan in a certain year, it is accrued, and is eventually paid when the company is able to. In other words, a guaranteed return of 10% each year with the £2,000,000 secured in preference stock. (link to accounts, page 14 onwards)
So the Khanjra'sconsume£200,000 worth of pure Riba each year and every year - and the company they run is the giver of that same riba. So not only are they producers of riba but also consumers of riba. This is the Sharia definition of riba base lending - which is divinely made haraam, defying this then Allah declares notice of war from Allah Himself and His Messenger. Both the giver of riba and taker of riba are warned in the Quran of the declaration of war.
This reality doesn’t seem to trouble Manya, as obviously he depends on their wealth to keep his campaigns afloat. He knows not to bite the hand that has fed him for so long, and still feeds him.
Manya's so-called faux charity, Hope and Help, operates out of a property owned by the Khanjras, and their financial support is the lifeblood of his activities - the charity claim being just a front. Despite his sermons on the evils of riba, Manyaremains silent on his benefactors’ riba dealings, choosing instead to maintain his cozy relationship with them. No fear of retribution from Allah because of his close financial and cosy association with those that are involved in riba, as both givers and takers.
Turning a Blind Eye When It Benefits Him
Manya'sselective morality reveals his true priorities. His existence and survival, both financially and professionally, hinge on the support of individuals and businesses that openly engage in riba-based transactions. Rather than uphold the principles he so passionately preaches, he selectively ignores them when it benefits him:
Noor Mohammad’s interest-bearing mortgage? Silence.
The Khanjras’ £2,000,000 interest-based loan? Silence.
The court battles funded by these same Khanjras, draining the masjid of its funds? Silence.
Instead, Manya saves his ire for those he has personal vendettas against, using the pulpit as a platform to settle scores. His sermons are not about upholding Islamic values but about targeting those he dislikes while shielding his allies and benefactors from scrutiny.
The Pulpit: A Tool for Vendettas, Not Guidance
Manya'sactions demonstrate that his sermons are less about guidance and more about personal grievances. While he names and shames those he has grudges against, he conveniently overlooks the actions of those who fund his campaigns, lifestyle, his pocket, or belong to his inner circle. This selective morality is as obvious something all in the congregation that listens to his rants, deep inside know fully well - hence his words are taken as mere entertainment like a court jester.
The Hypocrisy of Convenience
Manya's reliance on benefactors who engage in riba is a stark contradiction to his own sermons. If riba is truly as destructive as he preaches—and it is, according to Islamic teachings—then why does he continue to associate with and depend on individuals who thrive on interest-based dealings? The answer is simple: for Manya, principles take a backseat when it comes to personal gain. ££££s over piety.
As long as his pockets are lined, it seems irrelevant to him whether his benefactors are involved in kufr practices like riba. His silence on their actions reveals that his condemnation of riba is not rooted in genuine concern for adhering to shariah but his desire to maintain power and control.
Drowning in Hypocrisy
Manya's rants on riba are yet another example of his duplicity. While he rails against the evils of interest from the pulpit, he happily benefits from the financial support of individuals whose businesses thrive on riba. His silence on his brother Noor Mohammad’s interest-bearing loans and the Khanjras’ riba dealings exposes the hollowness of his rhetoric.
This pattern of hypocrisy underscores the reality of Manya'sleadership: a shallow display of piety masking a self-serving agenda. For Manya, the pulpit is not a place for hidayah but a weapon for targeting those he dislikes while shielding his allies and sugar daddies.
Noor Mohammad Manya : The Real Life Rumpelstiltskin
Manya’s use of the pulpit at Masjid Tauheedul Islam reveals a serious evil streak in his immensely flawed character : instead of being a place for hiddayah (guidance), noor (spirituality/light), and aman (peace), his sermons often serve as a platform for his personal grudges and vendettas. An obvious example of this is his tirade last year, denouncing the non-religious custom of observing a minute's silence for war dead. His shouting and pontificating, asking the audience whether such an act was Sunnah, was nothing short of an arrogant display of his self-righteousness.
While it is true that a minute’s silence has no religious basis, it is also devoid of any religious implications or affiliations. In Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), such customs fall under ‘urf—cultural practices of the land that are permissible so long as they are not affiliated to any other faith or breach Islamic shari'i laws. One example typifies this principle :
عن قيس بن سعد إِنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ مَرَّتْ بِهِ جَنَازَةٌ فَقَامَ فَقِيلَ إِنَّهُ يَهُودِيٌّ فَقَالَ أَلَيْسَتْ نَفْسًاوفي رواية أخرى قال إِنَّمَا تَقُومُونَ إِعْظَامًا لِلَّذِي يَقْبِضُ النُّفُوسَ
صحيح البخاري كتاب الجنائز باب من قام لجنازة يهودي 1250
صحيح مسلم كتاب الجنائز باب القيام للجنازة 961
Qays ibn Sa’d reported: A funeral passed by the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, and he stood up. It was said to him, “It is a Jew.” The Prophet said, “Was he not a soul?” In another narration, the Prophet said, “Verily, you stand to glorify Allah, who is the receiver of souls.” - Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 1250, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 961 Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim
Manya, in his eagerness to target others, ignored this nuance or most likely had no clue this fiqhi issue, choosing instead to grandstand and showcase his supposed piety, instead he showed how little scholarly knowledge he possesses or any semblence of depth on such issues.
Selective Morality: Ignoring His Brother’s Open Kufr Practices
What Manya conveniently omitted from his fiery holier than thou sermon, however, is the behaviour of his own brother, Noor Mohammad 'Manya' Master - the living embodiment of the fairytale angry character 'Rumpelstiltskin'. This same brother has been instrumental in Manya's personal temperamental campaigns of chaos, openly promoting non-Islamic holidays and kufr events - via his garbage recycling business (how very apt !), MV Recycling. From Christmas and Easter greetings to Mother’s Day wishes and even displaying the crucifix on memorial days, his brother has consistently engaged in practices far more problematic than the custom of a minute's silence.
Yet, Manya remains silent. There are no sermons denouncing Noor Mohammad Manya's actions, no public shaming, no fiery condemnations from the pulpit. This glaring double standard spotlights Manya's hypocrisy. If he is so concerned about Islamic norms, why does he not address the kufr violations within his own kin and circle? Why is his outrage reserved only for those he begrudges or feels envious of?
The Baseball Bat-Wielding Campaigner
Noor Mohammad Manya is no stranger to controversy. He was the same anger prone individual who went house-to-house, campaigning for his brother's reinstatement after Manya's suspension, often employing aggressive tactics. On one occasion, he was armed with a baseball bat, intimidating others like a common hooligan. This man, who has severe anger issues, played a key role in his brother Manya's chaotic and hooligan like campaigns, has shown no regard for Islamic norms, let alone the sanctity of the masjid’s reputation. This is the same individual that encouraged mothers of children who attended the madrasah, to stop giving fees in some lame protest for his brother's suspension. He even went as far as rousing mothers to demonstrate outside Tauheedul for his brother's reinstatement.
Yet, instead of addressing such vile behaviour, Manya turns his attention to matters like cultural customs, using the pulpit to lash out at those who he perceives as adversaries. His selective moral outrage reveals not an imam concerned with the deen but a man driven by personal vendettas.
The Pulpit as a Tool for Vengeance
Manya's rants from the pulpit have become a vehicle for his personal grievances, for nigh on 20 years. His pattern is clear:
Targeting Institutions and Individuals He Dislikes: Whether it’s naming and shaming specific people or condemning entire institutions, Manya uses his position to settle scores rather than guide the community.
Ignoring Major Violations Within His Inner Circle: While he loudly condemns minor issues, he conveniently turns a blind eye to significant violations committed by those closest to him, including his brother.
Using Religion as a Cover: Manya cloaks his attacks in the guise of religious piety, pretending that his sermons are rooted in Islamic concern when they are clearly driven by personal animosity and arrogance.
If Manya truly believed in holding people accountable to Islamic standards, his brother’s actions would have been the first on his list of public condemnations. His silence on this matter speaks volumes and highlights his insincerity.
A Penny-Shop Maulwi with a Mountain of Chips on His Shoulder
Manya's behaviour is not just hypocritical but indicative of a deep-seated inferiority complex. His sermons often come across as attempts to assert his authority and prove his worth, but they only reek of his shallow understanding of leadership and deeni knowledge. Instead of guiding the community with wisdom and humility, he lashes out, trying to mask his personal insecurities behind a facade of religious righteousness.
One cannot help but see Manya as a penny-shop maulwi—a desperate wannabe leader with so many chips on his shoulder that it would take an industrial planer to smooth them out. His inferiority complex drowns him, leaving him unable to see the contradictions and shallowness in his behaviour. While he denounces others for violating Islamic norms, his own actions and those of his close allies remain glaringly unchecked.
In response to a questionof the appropriateness for a woman to directly engage in personal dialogue with a maulana or buzrugh, especially regarding private matters, and does the maulana's status justify such interactions?
The man’s ‘maulana’ status is not a licence for dialogue with another man’s wife. This maulana should shame himself for his ‘zina’ dialogue. She is decidedly evil for exposing all the irrelevant home issues to the maulana or to even the wife of the maulana.
It is also disgraceful for wives to have verbal conversation and dialogue directly with maulanas from whom they seek advice. Even if the maulana is an elderly, senior Buzrugh/Wali who can perform miracles, then too the wife has no right to speak directly with the ghair mahram molvi nor does the Buzrug have such a right. -Shaykh-al-Hadith Mufti Sadeq Desai - Majlis-al Ulama, South Africa, the distinguished Mufti is the senior Khalifah of Maulana Maseehullah Khan Saab (r) who in turn was the Khalifah of the Mujaddid, Hakeemul Ummat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (r)
Manya’s leadership of "Hope and Help" is yet another example of his blatant hypocrisy. While he has used the pulpit to vehemently denounce communication with ghair mahram females, particularly in private or personal matters, his own actions stand in direct contradiction to his public pronouncements. Under the guise of consultations, Manya engages in personal dialogues with women, often on sensitive and private issues, a practice he himself has condemned from the pulpit.
This double standard not only undermines what little credibility he has but also exposes the stark inconsistency between his words and deeds. How can someone who so openly denounces this behaviour justify engaging in it under the pretense of offering help? Manya’sactions are a glaring example of the very hypocrisy that the Prophet ﷺ warned against— evil ulama (ulama-e-soo) who preach righteousness while acting contrary to it.
‘Ali رَ reported God’s messenger as saying, “ A time is soon coming to mankind when nothing of Islam but its name will remain and only the written form of the Qur’an will remain. Their mosques will be in fine condition but will be devoid of guidance, their learned men will be the worst people under heaven, corruption coming forth from them and returning among them.” Baihaqi transmitted it in Shu'ab al-iman.
Abu Dharr رَ reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, you are in a time of many scholars and few preachers. Whoever leaves a tenth of what he knows will be ruined. There will come a time for people of few scholars and many preachers. Whoever adheres to a tenth of what he knows will be saved.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 21372
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
The hadith of the Prophet ﷺ often serve as timeless warnings, offering insights into societal challenges that would arise within the Muslim community. Two particular narrations resonate profoundly with the state of Masjid Tauheedul Islam under the destructive leadership of Manya. The first describes a time when mosques will be grand in appearance but devoid of true guidance, and the second foretells the imbalance between scholars and preachers, signaling a loss of sincerity and substance in religious leadership.
By examining Manya's actions—his history of chaos, divisiveness, court cases, and self-serving exploitation of religious authority—it becomes clear how these hadith find chilling relevance in the state of Tauheedul today.
1. Grand Mosques Without Guidance
The Prophet ﷺ said: “A time is soon coming to mankind when nothing of Islam but its name will remain and only the written form of the Qur’an will remain. Their mosques will be in fine condition but will be devoid of guidance, their learned men will be the worst people under heaven, corruption coming forth from them and returning among them.”
This hadith captures the reality of many modern mosques, including specifically, Tauheedul, which now stands as a glaring example of an institution consumed by appearance but hollowed out spiritually. The masjid, under Manya's corrupt leadership, has become austere and adorned outwardly, yet it lacks harmony, sincerity, and true guidance. Instead of being a place where worshipers find solace, unity, and spiritual growth, it has devolved into a battleground of egos, chaos, and division.
Manya's tenure has been marked by:
Court Cases and Financial Strain: Instead of fostering unity, Manya instigated unnecessary legal battles, draining tens of thousands of pounds from the masjid’s funds. These resources, meant to serve the community and maintain the masjid’s sanctity, were squandered on self-serving pursuits.
Chaos and Division:Manya's actions have fractured the community, pitting neighbours against one another. The once-thriving institution, built on decades of sacrifice, is now marred by mistrust and hostility.
Exploitation of Leadership: Rather than exemplifying the humility and integrity expected of a leader, Manya has used the pulpit to issue edicts that justify his own actions, even when they contradict Islamic principles, and vent out his own personal grievances against those he dislikes, using religion as a cover, as obvious as a fig leaf struggling to conceal a towering tree of deceit and hypocrisy.
Tauheedul is now a masjid in fine condition physically, but spiritually it is bereft of the unity and sincerity that once defined it. This transformation aligns disturbingly well with the hadith’s warning about corruption emanating from those entrusted with leadership.
2. The Decline of True Scholars and the Rise of Preachers
The second hadith states: “Verily, you are in a time of many scholars and few preachers. Whoever leaves a tenth of what he knows will be ruined. There will come a time for people of few scholars and many preachers. Whoever adheres to a tenth of what he knows will be saved.”
This narration highlights the shift from a time when scholars were abundant, and adherence to knowledge was paramount, to an era where preachers abound but true scholarship and sincerity are scarce. Manya supremely exemplifies the latter. While he positions himself as a leader and preacher, his actions and genuine knowledge reveal a lack of depth, sincerity, and adherence to the values of Islamic leadership.
Superficial Knowledge:Manya uses his position to manipulate Islamic principles for his benefit. For example, his contradictory statements on court cases—first condemning them as un-Islamic and later justifying them when they suited his agenda—demonstrate a willingness to twist religious guidance for personal gain.
Lack of True Scholarship: His actions do not reflect the qualities of a true scholar, who prioritises the community’s welfare and acts as a symbol of unity. Instead, his self serving leadership has led to chaos, disillusionment, and the erosion of trust within the community.
The Rise of Empty Preaching: Under his watch, the masjid has become a stage for pompous self-centred rhetoric devoid of any sincerity. His sermons and actions do not inspire spiritual growth but instead serve as tools to legitimise his questionable actions and attack those who oppose him but also those he has petty greviences with and is deeply envious of. A tragic case of a deplorable inferiority complex.
Manya embodies the type of preacher described in the ahadith—one who lacks depth and sincerity, contributing to the decline of true guidance.
3. Preplanned Chaos and Self-Serving Leadership
Manya's 180-degree turn regarding court cases is a prime example of his self-serving leadership. In one speech, he condemned the use of secular courts as contrary to Islamic principles, warning against seeking judgments outside the Shariah. Yet just months later, he changed his tune, justifying court cases when they aligned with his personal agenda. This preplanned shift was not born of newfound conviction but was a calculated move to lay the groundwork for his immoral actions, including dragging the masjid to court.
By manipulating religious teachings, Manya has demonstrated not only hypocrisy but also a dangerous tendency to use his position for personal gain, all while cloaking his actions in religious legitimacy. Such behaviour aligns with the hadith’s warning about corruption emanating from those entrusted with leadership, turning them into the worst of people under the canopy of the sky.
4. A Charlatan Masquerading as a Leader
The Prophet ﷺ warned about leaders who corrupt their communities under the guise of righteousness. Manya's actions reveal him to be a charlatan—a man who issues edicts to suit his personal agenda, slanders those he envies, and manipulates the community for his gain. His inferiority complex and desire for control have turned Tauheedul into a masjid of division and dysfunction.
The masjid, once a place of unity and spiritual growth, now stands as a monument to Manya's self-serving ambition. His actions have undermined decades of effort by ulama and elders who built the institution with sincerity and sacrifice. The masjid is now physically adorned but spiritually empty, a tragic reflection of the hadith.
The two hadith perfectly encapsulate the state of Tauheedul under Manya's failed leadership. The masjid, once a thriving institution of guidance and unity, is now grand in appearance but devoid of true guidance. Manya's self-serving actions, manipulative leadership, and exploitation of religious authority have turned the masjid into a battleground of division and distrust.
True leadership requires sincerity, humility, and accountability—qualities glaringly absent in Manya's tenure. If the community continues to tolerate this charlatanry, they risk fulfilling the very warnings of the Prophet ﷺ, losing not only the physical institution of the masjid but also its spiritual purpose.
Manya: A Case Study in Hypocrisy and Self-Serving Deceit
Manya’s contradictory statements, made within a short span of time (see previous post, below and this one), expose the hypocrisy and self-serving agenda of a man entrusted with the sacred role of leading a masjid. By comparing his two talks—one dismissing the legitimacy of court interventions and the other endorsing it outright—it becomes evident that his actions were premeditated, carefully designed to justify his immoral behavior and lay the groundwork for personal gain.
Talk 1: Rejecting Court Interventions
In his first talk, Manya castigates the use of secular courts, painting it as contrary to Islam. He says:
"What do we do if there are mistakes in our intentions? Seek ease and comfort (phowti/bhowti)—where we see benefit in Shariah, we will knock on Maulana’s door and Mufti Sahib’s door. And where we see that the decision will be different, then we will go to Crown Court, High Court, Supreme Court, Civil Court, Magistrate, although we know that this system is not the system of Allah and the Messenger of Allah; this is the system of the Ministry of Justice here."
In this statement, Manya clearly portrays reliance on secular courts as a betrayal of Islamic principles, framing it as a rejection of Allah’s and His Messenger’s laws. He derides those who pursue legal recourse in such courts, portraying it as a selfish and spiritually flawed choice. His tone is one of moral superiority, condemning the very idea of turning to secular institutions for justice.
This talk, made before January 2024, creates the impression that Manya is firmly against the use of courts to resolve disputes, especially involving religious institutions such as mosques.
Talk 2: Endorsing Court Cases for Personal Gain
In January 2024, Manya did a complete about-turn. He declared:
"Yes, you have the right… If a mosque violates the rights of an Imam in terms of wages and salary, then the Imam has the right to take the trust or committee of this mosque to court. He has not done anything wrong. No one can say that so-and-so Maulana Sahib or so-and-so Imam took the mosque to court. If the Imam took the mosque to court, then it is a straightforward matter that the committee members or the trustees… If you did not give him what he was entitled to, he did not ask for it, then who will give this Imam his right? One way is for the Imam to go to the court and when the judge in the court says that he should give him this much money, then the mosque trustee committee will be forced to give whatever it is."
Here, Manya suddenly becomes an advocate for taking mosques to court, framing it as a legitimate and Shariah-compliant action. He justifies it by invoking the Imam’s right to fair treatment and wages, positioning himself as a defender of justice. Gone is the earlier condemnation of secular courts as un-Islamic. Instead, he argues that it is not only permissible but necessary for Imams to seek justice through the legal system.
The 180-Degree Turn: Preplanning for Personal Gain
The stark contradiction between these two talks cannot be ignored. Manya's earlier rejection of court interventions as contrary to Islam sets the stage for his later about-face, where he endorses court cases to justify his own actions. His second talk came just months before he and his cronies dragged the masjid to court, a move that depleted its resources and plunged it into financial turmoil.
One can only conclude that his first talk was a calculated maneuver to dissuade others from challenging his plans. By condemning the use of courts, he laid the groundwork to position himself as a moral authority. Then, in January 2024, he shifted his stance, conveniently framing court cases as permissible—only after he had set his plans into motion.
This level of duplicity demonstrates not only a lack of sincerity but a deliberate attempt to manipulate religious teachings for personal benefit. Manya's change in rhetoric was not born of a newfound conviction but was a strategic move to justify his immoral actions.
A Charlatan Masquerading as a Leader
Manya's actions highlight the characteristics of a charlatan:
Self-Serving Deceit: He uses the pulpit to issue edicts that serve his personal agenda, making his own actions appear halal while condemning others.
Slander and Envy: He slanders those he envies or views as threats, disguising his personal vendettas as religious edicts.
Inferiority Complex: His behaviour reeks of an inferiority complex, where he uses manipulation and deceit to bolster his authority, knowing he lacks genuine respect or integrity.
Betrayal of Trust: By dragging the masjid to court, Manya betrayed the sacred trust (amanah) placed in him as a leader, prioritising his own interests over the welfare of the community.
A Rhetorical Question for Reflection
To those who continue to support Manya , ask yourselves:
How can a man who issues contradictory statements to serve his own interests be trusted as a leader?
How can someone who slanders others under the guise of religious edicts represent the House of Allah?
Is this the example of justice and integrity we want for our masjid and madrassa?
Manya's hypocrisy has not only exposed his lack of sincerity but has also brought the masjid to its knees. This is the sort of charlatan who manipulates religious teachings to justify his immoral actions, caring little for the destruction left in his wake.
Manya's contradictory statements and self-serving actions have caused irreparable harm to the masjid / madrasah and its community.
Manya Gives His Blessings For Madrasah Teachers To Take Legal Action Against Him, Iqbal Manya, and Lookman Yusuf
From one of his pompous and ego filled grandiloquent rants (January 2024) :
ہاں آپ کا جہاں حق ہے آپ نے کسی کے یہاں خدمت
کی ملازمت کی کام کیا اور بوس آپ کے پیسے نہیں دے رہا ہے
یا آپ کا ویجیس اس نے کار دیا ایسے ہی اور ویجیس کم دے
دیا اور آپ نے اس سے مانگا کہ بھائی میرا ویجیس تم نے کم
کیوں کر دیا میں نے تو اتنے گھنٹے کام کیا ہے اور ویجیس اتنا
دے رہو اگر وہ مان کر دے رہا ہے تو ٹھیک ہے اگر وہ
نہیں دے رہا ہے تو آپ اتمنان سے کورٹ میں جائیے اس پر کیس
کریں اس کی شریعت کی طرف سے اجازت ہے اور بتاؤں اگر مسجد کسی
امام کے ساتھ ایسا کرتی ہے اگر مسجد اور یہ بات وائرل ہوگی ہونے
دو اگر کوئی مسجد کسی امام کا حق مارتی ہے ویجز میں تنخواہ میں
تو امام کو حق ہے کہ وہ اس مسجد کے ٹرسٹ کو یا کمیٹی
کو کورٹ میں لے جائے اس نے کوئی گناہ کا کام نہیں کیا کوئی
یہ نہیں کہہ سکتا کہ فلانے مولانا صاحب نے یا فلانا امام نے مسجد
میں کورٹ میں لے گیا امام صاحب مسجد کو کورٹ میں لے گئے تو
سیدھی بات ہے آپ نے جو کمیٹی والوں نے یا ٹرسٹیوں نے امام کا
جو حق بنتا تھا نہیں دیا آپ سے مانگا نہیں دیا تو اس امام
کو حق کون دلائے گا ایک راستہ یہ ہے کہ امام محکمے میں چلا
جائے کورٹ میں اور کورٹ والا جج جب یہ کہتا ہے کہ اس کے
اتنا حق پیسے بنتے اس کو دو تو پھر مسجد والے ٹرسٹی کمیٹی جو
بھی ہو وہ دینے پر مجبور ہوں گے اگر یہاں یہ فیصلہ نہیں ہوا
.تو میدانِ محشر میں اللہ تعالیٰ کریں گے فیصلہ
Yes, you have the right, you worked for someone and he is not giving you money or he gave you your wages like that and he gave you less wages and you asked him, brother, why did you reduce my wages? I have worked so many hours and you keep giving me this much wages. If he is agreeing to it, then it is okay. If he is not giving it, then you should go to court and file a case against him. It is allowed by Shariah. And let me tell you, if a mosque does this to an Imam, if a mosque and this matter will go viral, let it be. If a mosque violates the rights of an Imam in terms of wages and salary, then the Imam has the right to take the trust or committee of this mosque to court. He has not done anything wrong. No one can say that so-and-so Maulana Sahib or so-and-so Imam took the mosque to court. If the Imam took the mosque to court, then it is a straightforward matter that the committee members or the trusteesIf you did not give him what he was entitled to, he did not ask for it, then who will give this Imam his right? One way is for the Imam to go to the court and when the judge in the court says that he should give him this much money, then the mosque trustee committee will be forced to give whatever it is. If this decision is not made here, then Allah Almighty will decide on the Day of Judgment.
It's against the law for an employer to not fully pay an employee for hours worked in the UK. This is because employers are required to pay employees for the hours worked, regardless of how much work they actually do.
If you are not being fully paid for hours worked in the UK, you can make a claim to an employment tribunal.
You can also contact Acas for free and confidential advice
Viral post reproduced here :
IQBAL MANYA BREAKING THE LAW
Iqbal Manya has imposed mandatory ‘Voluntary Work’ upon teachers at the madrassa. This is against the law and Charity Commission will be notified with evidence of the meeting that took place on 17/01/2025.
What does the Law say
Your employer cannot legally force you to do voluntary work without consent. By definition volunteering means freely offering your time and without being compelled to do so, and any attempt to mandate voluntary work would be violation of employment rights.
Voluntary nature
Volunteering is inherently voluntary, means you should never feel pressured or obligated to participate.
Legal Implication
If your employer tries to coerce you into volunteering by implying negative consequences for not doing so i.e. 13 teachers will have to be made redundant, this could be considered as constructive (premeditated) dismissal or other employment law violations.
Check your contract
Whilst your employment contract may mention company organised volunteer opportunities, it should not state participation is mandatory.
What can you do if your employer pressures you to volunteer
Politely explain that you are not comfortable with the pressure to volunteer and would like to decline without any negative repercussions.
Consult HR
If the issue persists, reach out to your Human Resources Department (Bright HR contact: 0800 470 2432) and discuss your concerns and understand your rights regarding volunteer work.
Contact a Trade Union
If you are a member of a trade union, they may be able to provide legal advice.
Contact Acas
You can contact the Acas helpline (0300 123 1100) for law and employment advice.
Seek legal Advice
In extreme cases where your employer is actively retaliating against you for refusal for volunteer, consider consulting an employment lawyer.
Teachers responsibility
Iqbal Manya or Manya cannot force any teacher to stay beyond 7:00 pm if they don’t wish to do so. Teachers are in their full right to go home at 7:00 pm once they have completed their duty as per employment law. The safeguarding of children beyond 7:00 pm will fall onto the Principal and the DSL. The committee need to revisit their decision as this could have serious consequences for the institute.
Advice for Parents
You might want to check in with your child’s teacher if they are planning to stay beyond 7:00 pm and ensure your child is under supervision for the duration they are in the Madrassa.
Disclaimer: Trust was destroyed when we explored and tested the law out on our own ‘brothers’ in October and so it continues. Manya and his crooks have submitted another court injunction to claim money back for their costs. The hearing is end of this month.
Double Pay for Manya, Free Labour for Teachers: The Injustice at Tauheedul
"Personality worship is more dangerous than idol worship because an idol does not have a mind that can become corrupt. But when you worship a human, they turn into Pharaoh."
The Shameful Exploitation of Teachers Under Manya's Leadership
The recent revelations about the oppressive treatment of madrasah teachers at are not only alarming but utterly shameful. What was once a thriving institution built on integrity and sacrifice has been reduced to a shell of its former self, plagued by mismanagement, deceit, and outright exploitation under Manya and his clique. The situation exposes a disturbing pattern of greed, lies, and disregard for the very individuals who form the backbone of the madrasah’s legacy.
Manya’s Greed: Doubling His Own Pay While Exploiting Teachers
Perhaps the most glaring injustice is Manya's decision to double his own salary (100% pay rise) while forcing over 80 teachers to work without pay. These are individuals who have dedicated their lives to teaching ta’leem and nurturing generations of children. Instead of supporting them, Manya chose to strip them of their financial dignity, reducing them to what can only be described as modern-day slavery.
Adding insult to injury, the teachers who relied on their modest income to support their families were left demoralised and financially crippled. Many now face the loss of welfare benefits, free medication, and other essential services—all because of Manya's self-serving decision to report them to the HMRC.
Darbar’s Lies: Deceit in the Courtroom
Manya's actions are matched by his loyal accomplice, Darbar, whose lies to the court reveal the depth of their dishonesty. Claiming to earn a mere £75 per week, Darbar sought to manipulate legal proceedings and evade accountability. This blatant falsehood not only discredits him but also highlights the duplicitous tactics used by Manya's camp to maintain their grip on power.
The hypocrisy is staggering: while Darbar misrepresents his earnings, the teachers—those who should be receiving fair compensation—are forced into unpaid labor. Such behaviour is not just immoral; it is an affront to the principles of justice and fairness that Islam demands.
Desai’s Subservience: Idol Worship over Duty
Lookman 'the house negro' Desai, another key figure in Manya's circle, has shown nothing but contempt for the teachers and the community. Instead of advocating for fairness, he has bowed in servile obedience to Manya's every command. Desai’s disregard for the welfare of ustaads and the parents is emblematic of his complete failure as a leader. His suggestion that teachers should “teach with sincerity” while refusing to pay them is not only insulting but exposes his utter disregard for their dignity and sacrifices.
Desai’s behaviour is nothing short of idol worship—placing Manya's wishes above his responsibilities to Allah and the community. His actions betray the trust placed in him as a leader and highlight his complicity in the systemic exploitation of teachers. Is there any doubt why he is referred to as the "house negro" to his "house master" Manya ?
Small Man, Big Injustice: Noor Manya's Hypocrisy on Fees and Teacher Exploitation
Noor Manya, the short gobby baseball bat weilding brother of Manya, once passionately called on women to protest outside the mosque office over the raised fees, championing Akubat's (another gobshite) campaign under the banner of "Our Vision" to reduce fees and "bring the good old days back." Yet, where is Noor Manya now, as the fees remain high and ustaads are being forced to teach for free?
Manya has conveniently secured a 100% pay hike while the ustaads face the indignity of unpaid labour. His 'house negro' Lookman Desai, in front of fellow teachers, blatantly admitted that the fees would not be reduced anymore. Instead, he had the audacity to advise the teachers to "teach with sincerity"—a thinly veiled message meaning, "We will not pay you for your services."
This two-tier wage system, where some receive unfair caps while others enjoy inflated salaries, is nothing short of exploitation. Noor Manya, who once rallied for fairness, must now answer this: Will you demand accountability from your brother and the committee for their shameless greed? Or was your campaign merely a tool to manipulate the community while turning a blind eye to the injustice now unfolding by your very own brother ?
A Committee of 8 Corrupted Individuals
The current committee, filled with individuals of questionable integrity, includes a convicted gold smuggler, wage thieves, and proven liars. These individuals have collectively destroyed the masjid’s reputation, undermined its financial stability, and turned it into a toxic environment. Their election was driven not by merit but by the lies and manipulations of Manya, Darbar, Akubat, Khanjra, and others.
This group’s policies have drained the masjid’s funds and enslaved its teachers, leaving it unable to fulfill its fundamental purpose: providing ta’leem for future generations. The masjid, once a model institution with a healthy balance sheet and valuable assets, is now mired in turmoil and injustice.
A Rhetorical Question for the Community
To those who voted for Manya, Desai, and the corrupt committee, let us ask: Is this what you were promised? Did you believe their false promises of reform and fairness, only to find that they have plunged the masjid into ruin? Did you think their leadership would honour the sacrifices of the ulama and elders who built this institution, or are you now realising the cost of your misplaced trust or was it just blind 'shakhsiyat parast' (hero worshipping) of Manya ?
The Prophet ﷺ warned, “When authority is given to those who do not deserve it, then wait for the Hour.” (Sahih al-Bukhari).
By supporting these individuals, the community has handed the House of Allah over to fasiqoon (open sinners) and fajiroon (shameless wrongdoers).
The exploitation of teachers—forcing them to teach without pay while Manya doubles his own salary—is an indictment of the entire community. This is not just a failure of leadership but a failure of accountability. By tolerating such injustice, we have allowed the masjid to become a place of oppression rather than a beacon of light.
Imagine if this treatment were inflicted upon your own family. Would you remain silent if your father, mother, sister, or brother were forced into unpaid labour while their employers lived in luxury? Why, then, do we accept such treatment for the ustaads who nurture our children?
There has to be end to this cycle of exploitation and corruption. This means holding Manya, Darbar, Desai, and their accomplices accountable for their actions. It means restoring the dignity of the ustaads and rebuilding the masjid/madrasah as a place of justice and integrity.
If we fail to act, we will not only allow this injustice to continue but will also bear responsibility for the consequences. Allah is just, and those who oppress others will face His wrath.
“And do not incline toward those who do wrong, lest the fire touch you, and you have no protectors other than Allah, nor would you then be helped.” (Quran 11:113)
The treatment of madrasah teachers under Manya's leadership is a filthy stain on the legacy of Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam. There must be a demand for justice for those who have been wronged. This is not just about wages—it is about restoring the dignity of an institution that has served generations of Muslims.
To those who put hero worship before Allah’s worship, who supported fasiqoon and fajiroon into positions of amanah, and empowering these individuals, you have contributed to the destruction of the House of Allah and the education of thousands of children.
May Allah’s wrath be upon those who have caused this harm. May those who supported this destruction be ruined in this life and the Hereafter. May their actions serve as a warning for others, and may Allah protect His house and His deen from such vile individuals in the future.
To those complicit in this injustice, reflect on the consequences of your actions. And to those who remain silent, remember that silence in the face of oppression is itself an injustice.