Webpage Stats :
Albania, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Great Britain, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Maldives, Malaysia, Mauritius, Morocco, Netherlands, Pakistan, Panama, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sweden, Türkiye, Ukraine, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates, United States
VPNs, Broadband, and Bold Claims: A Forensic Fantasy
Another day, and another enormously lame attempt at desperately trying to look technically competent cyber forensics.
This attempt at unmasking a website operator is an impressive piece of creative (ChatGPT) writing, but it doesn’t hold up well under scrutiny. Here's why it's more fiction than fact:
Let's start with the break through claim of "the true IP address 81.46.212.88, linked to a residential broadband connection in Blackburn."
While some would have you believe it’s tethered to a cozy broadband connection in Blackburn, reality tells a slightly spicier tale: it’s geolocated in Spain. ¡Olé!
This raises several hilarious possibilities:
Teleporting Broadband:
Perhaps Blackburn has unlocked the secret to instant global travel—but for broadband. One moment, the packets are sipping sangria in sunny Spain; the next, they’re navigating the rainy streets of Lancashire. Truly, a marvel of modern technology.
Blackburn: The New Costa del Sol:
Did someone accidentally type "Blackburn" into Google Translate, and it spat out "Spain"? Or maybe Blackburn has secretly annexed part of the Iberian Peninsula. That would explain the sudden uptick in paella at the local chippy.
VPNception:
Could it be that the accused is using a VPN to appear as if they're in Spain, while the investigator is using another VPN to pretend they're in Blackburn? A classic case of “who’s hiding where?” In the end, the internet may simply be trolling us all.
Inspector Gadget Wi-Fi Edition:
“Go-Go Gadget GeoLocation!” Except the gadget gets it wrong. First Spain, then Blackburn, and next it’ll claim the IP is broadcasting from a Starbucks on Mars.
Claiming 81.46.212.88 as proof of a Blackburn connection while it enjoys the sunshine in Spain is like saying your lost sock is in Narnia because your dryer said so. It’s less an investigation and more an IP guessing game. Viva España, and maybe viva Blackburn too—if it ever turns up!
And now addressing the rest of spiel :
VPN Tracing Mystique:
The claim of using "reverse DNS" and "deep packet inspection" (DPI) to unmask a VPN user is laughable. ProtonVPN encrypts all traffic end-to-end, making DPI useless for revealing the original IP address. VPN endpoints only show the IP assigned by the VPN provider, not the real IP of the user.
Residential Address Magic:
The jump from an IP address to a precise residential address in Blackburn, down to Hayfield in Beardwood, is pure fantasy. No ISP hands out such granular location data to random investigators. This would require either a legal subpoena or outright hacking—neither of which are casually achieved.
Device Specifics Overload:
Listing a Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Android 14 is an attempt to sound technical, but no legitimate investigation would produce this level of unnecessary detail unless the device was physically in hand. Browser fingerprints don’t reveal that much specificity.
Metadata Fairy Tales:
Details like the article's keywords and metadata are amusingly irrelevant to proving the author's identity. Metadata could easily be spoofed or anonymized. Claiming these as "forensic evidence" is reaching.
Over-Complicated Logs:
The log entry’s level of detail reads more like a fictional spy thriller than a genuine investigative report. Real logs would show timestamps, IP addresses, and maybe browser strings—not a full narrative of actions.
Alleged Article Focus:
The attempt to tie the article's content ("Betraying Trust") to the operator's identity is circumstantial at best. The content of an article doesn’t prove who uploaded it. Forensic analysis would require correlating hard evidence like payment data or login credentials—not a dramatic rundown of the text's moral themes.
This "evidence" tries so desperately to sound technical but reads more like an over-the-top attempt to impress with jargon and specificity. It’s the digital equivalent of claiming someone left fingerprints on a hologram. If this is the best they’ve got, Sufyan can sleep easy.
Liars Becoming Leaders in the House of Allah: A Path to the Wrath of the Almighty
Gold Smuggling Convict President, Lookman Yusuf's (Desai) Blatant Lying
For Example LYING to the Charity Commission.
Then You Have Manya Whose Habitual Lying Has Been Exposed Countless Times -
And Musallis Still Expect Their Salaat Behind Him To Be Rewarded ?
Manya, Desai and their ilk, will convince themselves, in order to satisfy their consciences, that they are lying for a good cause - like the Shia rafidhis do by pracisting their kufri belief of "Taqiyyah".
Taqiyyah in their religion means presenting outwardly something that is different from what one believes inwardly, as an act of religious devotion. Thus they attributed lying and deceit to the religion of Allah, wrongfully and out of enmity.
This corrupt belief has nothing to do with the beliefs (‘aqeedah) of Ahl as-Sunnah. According to Ahl as-Sunnah, lying is one of the attributes of the hypocrites. A person may keep on lying and persist in lying until he is recorded with Allah as a liar. These people tell lies and persist in lying in all things, then they regard that as part of their beliefs and religion.
The way of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jama‘ah is based on truthfulness and justice; lying is not part of their religion, praise be to Allah.
"lies are fabricated by those who do not believe”– ad-Da‘ifah (5521)
____________
"A man will continue to lie and he will pursue his lie to the extent that, in the court of Allah Almighty, he is recorded as a great liar" - Tirmizi, vol. 3, p. 391, Hadith. 1978
____________
It was asked : O Messenger of Allah صَلَّى الـلّٰـهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ وَسَلَّم! “Can a believer be a coward?” He replied: “yes.” It was asked: “can a believer be miserly?” He replied: “yes.” Someone asked: “can a believer be a liar?” The noble Prophet صَلَّى الـلّٰـهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ وَسَلَّم stated: “No." - Muwatta Imam Malik, vol. 2, p. 468. Hadees 1913
____________
"peace and serenity can never be found for the one who possesses this trait (lying)." - Adab Al-Dunya Wal-Deen, p. 413
____________
"Lying is the worst of the great sins." - Mu’jam Kabeer, vol. 18. p. 140. Hadith. 293
____________
Reproduced from a Viral Post :
CUBE HR REPORT
Manya’s puppets told the charity commission on Friday 13th December, that they had reinstated Manya on the back of an independent review.
The Charity Commission suspected their timeline did not match the sequence of events. It transpires the request for the independent review was made by Manya and his puppets after they received the HR report, and clearly counter-measured the outcomes.
Altaf Khanjra has been negotiating in the background and the only company to take responsibility to represent Manya was CUBE HR.
CUBE has returned their conclusion of their review, and unlike the HR company which concluded Manya should be dismissed without notice, CUBE has refuted every misconduct under ‘NO EVIDENCE.’
When both reports are compared, the HR company concluding Manya’s dismissal has done so on factual evidence. Whereas CUBE HR has acted biased in their report. CUBE HR needed to protect their reputation, and the most viable rationale to each misconduct that could’ve been accepted from a professional company would only have been ‘No Evidence.’
Now the committee is required to sit down and deliberate which report holds more credibility. One thing is for sure, Desai did not reinstate Manya based on the CUBE report as he claimed in the call to CC. Desai has still not made the minutes of the meeting on Thursday 31st October 2024 available to the full committee, despite numerous requests. Ironically, Manya’s reinstatement was on Halloween night. Desai has either treated or tricked the community.
We will let CC decide in the new year!
“Those who disrespect the Ulama and the Awliya, humiliate and disrespect them when they are laid in their graves, their faces they will be turned away from the Qiblah! I swear by Allah! If you do not believe me, go and check for yourselves.”
Hadhrat Mawlana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi (Allah sanctify his secret)
Reproduced from a Viral Post :
SIGN OF THE LAST HOUR
Over the years we have heard scholars relay numerous signs of the day of judgement. One of the signs we have heard them convey from the Prophet (PBUH) is that the latter nation will insult the former pious predecessors.
In the past months, one of the most gripping revelations that came to light was Manya's comment about the honourable Sheikh, Mufti Taqi Usmani. Manya made a derogatory comment about the Sheikh’s appearance—the very appearance the Lord has fashioned him in. Manya mimicked the Sheikh’s features and then insulted his verdict on an Islamic ruling.
This is a mediocre scholar or an immature scholar mimicking a renowned scholar who is revered for his Islamic expertise. Not only did Manya claim he was much better looking than the Sheikh, but he also asserted he was greater in knowledge.
Manya's corrupted views have radicalised young and old alike over the past 20 years.
Adam Mehboob Khanjra passionately insulted the respected Moulana Ismail Manubari (May the Lord have mercy on him) aiming to build Manya's profile for votes. Adam Khanjra, like his dad, insulted his wider family, commenting, “What has Moulana Ismail Manubari done for the community?"
This was a deliberate attempt to defame a Godly scholar who saw thousands attend his burial ceremony in India and unify opinion that Manya is the only worthy scholar who has served this community. Ultimately, Adam is just a product of Manya's corrupted effect that has enveloped so many in its grasp.
The disease has infiltrated to such an extent that ignorant individuals are insulting Godly scholars who have moved on and met their Lord. Manya's tenure as an imam is a testimony to the prophecy of the Prophet (PBUH) before our own eyes.
Technical Report and Analysis: A Critical Review of “Unmasking the Cloaked Defamation Campaign”
By Aamir Kasim, MSc Cybersecurity, Certified Cyber Forensics Specialist - USA
This report serves as a technical analysis and critique of the investigative claims presented in “Unmasking the Cloaked Defamation Campaign.” While the document purports to outline a multi-layered, cutting-edge cyber forensic investigation, it instead demonstrates a lack of technical coherence, reliance on buzzwords, and overblown assertions that would be better suited for a low-budget Hollywood cyber-thriller than a legitimate forensic report.
The presentation of weak, circumstantial findings as irrefutable evidence reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of cyber forensics and investigative integrity. What we are presented with is not a robust technical analysis but a patchwork narrative that attempts to cloak conjecture in pseudo-technical language.
Report Statement: Investigators accessed historical WHOIS data to link registrants to the domain www.suhailmanya.com.
Technical Analysis:
Accessing WHOIS data, including historical records, is a basic investigative tool, not an advanced technique. Most modern domain registrants utilize privacy protection services or pseudonyms, rendering WHOIS data unreliable as conclusive evidence.
Issues:
Critique:
Claiming WHOIS data as a “critical lead” is not only amateurish but demonstrates a reliance on surface-level tools while presenting them as ground-breaking discoveries.
Report Statement: Investigators “circumvented CDN masking and proxy layers” to uncover the hosting server.
Technical Analysis:
Reverse DNS can reveal IP addresses unless obfuscated by CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) like Cloudflare. CDNs exist specifically to mask hosting servers from discovery. Bypassing such protections is technically implausible without insider access, a severe server misconfiguration, or legal intervention.
Issues:
Critique:
The report treats CDN circumvention as a foregone conclusion, which, without supporting evidence, reads like something lifted from a Hollywood hacking montage.
Report Statement: DPI allowed investigators to analyze network traffic despite VPNs and CDN masking.
Technical Analysis:
DPI is a highly intrusive method requiring network-level access, such as cooperation from Internet Service Providers (ISPs) or court warrants. Furthermore, VPN encryption renders DPI largely ineffective without direct access to the VPN provider’s logs.
Issues:
Critique:
The narrative portrays DPI as a magical tool capable of bypassing encryption and uncovering user identities—claims that belong in a cheap cyber-thriller rather than a professional investigation.
Report Statement: Investigators linked devices to uploads using cookies, screen resolutions, installed fonts, and analytics tags.
Technical Analysis:
Browser fingerprinting, while useful in tracking users, is not unique or definitive evidence of identity. Thousands of devices can share similar screen resolutions, fonts, and browser attributes.
Issues:
Critique:
This claim reflects a misunderstanding of digital fingerprinting as irrefutable evidence. Fonts and screen resolutions are not unique identifiers—such statements are akin to CSI characters enhancing a grainy image to read a license plate. It’s technical sleight-of-hand, not forensic rigor.
Report Statement: A hosting payment was “linked conclusively” to an individual.
Technical Analysis:
While payment trails can provide evidence, they are not conclusive proof of authorship. Hosting payments can be shared, spoofed, or made on behalf of others. Without corroboration, this claim remains baseless.
Issues:
Critique:
Treating payment data as a “smoking gun” overlooks the basic principle that payments alone do not prove operational involvement. This is the investigative equivalent of finding crumbs on a table and declaring, “Case closed—it was you who ate the cake!”
The report is littered with cyber-forensic buzzwords (“deep packet inspection,” “CDN masking,” “reverse DNS”) presented without any technical substantiation. This reflects an effort to overwhelm non-technical readers with jargon to create a veneer of credibility, a very weak one at that.
Examples of Overreach:
Hollywood Comparisons:
The report reads like a montage scene from a B-grade cyber-crime movie where an investigator shouts “I’ve hacked the mainframe!” while green text scrolls across the screen. Real forensic work is methodical, documented, and evidence-driven—qualities entirely absent here.
One of the most glaring failings of the report is its handling of attribution:
The logical leaps here are staggering and betray a fundamental misunderstanding of investigative forensics.
The “Unmasking the Cloaked Defamation Campaign” report is a prime example of investigative theatrics over substance. While peppered with buzzwords and pseudo-technical analysis, it ultimately fails the most basic standards of cyber forensics:
This report is not in any way a serious forensic analysis; it is a very loosely stitched narrative designed to impress the uninitiated. It relies on Hollywood-style exaggeration rather than legitimate technical rigor. For the sake of fairness and accuracy, this investigation requires a complete re-evaluation by independent cybersecurity professionals.
Until then, it serves as a high school Computer Science lesson :
buzzwords, speculation, and theatrics do not make forensics—they make fiction.
Prepared by: Aamir Kasim, MSc Cybersecurity, CISSP, CEH - USA
Certified Cyber Forensics Specialist
Reproduced from a Viral Post :
AKUBAT - AKA A BUTT
Ibrahim Akubat is the most dedicated Manya ally. Akubat has built a career on conflicts. He was cast out by the community in Birmingham for continuously entangling himself against management of any kind. This included both school and mosque management.
Akubat has this MOTO ‘I know better than all’. This is the reason why Akubat and Manya have been strong allies in the recent conflict. Both characters resonate with each other. Akubat and Manya are from the same village in India Gujrat, Sitpon. Their genealogical and geographical background offers them both a similar mindset.
Akubat is not thought of as a regular ‘mosque goer’. He hasn’t really got involved in any activity’s the mosque has had to offer in the past years. Akubat has only ever got involved in conflicts with mosques and institutions.
Although, in the past Manya and Akubat have not seen eye to eye, but a common enemy brings people together i.e. Star academy. Akubat's enmity with Star academy began, when he applied for a Sport teacher’s role and was rejected based on merit. Manya and Akubat both struggle with criticism, regardless how constructive it may be. This inspired Akubat to have a new objective in life ‘To discredit Star Academy’.
Akubat has been instrumental in campaigning for Manya and held a pivotal role within Manya's mob, He led the Charity Commission complaints, Anti Semitism propaganda and created untold discord in the mosque and community.
These commitments Akubat exercised, raised his ranks in the eyes of Manya. Members who were unfortunate to pray their Jummah prayer the day Manya returned to his ‘throne’. Would have witnessed how Manya embraced Akubat for some time. This was Manya's appreciation for Akubat's dedication in destroying and corrupting the community for Manya.
After discussing this incident with some scholars, they pointed out a narration of the Prophet (PBUH):
Satan places his throne over the water, then dispatches his soldiers from the Jinn to tempt people and mislead them. The closest one to Satan is the one who causes the most mischievous deviation among people. One of those devils will come and say to Satan: I did this and that (i.e. I enticed someone to steal, drink, for example). Satan tells him: You did nothing worth the attention. The line continues until one comes up and says: I did not leave so-and-so until I caused dissension between him and the other that he divorced her. Satan shall bring him closer, hug him, and say: It is you (i.e. you are the one who fulfilled my wish of misleading and corrupting people). — Authentic Muslim
Pulling Back the Curtain: Exposing the Baseless Claims Behind the ‘Cloaked Defamation Campaign’
The recent message on unmasking the cloaked defamation campaign appears to be nothing more than a smear campaign cloaked in technical jargon. Notice how the author claims to have uncovered extensive digital evidence, yet fails to present a single verifiable piece of proof. Without concrete data such as actual WHOIS records, certified ISP logs, or authenticated financial documents, their elaborate narrative amounts to hearsay at best.
The claims hinge on highly complex investigative methods that, in reality, would require legal warrants, expert cybersecurity consultants, and official court orders. If the author genuinely possessed such ironclad evidence, the natural course of action would be legal proceedings, not a WhatsApp message broadcast. Real, evidence would prompt immediate takedown requests of the website through internet service provider, domain registrars, or the police. Instead, we see a reliance on unsubstantiated accusations and name dropping of community members and institutions, apparently chosen because (a) they have the skills or resources, and (b) they may have personal grudges or issues with the person at the center of this controversy. Remember, if half of the members voted against this individual, that leaves a potentially large pool of people who might be responsible. Who are they going to attack next?
This sort of unproven finger-pointing, naming individuals based on presumed motives and flimsy connections, reveals the true intent: to sow distrust and drag people’s reputations through the mud. The reliance on technical terminology and supposed “digital fingerprints” without any tangible, publicly verifiable proof suggests an attempt to deceive the audience into believing these grand claims. We’re asked to trust an unknown, anonymous investigator who, if truly in possession of damning evidence, should be knocking on a courtroom door, not sending around a chain message. And we all know they love going to court, they just need an excuse.
What’s ironic is that by repeatedly circulating this message, they’re unintentionally (or intentionally) boosting the site’s visibility. Instead of protecting Suhal Manya’s reputation, this approach only draws more attention to the website, effectively driving more people to the content (check the stats). This counterproductive tactic raises an important question: are these individuals genuinely trying to help Suhal Manya?
Hypocrisy in Preaching Unity While Fomenting Division: The message pretends to advocate for communal integrity, yet it works to fracture trust within the community. If the author genuinely cared about restoring harmony, they would pursue open dialogue, verifiable facts, and constructive solutions, not secretive, self-serving fearmongering.
And let’s not forget, just because one individual’s name is being targeted doesn’t give anyone the right to turn around and do the same to others. Defaming others to “defend” someone else only perpetuates the cycle of mistrust and hostility, ultimately harming the very reputation they claim to protect.
In short, the message that was circulated was crafted to mislead, frighten, and manipulate the community. Without real evidence or legitimate legal follow-through, it’s just another attempt at defamation of community members, one relying on smoke, mirrors, and complex sounding but ultimately empty claims.
WHO LOST?
Manya’s team are in a misconception that they won or came out better in the conflict we have witnessed in the past 7 to 8 months.
Prior to Manya’s bright idea to call out the Trust Board and the committee on the back of a personal matter, Manya was at no obligation to stick to a script or narrative. Manya now, is obliged to speak only what the committee have endorsed is acceptable. Manya would often prolong his talks to show he is not under any management control. Manya now finishes on time. Manya was in complete control of the Madrasah, but policies will dictate the affairs. Manya wanted assets sold, fees have been increased and he is to blame.
Manya wanted the Trust board changed. Manya, no longer can touch Trustees. Manya wanted the committee eliminated. Committee will be elected every year. Manya was regarded as an influential speaker and a scholar advocating religious ethics. Manya is no longer listened to, nor is he regarded as a righteous scholar. Manya held some respect in the eyes of righteous people due to his Imam position. Manya is disgraced and is the only imam to take the Mosque to court as per common knowledge.
Manya was accepted as a speaker of truth, his hypocrisy on many occasions has been made apparent (Phowti Bhowti clip). Manya ousted some sincere individuals from the community. These very individuals are now in the committee. Manya held some trustees as his close allies, these very trustees are now against Manya. Manya claimed to bring people together. Manya has caused unprecedented disunity in the community. Manya has disgraced people associated with him. Manya has decreased reward of the congregation praying behind him. Manya worked to solve problems in the community. Manya himself has become the problem.
To assume the office or a position, doesn’t define victory or loss.
MANYA THE ERISTIC
Manya has ordered some placards to be sent out listing or better put, picturing anyone and everyone, who is thought to be against Manya. On the placards we have 5 scholars from different institutions, professionals from all walks of life, Trustees, Tabligh brothers and 2 institutions marked, to indicate propaganda against Manya is being orchestrated from.
A sound minded individual will only come to one conclusion when one analyses these placards and posters. It’s Manya against the world. Manya has not left any stone unturned in attacking anyone who is a threat to his status, anyone who has progressed in their profession, be it religious or secular.
Mufti Abdul Hamed is continuously targeted for running a successful chain of schools for the Muslims across the country. The very individuals who are in support of Manya are the first one’s to fight for admissions in Star Academy. Manya who is responsible for the Islamic education for our children, has not only bought the Islamic education below standard, but has planted a 150% increase in fees on the parents.
Moulana Rafiq Sufi, who has dedicated his life in Blackburn Darul Uloom and is involved in numerous services for religion, is being pictured as against Manya. Anyone know why? Maybe because Moulana Rafiq Sufi didn’t make him the head for LCM?
Shaikh Imtiyaz Damiyal is listed due to his affiliation with AHF. The very idea Manya wanted to adopt but with a caveat that he will be the principle, and it will run under his command.
Moulana Talha Manubari targeted for voting against Manya. As well as being part of a successful family who are running 100’s of Islamic institutions in India, UK and many parts of the world.
Moulana Farhan Shikora well, we all know why his on the placard. Just doing his job.
These placards have proven only one thing. Which is Manya is an Eristic (someone who argues with the mirror). Manya is unable tolerate anyone being successful in life. Hence why he has targeted almost every institution the Muslims are benefitting from. AHF, Blackburn DU, Blackburn Markaz, LCM and many more.
To Manya, the only person doing any good in the world is himself, and if you are not with him, you’re against him.
A Lesson for the Morons who Concocted the Comical Malarky titled :
"Unmasking the Cloaked Defamation Campaign"
The Streisand Effect refers to a phenomenon where an attempt to suppress, hide, or censor information inadvertently draws more attention to it, often making it more widely known than it otherwise would have been. The effect is named after the American singer and actress Barbra Streisand, stemming from a 2003 incident.
In 2003, Barbra Streisand sued a photographer for $50 million to remove an aerial photograph of her Malibu home from a public collection documenting coastal erosion. Before the lawsuit, the photograph had only been accessed six times, two of which were by Streisand's lawyers. However, after news of the lawsuit broke, the image went viral, gaining significant public attention and being downloaded by thousands of people.
This counterproductive result highlighted how attempts to suppress information in the digital age can backfire, amplifying the very thing someone is trying to conceal.
Corporate or Government Censorship: When an organization or government tries to ban or remove content, such as videos, articles, or memes, it often leads to public backlash and increased attention to the suppressed material.
Social Media: When individuals attempt to remove embarrassing posts or photos, others may repost and amplify them in defiance.
Legal Cases: High-profile lawsuits aiming to suppress specific information often turn the information into a public spectacle, ensuring that more people learn about it.
This phenomenon serves as a lesson for individuals, businesses, and governments navigating the complex dynamics of information in a hyperconnected world.
The Great Toon Cyber Conspiracy: Unmasking suhailmanya.com
Mufti Tariq Masood Gives Point Blank
Naseehah to the Manyas of this World
یہاں سے بات شروع ہی تھی کہ سارے فسادات کی جڑ یہ ہے کہ اپنی ٹانگ سب سے اونچی رکھنا۔ میں، میں، میں، میں ہوں۔ چاہے مذہبی سکولر یہ کام کرے یا کوئی سیاستدان، آپ گھر میں باپ بننے کی کوشش کریں۔ کہیں بھی جب آپ کے اندر "میں" آ جائے گی نا، کمیٹیوں میں بھی ایسا ہی ہوتا ہے۔ کمیٹیوں میں، مسجدوں میں ایک آدمی سب پہ ہاں بھی آئے تو وہاں تو سب کا باپ بن کے بیٹھا ہوتا ہے۔ وہ کہتے ہیں میری بات سنو، میرے علاوہ کسی کی مس نہ سنو۔
ہم نے علماء کو دیکھا ہے، رائے میں اختلاف ہوا تو وہ کہتے ہیں ان سے فتوہ لے لو۔ ہم نے بڑے علماء کو ایسے دیکھا ہے اور چھوٹے لوگ کیا کر رہے ہوتے ہیں؟ مجھ سے لو، میں بتاؤں گا۔ باقی سارے چورن بیچ رہے ہیں، باقی سارے کیا کر رہے ہیں؟ جاہل ہیں، ان کو کیا پتا؟ میں ہوں، میں جہاں میں آگئی۔ چاہے مذہب میں ہو، سیاست میں ہو، کہیں بھی انسان کی گردن میں سریہ آ گیا تو سمجھ لو اب امت سے اس کو خیر نہیں ملنے والی۔ اب خیر نہیں ملے گی اس کو امت سے۔
__________________________________________________
The conversation began with the point that the root of all conflicts is the desire to keep one's leg the highest. "I, I, I am everything." Whether it is a religious scholar doing this or a politician, even at home, someone tries to act like the head of the family. Wherever this "I" enters, the same happens—even in committees. In committees, in mosques, if one person gains dominance, they start behaving like everyone's boss. They say, "Listen to me, don’t listen to anyone else."
We have seen scholars; when there is a difference of opinion, they say, "Take the fatwa from him." We have seen great scholars act like this, so what do the lesser people do? They say, "Come to me, I will tell you. Everyone else is just selling nonsense. What are the others doing? They are ignorant; what do they know? I am the one." Wherever this arrogance enters—whether in religion, politics, or anywhere else—understand that such a person will no longer bring good to the Ummah. They will not bring goodness from the Ummah.
_______________________________________________________________
વાર્તા એ બિંદુથી શરૂ થઈ કે બધી લડાઈઓની મૂળ જડ એ છે કે પોતાની ટાંગ સૌથી ઊંચી રાખવાની ઈચ્છા. "હું, હું, હું જ બધું છું." ચાહે તે કોઈ ધાર્મિક વિદ્વાન હોય કે રાજકારણી, ઘરમાં પણ કોઈક પોતાને ઘરનો વડા બનાવવાનું પ્રયાસ કરે છે. જ્યાં પણ આ "હું" પ્રવેશી જાય, ત્યાં એ જ થાય છે—અથવા તે સમિતિઓમાં જ હોય. સમિતિઓમાં, મસ્જિદોમાં, જો કોઈ એક વ્યક્તિનો પ્રભાવ વધી જાય, તો તે બધા પર બોસની જેમ વર્તવા લાગે છે. તે કહે છે, "મારી વાત સાંભળો, બીજાની વાત ન સાંભળતા."
અમે વિદ્વાનોને જોયા છે; જ્યારે મતોમાં ભિન્નતા આવે છે, ત્યારે તે કહે છે, "એના પાસેથી ફતવો લઈ લો." અમે મોટા વિદ્વાનોને આ રીતે વર્તતા જોયા છે, તો નાના લોકો શું કરે? તે કહે છે, "મારા પાસે આવો, હું કહીશ. બાકી બધા તો ફક્ત બકવાસ વેચી રહ્યા છે. બીજા શું કરે છે? તેઓ અજ્ઞાન છે; તેમને શું ખબર? હું જ તે વ્યક્તિ છું." જ્યાં પણ આ અહંકાર પ્રવેશી જાય—ધર્મમાં હોય કે રાજકારણમાં કે અન્ય ક્યાંક પણ—સમજી જાવ કે આવા વ્યક્તિમાંથી હવે ઉમ્મતને કોઈ ભલાઈ મળવાની નથી. તેમને ઉમ્મત તરફથી ભલાઈ નહીં મળે.
إِذَا رَأَيْتُم طَالِبَ العِلْمِ يَعْتَنِي بِتَزْكِيَتِهَا وَيَبْحَثُ عَنِ التَّزْكِيَاتِ وَيُرِيدُ أَنْ يَرْفَعَ مِنْ شَأْنِهِ فَهَذَا مَرِيضٌ لَا بُدَّ أَنْ يَتَعَالَجَ
If you see a seeker of knowledge who is concerned with self-promotion, seeks praise, and wants to elevate his own status, then this is a sick person who must seek treatment.
إِذَا رَأَيْتُم طَالِبَ العِلْمِ لَا يَسْمَعُ النَّصِيحَةَ، وَلَا يَشْكُرُ النَّاصِحَ، وَلَا يُحِبُّ الإِرْشَادَ وَالتَّوْجِيهَ، فَهَذَا مَرِيضٌ يَجِبُ أَنْ يُعَالِجَ نَفْسَهُ
If you see a seeker of knowledge who does not accept advice, does not thank those who advise him, and does not love guidance and direction, then this is a sick person who needs to correct himself.
إِذَا رَأَيْتُم طَالِبَ العِلْمِ يَفْرَحُ عِنْدَمَا يَسْمَعُ عُيُوبَ الآخَرِينَ وَيَنْشُرُهَا وَيَتَّبِعُهَا وَيُرِيدُ أَنْ يَفْضَحَ إِخْوَانَهُ، وَيَتَتَبَّعَ عَوْرَاتِهِمْ، هَذَا مَرِيضٌ، خَاصَّةً إِذَا كَانَ يَتَتَبَّعُ أَقْرَانَهُ
If you see a seeker of knowledge who rejoices in hearing about others' faults, spreads them, pursues them, and seeks to expose his brothers and follows their shortcomings, then this is a sick person, especially if he focuses on his peers.
إِذَا رَأَيْتُم طَالِبَ العِلْمِ يَحْتَقِرُ مَنْ حَوْلَهُ وَيَسْتَنْكِرُ عَنْ اسْتِشَارَةِ طَلَبَةِ العِلْمِ العُقَلَاءِ الفُضَلَاءِ الَّذِينَ هُمْ أَكْبَرُ مِنْهُ وَقَدْ سَبَقُوهُ فِي الدَّعْوَةِ، فَاعْرِفُوا أَنَّ هَذَا مَرِيضٌ
If you see a seeker of knowledge who looks down on those around him and refuses to consult wise and virtuous students of knowledge who are older than him and have preceded him in the path of dawah (Islamic call), then know that this is a sick person.
إِذَا رَأَيْتُم طَالِبَ العِلْمِ يَتَفَاخَرُ بِنَفْسِهِ وَيُحِبُّ الجِدَالَ وَالمُمَارَاةَ، كَذَلِكَ هَذَا فِيهِ مِنَ المَرَضِ وَالعُجْبِ، يَجِبُ أَنْ يُعَالِجَ نَفْسَهُ
If you see a seeker of knowledge who prides himself, loves argumentation, and engages in disputes, then he too is afflicted with the sickness of arrogance and must correct himself.
يَا إِخْوَتَاهُ، هَذَا العِلْمُ يُؤَدِّبُنَا، يُعَلِّمُنَا التَّوَاضُعَ، يُعَلِّمُنَا الأَدَبَ، يُعَلِّمُنَا أَنْ نَعْرِفَ أَنَّ هُنَاكَ مَنْ سَبَقُونَا بِالعِلْمِ وَالفَضْلِ.
O my brothers, this knowledge disciplines us. It teaches us humility, manners, and to recognize that there are those who have preceded us in knowledge and virtue.
يَجِبُ أَنْ نَحْتَرِمَهُمْ، لِأَنَّكَ إِذَا عَامَلْتَ أُولَئِكَ بِهَذِهِ الأَخْلَاقِ السَّيِّئَةِ، فَإِنَّ الجَزَاءَ مِنْ جِنْسِ العَمَلِ. سَيَأْتِي مَنْ بَعْدَكَ وَسَيُعَامِلُكَ كَمَا عَامَلْتَ غَيْرَكَ، فَلْتَأْتِي النَّاسَ كَمَا تُحِبُّ أَنْ يَأْتِيَ إِلَيْكَ النَّاسُ.
We must respect them because if you treat others with bad manners, then the punishment will match the deed. Those who come after you will treat you just as you treated others. So treat people in the way you would like to be treated.
هَذِهِ أَمْرَاضٌ، وَهِيَ كَثِيرَةٌ، وَهِيَ مِنْ أَمْرَاضِ القُلُوبِ، فَعَلَيْنَا يَا إِخْوَتَاهُ وَيَا طَلَبَةَ العِلْمِ أَنْ نَتَعَلَّمَ فِي دُرُوسِنَا التَّوَاضُعَ
These are diseases, and they are many. They are diseases of the heart. Therefore, O my brothers and seekers of knowledge, we must learn humility in our studies.
Viral post reproduced here :
NO REPORT
No report has been requested from any company in regard to Manya’s unfair treatment. The timeline of Manya’s report does not match how the events have unfolded. Manya in desperation has been holding meetings in the office, to come to some pretence of the report claim.
Manya has put his 8 puppets in an extremely awkward situation. The CC wants to see the report and so do the full committee. CC have told the committee to make the report available for all to see in Fridays meeting. Desai (chairman) has to provide the report to the full committee otherwise more governance gaps and perversion and distortion will have to be logged with CC.
The plan is to delay releasing this report so that time is bought in order to put something together. Desai and his team informed CC, that the reinstatement of Manya was based on an independent review which means the review was concluded and the report was issued by the so called independent company.
The report should be available at anytime when requested, otherwise it’s clear there is no report as per one of the 8 committee members testimony. If Desai does not provide the report in due course, the members have the right to demand an SGM on the grounds of transparency. Desai has a responsibility towards the members, on what his course of action will be in regard to Manya’s position.
Members are still waiting an AGM announcement documented in the constitution that was to take place in December. Desai is responsible towards the charity members to give financial accounts, especially the financial irregularities allegations claims made by Manya.
Desai and Manya’s plan is to dilute the situation and try to manipulate the committee, to come to a decision, allowing Manya to stay. On a separate note Manya is planning to throw Desai under the bus if it means to save himself in this situation and distance himself from his reinstatement decision.
Manya needs to manage damage limitation and resign, or else he is risking MTI being run by the CC. Manya is required to decide, whether his pride is more important to him or the safety of the charity.
Charity Commission Cuts Through Manya
and His Cohorts’ Clueless Muppetry
Viral post reproduced here :
INTEGRITY
The long-awaited charity commission meeting took place today. As expected, the focal point was Manya and his illegal appointment. By now Manya should've been sacked, as the HR report with considerable evidence and thorough investigation concluded dismissal.
CC already had in mind what they wanted to discuss or, better put, tackle. They approached the committee with direct questions on Manya's reinstatement and on what grounds he had been reinstated.
Of course, CC had read the dismissal verdict investigated by Sam Daniel's team from the HR organization. They understood well the self-appointed chairman and his team had acted against integrity and demanded answers.
Desai and his team, as expected, lied their way through the interrogation. Their reasoning or justification for reinstating Manya was that they had acted on the back of an "independent review," and their review concluded Manya had been unfairly treated. Harun Janab tried to distract CC from Manya's topic by claiming, "They (old committee) have stolen £50k from the charity." He was referring to the court case charges. Maybe Harun has forgotten the initial disturbance in the mosque, which led to disagreements upon disagreements initiated by him, ripping a notice from the board. He was confronted the day after and, like Manya, lied it wasn’t him. Although CCTV had captured him, the CC told him to "shut up!"
Here we have two separate reports. One report was thoroughly investigated with concrete evidence, and another report no one has seen. Questions around this report—whether it was carried out before the HR report or after—are still unanswered. What evidence is used in this report? Did Manya raise his concerns with his employer, and where is this logged? Did Manya seek help from independent bodies during his so-called unfair treatment?
CC awaits Manya's bios report from the chairman and his team. The comparison between the two, of course, will be made, and a decision will be required. What the chairman cannot do anymore is act as if "I’m the Chairman".There was much grilling he received for assuming the "I’m the Chairman" attitude in the past month or so. Desai will have to work with the full committee to come to a decision using evidence from both reports and providing rational details on how he has come to a decision.
If anything, life has got very difficult for Manya.
Viral post reproduced here :
PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN
Organising an event like 'Father's and Sons’ for the first time in the history of MTI seems very odd. The timing is also very suspicious when Manya has lost all but blind support in the country, if not the world.
Parents risk destroying the good character of their children by allowing them to be exposed to Manya. Anyone who has embraced Manya as their spiritual guide has lost modesty from their souls. This includes adults and young alike.
The likes of Yakub Khanjra, a multi-million pound business owner behaving like a thug in the mosque, pushing Ali bhai Vika. Altaf Khanjra, details not required. Minhaj Khanjra, attempted theft in the mosque for Manya's sake. Umar Matadar, a young soul, who had it not been for the influence of Manya, would've concentrated on his career. Completely tarnished by sending vile and disgusting messages to 70-year-olds. These individuals and many more destroyed their spiritual well-being by the influence of Manya.
Manya's disease is so contagious that it affected his own family. Noor Manya resorted to swinging a bat and was ready to attack an elder. Idris Manya and his nephews surrounded a Trustee's house, intimidating his wife and daughters.
If anyone assumes that the above was the need of the occasion, then which imam's son would strangle a man in his 50s? An imam’s son should be advocating the character resembling the Prophet (PBUH) and be an exemplar for other such youths in the community, ‘Father like son’ as the saying goes. Manya has been unable to nurture his own children according to Islamic principles. In fact, his effect has rubbed off onto them. His eldest son has also encountered numerous conflicts and has been given a final warning in the Islamic institution in S.A. One of the complaints received was he was relaying different information between teachers, causing friction between them.
Many will ignore the above facts and will console themselves with ‘it's only Quran and Hadith and innocent activities’ for tomorrow's justification. If it was just that, then we would not see an academic relaying Quran and Hadith to the audience, yet the effect of his academia is transparent in his listeners. The verifier relaying his research and evidence through Quran and Hadith, yet the audience are affected by his aura. The Sufi scholar using Quran and Hadith for his view, yet his students are enveloped in the fervour of Sufism. A liberal affecting his audience with his eloquence.
Manya's audience consume his qualities of hatred, pride, vanity, discord, carnage, creating a toxic and suspicious environment, foul-mouthed, disrespect, haughtiness, love of the world, and lies. You choose.
* Carlo Gambino and Thomas Gambino were the father and son Scicilian crime duo that headed the New York Gambino Mafia in the 1960s/70s
Manya, who rarely was interested in accommodating scholars and pious individuals, has organised 2 events in 7 days.
The likes of Peer Abdur Raheem, who has no connection or affiliation with Manya, was invited to a programme to clean up Manya's reputation. Manya couldn't help showing his disrespect even on this occasion. He left without entertaining the guest and didn't partake in the meal with him.
Manya knew well he would have to sit with scholars and pious individuals and face them with a guilty face, and in return, scholars would be unable to speak to Manya on any familiar grounds. These pious individuals and scholars meet and talk about the challenges facing the Muslims. How could Manya sit with them and converse about Muslims' trials and tests when he himself has become the biggest trial for the very community these pious individuals came to advise?
In reality, Manya will not be able to attend any scholarship events, any gatherings where big scholars attend, nor will he be invited to make speeches in gatherings where other righteous scholars are present. Not only is he not fit for these occasions, but he will be a taint to the event and will ultimately void it of any blessings.
So, Manya, in order to gloss over the deep cracks he created and divisions in society, is holding programmes to move attention away from the deep-rooted cause of his fitnah. Holding such programmes like ‘Father and Son,’ playing with emotions and again using emotional blackmail to lure ill-informed and gullible members of the public.
These programmes are nothing new. These have been taking place across the country for over a decade at this time of the year. Some mosques hold sleepovers (Manya's next year's plan, if he survives) to engage the youth and somewhat keep them attached to the mosque. Manya, on many occasions, was approached with this idea in the past years, and he always called this an innovation (Biddah). So why is Manya holding these programmes himself? Manya is no longer serving the community for the sake of the Lord; he is serving the community for the sake of his reputation. Just as the Saudi government is accused of sport washing, Manya is PROGRAMME WASHING.
A Reflection on Lookman Yusuf and Suhail Manya
The unfolding situation at Tauheedul Mosque brings to mind powerful metaphors from history that illuminate the troubling dynamic between LookmanYusuf and Suhail Manya. Yusuf, who might be likened to the “house negro,” and Manya, the “house master,” embody a troubling relationship where loyalty and control intersect in ways that undermine the sanctity and independence of the mosque.
In this metaphor, Lookman Yusuf serves as the “house negro”—a term historically used to describe a person who, in exchange for a semblance of status and favor, would serve his master with unwavering loyalty, often prioritising the master’s interests over the well-being of his own community. Yusuf’s recent appointment as president of the mosque places him in a position of authority, yet this authority is tainted by a sense of obligation and allegiance to his “master,” Manya, whose history is marred by allegations of misconduct. In this light, Yusuf’s role is less about serving the mosque and more about securing his position by maintaining the favor of Manya, his metaphorical master.
Yusuf’s first act as president is revealing: instead of striving to elevate the mosque’s reputation or address the community’s concerns, he hastily reinstates Manya as imam, despite Manya's notorious past and the damage his reputation has caused. This decision mirrors the “house negro’s” role—acting in alignment with the house master’s wishes, perhaps even at the expense of his own integrity or the community’s trust. Rather than using his position to protect the mosque’s sanctity, Yusuf appears to be fulfilling an obligation to Manya, acting as an instrument for Manya's ambitions rather than as a leader for the community.
Suhail Manya, as the “house master,” epitomises the figure who wields influence and control behind the scenes, pulling strings and ensuring that those in positions of authority act according to his will. Manya's background and past controversies would ordinarily preclude him from a trusted leadership role, especially one as sacred as that of an imam. Yet, through his influence over Yusuf, Manya is able to bypass accountability and return to a position of authority, demonstrating the depth of his influence. Like a master who rewards and protects loyal servants, Manya has seemingly groomed Yusuf for this very role, ensuring that his interests are safeguarded and that he can continue to exert influence over the mosque without needing to answer for his actions.
This dynamic is a profound betrayal of the values that a mosque should represent. Rather than fostering a space of spiritual guidance, ethical leadership, and community trust, the relationship between Yusuf and Manya embodies loyalty to power over principle. The community, left as bystanders to this troubling alliance, is forced to watch as decisions affecting their place of worship are made not with their welfare in mind, but with the interests of a few who serve their own agendas.
The relationship between Yusuf and Manya serves as a cautionary example of what can happen when those in power prioritise allegiance over integrity. By allowing such figures to hold sway over the mosque, the sanctity of the space is compromised, and the community’s trust is eroded. True leadership within a mosque demands independence, integrity, and a commitment to uphold Islamic values, not blind loyalty to those who wield influence for self-serving ends.
In the end, the metaphor of the “house negro” and “house master” serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of misplaced loyalty and unchecked influence. It is a call to the community to recognise and reject such dynamics, to demand leaders who act with genuine piety, and to protect the sacred spaces meant to serve as sanctuaries of faith, not tools of manipulation.
Fisq on the Prayer Mat:
Corruption Tainting Our Masjid's Leadership
We have witnessed an unprecedented and deeply troubling display of dishonesty and kufri scheming. The fasiq Suhail Manya and his cohorts, in their relentless campaign to remove the masjid committee and trustees, have spread such overt lies without regard for the harm inflicted on individuals or the community. It is one thing to raise questions or seek accountability, but the methods employed reveal a level of scheming that goes beyond constructive criticism.
Their accusations were not only baseless but also personally targeted, aimed to undermine the character and dedication of those who have, for years, served the masjid with integrity. With complete disregard for truth, they took advantage of community trust, manipulating sentiments and twisting facts, all for personal gain and influence. To falsely accuse individuals, particularly those who have spent countless hours in service of the community, is a grave act, and one that bears consequences not only in this world but in the hereafter as well.
The sad irony is that the very individuals who claim to act in the community's best interest have shown behaviour that lacks the very principles of honesty, humility, and compassion they claim to uphold. Their campaign has ultimately only created division and suspicion, weakening the fabric of unity that a masjid strives to uphold. In an attempt to slander those who truly care for the masjid, they have shown a shocking willingness to sacrifice the community’s peace and cohesion for their own agenda.
The biggest injustice our community faces is that the very individuals who once schemed, slandered, and even resorted to aggressive tactics now hold positions of authority within the masjid committee. These individuals, who have left no stone unturned in their efforts to harm those who served with sincerity, now occupy roles meant to represent the community's values and guide its future. Even more disheartening is that the leader of this group, Suhail Manya, the root of this fusook, discord and malice, now appointed his house negro as president of his own choosing so that he could whisper his desired wishes like he did to previous late president.
To add to the irony, the same fajir Manya, who once led this campaign of fasaad, division and falsehood, now assumes the role of imam leading others in prayer - proving that his puppet house negro that appointed him, did what he was commanded by his house master. The prayer mat—a place that demands humility, sincerity, and purity of heart—has become a platform for one who has shown none of these qualities. It is the highest form of shame to see this position of spiritual leadership held by someone who has displayed immense dishonourable actions in the community's eyes. Among those praying behind him, 99% are undoubtedly more worthy, in sincerity and virtue, to lead the congregation than he is.
This situation underscores a painful reality for the community: that such individuals, having gained influence through manipulation, have been given control over the very space that should be a sanctuary of honesty, peace, and unity.
HOW THE TABLES HAVE TURNED
Manya and Darbar/Patel in their statements to the court, back stabbed MTI by complaining to HMRC and CC around ‘Financial irregularities’ and drafted the ‘Modern day Slavery’ documents with help of Akubat.
Manyas words:
‘I informed the Trustees that the staff members are significantly dissatisfied and are being paid below NMW’
Darbars/Patels words:
‘I have been a teacher in the madrasah since 2009 and have received £75 per week’
Members will remember when Noor Manya was vehemently protesting the increase of fees and was against paying it. He even offered or proposed with a drafted message by Suhail Manya on the WhatsApp announcement group for a ‘respected’ sister to lead the protest outside the mosque office. Firstly, the Manya’s clearly have no respect for other people’s women. Just as Manya has used multiple individuals for his dirty work, he tried to use our mothers and sisters to forego their respect and chastity, and amid men stand and voice ‘LOWER THE FEES, WE WANT MANYA BACK’.
The campaign in October was run on the back of ‘If we come into power we will lower the fees’ Well, well, well (ring a bell), Manya and Lookman Desai have had numerous disagreements on this already. Manya proposed to sell properties and subsidise the fees, so he doesn’t look like a fool or to ease the pressure from him. Lookman, on the other hand with some little brains VU and others have refused and maintained that we can’t sell properties. So now, what can Lookman and his team of 13 do?
They’ve created the monster and now must deal with it. They held a meeting with the 7 outcast members to agree the increase of fees. Of course, the 7 already were in agreement as the Madrasah will not survive otherwise.
We would like to request the Manya family to bring their mothers, sisters and daughters out of their houses and protest at the office entrance. The likes of Zakir Kamboli who claimed ‘all will be revealed’ to elaborate what has been revealed so far? The likes of Farzana Waaka who called the committee thieves, please present your evidence. Suri, who wanted to protest is requested to go to the office and demand lowering fees. Taz who asked us to refer to the court papers point 11 and sue the mosque holds £5 million worth of assets, to demand Lookman to sell and help the poor parents. Munira Apa who thought this was a propaganda against her ‘beloved imam’ to call out Lookman and his team for increasing fees, further fuelling the disgrace of Manya. Talha (Mol Abdullah’s son) asking reason for fees going up after the madrasah started? Still a valid question! Lastly, Mona who continuously moaned, not sure who this is but her moaning is needed more than ever!
Won't Somebody Please Think of the New Car Lease ?
Date: 10/12/2024
السلام عليكم
I hope this letter finds you in the state of vulnerability and naiveness.
As part of our ongoing manipulation and bios management of our soon to be private Madrasah, there are a number of key factors and systems being reviewed. We will only communicate these shenanigans once we work out how to turn the computer on. We have been ordered by our Master to demand outstanding protection money from parents for this term as our Master still has his monthly payment outstanding on his BMW.
In the new year, he is expected to get a new car, and we will have worked out new charges for your child’s below-standard education. As we are planning to increase our Master’s wages and pay him additional payments to sit in his office munching cashew nuts and almonds during Madrasah times, we will offer you a better payment plan, so the money keeps rolling in.
We are currently putting a system in place for parents with financial difficulties; you will have an option to pay in cash directly to our Master, so we don’t have to declare his overall income.
Jazakallahu Khairan for your continued stupidity and blind trust in our manipulating Master. We ask you to continue making dua that you may never come out of your stupidity. Should you have any questions or require further information, please don’t bother as we only give orders.
The 8 Executive Criminals and the 5 Bandits
Payment Schedule | Annual Payment | Termly Payment | Monthly Payment |
---|---|---|---|
Annual Service | £420 | £140 | £52.20 |
Annual Service with MOT | £630 | £210 | £78.75 |
Service/MOT/Valet | £630 (promotional) | £210 | £78.75 |
Service/MOT/Valet and Parking | £80,000.00 | £26,666.00 | £10,000 |
Sort Code: 16-13-26
Account Number: 14075868
Name of Organisation: Suhail Mani Master
Stay Vigilant: Protecting the Integrity of Tauheedul Mosque
It is imperative for all members to be vigilant and fully aware that new co-opted members into the exec committee
DO NOT hold voting rights as stipulated by the mosque’s governing constitution.
The masjid constitution clearly states :
The potential misuse of these co-opted individuals to further an agenda dictated by the fuhrer Manya and his house negro,
Lookman Yusuf, poses a direct threat to the accountability and transparency of the mosque's operations.
Specifically, be on guard against any attempt to:
Override HR Findings: It is feared that resolutions may be proposed to dismiss the conclusions of the HR
investigation, shielding those responsible for improper actions from accountability.
Circumvent Due Process: Co-opting members and granting them illegitimate voting rights would undermine
the rightful voices of the community, wiping out any little trust left in the mosque’s governance.
Let it be absolutely clear:
Co-opted members are brought in to fill gaps in expertise or to provide additional support.
Their presence does NOT grant them the right to vote in any executive committee decision making.
The Eclipse of Scholarship:
How the tyrant Manya Strangled MTI’s Pulpit
What was once a sacred beacon of spiritual enlightenment and scholarly exchange has, over the last two decades, been reduced to a shadow of its former self—all at the hands of one man’s unbridled ego and unchecked authority. MTI, a mosque that once welcomed a rich tapestry of diverse scholars to share the light of divine guidance, now finds itself shackled by the whims of fragile Manya, who has brazenly monopolised its pulpit.
Insecure Manya's inferiority complex has become a chokehold on the community’s spiritual growth. Scholars of great stature from around the globe—whose knowledge and eloquence could have enriched the community—have been systematically excluded, their potential deemed too threatening to his fragile ego. Only his inner circle of sycophants and unremarkable allies have been granted access, ensuring that his unearned limelight remains undisturbed.
This is no accident but a calculated campaign. Over the years, unstable Munya has deliberately diminished the presence of true scholars and dynamic speakers, ensuring that he alone remains the centre of attention. This insecurity has deprived the community of exposure to articulate, influential figures who could have inspired, educated, and elevated them.
Local scholars, young and vibrant with fresh ideas, have repeatedly approached delicate ego'd Manya with offers to organise Qur'anic lessons, improve curricula, and conduct monthly Seerah programmes. Their requests were met not with encouragement, but with outright hostility and authoritarian dismissal. Tyrant Manya's iron-fisted response has forced many of these promising talents to leave, offering their services elsewhere where their efforts are appreciated. MTI, meanwhile, is left with the scraps—content deemed unworthy elsewhere, passed off as sufficient for the community, fragile Manya claims to serve.
The few young scholars still lingering around MTI are mere ornaments, their presence akin to flies swarming over refuse. These individuals—deliberately chosen for their lack of oratory skill or willingness to submit—pose no challenge to zalim Manya's stranglehold. They are not contributors but placeholders, utilised only when Manya's frequent trips to the zina capital of the middle-east, render him unavailable for his own duties.
Adding insult to injury, the so-called president and the obedient House Negro, Lookman Desai, has rubber-stamped Manya the Assad wannabe's tyrannical grip by endorsing a policy that ensures the imam alone conducts all programmes. This deliberate bottleneck reinforces fasiq Manya's dominance, perpetuating a cycle of mediocrity under the guise of leadership.
In truth, facist Manya's reign of zulm represents nothing less than a betrayal of trust—a dereliction of duty owed to the community he claims to lead. He has robbed the mosque of its essence, turning it from a hub of scholarship into a stage for his personal ego.
As the Gujarati proverb aptly warns:
Aundro in basti mey Koryo sardar!
(In a society of the blind, the one-eyed is made king.)
અંધ સમાજમાં એક આંખવાળાને રાજા બનાવવામાં આવે છે
But let us be clear: the one-eyed king is not a leader. He is a pretender, propped up by fear and mediocrity. MTI deserves better. Its people deserve better. The time has come to challenge this monopoly and reclaim the mosque for the benefit of all, not the glorification of one.
The Fasiq Mania May Plot,
But The Ultimate Plan Belongs to Allah
THE PLOT THICKENS
Why ?, you may ask
Why this many changes?
Why put the madrasah in to disrepute
Why upset the ustads
Why put fees up promising better delivery only to reduce teaching time
The answer?
Fasiq Manya doesn't want these ustaads
Fajir Manya doesn't want these students
Zalim Manya doesn't want this madrasah
What the Ghaddar Manya wants is this madrasah to close
He wants to get shot of these ustaads
He wants these students to leave.
He wants to make his own academy in place of it.
He is trying to manipulate the committee into giving him the property to use for free.
Even if he pays, it will be the bare minimum.
He wants to make a Daruloolum in both buildings. He is selling it under the pretence of it saving MTI financially
He wants to break MTI financially, then offer the idea of a Daruloolum to save it. The committee will have no option but to accept.
His goal is to get the building for free. He will run it from 8am to 8 p.m., which will leave no room for a 5pm-7pm madrasah.
He is not thinking about our children, the children that are so eager to go to madrasah.
He does not care about their tarbiyah.
He does not care about our children's future.
It's all about power and control.
It's time now for the ustaads to speak up againt this treachery!!
From Damascus to Bicknell:
The Fall of Tyranny, Big and Small
The unthinkable happened yesterday: Bashar al-Assad, the illusionary strongman who ruled Syria with an iron fist for over two decades, was ousted from power. His once-loyal fighters abandoned him in droves, and the country fell to rebel forces in less than a week. Assad's swift downfall is a stark reminder that no regime—no matter how entrenched—is immune to collapse when its foundations are built on fear and corruption.
Fasiq Manya’s Reign of Deceit
Manya’s "Tarbiyat" Advice:
Hypocrisy at its peak: a man who thrives on conflict and undermines others now lectures on nurturing and unity.
Exploitation of Teachers:
Shamelessly manipulates teachers into unpaid work to fix financial issues he caused by involving HMRC and CC.
Incompetence and Decline:
Over 20 years, Manya dragged the madrasah into decline, yet he now positions himself as a reformer.
Blame-Shifting Tactics:
Uses planted questions and decoys to deflect attention from his role in the madrasah’s troubles.
Conflict and Fees:
Lectures on avoiding conflict despite orchestrating chaos for years; refuses to reduce fees while benefiting from his large salary.
Unqualified Leadership:
Appointed a gold-smuggling convict as chairman with no consultation and no regard for integrity or the community’s trust.
False Slogans of Service for Allah:
All actions—from taking credit for others’ work to forcing unpaid labour—are rooted in self-interest, not faith.
Conclusion:
Manya’s leadership is a textbook case of hypocrisy, manipulation, and self-serving agendas cloaked in false piety. The community must see through his facade before further damage is done.
Hypocrisy Unveiled: The Manipulative Tactics
and Self-Serving Agenda of Fasiq Manya’s Leadership
Maniupulation of the Teachers :
Manya held a meeting with the madrasah teachers, opening with advice on their responsibility toward the "tarbiyat" (nurturing) of students. This introduction was dripping with hypocrisy. Here is a sad excuse for a man who rejected a public apology displayed for all to see, yet now positions himself as a guide for tarbiyat. The irony was not lost on the teachers, many of whom exchanged knowing smirks as the phrase "pot calling the kettle black" seemed to echo in the room.
The glaring contrast between the previous Shura's humility and Manya’s Hitler'esque attitude was so evident. The Shura once invited esteemed scholars like Mufti Inayatullah Sahib, a figure known for his God-fearing nature, to guide the teachers. Fuhrer Manya, on the other hand, deemed himself worthy of this role—despite being the very person who undermined these teachers by reporting supposed flaws to HMRC and the Charity Commission. While he might argue the complaints targeted the trustees, but anyone with an iota’s worth of a brain cell would clearly comprehend that the entire institution and its students were put under jeopardy
Narcissism and Empty Promises
Manya’s disdain for elder scholars and senior alims, who embody humility, stems from his narcissistic belief in his own supremacy. During the meeting, he declared there would be "changes" in the madrasah, implying responsibilities would be reassigned.
However, Manya’s own contributions to Islamic education are negligible. He rarely taught at Bolton Darul Uloom or MTI and is known for stealing credit for the book Zaadul Muslimeen, a project driven by another teacher. Now, he proposes changes modeled on the previous Shura’s efforts but positions himself to take the credit. Over 20 years, he allowed the madrasah to decline, producing huffaz whose recitation resembles a poorly trained villager’s accent rather than the polished tone of capable scholars. The community been here for 60+ years, where Islamic education has advanced to new heights, yet the faux maulwi Manya has dragged the madrasah 20 years if not 40 years behind.
Exploitation of Teachers
The true purpose of the meeting became clear: manipulating teachers into accepting a "subject-based" teaching model. Teachers would teach specific subjects for 1–1.5 hours, with any remaining time considered "voluntary." This cost-cutting measure, veiled as "efficiency," is a direct consequence of the financial strain caused by Manya’s complaints to HMRC and CC.
When a teacher asked about the possibility of volunteering for the full 2.5 hours, Manya cynically replied, "That’s up to them; we can’t force anyone."
It is now clear why this question was strategically posed to the teachers: to emotionally pressure vulnerable individuals into volunteering their time, all while subtly hinting at MTI’s insufficient funds. This approach conveniently avoids any acknowledgment that the current financial strain is a direct result of their own actions. If anyone should be leading by example and offering voluntary service, it is Manya himself. But then, how else will Manya be able to clinch the £30k–50k annual salary that he has had his eyes on for so long ?
Orchestrated Manipulation
Manya used pre-planned decoys to control the meeting’s narrative:
Imtiaz VU, the human doormat, was instructed to bring up the Mixlr service payment, twisted the story to vilify the committee despite knowing the truth.
At the time, Sanaullah Rustam requested the lemming VU to visit the office and handle the payment for the Mixlr service. However, VU declined, stating it was for his book of deeds. Yet, when the opportunity arose, this was spun and presented to the public in a way that painted the committee as malicious.
Additionally, Manya had prepped his gnome of a brother, Noor Manya, regarding the graveyard purchase in Ribble Valley. Munchkin Noor Manya raised the issue during the meeting, and Manya seized the moment to distort the facts entirely, presenting a completely false narrative of the incident. A typical ploy they resort to, to bring up unrelated issues to distract from the real agenda.
Their tactics aimed to shift blame and obscure their own role in the charity’s current financial troubles.
Double Standards on Conflict and Fees
Fuhrer Manya warned teachers about a "zero-tolerance policy" for conflict, a laughable statement coming from the very individual who instigated endless disputes within the institution. When asked if fees would be reduced, his response was a blunt "No," offering no explanation. The hypocrisy deepens when one recalls how Manya’s family protested against previous leadership for less. Maybe someone can locate Noor Manya (use a magnifying glass if necessary) and ask him if he can gather his sisters/mother and wife to protest outside the office ?.
Grandstanding Apologies and Empty Platitudes
The poodle Imtiaz VU offered an insincere apology for the "turbulence" caused by the committee, likened to colonial powers destroying nations and then claiming to rebuild them. Manya’s self-appointed house negro of a chairman, Lookman Yusuf Desai, introduced himself as "the chairman" while advising teachers to teach "for the sake of Allah." This from a man with a history of gold smuggling, whose rise to power involved blatant manipulation and deceit. The House Nigger has to obey his master !!
All this aligns with the hadith of the beloved Prophet (peace be upon him), which warns of the signs of the Day of Judgment: when leadership and responsibility are entrusted to the worst and most unfit individuals.
Consider Manya's actions: instigating riots in the mosque, with his brother wielding a basebll bat; orchestrating online and door-to-door petitions; The Bruce Forsyth tribute act, Altaf Khanjra behaving disgracefully on the mosque steps; Manya, Darbar, and Akubat filing complaints with the Charity Commission and HMRC about the madrasah's infrastructure; dragging the mosque into court; blatant irregularities in the last election; and appointing a chairman, secretary, and treasurer without proper consultation of the elected committee. All of this, forced upon the community without allowing a fair investigation— was this truly for the sake of Allah?
Or simply for Manya’s own interests?
If you are still confused, then consider the kufri act, when Ilyas Musa Patel/Darbar (no one knows for sure what his surname is) announced madrasah closure in May, well was that for the sake of Allah as well?
A Thief Knows a Thief as a Wolf Knows a Wolf
It is no surprise that Manya, with his questionable track record, has chosen someone like Kovariwala—a man involved in numerous bankruptcies—to act as his mediator. This is a classic case of how a fasiq (an openly sinful or corrupt individual) is naturally drawn to another of similar character. The Qur'an and Islamic teachings warn us about the company we keep, as it often reflects and reinforces one’s true nature:
"The wrongdoers are allies of one another, but Allah is the ally of the righteous." (Surah Al-Jathiyah, 45:19)
Birds of a Feather: Just as honest people seek out honesty, fasiqs gravitate toward others who will justify or enable their corruption. By appointing Kovariwala —a person with a trail of financial ruin and dishonesty—Manya has shown his reliance on a network of those who prioritize self-interest over accountability.
Reinforcement of Sin: A fasiq surrounds himself with others who will not challenge his actions, ensuring that wrongdoing becomes normalized. Kovariwala's history of financial irresponsibility aligns perfectly with the kind of moral flexibility Manya seems to value in his allies.
This unholy alliance is not just a reflection of poor leadership but a dangerous pattern that threatens the integrity of our community. It is a stark reminder of the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) warning:
"A man is upon the religion of his close friend, so let one of you look at whom he befriends." (Sunan Abi Dawood, 4833)
The Bitter Irony: The Liars,
Thieves, and Disgraced Behind the Scenes
"Irony" is a word deeply rooted in history, stemming from the Greek eironeia, meaning "simulated ignorance"—a fitting description for those who have shamelessly masqueraded as champions of justice, only to reveal themselves as wolves in sheep's clothing. Let us examine the bitter irony of their actions:
The same individuals who:
The same individuals who:
These self-proclaimed "pillars of the community," who claim to be on the "front lines nurturing our children," are nothing more than pickpockets. Yes, thieves. Dishonored, disgraced, and devoid of honesty, these individuals now turn their sights on the ustaads—those who have tirelessly served our community.
These liars, who once loudly demanded fair wages for the ustaads, are now working behind closed doors to strip them of their rightful earnings. Here’s the vile ultimatum they are forcing on our hardworking educators:
Ustaads have reportedly been approached, coerced, and guilt-tripped in recent days. Seeds of manipulation have been planted, and the message is clear: "Do as we say, or else."
These people are pressuring the very backbone of our community—our educators—to sacrifice their livelihoods. Reputations are being threatened, and fear tactics are being used to force compliance. These are the same individuals who once cried about wages but now conspire to take them away.
We demand answers for the destruction they have caused:
These individuals have stolen from us:
This cannot continue. The community must act before more damage is done. Stand up. Speak out. Protect the pillars of Tauheedul—our ustaads, our masjid, and our values. If we remain silent, we risk losing everything to these thieves who hide behind false pretenses.
Enough is enough.
Bartering Paradise for Power :
The Spiritual Peril of Ignoring a Father’s Dying Wish
Hafiz Desai رحمه الله called all his sons together before his passing and instructed
them to stay away from involvement in mosque affairs.
What do Lukman and Sajid Desai do? Overwhelmed by their blind allegiance
to a Suhail Maniac, they disregard their father’s final wishes and exchange
the key to Paradise for the key to an office.
The scenario presented is one of immense spiritual gravity, especially when
viewed through the lens of Sharia. Ignoring or acting contrary to a parent’s dying
wishes is not a matter to be taken lightly in Islam. Let us unpack the potential
consequences and reflect on the seriousness of such actions.
The Sanctity of a Parent’s Wishes in Islam
In Islam, fulfilling the wishes of one’s parents—especially those expressed during
their final moments—is not merely a matter of etiquette but a profound moral obligation.
Allah commands in the Qur'an:
"And We have enjoined upon man [care] for his parents. His mother carried him, [increasing her]
in weakness upon weakness, and his weaning is in two years. Be grateful to Me
and to your parents; to Me is the [final] destination." (Surah Luqman, 31:14)
How sadly ironic that the very name of the surah where this is emphasised is
disregarded by someone who bears the same name.
This verse emphasises the deep debt we owe to our parents, who are second only
to Allah in deserving our obedience and gratitude. Disregarding a parent's
sincere and final advice, especially when it concerns matters of deen, is an
act that not only risks Allah’s displeasure but also jeopardizes one’s standing
in the Hereafter.
The Prophetic Warning on Disobedience to Parents
The Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said:
"Shall I not inform you of the gravest sins?" They said, "Yes, O Messenger of Allah."
He said, "Associating others with Allah, and disobedience to parents." (Sahih al-Bukhari, 2654)
and
"jannah lies beneath their (parents) feet." -مرقاة المفاتيح شرح مشكاة المصابيح – (ج 9 / ص 157)
By ignoring their father’s advice to refrain from mosque dealings, Lookman and
Sajid Desai have potentially committed an act of grave disobedience. Their father’s
request was clear and rooted in wisdom—to avoid entanglement in disputes and politics
that often taint the sanctity of serving in Allah’s house. Disregarding this advice
for worldly gains, such as obtaining "office keys," reflects misplaced priorities
and a stark deviation from Islamic ethics.
Bartering Paradise for Office Keys
The imagery of "bartering the key of Paradise for the office key" is particularly
striking and deeply symbolic. In Islam, the "key to Paradise" is earned
through sincere faith, righteous actions, and fulfilling one’s obligations to
Allah and others—including honouring parental rights. When worldly pursuits, such
as the desire for power or influence in a mosque committee, override the eternal
significance of Paradise, it is an act of spiritual bankruptcy.
The Qur'an warns about such trade-offs:
"They are those who have purchased the life of this world at the price of
the Hereafter. Their torment shall not be lightened, nor
shall they be helped." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:86)
This verse serves as a dire reminder that prioritising worldly gains at the
expense of one’s Hereafter is a loss of unimaginable proportions.
The Broader Consequences of Ignoring Such Advice
Loss of Barakah (Blessings): By ignoring their father’s advice, Lookman and
Sajid Desai risk losing barakah in their endeavours, as Allah’s blessings are
closely tied to obedience and gratitude towards parents.
Damage to Family Legacy: Their father’s wisdom and legacy may be overshadowed
by the consequences of their actions. Instead of honouring his memory, they risk
tarnishing it by going against his guidance.
Accountability in the Hereafter: The sons will have to answer to Allah for their
actions. The gravity of ignoring a father’s dying wish, particularly one tied to
spiritual well-being, will not be overlooked on the Day of Judgment.
Community Disgrace: The community will inevitably view their actions as self-serving,
which undermines not only their personal reputation but also the trust placed in them
to act in the best interest of the masjid and its congregation.
A Call for Reflection and Repentance
It is not too late for Lookman and Sajid Desai to reflect on their actions. They
must recognise the spiritual and communal harm caused by disregarding their father’s
wishes. The doors of repentance are always open, and Allah is Most Forgiving to
those who turn to Him sincerely.
They should:
Seek Forgiveness from Allah: Repent sincerely for disobeying their father and
prioritising worldly matters over the Hereafter.
Rectify the Wrong: Step back from their current roles and realign their actions
with the advice given by their late father.
Rebuild Trust: Re-establish themselves as trustworthy individuals by prioritizing
the community’s benefit over personal gain.
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said:
"The pleasure of the Lord is in the pleasure of the parent, and the displeasure
of the Lord is in the displeasure of the parent." (Sunan al-Tirmidhi, 1899)
Their father’s advice was given out of love and foresight. Disregarding it is a matter
of immense consequence—not just in this world but in the eternal life to come.
May Allah guide them to reflect, repent, and rectify their actions
before it is too late. Ameen.
THOUSANDS of muslims consumed
haram KFC food due to the fasiq
and fajir Manya proclaiming it as halal
(click above image for court case details)
KFC lost its case after years of attempting to
claim that its burgers are made from 100% chicken.
It was revealed that only 15% of the content is
chicken, while the remaining 85% consists of ingredients
deemed unsuitable for human consumption, fit only for animal feed.
In addition, the Council of Islamic Justice has revoked
its halal certification after discovering that the spices,
ketchup, and mayonnaise used in their products are reportedly
mixed with substances derived from pork fat.
THOUSANDS of Muslims were deceived into consuming haram
KFC food because of the blatant lies and treachery of the
fasiq and fajir Manya, who falsely declared it halal.
Now remember who arrogantly and shamelessly declared it halal ?
The Halalization of the Haram - Rasputin and his KFC love affair
A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing:
The Deception of Suhail Manya
and the Betrayal of
Marhoom Rafique Buksh (Rahimahullah)
Posted as received - verbatim
I write these words with a heavy heart, as someone who had the
enormous privilege of spending over two decades in the company
of Marhoom Rafique Bhai (Rahimahullah). Together, we travelled
far and wide in the path of Allah—across the UK, Europe and to
India and Pakistan, and beyond—calling people to the Deen and
witnessing first-hand the transformative power of his sincerity
and dedication. His life was one of immense khidmat (service), and his
contributions to the Ummah remain immeasurable. Not a single soul
that had the fortune to come in personal contact with him, will
have anything but pure praise for his istiqamat for striving
in Allah's cause, right from his early adulthood days, all the way
to his last breath.
In his final years, many illnesses and advancing age led him to a life of
relative solitude, away from the noise of society and the distractions
of this dunya. It was a time of quiet reflection for him, but also,
unfortunately, a time when others sought to exploit his trust and good
name. For too long, I remained silent, out of respect for his state
and the delicate circumstances surrounding the events I will now recount.
But with his passing into Allah’s mercy, I feel compelled to speak—to clear
his name and the names of the other innocent trustees who were unwittingly
caught in the web of deception spun by the despised persona of Suhail Manya.
Let it be known to all that Marhoom Rafique Bhai (Rahimahullah), along with
the others who were duped into becoming trustees, bear no fault or
misdeed in what transpired. Their innocence is beyond question, and
their integrity remains intact. What follows is a necessary account,
not only to exonerate the marhoom and his fellow trustees but also
to shed light on the deceitful actions of those who sought to exploit
their trust and piety.
In the history of our community, there are tales of immense sacrifice and
service, of individuals who dedicated their lives to the upliftment of Deen
and the betterment of society. Among such luminaries was
Marhoom Rafique Buksh (Rahimahullah), a man who devoted over five decades in the
path of Allah, leaving an indelible mark on countless hearts. It is with heavy
hearts that we recount the vile actions of Suhail Manya, a man who not only tarnished
his own soul but also exploited the trust of innocent servants of Allah.
Rafique Bhai's journey began in the 1970s, a time when the Ummah in the UK was
seeking guidance and direction. He stood steadfast with pious elders like
Hafiz Patel (Rahimahullah) Marhoom Vali Bhai (Rahimahullah),
Marhoom Ismail Master (Rahimahullah), Haroon Bhai and many others, all
beacons of Tabligh and Da'wah. Together they traversed towns and cities,
calling people to Allah, revitalising hearts, and awakening a sense
of purpose in the youth. The fruits of their efforts were monumental: countless
young men and women, once lost to the distractions of dunya, found their way back
to the Deen. Rafique Bhai’s sincerity, humility, and tireless commitment became a
hallmark of his service.
He was not merely a figure of inspiration; he was a pillar of trust, a man whose
heart radiated goodwill, and whose actions spoke louder than words. His assumption
of goodness in others was a reflection of his own pure soul—a trait that would
tragically be exploited by Suhail Manya, a scoundrel cloaked in the garb of religiosity.
The Deception of Suhail Manya
Manya, the self-styled ungodly monk of our times, honed his craft as a manipulator
par excellence. His evil tongue, sharp with deception, sought out the pious and
sincere, knowing full well that their trust and innocence made them easy prey.
Rafique Bhai, with his lifetime of selfless service, was the perfect target for
this schemer’s vile machinations.
Manya, under the pretence of noble intentions, sweet-talked Rafique Bhai into
becoming a trustee of what appeared to be a reputable charity. Unknown to
Rafique Bhai, this charity was a fake—a shadowy mimicry of the Bolton Darul
Uloom it purported to represent. Using the same name and details, Manya orchestrated
a scheme to move assets from the genuine institution into his fraudulent venture.
His intention was clear: to place mukhlis (sincere) individuals in positions of
authority, only to manipulate them later for his own nefarious goals.
The Unveiling of a Fraud
By the infinite mercy of Allah, Manya’s plotting was exposed. The moment
Rafique Bhai and the other duped trustees realised the extent of the treachery,
they withdrew in utter shock and disbelief. Their hearts, once filled with trust,
were shattered by the realisation that they had been pawns in a game
of greed and deception.
Rafique Bhai, a man who would have never knowingly associated himself with
dishonesty, confided in me that he was left bewildered by the audacity
of Manya’s actions. His withdrawal was swift and unequivocal—a testament
to his unwavering adherence to the principles of truth and integrity.
The Legacy of Rafique Bhai vs. The Disgrace of Manya
Today, Rafique Bhai rests in Allah's mercy, his decades of service undoubtedly
earning him the eternal pleasures of Jannah. His immense contributions to the Deen,
his sacrifices, and the countless lives he touched stand as an enduring legacy.
His story is a reminder of the beauty of sincerity and the power of steadfastness
in the path of Allah.
In stark contrast, Suhail Manya and his evil ilk remain stained by their treachery.
Such individuals should hang their heads in utter shame. Were Shari'ah law to be
applied, their punishment would serve as a deterrent for others who dare to exploit
the trust of the Ummah. Flogging or whipping would be a fitting recompense for the
deceit and harm they have caused.
A Warning to the Blind Followers
Let this also be a warning to those who continue to cheer Manya on, blind to
his evil. Those who choose to worship him as if he were a demigod (shakhsiyat parast),
immune to accountability, are engaging in an act perilously close
to shirk. Turning a blind eye to oppression, deaf ears to cries of truth,
and sealed hearts to justice are all traits condemned in the Qur’an.
May Allah’s justice be swift and decisive, exposing the hidden evil in this
world and holding the perpetrators accountable in the Hereafter. As for
Rafique Bhai and all the sincere trustees duped by Manya, their innocence
is known to Allah, and their intentions will be rewarded in full measure.
May we take heed from this tale and never allow such wolves in sheep’s
clothing to prey upon the sincere again. May Allah protect His Deen,
expose the hypocrites, and elevate the ranks of those who sincerely
serve His cause.
Ameen
Yet Another Shaykh/Maulana
Calls Out Manya as a
"total hypocrite"
MANYA's moto : "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO !!"
19th July 2007: Police on course to learn Islamic issues
(https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/1557530.police-on-course-to-learn-islamic-issues/):
Police recruits at the Islamic College with, front from left, Chief Insp Peter Matthews,
Siraj Madari, of the college academic board, Deborah Braithwaite, Greater Manchester
Police human resources manager, college principal Suhel Manya...
______________________
4th May 2024: Joint Statement of Muslim Scholars (‘Ulamā’) on Free-Mixing
Signatory #24: Mawlana Suhail Manya (Blackburn, UK)
I genuinely wonder how does it feel like having a total hypocrite as one of the
signatories to your 'fatwa'. Of course, the whole bunch of them don't like the
questions being lobbed at them about the application of tafsiq on countless scholars,
because not only will they have to declare them to be fussaq, they'll end up declaring
a bunch of the signatories to be fussaq as well.
Maulana Ismail Ibrahim - UK
The Clueless Muppets of Chaos:
Lookman Yusuf, Suhail Manya, and
the Treasurer Iqbal Mania's Stupidity –
A Recipe for the Masjid’s Destruction
This toxic combination of criminality, stupidity,
and manipulation is leading our masjid to ruin.
" It’s absolutely clear the new treasurer is an absolute
numpty who doesn’t even know how to read a bank statement
and sends out public notices on mosque notice board with
incorrect and false information, the guy was shown
statements with ivermectin 100k in the mosque account
and he decided to only use the one account with 33k in it "
Betrayal and Chaos: The Devastating
Legacy of The Reprobates
Manya, Khanjra and Kowari
A message is circulating claiming that the Trustees
and Committee refused to listen before the court case.
Let’s be absolutely clear—this is false.
Hfz Zuber Bharuchi (EG) attempted to mediate, and the
Committee at the time, led by Imran Fasiwala, was
willing to make significant sacrifices. They were prepared
for a complete reset, with Manya stepping down and the
Committee resigning to start afresh. However, this goodwill
was met with one non-negotiable demand from the opposing
side: the reinstatement of Suhail Manya, their Guru and Peer Saab.
Despite offers of democratic resolution through a ballot box
election, they outright refused. Instead, they forced the matter
into court, driving up costs and showing a blatant disregard for
the masjid’s resources.
The court case wasn’t just about elections. Let’s not forget
the serious allegations of fraud against the defendants, the
Trustees’ dismissal, and the urgent need to address Manya’s
HR disciplinary case. Yet, Khanjra and Kowari consistently chose
to disregard all of this, dragging the masjid further into chaos
and squandering its funds.
Now, let’s talk about the real cost of their mismanagement.
The madrasah is staring at a minimum deficit of £150,000, thanks
to shysters Altaf Khanjra and Suhail Manya. That’s undeniable.
To put this into perspective:
- The September salary bill alone hit an alarming £53,000, a
more than 100% increase from the previous month.
- With these spiralling costs, parents are being forced to bear
the burden, with fees expected to rise to £15 per week just to
break even. And this doesn’t even account for the
minimum wage and NI increases in April 2025.
This isn’t just a misstep; it’s a disaster of epic proportions,
engineered by the goondas Khanjra, Kowari, and Manya. Their
incompetence and self-serving decisions have left a legacy of division,
financial ruin, and an uphill battle for the masjid and madrasah.
Manya, Khanjra, Kowari—this mess is your doing, and the
community will not forget.
Financial Turmoil Unveiled: How Phowti
& Bhowti Court Action by Altaf Khanjra,
Suhail Manya, Ilyas Darbar Drained
£80,000 from Our Masjid
This message on whatsapp has gone viral :
FINANCE !! FINANCE !! FINANCE
While careful budgeting and fiscal oversight has always remain the priority
for the masjid, there is no doubt that unforeseen circumstances have impacted
reserve levels in the past 6 months.
Firstly, an unexpected High Court case led to substantial legal expenses.
Despite best efforts to manage these costs, the complexity and scope of
the case extended beyond original projections, significantly increasing the
financial burden. Apparently approximately £70,000 was spent.
Let’s ask the question who took the masjid to court ? Altaf Khanjra & Co and
Suhail Manya. Even the judge in his ruling said it would be unfair for the
defendants to be personally liable for the cost. The Trustees and
Executive Committee were defending the masjid from these scoundrels
and therefore had no choice but to defend the masjid and still are.
Don't forget, it cost the masjid an additional £10,000 to go back to the
high court for the judge to approve a ballot election just because
Altaf Khanjra/Imran Kowari & Co and Suhail Manya wanted a show of hands for the
election and would not back down.
Honestly, these guys have been bullies all the way. Why ? Because they
have the money to be bullies !!
Secondly, a rise in teacher salaries, above initial expectations, has
also contributed to reserve reductions. Again who wrote in their witness
statements about wages etc… ? Altaf Khanjra (did a maths lesson in his statement)
and Suhail Manya and Ilyas Darbar did the same. The madrassa on the back
of their witness statement is expecting an annual deficit of approx £150,000 a year.
Come on Altaf Khanjra and Imran Kowari put your hands in your pockets
please to help with this deficit.
These circumstances were beyond initial forecast but were necessary
to protect the masjid.
The allegations about lack of transparency / hand over are all false
and everything has been provided to Iqbal Mania and somethings can’t be
provided like Charity Commission access codes. These belong to the Trustees,
always has been.
Lookman Desai (Mr Chairman) I think you need to make a few phone calls
my friend, call in them favours.
Betraying the House of Allah:
How Greed and Corruption Drained
15+ Years of Mosque Stability
For over 15 years, under the careful stewardship of the previous committee,
and presidency of the late Hafiz Desai and with the support of dedicated
trustees, the Tauheedul Mosque maintained a consistently healthy financial
balance. Year after year, they managed the funds responsibly, and as of
May/June 2024, they had nearly £190,000. Fast forward a few
months, and that balance has plummeted. What exactly happened in
this short period? Let's do some rational thinking. Did the funds mysteriously
decide to leave on their own? Was the mosque conned by some "Nigerian prince"
offering millions in exchange for a release fee? Or was it the scheming
of a scoundrel who, after the president’s passing, saw an opportunity to
seize control of the mosque, appoint his own puppets as trustees and president,
and drain its resources?
Enter Suhail Manya, the devil incarnate, and his band of akhlaqless money-obsessed
followers. Not satisfied with the mosque’s stable financial legacy, they
launched a "phowti" and "bhowti" court case, dragging the mosque to high
court and running up tens of thousands in costs—costs that the mosque simply
couldn’t sustain, but which the namak haram mafia found no problem funding from
their side. His dajjalic cursed gang's endeavour was to drain the masjid's
resources by taking it to court. Not some small claims court, but the high court.
Where costs spiral to eye watering sums. They had the money goondas on
their side, to withstand no matter what cost but then
the masjid didnt have deep pockets.
The Manya mafia scum didnt really care about the high court costs in
the 10s of 1000s that the masjid had to bear because a bunch of evil shyshters
thought it was some sort of good deed to take the House of Allah to
a "phwoti" and "bhowti" kuffar court.
For over 15 years, the mosque thrived financially. Then, almost immediately after
May or June 2024, the decline began. It doesn’t take Price Waterhouse to figure out what changed.
Allah's curse be upon those who bought His house into disrepute and dragged
it into the Kuffar "phowti" and "bhowti" courts.
Suhail Manya’s Mafia Cult Wasting
Over £150,000 in Haraam Kuffaar
"Phowti" and "Bhowti" Court Battles
Letter as received, posted verbatim :
by Mufti Umar Ismail Moosa - South Africa
The Manya Cult’s haraam, satanic, and Imaan-destroying
fighting has corrupted the faith and morals of those
ensnared in its web. This deviant mafia has devolved into
a cult that is steadily degrading both the Akhlaaq and Imaan
of the Muslim community. The exorbitant sums of money this
vile faction has squandered on kufaar court cases reveal the
malicious intentions and vile objectives of the human shayaateen
leading this wayward group, operating under the reprehensible
influence of Manya and his gang of goondas (thugs).
These goondas are being driven by Iblees, who has become
the sheikh of their faction. Manya, the devil incarnate, has
gone from condemning others for seeking justice in
"phowti" and "bhowti" avenues to hypocritically doing the
same – a clear display of his munafiq nature. Today, his
khwaarij faction stands as brothers of Iblees, wasting tens
of thousands of pounds on utterly haraam avenues.
In addition to being Shaitaan’s companions through their
reckless spending, they are corrupters of the Deen, using
it as a cover to peddle their own desires for enmity and
animosity. Their shaitaani gatherings, cloaked in the guise
of preaching, are just social events under the pretense
of righteousness.
This hell-bent cult represents one of the clearest signs
of the approaching Hour of Qiyaamah, as described in the Hadith:
“…the dunya will be pursued with the amal (deeds) of the Aakhirat.”
May Allah Ta’ala save this fallen and disgraced Ummah from the
clutches of these human devils who hide their wickedness
behind a facade of Deeni deeds.
A Concerned Resident's Letter
Letter posted as received, verbatim
I am disappointed by the way Suhail Manya has conducted himself.
His behaviour, marked by a bullying, overpowering nature, has been
especially troubling as he’s targeted Bhai Sabir Esa Vakil. This
kind of conduct not only harms those directly involved but also
impacts the community as a whole. I truly hope for a resolution
where respect and compassion take precedence, allowing everyone
to move forward in a more positive and supportive environment.
It’s truly disheartening to see the disruption and division that
Suhail Manya's actions have caused within our community. His
approach has not only unsettled the harmony we’ve worked hard
to maintain but has also created unnecessary tension among
community members. A united community is our strength, and
actions that drive wedges between us weaken our bonds and sense
of solidarity. I hope we can find a way to heal these divisions
and restore the mutual respect and unity that our community deserves.
As a member of Masjid e Irfan, I feel embarrassed that Suhail Manya
is behaving like this. Suhail Manya is nothing but a narcissist,
rude, bully. Attacking our elders and those that have passed away.
He should step down and resign, running a charity under Hope
and Help but too busy getting government funding.
Signed: Mrs S. M. D., Blackburn
Open Letter of Clarification
Regarding the Masjid Cemetery Project
Letter posted as received, verbatim :
As salamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
Bismillah-ir-Rahman-ir-Rahim
As I sit here in front of the Kaaba, with Allah as my
witness, I want to address the slander and accusations
being spread about me and the masjid committee regarding
the cemetery planning application.
Firstly, let me be clear: I have forgiven all of those
who have falsely pointed fingers at me and the masjid
committee that was involved at the time. At every stage
of the application process, the late Hafezi Mama Desai,
may Allah grant him the highest rank in Jannah, approved
our actions. Every penny spent on the project was approved
by him, and we took every possible precaution to prevent
any misuse or loss of funds. These are the true facts,
and Allah is my witness.
Now, I ask you to reflect on the situation: Who has truly
benefited the most from the cemetery application? The land
was originally purchased for approximately £110,000. Today,
its value is close to £500,000, and if planning permission
is granted, it could be worth between £11 million and
£20 million. Why, then, did the family who owns the
land withdraw the application right on the eve of its
submission?
Even if the application had failed, we had secured a
“no win, no fee” agreement with a specialised planning firm.
This meant there was no financial risk to the masjid—it was
a win-win situation. Yet, despite knowing this, the
family and their advisors chose to pull the application.
As for myself, I have always acted with integrity and
with the best interests of the community at heart. If I
have wronged anyone or spoken falsely, then I will answer
to Allah. My conscience is clear, and I have served our
masjid and community to the best of my abilities, always
with Allah’s guidance.
May Allah protect us all from greed, hypocrisy, and false
accusations, and may He guide us to the truth.
Sabir Vakil
Reading Salaah Behind The
Malignant Major Sinner
S. Manya Is Makruh Tahrimi
مکروہ تَحریمی - Are Actions Viewed in the
Same Manner as HARAM Actions
Tauheedul's Tragic Tale
Oh Tauheedul Mosque, what a sight,
Once pure as day, now lost to night.
Once stood for justice, now it’s clear,
A stage where puppets draw near.
Lookman "house nigger" Yusuf, so bold,
With gold-stained smuggled hands, in power enrolled.
Anointed now to lead the scene,
But does he know what leading means?
Beside him stands his tyrant "master" proud,
The house-master Manya, arrogant head unbowed.
Returned to rule with evil deeds concealed,
Their shadows long, intentions sealed.
A pair of devilish partners, flawed and vain,
Who shroud the mosque in lasting stain.
Instead of guidance, trust, and care,
It’s vanity and shame they proudly share.
The faithful murmur, hearts betrayed,
For house master and house nigger, role replayed.
A sacred space, now cloaked in jest,
By those unfit to lead the blessed.
Tauheedul Mosque, what will you choose?
The path of purity or power’s ruse?
Let voices rise, let truth be told—
It’s time for courage to take hold.
_________________________________________
توحید المسجد کی المناک کہانی
اے توحید المسجد کیا نظارہ ہے
کبھی دن کی طرح پاک تھا، اب رات میں کھو گیا ہے۔
کبھی انصاف کے لیے کھڑا تھا، اب صاف ہے
ایک مرحلہ جہاں کٹھ پتلیاں قریب آتی ہیں۔
لقمان "گھر نیگرو" یوسف، اتنا بے باک،
سونے سے داغے ہوئے اسمگلنگ کے ہاتھوں، اقتدار میں اندراج۔
منظر کی قیادت کے لیے اب مسح کیا گیا،
لیکن کیا وہ جانتا ہے کہ معروف کا کیا مطلب ہے؟
اس کے پاس اس کا ظالم "آقا" فخر سے کھڑا ہے،
گھر کا مالک مانیا، مغرور سر جھکا ہوا ہے۔
برے کاموں کو چھپا کر حکمرانی میں لوٹا،
ان کے سائے لمبے، ارادوں پر مہر۔
شیطانی ساتھیوں کا ایک جوڑا، ناقص اور بیکار،
جس نے مسجد کو دائمی داغ میں کفن دیا۔
رہنمائی، بھروسے اور دیکھ بھال کے بجائے،
یہ باطل اور شرم کی بات ہے جو وہ فخر سے بانٹتے ہیں۔
وفادار گنگناہٹ، دلوں نے دھوکہ دیا،
ہاؤس ماسٹر اور ہاؤس نیگرو کے لیے، کردار دوبارہ ادا کیا گیا۔
ایک مقدس جگہ، اب مذاق میں لپٹی ہوئی ہے،
ان لوگوں کی طرف سے جو برکتوں کی قیادت کرنے کے قابل نہیں ہیں۔
توحید المسجد، آپ کس چیز کا انتخاب کریں گے؟
طہارت کا راستہ یا طاقت کی چال؟
آواز اٹھنے دو، سچ بولنے دو-
یہ ہمت پکڑنے کا وقت ہے۔
______________________________________
તૌહીદ અલ-મસ્જિદની કરુણ વાર્તા
ઓ તૌહીદ અલ-મસ્જિદ, શું દૃશ્ય છે
દિવસ જેવો શુદ્ધ હતો, હવે રાતમાં ખોવાઈ ગયો.
એકવાર ન્યાય માટે ઉભા હતા, હવે સાફ
એક સ્ટેજ જ્યાં કઠપૂતળીઓ નજીક આવે છે.
લુકમાન "ઘર નિગ્રો" યુસુફ, આટલો બોલ્ડ,
સોનાની દોરીવાળા દાણચોરોના હાથે, સત્તામાં પ્રવેશ.
હવે દ્રશ્યનું નેતૃત્વ કરવા માટે અભિષિક્ત,
પરંતુ શું તે જાણે છે કે અગ્રણી અર્થ શું છે?
તેની બાજુમાં તેનો જુલમી "માસ્ટર" ગર્વથી ઉભો છે,
ઘરના માલિકે ગર્વથી માથું નમાવ્યું.
ખરાબ કાર્યો છુપાવીને શાસનમાં પાછા ફર્યા,
તેમના પડછાયા લાંબા, ઇરાદાઓ પર સીલ.
દુષ્ટ સાથીઓની જોડી, ખામીયુક્ત અને વ્યર્થ,
જેણે મસ્જિદને કાયમી ડાઘમાં ઢાંકી દીધી.
માર્ગદર્શન, વિશ્વાસ અને કાળજી રાખવાને બદલે,
તે મિથ્યાભિમાન અને શરમ છે જે તેઓ ગર્વથી શેર કરે છે.
વિશ્વાસુ ગણગણાટ, હૃદય દગો,
હાઉસ માસ્ટર અને હાઉસ નેગ્રો, ભૂમિકા ફરી ભજવવામાં આવી હતી.
એક પવિત્ર સ્થળ, જે હવે મશ્કરીમાં ઢંકાયેલું છે,
જેઓ આશીર્વાદ દોરી શકતા નથી તેમના દ્વારા.
તૌહિદ અલ-મસ્જિદ, તમે શું પસંદ કરશો?
પવિત્રતાનો માર્ગ કે સત્તાની યુક્તિ?
અવાજ ઉઠાવવા દો, સત્ય બોલવા દો-
હિંમત રાખવાનો સમય છે.
Proof of Charlatan Manya
and His Odious Charity
Asset Theft Subterfuge
By Allah’s grace, this dajjalic scheme was uncovered (see video below),
and immediate measures were taken to dismantle this fraudulent plot.
Link: Click Here
The first is the fake shadow one Manya and his crooks created to carry out their attempted theft.
The second one is the genuine Bolton DU Charity
___________________
Now look at the details of both the fake and genuine charities.
Compare details of both, and see for yourselves the manipulative deceit in play:
Details of Manya's fake one (into which he attempted to transfer assets) :
Note When This FAKE Shadow Charity Was Created :
Link for the above here : CLICK HERE
____________________________________
Details of the genuine charity (from which Manya was attempting to steal assets) :
Now Look At When The GENUINE Bolton DU Charity Was Created :
Link for the above here : CLICK HERE
Contagious Corruption:
How One Toxic
Influence Pollutes
All Who Associate
In relation to the post before this one,
The following message has been virally shared :
The Deceptive Allure of False Piety:
A Cautionary Tale of
Manipulation and Betrayal
Surprise, surprise, another day and yet
another revelation about the zalim
Suhail Manya aka Rasputin. Another example
of the cunning methods by which he
draws unsuspecting individuals into his web. His
approach is disarmingly persuasive, whispering
promises of heavenly rewards to those with pure
intentions, only to manipulate and exploit them to
serve his own concealed agendas. By preying upon those
who trust easily or admire his apparent religiosity,
Manya gains their loyalty and aligns them with his schemes.
The individual mentioned above, a respected elder known
for his piety, has been one such victim.
Under the guise of needing support and new trustees for
Bolton Darul Uloom, Manya connived and convinced the elder
to lend his name, all while keeping him unaware of any
of his deceitful intentions (DU assets transfer). And when the truth
surfaced, Manya was nowhere to be seen, leaving the innocent
individual, now ill, in the line of public scrutiny.
The lesson here is clear: association with those whose
actions are toxic and immoral inevitably taints those
around them. Regardless of intentions, involvement
with manipulative and worldly intoxicated individuals like
Manya can only bring harm, staining one's reputation and
leaving a legacy of mistrust. It’s a cautionary reminder
to all to be wary of such sweet whisperers and promises and
to remain vigilant about whom we trust with our
names and reputations.
Manya’s Scheming Plot:
A Yellow-Bellied Coward’s
Attempt to Hijack DU Assets
When Yousuf Bhailok uncovered the scheming of Manya, Kamboli,
and Darbar—who had been shamelessly deceiving him and plotting a
hostile takeover, going so far as to transfer DU’s assets into the
hands of their self-appointed trustees—the depth of their
dishonesty was laid bare. Manya, showing his true cowardly
nature, slipped out of DU the moment he heard Bhailok was on
his way, well aware of the reckoning that awaited him. Bhailok,
intent on confronting the conspirators, instructed Darbar to
summon Manya to his office, but Darbar, in a brazen display of
loyalty to his deceitful cohort, kept fabricating excuses, claiming
Manya was unreachable.
Their plan was insidious: provoke Bhailok into anger, hoping
he would lash out at Darbar, giving them the perfect excuse
to oust him from DU as a trustee. In a desperate attempt to
set the trap, one of Manya's lackeys recorded the exchange,
eagerly waiting for any moment they could twist to play the
victim, seeking evidence that would paint Bhailok as the aggressor.
But Bhailok saw through their crude games. His sharp retorts
laid their arrogance and deceit bare, exposing them for what
they were: conniving manipulators, caught red-handed in their
shameless plot to divert DU’s assets for their personal gain.
The audacity and greed of Manya and his cohorts were
unmistakable, as was their humiliating failure to cover up
their illicit ruse.
Betraying Hanafi Principles:
Convicted Gold Smuggler's
HARAAM Appointment Exposes
Mosque Leadership Crisis
Lookman Yusuf claimed that Allah's punishment would descend
upon the community due to the suspension of S. Manya. Yet, one must
ask—if divine retribution is a concern, will it not be even more likely
when the community permits a haram appointment that flagrantly defies
Hanafi / Sharia law? By disregarding the strict Islamic standards for integrity
and trust in leadership, this decision directly contravenes the principles
of classical Hanafi jurisprudence. It raises a serious question: if we
fear Allah’s wrath for perceived injustices, how can we ignore the
consequences of violating sacred laws governing our religious institutions?
The Hanafi texts below —Fatawa Hindiyya, Radd al-Muhtar,
Mukhtasar al-Quduri, and Al-Hidayah— are foundational works
in Hanafi scholarship and are regarded as authoritative sources
for understanding Islamic law within the Hanafi school.
Each text serves a specific purpose in the development
and application of Hanafi jurisprudence
An examination of Yusuf’s appointment through the lens
of classical Hanafi texts—Fatawa Hindiyya, Radd al-Muhtar by Ibn Abidin,
Mukhtasar al-Quduri, and Al-Hidayah by Al-Marghinani—reveals a
stark and undeniable contradiction with the core Islamic standards
for mosque governance. This choice blatantly disregards the uncompromising
requirements for integrity and trust outlined in these authoritative sources,
exposing a profound failure to uphold even the most fundamental
principles of Islamic leadership.
1. Fatawa Hindiyya (Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya): Necessity of Integrity in Leadership
Fatawa Hindiyya , also known as Al-Fatawa al-Alamgiriyya , is
a monumental Hanafi legal text commissioned during the reign of Mughal
Emperor Aurangzeb and remains a foundational source for Hanafi rulings.
In Volume 1, Book of Judiciary ( Kitab al-Qada ), it states that individuals
of questionable character or criminal behavior should not be placed in
leadership, particularly in religious roles. This text emphasizes that
leadership in sacred spaces like mosques requires amanah (trustworthiness),
and placing someone convicted of gold smuggling directly violates these principles.
The Fatawa Hindiyya elaborates that those entrusted with community
leadership must be free from unethical practices and criminal history,
as such traits compromise their ability to uphold the moral and spiritual
integrity required by their role.
(Reference: Fatawa Hindiyya, Volume 1, Book of Judiciary) .
_________________________
2. Radd al-Muhtar (Ibn Abidin): Disqualifying the Corrupt and Dishonest
Radd al-Muhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar by Ibn Abidin, a crucial
commentary in Hanafi fiqh, offers detailed guidance on the qualifications
for religious and community leaders. Ibn Abidin warns explicitly against
appointing leaders with a reputation for dishonesty or past crimes.
He asserts that any individual known for a lack of amanah or integrity
fails to meet the ethical and legal requirements for leadership, particularly
in roles that involve public trust, such as in a mosque.
Lookman Yusuf’s conviction for gold smuggling undermines these standards,
as it contravenes the expectation of irreproachable conduct Ibn Abidin
outlines for leaders. According to Radd al-Muhtar , leaders in sacred
spaces must demonstrate piety and uprightness, and failure to meet these
criteria justifies disqualification from leadership.
(Reference: Radd al-Muhtar, Volume 4, under rulings on public trust and integrity) .
____________________
3. Mukhtasar al-Quduri: The Integrity and Moral Responsibility of Leaders
Mukhtasar al-Quduri , authored by Imam al-Quduri, is one of the earliest
and most influential texts in Hanafi jurisprudence, widely studied for its
concise and practical rulings. In sections concerning community leadership,
Al-Quduri asserts that leaders must embody Islamic virtues, as their conduct
reflects on the institution they serve. He warns that any individual with a
criminal past or a history of dishonest behavior is unsuitable for leadership
roles within religious settings.
Al-Quduri’s teachings emphasize that leadership is a trust ( amanah ) and that
mosque leaders are held to even stricter moral standards, as they directly
influence the community's spiritual welfare. Placing Lookman Yusuf in this
role disregards these principles, contradicting Al-Quduri’s requirement that
religious leaders be both morally upright and free from reputational blemishes.
(Reference: Mukhtasar al-Quduri, Chapter on Public Trust and Religious Leadership) .
_________________________
4. Al-Hidayah (Al-Marghinani): Upholding Justice and Removing the Unfit
Al-Hidayah , by Burhan al-Din al-Marghinani, is another seminal text in
Hanafi law, extensively used for its detailed explanations on fiqh. In Volume 4,
where Al-Marghinani discusses qualifications for positions of authority, he
states that leaders must exemplify justice, honesty, and public trust.
Al-Marghinani advises that any leader found lacking in these qualities or involved
in dishonest behaviour should be removed to preserve the institution’s integrity
and uphold public confidence.
Lookman Yusuf’s criminal record as a gold smuggler fundamentally conflicts
with the standards set in Al-Hidayah , where Al-Marghinani insists that
leadership in mosques and other religious institutions should never be
tainted by individuals with histories of dishonesty or corruption. His
teachings advocate for the removal of unfit leaders, stressing that maintaining
the institution’s sanctity and trustworthiness is paramount.
(Reference: Al-Hidayah, Volume 4, on the qualifications and ethical responsibilities of leadership) .
_________________________
Classical Hanafi teachings are clear and unified in their stance: leaders in
religious institutions, especially mosques, must be individuals of the highest
moral standing, free from criminal or dishonest conduct. The appointment of
Lookman Yusuf, a man convicted of gold smuggling, is a direct violation of
these principles, as outlined by Fatawa Hindiyya , Radd al-Muhtar ,
Mukhtasar al-Quduri , and Al-Hidayah . These texts collectively highlight
the need for integrity, justice, and unwavering trust in any leadership role
within the mosque.
The classical Hanafi rulings make it clear that such an appointment is not
only ill-advised but also harms the mosque’s moral standing and damages the
trust the community places in its leadership. According to these texts, it is
imperative for the community to rectify this error by reassessing Yusuf’s position,
removing him if necessary, to ensure that the mosque is led by individuals who
truly embody Islamic values.
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ cautioned, “When authority is given to those who do
not deserve it, then wait for the Hour” (Sahih al-Bukhari 6496).
The teachings of our Hanafi scholars echo this prophetic wisdom, urging
the community to uphold the sacred trust of mosque leadership and to protect
it from any association with dishonesty or unethical behaviour. It is the
responsibility of every community member to ensure that the mosque remains
a bastion of trust and moral guidance by selecting leaders who are both fit
and worthy of the role.
A Grave Breach of Trust: Reflecting on
the Appointment of Lookman Yusuf in Light
of Islamic Rulings on Mosque Leadership
The recent appointment of Lookman Yusuf, a man convicted of gold smuggling,
to a leadership role in Tauheedul mosque has left many in the community
both disappointed and questioning the standards of mosque governance.
This troubling decision stands in direct contradiction to Islamic legal
principles regarding the appointment of leaders, particularly for sacred
institutions like mosques, where trust, honesty, and moral integrity are
paramount. Drawing on specific fatwas (legal rulings) from Deoband scholars,
Darul Uloom Karachi, classical Hanafi jurisprudence, and the teachings of
Imam al-Nawawi, it becomes clear that such an appointment is not
only ill-advised but deeply problematic in light of Islamic jurisprudence.
1. Deoband DU Rulings: The Impermissibility of Dishonest Leadership
Darul Uloom Deoband has long held that leadership within a mosque is a
trust (amanah) that must not be handed over to anyone lacking integrity.
Their fatwas stress that a history of criminal behaviour or dishonesty
disqualifies an individual from positions of religious authority.
According to these rulings, placing a convicted individual in a role
that influences the mosque and its community is a direct violation of Islamic
values, as it places the sacred function of the mosque under the leadership
of one whose actions are inconsistent with its moral purpose. This decision,
therefore, undermines the mosque’s standing and integrity.
In Deobandi thought, leadership in the mosque must be based on both
taqwa (piety) and amanah (trustworthiness). The ruling refers to the
Hadith, “If authority is given to those who do not deserve it, then
wait for the Hour” (Sahih al-Bukhari 6496), suggesting that the appointment of
someone like Yusuf brings about harm not only to the mosque but also to
the wider Muslim community. Therefore, those responsible for his appointment
should reconsider his position and align mosque governance with Islamic
ethical standards.
(Reference: Fatawa Darul Uloom Deoband, Volume 6) .
________________________
2. Darul Uloom Karachi (founded by Grand Mufti Mohammed Shafi رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ):
Safeguarding the Community’s Trust
Similarly, Darul Uloom Karachi has issued rulings emphasizing that
individuals with a past involving unethical actions or criminal convictions
should not be entrusted with roles of mosque leadership. In their fatwas ,
they assert that a mosque’s leaders are representatives of Islam and the
community's values, making it impermissible to appoint those whose actions
compromise this representation. Appointing a gold smuggler, someone with a
proven history of dishonesty, violates the principle of amanah and severely
compromises the trust that the community places in its religious institutions.
Darul Uloom Karachi’s fatwa aligns with the Quranic verse: “Allah commands
you to render trusts to whom they are due…” (Quran 4:58). This verse underscores
that trust must be given only to those who are capable and worthy, which in
Islamic legal terms excludes individuals involved in crimes, especially those
driven by greed or dishonesty. Lookman Yusuf’s appointment, therefore, stands
in direct opposition to this ruling, calling for the community to reconsider its
decision to protect the mosque’s sanctity.
(Reference: Fatawa Darul Uloom Karachi, Volume 5) .
________________________
3. Classical Hanafi Jurisprudence in Fatawa Hindiyya: Removing the Unworthy
The Fatawa Hindiyya (also known as Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya or Al-Fatawa al-Alamgiriyya ),
a seminal Hanafi text, provides guidance on the responsibilities of religious
and community leaders. It specifically advises that any leader whose actions or
character damage the institution they represent should be removed from office to
prevent harm to the community. In the context of mosque leadership, the text
explains that individuals who have acted dishonestly should not be placed in
positions of trust, as this jeopardizes the mosque's role as a moral and spiritual anchor.
This principle is particularly relevant to Lookman Yusuf’s case. His appointment
contradicts the Hanafi ruling that individuals involved in unethical conduct
should be disqualified from positions of authority within religious institutions.
By allowing him to lead, the community risks undermining the mosque’s integrity,
potentially creating a public perception that dishonesty is acceptable in positions
of religious leadership.
(Reference: Fatawa Hindiyya, Volume 1, Book of Judiciary) .
________________________
4. Imam al-Nawawi’s Al-Majmu’: Accountability and Removal of Dishonest Leaders
In Al-Majmu’ , Imam al-Nawawi addresses the moral qualifications necessary for
those entrusted with leadership roles, especially within religious settings. He
argues that anyone proven to have committed acts of dishonesty or to lack integrity
fails to meet the requirements of amanah and justice, which are prerequisites
for Islamic leadership. Imam al-Nawawi’s writings emphasize that if a leader is
found to breach these ethical obligations, they should be removed from their
position to protect the institution’s sanctity and credibility.
Applying Imam al-Nawawi’s guidance to Lookman Yusuf’s case, it is clear that his
appointment violates these core principles. Given his criminal record, Yusuf’s
leadership cannot fulfill the Islamic obligation of amanah , making his removal
not only justified but necessary. According to Imam al-Nawawi’s standards,
retaining him in this role risks setting a dangerous precedent and tarnishing the
community’s moral fabric.
(Reference: Al-Majmu’ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab, Volume 9) .
___________________________________
Upholding Integrity in Mosque Leadership
Islamic teachings, both classical and contemporary, are unequivocal in their
stance on the necessity of integrity and moral uprightness for those in positions
of religious authority. By appointing Lookman Yusuf—a man with a criminal history
involving dishonesty—to a prominent role in Tauheedul mosque, the community
inadvertently jeopardises the mosque’s moral standing and the trust of its congregation.
The fatwas from Darul Uloom Deoband and Karachi, along with classical texts like
Fatawa Hindiyya and Al-Majmu’ by Imam al-Nawawi, all point to the same
conclusion: mosque leaders must be people of integrity, and any breach of this
trust must be met with firm action. Given this clear consensus, it is imperative
that the community and mosque administration reconsider Yusuf’s appointment, not
as a matter of personal judgment but as a matter of fulfilling Islamic legal
and ethical obligations.
As the Prophet ﷺ warned, “When authority is given to those who do not deserve
it, then wait for the Hour” (Sahih al-Bukhari 6496). In light of this teaching
and the overwhelming scholarly guidance, the community’s duty is to uphold
the sacred trust of mosque leadership by ensuring that those who hold it are
truly worthy of the role.
From Reverence to Reservation:
A Reflection on the
Irrevocable Damage to
Suhail Manya's Standing
Posted as received. For the purpose of preserving
anonymity, any direct references to the writer have
been removed
I used to hold Maulana Suhail Manya in high esteem,
admiring his oratory skills and the way he seemed to
connect deeply with people. His talks and sermons used
to resonate with me, offering guidance and insight that
I genuinely valued. I looked forward to his words,
finding comfort in the way he delivered the message of
Islam. However, recent revelations about his past and
alleged double standards have changed my perception entirely.
The depth of respect I once had has faded—not because
of any personal grievance, but simply because of what
has surfaced about his character. It’s hard to overlook
the accusations and the whispers that have accumulated
over the years, which suggest that Maulana Suhail Manya
may have not been consistent in his private life with
the ideals he preaches publicly. Stories of discrepancies
between his words and actions, especially when it comes
to matters of integrity and responsibility, have made it
difficult for me to continue listening to him with the same trust.
One particular incident stands out. During a Friday khutbah
recently, as he spoke, I felt an inner detachment. His words,
which once felt genuine and impactful, now seemed hollow.
My mind kept wandering back to the things I had heard about
his past, the double talk, and the seeming incongruity between
his public persona and the reality others have shared about him.
There were moments when I wanted to connect, to feel the message
as I once did, but an internal barrier kept reminding me that
these words might be coming from a place not as sincere as I’d
once thought.
To be clear, I still respect Maulana Suhail Manya as a scholar, as
I do all scholars who dedicate themselves to the study of Islam.
But that respect has shifted; it’s no longer rooted in admiration
or a personal connection. His words no longer carry the weight they
used to, and I feel my trust in him has been irrevocably damaged. I
believe this sentiment is shared by many, both within his congregation
and beyond. His standing will likely never regain the same reverence,
even among his peers, scholars, and ordinary individuals alike. Any
respect he still commands will, I fear, be only surface-level, a
courteous politeness rather than genuine esteem.
In light of all that has come to light, I cannot take his words to
heart as I once did. The respect I once held has been replaced by a
careful distance, where I listen but no longer connect on the same
level. For me—and, I believe, for many others—he has become a figure
whose words now ring hollow, devoid of the depth they once had.
Reserving a Parking Bay
Exclusively for the Imaam ?
HARAAM !!
Mufti Mohammed Desai رَحِمَهَا ٱللَّٰهُ
Exploiting waqf mosque property for personal benefit is strictly
prohibited. Islamic scholars have issued fatwas emphasizing that
waqf properties, including mosques, must be used solely for their
designated purposes. For instance, it is impermissible to use mosque
land for private enterprises or personal matters.
Mufti Mohammed Desai رَحِمَهَا ٱللَّٰهُ
Darul Iftaa Mahmudiyyah
Durban
____________________________________________________________________
Darul Uloom Deoband has also issued fatwas concerning waqf properties.
In one of their rulings, it is stated that any form of misappropriation
or misuse of waqf assets is haram (prohibited). If someone in charge of
waqf property uses it for personal or commercial reasons, this is seen
as a violation of trust and Islamic ethics. Any gains from such
exploitation should be returned to the waqf.
Darul Ifta,
Darul Uloom Deoband, India
____________________________________________________________________
Question:-
Is it permissible to have a parking bay reserved exclusively for the Imaam
at the Masjid, considering that the Land is Waqf property?
Answer:-
Land donated to the Masjid is generally made Waqf for the use of the Muslim
Ummah. This simply means that every Muslim has equal right in utilizing
the Waqf land and no person enjoys superiority over another. It is therefore,
incorrect to reserve a parking for the Imaam in a Masjid parking lot that
was made Waqf for the benefit of the Muslim Ummah. If the Imaam is late,
then he should park his vehicle wherever parking space is available.
Yes, there is no harm in requesting the Musallis to leave a parking bay
close to the Masjid entrance vacant for the Imaam, particularly if he is an
elderly Imaam and experiences difficulty in walking from a distance. However,
this in no way means that the parking bay is reserved exclusively for the Imaam.
If another Musalli parks in the parking bay, then he should not be asked to
move his vehicle, nor should anyone look at him with contempt.
ALLAH TA’ALA KNOWS BEST!
ANSWERED BY:
Mufti Mohammed Desai رَحِمَهَا ٱللَّٰهُ
Date: 19 Jumadal Ula 1444 / 14 December 2022
Darul Ifta ibn Masood was run by Mufti Mohammed Desai Saheb رَحِمَهَا ٱللَّٰهُ who was a
Graduate of Darul Uloom Azaadville. He completed his training in the
field of Ifta over 10 years under the senior Mufti of Azaadville,
Mufti Muhammad Saeed Motara Saheb D.B. He also spent many years in the company of
Hadhrat Moulana Abdul Hamid Is’haq Saheb, the Principal of Darul Uloom Azaadville,
and the Khalifa of Hadhrat Moulana Hakim Akhtar Saheb D.B..
https://fataawa.co.za/reserving-a-parking-bay-exclusively-for-the-imaam/
'Yes Massa !!'
The House Negro Must
Obey The Master
Hypocrite peers only produce hypocrite followers
Lookman Desai gave a speech in May outlining some
‘Grave mistakes’ made by the then committee.
He gave a speech that the wrath of the lord
coming on to the community for not allowing Suhail Manya
to come to the mosque. We know very well that was an
employment protocol letter to Suhail Manya outlining the
fact that you can’t enter your workplace if you’re suspended.
So, that if this goes to Tribunal the mosque can cover
themselves and say we did follow protocols.
Lookman Desai who is as bright as a broken light bulb,
thought a Tsunami is going to takeover the Brookhouse area
of Blackburn. He explains “our kids are laughing at us”
So, now Lookman Desai has sacked 2 imaams because Suhail Manya
is feeling inferior to their recitation. Suhail Manya who
is 50 soon has deprived young talent to come through.
Lookman Desai, is the wrath of the Lord not going to
descend now? Oh wait! Since Suhail Manya has graced us
with his presence again the spirituality is back right?
The kids are not laughing anymore that a grown man who is
in his late 50’s is unable to decide a matter without being dictated
by a tyrant? A grown man who has grand children is being told
to fire 2 imaams so the tyrant's lime light is not over shadowed.
A grown man who stood up and said “don’t cause disruption here
act in courteous manner, if you want to address anything around
the committee not being appropriate, go to the office”. Does Lookman
think we are stupid? You were sending a message out in that clip
and inciting hatred towards the committee.
Now, when people are challenging you about
- appointing yourself as the president,
- reinstating Suhail Manya,
- overruling the Trustees,
- removing the “shura” from the madrasa
and sacking the 2 imaams.
IT'S YOU ! Who does not want to listen.
Where is your speech now?
A hypocrite only breeds a hypocrite!
The Zaalim and His Zulm Resumes
ظالم اور اس کا ظلم دوبارہ شروع ہوا
Fatwas From Deoband, Karachi and
Other Institutions on Mosques
Appointing Criminal Individuals
Numerous fatwas (Islamic legal rulings) address the matter of appointing individuals
who have criminal and dishonest past to leadership roles in mosques. Scholars and institutions
issuing these fatwas generally stress that a mosque's leadership should be
composed of individuals who exemplify honesty, piety, and adherence to Islamic principles,
as they are entrusted with maintaining the spiritual integrity of the institution.
Here is a summary of some prominent fatwas on this issue:
1. Fatwa on the Necessity of Piety and Trustworthiness for Mosque Leaders
Many fatwas emphasize that mosque leaders must be people of high moral
standing. For instance, the Darul Ifta in Saudi Arabia, and institutions like
Darul Ulooms Deoband, Karachi and Al-Azhar, state that committee members
of mosques must possess amanah (trustworthiness) and taqwa (God-consciousness).
and have no criminal past. This is because they are responsible for the spiritual well-being of the
congregation and the mosque’s operations, and any past or present
dishonesty compromises the mosque's role as a religious and ethical beacon.
2. Fatwa on Disqualifying Dishonest Individuals from Mosque Committees
Many muftis have ruled that dishonest individuals, or those who have
committed criminal or unethical acts, should not hold positions within mosque
administration. For instance, a fatwa from Darul Uloom Karachi clarifies
that it is impermissible to appoint individuals known for dishonesty or criminality, as
this would undermine the sacred nature of the mosque. The fatwa further advises
that the community should actively oppose such appointments, citing the Hadith:
“When authority is given to those who do not deserve it, then wait for the Hour.” (Bukhari).
3. Fatwa on Removing Dishonest Leaders from Mosque Leadership
There are fatwas explicitly address what to do if a mosque leader is found to be dishonest
or has committed illegal acts. The Fatawa Hindiyya ,a classic Hanafi text, and Al-Majmu'
by Imam al-Nawawi both state that if a mosque leader is discovered to be
untrustworthy, or has committed criminal acts, steps should be taken to remove him to
prevent harm to the mosque's reputation and integrity. This is based on the principle
of preventing munkar (evil) and preserving the mosque’s sanctity.
4. Contemporary Fatwas on Accountability and Governance in Mosques
In light of modern organisational needs, scholars like those from
European Council for Fatwa and Research and Darul Ifta Egypt have issued
fatwas addressing governance standards. They recommend implementing criteria
for mosque leadership that include transparency, regular assessments of character,
and accountability mechanisms. These fatwas encourage mosque boards to create rules
that allow removal of leaders who fail to meet these standards.
5. Fatwa on the Responsibility of the Community to Uphold Mosque Standards
A fatwa from Darul Ifta Jordan addresses the responsibility of the
community in ensuring honest leadership in the mosque. It stresses that congregants
have a duty to support only those who display piety and integrity and are free from a
criminal past. The fatwa references the Hadith: “Whoever among you sees an evil, let him
change it with his hand. If he is unable to, then with his tongue. And if he is unable to,
then with his heart, and that is the weakest of faith.” (Muslim). This fatwa
encourages community members to use lawful means to oppose the appointment of
dishonest and criminally checkered leaders in the mosque.
6. Rulings on Avoiding Corruption and Nepotism in Mosque Leadership
Scholars have issued fatwas condemning corruption and nepotism within mosque
leadership. Fatwas from institutions like Dar al-Ifta al-Missriyyah (Egypt)
and Darul Uloom Deoband underline the impermissibility of favouritism in
appointing mosque leaders. They advise that if individuals are appointed based
on family ties, financial influence, or other biases rather than merit, this
constitutes a betrayal of trust.
The overarching theme in these fatwas is clear: honesty, piety, and
trustworthiness are indispensable qualities for mosque leadership. A dishonest
individual or one who has a criminal history violates the sanctity of their
position and the community’s trust, which Islamic law holds in high regard.
Most fatwas call for community vigilance in selecting and supporting leaders and
emphasise that leadership in the mosque is a sacred trust with
serious accountability in this life and the Hereafter.
Blasphemy in Plain Sight:
Misusing Sacred Nasheeds and
the Illiteracy of Misplaced Devotion
گستاخ رسول صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم
Shaykh Abdullah Mohammed Qasmi - Ustaad of Hanafi Jurisprudence
Madinat-al-Munawwara
When considering an incident such as the use of the nasheed Tala’ al-Badru ‘Alayna in
celebration of a mere mortal’s return, it is essential to approach the matter with both
religious knowledge and a sense of deep reverence for Islamic history. Historically, this
nasheed has unparalleled significance in the Islamic tradition. It was sung by the people of
Madinah as an expression of profound joy, love, and devotion upon the arrival of the
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ to their city. To misuse this nasheed for anyone else, regardless
of their status or role, not only cheapens its sanctity but also borders on disrespect
to the Beloved Prophet ﷺ himself.
The Solemnity of Tala’ al-Badru ‘Alayna
The nasheed Tala’ al-Badru ‘Alayna is unique and, historically, its meaning and
context are tied exclusively to the Prophet’s ﷺ arrival in Madinah. No Islamic source,
no classical text, nor any account by the righteous predecessors permits the use of
this nasheed in reference to anyone other than the Prophet ﷺ. To attempt to parallel
an ordinary individual’s return, no matter how respected, with the hijra of the Messenger ﷺ
is a gross distortion of Islamic heritage and understanding. This is an instance of taking
an act of historical reverence and attempting to grant it to someone who has no such divine
or historical standing. Such a comparison risks associating someone on par with the Prophet ﷺ,
a line no devout Muslim should ever cross.
Blasphemous Overtones
To invoke Tala’ al-Badru ‘Alayna for any purpose other than honouring the Prophet ﷺ is
not just an error in judgment; it verges on blasphemy. This nasheed is ibadah in and of
itself, tied to one of the most significant moments in Islamic history. To use it in any
other context strips it of its sanctity and disrespects the legacy of the Prophet ﷺ. In
celebrating the return of a contemporary individual with this nasheed, one creates a false
equivalency, as if his arrival mirrors the Prophet's ﷺ. This is an act that demonstrates
religious illiteracy, a failure to understand the context and purpose of nasheeds, and an
alarming lack of reverence for our Islamic traditions.
Religious Illiteracy and Misplaced Devotion
The responsibility for such an error does not lie solely on the individual being honoured
but also upon those who would blindly follow without knowledge. There is a disturbing trend
among followers to elevate leaders or figures without understanding Islamic principles
or boundaries. This devotion is misdirected and ultimately destructive, as it promotes a
distorted form of veneration that blurs lines which Islam has clearly delineated. True
love and respect for Islamic figures are expressed by following the Sunnah and adhering
to the boundaries set by Allah and His Messenger ﷺ, not by engaging in actions that lack
basis in Islamic jurisprudence or tradition.
This act also starkly exemplifies the religious illiteracy of those who elevate Suhail Manya
to the status of a peer or spiritual authority in a manner that Islamically educated individuals
would recognise as misguided. The notion of a spiritual guide (حضرة / پیر / شَيْخ) in Islam is one of immense responsibility,
spiritual refinement, and profound knowledge, grounded in adherence to the Shariah and Sunnah.
To bestow such a title or status upon an individual without just cause, without recognition
from scholars, and without evidence of deep scholarly acumen, is a clear sign of the followers’
lack of understanding regarding Islamic hierarchy and spiritual leadership. This misinformed
reverence reveals a community unable or unwilling to discern between true scholarship and emotional
attachment, failing to recognise the deep and demanding qualities that define true masha-ikh in Islamic
tradition. Blind devotion in such a context leads not only to spiritual decline but also to
practices that stray far from the authentic path laid down by our pious predecessors. The
misuse of a sacred nasheed like Tala’ al-Badru ‘Alayna for his return demonstrates a
misplacement of reverence, one that dilutes genuine Islamic teachings and reflects a profound
misunderstanding of the Deen.
It is our duty, as an Ummah, to correct these misconceptions and educate ourselves in the
matters of our Deen. We must not let emotional attachments cloud our judgment or lead us
to acts that dishonour our history. Those who value their faith must be wary of any practices or
celebrations that misuse elements with specific historical and spiritual significance. Respect
for the Messenger of Allah ﷺ requires us to be vigilant against any act that could diminish his
unique station in our hearts and in history.
May Allah grant us the wisdom to respect the traditions of our Deen and keep us steadfast
in the correct path. Ameen.
Who Knew Smuggling Gold Chains
Could Lead to Spiritual Gains!
Meet Lookman Yusuf,
the Gold Smuggling Convict President
We All Know Who the 'Master' Is and
Who the 'House Negroes' Are
Malcolm-X - Nov 10, 1963
There was two kinds of slaves. There was the house Negro and the field Negro.
The house Negroes – they lived in the house with master, they dressed pretty good,
they ate good ’cause they ate his food — what he left. They lived in the attic or
the basement, but still they lived near the master; and they loved their master
more than the master loved himself. They would give their life to save the master’s
house quicker than the master would. The house Negro, if the master said, “We got a good
house here,” the house Negro would say, “Yeah, we got a good house here.”
Whenever the master said “we,” he said “we.” That’s how you can tell a house Negro.
If the master’s house caught on fire, the house Negro would fight harder to put
the blaze out than the master would. If the master got sick, the house Negro
would say, “What’s the matter, boss, we sick?” We sick! He identified himself with
his master more than his master identified with himself. And if you came to
the house Negro and said, “Let’s run away, let’s escape, let’s separate,” the
house Negro would look at you and say, “Man, you crazy. What you mean, separate?
Where is there a better house than this? Where can I wear better clothes than
this? Where can I eat better food than this?” That was that house Negro. In those
days he was called a “house nigger.” And that’s what we call him today, because
we’ve still got some house niggers running around here.
This modern house Negro loves his master. He wants to live near him. He’ll pay
three times as much as the house is worth just to live near his master, and
then brag about “I’m the only Negro out here.” “I’m the only one on my job.”
“I’m the only one in this school.” You’re nothing but a house Negro. And if
someone comes to you right now and says, “Let’s separate,” you say the same
thing that the house Negro said on the plantation. “What you mean, separate?
From America? This good white man? Where you going to get a better job than
you get here?” I mean, this is what you say. “I ain’t left nothing in Africa,”
that’s what you say. Why, you left your mind in Africa.
On that same plantation, there was the field Negro. The field Negro — those
were the masses. There were always more Negroes in the field than there was
Negroes in the house. The Negro in the field caught hell. He ate leftovers.
In the house they ate high up on the hog. The Negro in the field didn’t
get nothing but what was left of the insides of the hog. They
call ’em “chitt’lin’” nowadays. In those days they called them what
they were: guts. That’s what you were — a gut-eater. And some of you
all still gut-eaters.
The field Negro was beaten from morning to night. He lived in a shack,
in a hut; He wore old, castoff clothes. He hated his master. I say
he hated his master. He was intelligent. That house Negro loved his master.
But that field Negro — remember, they were in the majority, and they hated
the master. When the house caught on fire, he didn’t try and put it out;
that field Negro prayed for a wind, for a breeze. When the master got sick,
the field Negro prayed that he’d die. If someone come [sic] to the field
Negro and said, “Let’s separate, let’s run,” he didn’t say “Where we going?”
He’d say, “Any place is better than here.” You’ve got field Negroes in America
today. I’m a field Negro. The masses are the field Negroes. When they see
this man’s house on fire, you don’t hear these little Negroes talking
about “our government is in trouble.” They say, “The government is in trouble.”
Imagine a Negro: “Our government”! I even heard one say “our astronauts.”
They won’t even let him near the plant — and “our astronauts”! “Our Navy” — that’s
a Negro that’s out of his mind. That’s a Negro that’s out of his mind.
Just as the slavemaster of that day used Tom, the house Negro, to keep the
field Negroes in check, the same old slavemaster today has Negroes who are
nothing but modern Uncle Toms, 20th century Uncle Toms, to keep you and me in
check, keep us under control...
Tauheedul Masjid:
A Laughing Stock in the Eyes of the World
In recent events, the election of Lookman Yusuf, a man convicted
of gold smuggling, to the presidency of Tauheedul mosque has
caused deep concern and dismay in our community. This appointment
not only casts a dark shadow over the masjid's reputation but also
raises serious questions about the values upheld by those in
leadership positions. What message does this send to the wider
world when a house of worship, a sacred place meant for guiding the faithful
on the path of righteousness, elevates someone with a past marred by
criminal activity?
The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about such times, saying:
“When trust is lost, then wait for the Hour.” Upon being asked how
trust would be lost, he responded, “When authority is given to those
who do not deserve it, then wait for the Hour.” (Bukhari).
This Hadith, like many others, emphasizes the importance of integrity
and the dire consequences of appointing those unworthy of leadership.
Another powerful reminder from the Prophet ﷺ states:
“If dishonest people are appointed as leaders, then wait for the
Day of Judgment.” (Bukhari).
This forewarning about the end times aligns closely with the
current reality we see unfolding. It is indeed a tragedy when
a masjid, meant to be a beacon of moral guidance, chooses to
dismiss such prophetic warnings. Appointing a gold-smuggling
convict, first to the committee and then to the presidency, only
deepens the feeling of disillusionment among community members.
The community must now consider the damaging implications of
this decision and reflect deeply upon the values it wishes to uphold.
Appointing leaders with clean records and a commitment to honesty is
not just a preference; it is an Islamic imperative.
What Rasputin's Mob Claimed and
What They Are Now Doing Themselves
Like it was Foretold, the Scheming has Started
How Did a Figure with a Criminal
Record Rise to Prominence in
Tauheedul’s Committee?
A Question of Trust: The Leadership of Tauheedul Under Scrutiny
The recent appointment of Lookman Mohamed Yusuf as president of Tauheedul has raised
eyebrows across the community. As an organisation known for promoting
social harmonty and welfare, Tauheedul’s reputation hinges on the
trustworthiness and integrity of its leadership. However, questions are now emerging
over the vetting process that allowed Mr. Yusuf, who has recent criminal convictions
related to a gold smuggling case in India, to ascend to a leadership position.
Background of the Convictions:
Earlier this year, in January 2024, Mr. Yusuf was convicted under Sections 114AA and 112(a)
of India’s Customs Act, 1962. These convictions stem from his involvement in a gold smuggling
case, which shook the Indian and British communities due to the scale and international
implications of the operation. Section 114AA addresses the culpability of individuals who
may have abetted or directly engaged in customs violations, while Section 112(a) implicates
those involved in the illegal import of prohibited goods. The convictions brought to
light a side of Mr. Yusuf’s activities that starkly contrasts with the values of transparency
and ethical leadership upheld by Tauheedul.
The Vetting Process – Lapses or Loopholes?
Despite these convictions, Mr. Yusuf was able to ascend to the role of president, which
raises pressing questions about the vetting process for committee members. Was there a
lapse in due diligence, or are there loopholes that allowed such a serious matter to slip
through? Understanding the selection criteria and the extent to which background checks are
implemented is essential for maintaining the community’s trust.
Impact on Tauheedul’s Image:
Tauheedul has built a reputation based on educational integrity and community service,
often representing the values and aspirations of Muslims in the UK and beyond. The
revelations about Mr. Yusuf’s background not only jeopardise this hard-earned reputation
but also cast a shadow over the organisation’s commitment to upholding high ethical standards.
Vetting Requirements and Constitutional Oversight:
Tauheedul’s constitution explicitly mandates that all committee candidates undergo thorough
vetting, including checks for any criminal history, to ensure that leaders maintain high
moral and ethical standards. This clause is intended to prevent individuals with criminal
backgrounds from assuming positions of influence, thereby safeguarding the organization’s
reputation and ensuring it reflects the values of integrity and trust. Given this stipulation,
Mr. Yusuf’s appointment raises questions about whether the constitution’s guidelines were
followed and, if so, how his criminal record was overlooked or deemed acceptable within this framework.
The Community’s Response:
Members of the Tauheedul community and other stakeholders are understandably concerned.
Many are calling for a review of the election procedures and stricter guidelines for vetting
potential leaders. Transparency in these processes will be vital in restoring confidence and
ensuring that leaders truly embody the values of the organisation.
Conclusion:
As more details emerge, the question remains: how did a person with a recent criminal
history reach such a significant role in Tauheedul? Addressing these questions openly can
pave the way for renewed integrity within the organisation and ensure that such oversights
do not repeat in the future.
c.50% of Musallis Rejected S. Manya
An Imam, particularly one who has served a mosque for nearly two decades,
undertaking responsibilities such as delivering sermons, officiating marriage
ceremonies, leading funeral prayers, offering family guidance, and overseeing
children’s education, would naturally anticipate being held in high regard by
the community. Islam places great emphasis on honouring scholars, making it
reasonable for an Imam in such a position to expect love, respect, and appreciation.
However, for nearly half or more of the community to feel discontented,
frustrated, and disappointed with an Imam strongly suggests a fundamental
unsuitability for the role, as well as a highly divisive presence.
Typically, in most mosques, if a poll were conducted regarding the Imam’s
leadership, one would expect upwards of 95% support. This makes the widespread
discontent surrounding Suhail Manya an undeniable indication of his polarising
influence, which has fragmented a previously flourishing, harmonious, and
productive community. His actions have not only disturbed the unity within
the community but have also estranged the scholarly circles within the town,
who have chosen to remain silent rather than offer support—a silence likely
born of numerous past conflicts and his overall contentious conduct.
Furthermore, Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) advises against an Imam leading prayer
when a significant portion of the congregation harbours dissatisfaction toward him.
Harmony between the Imam and congregation is essential for the prayer to be
effective, asserting that an Imam should not lead when enmity—whether due to
personal grievances or differing views—exists between them.
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) also stated,
“There are three whose prayers do not go any further than their ears:
a runaway slave until he returns, a woman who spent the night with her
husband while he was angry with her, and one who leads people in prayer
when they dislike him” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi).
In light of these principles, how can Suhail Manya persist in seeking
reinstatement to his role as Imam? The community now needs a fresh
beginning with an Imam who can mend fractured hearts and restore unity
through the core Islamic values of brotherhood and respect (Ikram al-Muslimeen).
The Truth - For Those Still in Denial
One More Example of Glaring Hypocrisy
S. Manya (Rasputin) Preaches Against
Seeking 'Phowti' and 'Bhowti' Justice -
Yet Happy To Seek Help From Yahood/Nasara
“O you who believe! Take not the Yahood and the Nasara for friends.
They are friends one to another. He amongst you who takes them for
friends is (one) of them. Indeed, Allah guides not wrongdoing people.” Al-Ma'idah (5:51)
"What do we do if there are mistakes in our intentions?
Seek ease and comfort (phowti/bhowti) - where we see benefit in Shariah,
we will knock on Maulana's door and Mufti Sahib's door
and where we see that the decision will be different,
then we will go to Crown Court, High Court, Supreme Court,
Civil Court, Magistrate, although we know that this
system is not the system of Allah and the Messenger of
Allah, this is the system of the Ministry of Justice here." - S. Manya
The Squandering of Wealth and Morality
The Haraam activities of S. Manya (by his own admission - see audio below)
and his cohorts, who have squandered over £80,000+ in just four months,
expose the utterly rotten and degenerate state of their spiritual and
moral character. The disgraceful actions attributed to them bear striking
resemblance to the warnings issued in previous contexts, and highlight the
following points of concern:
1. Gross Misuse of Wealth: In a mere four months, Suhail Manya (aka Rasputin) and his
associates have flushed an obscene amount of £80,000+ down the drain, a
blatant waste of resources. Much like those who sought judgment from
kuffaar courts, their actions signify a betrayal of trust and a gross
deviation from the path of righteousness. Instead of spending wealth in
avenues pleasing to Allah, they have drowned in frivolous pursuits. Their
behaviour is reflective of the Qur’anic warning that those who squander wealth
unjustly are "brothers of the Shayateen."
2. Shunning the Shariah for Vanity: While the Shariah offers a clear
framework for resolving disputes and managing affairs, these individuals
have chosen the path of worldly indulgence and excess. Shamelessness and
animosity have blinded them, leaving them wallowing in disgrace and
mockery. Their actions are a clear rejection of the Divine command to follow
the Shariah in all matters and not to chase the vain desires of those
ignorant of Allah’s law.
3. Inviting External Intervention: In their foolishness, these people
have sought external assistance. Such actions undermine
the sanctity of the faith and reflect a failure to handle
matters with the dignity and decorum expected of Muslims.
4. Deceptive Showpieces: The money they have squandered on grandiose court
ventures serves only to boost their egos. Their efforts are not driven by sincerity
or the desire to serve the Deen, but by vanity and riya (showing off), turning
what should be spiritual endeavours into mere facades of religious activity.
5. Engagement in Israaf and Ghulu’: Their wasteful spending on fruitless legal
ventures— or other unnecessary extravagances—betrays a deep-seated arrogance (takabbur)
and an obsession with outward displays of grandeur. This israaf (wastefulness)
and ghulu’ (excessiveness) are clear signs of spiritual corruption,
as they prioritise worldly appearances over the sincerity of faith and obedience to Allah.
S. Manya and his companions would do well to ponder on the path they have chosen.
Their actions, like those of misguided groups before them, are in direct opposition
to the Shariah and the commands of Allah Ta'ala. Without sincere repentance and
a return to the principles of justice, humility, and rightful conduct,
they risk complete spiritual ruin.
A Mufti saab at a London DU comments on
Rasputin's & his followers duplicity
The following is from a DU Mufti based in London and a graduate
of Azaadville Darul Uloom and is in reference to the following audio :
"What do we do if there are mistakes in our intentions?
Seek ease and comfort (phowti/bhowti) - where we see benefit in Shariah,
we will knock on Maulana's door and Mufti Sahib's door
and where we see that the decision will be different,
then we will go to Crown Court, High Court, Supreme Court,
Civil Court, Magistrate, although we know that this
system is not the system of Allah and the Messenger of
Allah, this is the system of the Ministry of Justice here." - S. Manya
Bismillah-ir-Rahman-ir-Raheem
I write this, in relation to the audio that was published on here
where M. Suhail Manya can be heard laying out the condemning of
resorting to the UK Court System (or any other secular justice system
for that matter).
The verse from Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:51) provides
critical guidance for believers on where our allegiances should lie.
Allah Ta’ala says:
“O you who believe! Take not the Yahood and the Nasara for friends.
They are friends one to another. He amongst you who takes them for
friends is (one) of them. Indeed, Allah guides not wrongdoing people.”
The verse from the Glorious Qur'an, 5:51, in which Allah Ta’ala commands
believers not to take the Yahood (Jews) and Nasara (Christians) as close
friends or protectors, has often been interpreted within the context of
loyalty, allegiance, and the integrity of Islamic values. It is a directive
aimed at maintaining a community's distinct moral and ethical framework,
ensuring that loyalty remains with fellow believers and does not compromise
the principles of the faith. This verse also has historical and political
connotations, where believers were advised to be wary of forming alliances
that could weaken their position, as faith and worldly interests sometimes clash.
Now, relating this to M. Suhail Manya, and the controversy surrounding his
speech, we encounter a stark contradiction. He made a public statement
condemning those Muslims who resort to the UK justice system,
implying that turning to non-Islamic authorities for justice was a violation
of Islamic values. He positioned himself as a staunch defender of Shariah
principles, advocating for Islamic solutions to disputes within the
community and shunning Western legal mechanisms as inappropriate for Muslims.
However, the reality, as revealed through his actions and
his followers, paints a different picture. Despite his vocal disapproval
of using the UK legal system, he and his close associates did exactly
that—resorting to the same courts for their own legal disputes. This
contradiction is not just a simple case of hypocrisy but raises deeper
questions about the misuse of religious rhetoric for personal or political gain.
M. Suhail Manya's actions bring to mind the very essence of the Qur'anic
warning: when leaders or figures of influence place themselves as guardians
of religious principles but then contradict those principles in their
personal conduct, they undermine the integrity of the faith and the community.
The verse from Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:51) reminds believers that misplaced
loyalty—whether to external forces or hypocritical leaders—can lead them
astray. The context of the verse suggests that loyalty to those who do not
share or respect the foundational beliefs of Islam can weaken the moral
fabric of a believer’s life.
M. Suhail Manya's case can be seen as a cautionary example. While he used religious
authority to condemn others for seeking justice through non-Islamic channels,
he simultaneously turned to the very systems he criticised. This duplicity
reflects a deeper issue of leadership and responsibility. If a figurehead
encourages division based on selective adherence to Islamic principles,
the unity of the community is at risk, as is the proper application of Islamic justice.
Islamic justice is founded on consistency, fairness, and the pursuit of
truth. Whether one uses an Islamic or a secular legal system, the emphasis
should always be on justice, not selective or opportunistic applications of
religious rulings. The verse warns against aligning with those whose actions
may compromise the moral integrity of believers. In this case, M. Manya's duplicity
compromised the very values he purported to uphold, confusing his followers and
sowing discord within the community.
Ultimately, the lesson we can draw from both the Qur'anic verse and the actions
of M. Manya is that true allegiance to Islam requires sincerity in both speech
and action. Leaders who use religious rhetoric to criticise others while not
applying the same standards to themselves betray the trust placed in them by
their followers.
Vote for Integrity: Support the 15 Candidates
Who Stand for Peace, Progress, and Accountability
In the upcoming election, it is crucial to stand behind candidates
who embody the true values of peace, integrity, and justice.
The 15 candidates we support have remained untainted by
associations with individuals who have engaged in actions that
contradict the principles of Islamic behaviour—no thuggery, violence,
death threats, or situations that required police intervention. They
represent a path forward based on accountability, moral leadership,
and the well-being of our community.
BOXES : 1-2, 9-14, 20, 22-25, 30-31
Dispelling Misconceptions:
A Clearer View of the Masjid's
Actions Regarding the Charity
Commission and Anti-Semitism Complaint
By a Muslim Barrister, currently practicing
at one of London’s chambers.
After thoroughly reviewing both the proceedings from yesterday's
meeting and the letter issued by the Masjid, I feel it is
necessary to provide some legal insight into the matter. There
appears to be confusion and misunderstanding about the Masjid's
actions in relation to the anti-Semitism complaint and its
interaction with the Charity Commission. As someone familiar
with the legal obligations of charities and trustees, I will
clarify the key facts and demonstrate that the Masjid Trustees
acted within the law and in the best interests of the community.
The presentation delivered by the PE DR raises significant concerns,
but upon closer scrutiny, several points must be addressed to
clarify the situation and demonstrate that the Masjid acted
appropriately and within the boundaries of the law.
Firstly, the Masjid Trustees received a complaint regarding
anti-Semitism, with the Charity Commission (CC) copied into
the communication. Prior to this, the Masjid had already been
in correspondence with the Charity Commission about a previous
issue dating back to October 2023. This background shows that
the Masjid was already following due process with the CC,
seeking clarity on how to handle sensitive matters in compliance
with their obligations.
A key issue in the PE DR's argument appears to be the handling
of Suhail Manya's bayaan from October 2023. While the complainant
pressed for immediate police involvement, the Masjid exercised
caution and reached out to the CC for guidance on how best to
proceed. The Masjid did not rush to involve the police, contrary
to the complainant's wishes, but instead sought appropriate advice
from the CC, which is the correct procedural step for an organization
in this position.
The Masjid’s actions demonstrate compliance with legal requirements.
By reporting the matter to the Charity Commission via their online
portal, as instructed, the Masjid fulfilled its obligations under
the law. The suggestion that the Masjid hesitated or was reluctant
to act is misleading—the Masjid took reasonable steps, including
forwarding the recording and other relevant materials to the CC.
The PE DR’s assertion that the Masjid may have sought to dismiss
Mr Manya is also incorrect. The Charity Commission’s mention of
dismissal was based on an assumption from the complainant’s own words,
not from any request made by the Masjid itself. This was clarified
in subsequent meetings with the CC, further proving that the Masjid
was not seeking to dismiss MS, but merely responding to legal
requirements and complaints lodged by a third party.
Additionally, there is the issue of ongoing correspondence
from IWC (Ibrahim Akubat) with the CC, criticizing the Trustees.
While these letters raise questions about the Trustees' competence,
the Masjid Trustees have a legal duty to report serious incidents under
the framework of "self-reporting," which the Masjid correctly followed.
This reporting is not an admission of wrongdoing but a legal requirement
for trustees of charities, especially in regulated sectors, to avoid
serious legal consequences. Any suggestion that this was an overreaction
is misplaced—the Trustees were acting to protect the Masjid and the wider
community from potential penalties.
In conclusion, the Masjid's actions, while perhaps not in line with the
desires of the complainant or the narrative pushed by the PE DR, were
fully compliant with the law. The Masjid acted in good faith, consulted
the appropriate authorities, and sought to protect both the Masjid and the
community from legal repercussions. Any claims to the contrary lack
substance when the full facts are considered.
In closing, I would have willingly provided my full name and the
chambers where I work, but after observing the violent threats
and intimidation directed at those who refuse to tow the line
of Mr. Manya and his party, I am compelled to protect myself and my
family. Such un-Islamic and unethical behaviour is reprehensible,
and for my safety, I must remain anonymous.
Facts about the Anti-Semitism issue
Conveniently Ignored by the PE Dr.
60mins of "It's not our fault" :
A Masterclass in Cloak, Dagger,
and Convenient Amnesia
From Netball to Governance:
How a PhD in PE Turns Charity Disputes Into a Marathon of Nonsense
Let's start with this speaker of the riveting 60mins showstopping presentation.
It all makes sense—the critic has a PhD in PE! Suddenly, his deep expertise in handling legal
disputes, trustee governance, and charity commissions becomes crystal clear. Let's face it, who better
to dissect complex organisational issues than someone trained in the art of blowing whistles
and making sure people stretch properly before a game of gully danda?
With that Mickey Mouse degree, his insights into the intricacies of governance
are just as rigorous as a half-time huddle. Maybe his next solution will involve some
jumping jacks or a trust-fall exercise to solve the election issues. Nothing says
“qualified to critique trustees” like a deep understanding of gym class.
So here’s to our esteemed PhD in PE—an academic titan who’s managed to bring all the
gravitas of a school sports day to a discussion about legal and governance matters.
Truly, the trustees should take note—next time they’re in a board meeting, perhaps
they should start with some press-ups. And to his presentation :
What a spectacle it must have been at Rasputin's little gathering of sycophants!
The room, no doubt, filled with rapturous applause as his loyal followers spun the most
dazzling tale of woe, shifting all the blame on the hapless trustees and committee members.
“Nobody Takes Pleasure in This” - Really? Because the tone suggested otherwise.
If you didn’t know better, you’d think this whole debacle was someone’s passion project
(arrow firmly pointed towards Rasputin). The way they kept repeating how sad and necessary
this is, you almost wonder if they’ve forgotten they’re supposed to be solving the problem,
not revelling in how long it’s dragged on.
“Section 115 Was Granted” - so Section 115 is the legal equivalent of Excalibur.
In reality, it’s just permission for someone to sue. It’s not exactly a badge
of honour. But of course, they spin it like some grand moment of triumph, as
if getting dragged into court is a sign that they’re really making headway.
Wake up, court cases are not signs of success—they’re signs that you’ve failed
to handle your own mess internally.
But one thing was glaring - by it's absence - not a single mention of the inconvenient truths.
Like that of the judge's deduction, in all his judicial wisdom, actually
praised those very same trustees and committee members
for doing what they did – acting in the best interest of the charity. But why let a
pesky little thing like reality get in the way of a good sob story?
The speaker, a PhD in Propaganda Engineering (though it could easily be mistaken
for a doctorate in ‘cloak and dagger’), conveniently "forgot" that the judge
outright dismissed the absurd notion of replacing the current committee with
Rasputin’s merry band of stooges. Imagine getting shut down so swiftly that the court
didn't even blink at the laughable demand to keep Rasputin
safe from the ever-looming threat of… being held accountable. Who would’ve thought?
In the speaker’s dazzling display of selective memory, there was zero mention of
the charming extracurricular activities Rasputin’s gang has been engaged in.
Rasputin's brother brandishing a baseball bat at a committee member's house?
Nope, nothing to see here, folks! Thugs showing up at a trustee’s home to intimidate him?
That must’ve slipped the speaker's mind! And of course, we can't forget the
heart-warming death threats sent to a trustee, promising to murder his grandson.
A minor oversight, surely. After all, when you're trying to make yourself look
like a victim, it's best not to remind the audience that your team has been
running a mafia-style intimidation campaign.
Then there's ringleader of these thugs, Rasputin's right-hand man, CEO of the RDL, Altaf Khanjra
Apparently, he’s just a misunderstood character in this tragic tale — leading
the charge with all the grace of a medieval enforcer, ensuring everyone
knows their place in the grand scheme of Rasputin’s delusions. But again, no
mention of the thuggish behaviour, because, well, why ruin a perfectly good
victim narrative with something as mundane as the truth?
And so we are left with a carefully curated sob story, where Rasputin and
his minions are the misunderstood heroes, valiantly battling against those
evil trustees who dared to… follow the law and act in the charity’s best
interest. How dare they! And all the while, Rasputin’s gang is portrayed as
noble crusaders for justice, while baseball bats are being swung and death
threats sent in the background.
What was witnessed at Waheed's is nothing more than a masterclass in misdirection.
The real story — the one with all the inconvenient truths about court rulings,
violence, and intimidation — got neatly swept under the rug. Instead, we’re
left with Rasputin’s supporters playing victim while engaging in a full-scale
campaign of cloak and dagger.
So, bravo to our PE Dr for managing to turn a complex, multi-faceted situation into
a one-man show of “We told you so” with zero self-awareness.
Standing ovation for that level of delusion.
Rasputin's Brother Spreading Lies -
The Manya's Can't Help But Lie
He runs a recycling business, but the biggest waste he deals
with is the truth—he’s been repurposing the same lies for years!
Another message for a musalli & masjid member :
The slaves of Dajjal (Suhail Manyo)
Irfan Mohammed (Chati)
Altaf Khanjra
Maaz Musa (Golita)
Javed Adam (Laundry)
IkramulHaq Patel (joro)
Saeed Adam (Coli)
These are the slaves of Dajjal who took the mosque to court.
No one in the country has taken the mosque to court for a Dajjal,
who for his ego has ruined a community.
Just as Dajjals followers blindly will follow him these Gaddar/slaves
without even thinking twice about the implications on the elders who
have given their blood and sweat for the mosque. Life long Qurbani of the
elders who established hafiz classes, maktab, and who taught for free.
These Slaves have done nothing for the mosque. Yet like useless dogs
who obey anyone for a bone thrown at them, started barking for an
individual who is so self centred that he would take his parents to
court if he didn’t get his way.
These Gaddars have been used for his dirty work and now have become
a page on the history of Muslims in the west! Wrong side of history!
When their grand children grow up they will be sitting on their laps
and they will be reading the court decision to them explaining their
heroics for Dajjal!
Dajjal will put anyone under the bus:
1. He put all his supporters under the bus when he refused to accept
Bhopa’s apology, when he got suspended he said ‘I was ready to accept but was held back by the crowd’
2. When questioned about why he held the meeting in Ramzan he said
‘I had to because the people wanted me to’
3. When questioned why you taking mosque to court he relied ‘Altaf Khanjra put my name down’
4. When challenged why he complained to HMRC he said it was ‘the teachers not him’
5. Now, after the results of the court hearing he said the 6 applicants are responsible not me
If the community is still sleeping wake up. Suhel Manya is the awakening of Dajjal!
Manipulating the Cause:
When Political Opportunism Becomes Shameless
As the 27th of October draws near, anticipation for the upcoming masjid
committee elections has begun to intensify. Among the various groups vying
for leadership, the campaign tactics employed by Suhail Manya (aka Rasputin) and his clique
have taken an unsettling turn, one that deserves to be called out for
its audacity and cynicism.
It seems their latest approach is to send out a stream of fliers across
WhatsApp, each filled with emotional appeals to vote for their team.
But what truly stands out, or rather sticks out like a sore thumb, is
that each flier is plastered with imagery associated with the Palestinian
cause—Palestinian flags, slogans, and iconography that have no direct
link to the actual issues at stake in this election.
Let’s be clear: the Palestinian cause is one of the most deeply felt
humanitarian and political struggles in the world today. It stirs emotions,
galvanises global movements, and for many, it represents the ongoing
battle for justice and self-determination in the face of oppression.
But to hijack such a profound and universally significant issue for
the sake of local masjid politics? That is not just distasteful—it’s a
blatant exploitation of community sentiments for personal gain.
Suhail Manya and his group have no more connection to the plight of
Palestine than any of the other candidates. The masjid elections are
about the governance and administration of local community affairs,
not about solving international conflicts. Yet, by slapping the
Palestinian flag onto their fliers, they are attempting to manipulate
voters, pulling at the heartstrings of the community as though
voting for their slate is somehow linked to supporting Palestine.
This cynical tactic reduces the Palestinian struggle to little
more than a political football, something to be tossed around for
votes, rather than the serious humanitarian issue that it is. They
are attempting to shame the community into voting for them, as
though not casting a vote for Manya's team is akin to turning your
back on Palestine. Let’s not mince words: this is emotional blackmail,
plain and simple.
Using the suffering of others to elevate one’s own political prospects
is the lowest form of opportunism. It shows a complete disregard for
the dignity of those truly impacted by the situation in Palestine
and a disturbing willingness to exploit anything for votes. It should
make us question the integrity of those using these tactics. If they are
willing to manipulate such a sacred cause to win an election, what else
will they be willing to manipulate once in power?
It’s high time our community recognises these tactics for what they
are: a shameless ploy to gain influence, wrapped in the guise of solidarity.
We must not allow the Palestinian cause to be reduced to a marketing tool,
especially not in the context of local masjid politics. Let the candidates
stand on their own merits, on their ability to serve our community, rather
than hiding behind the flag of the Palestinian struggle.
This election should be about who can best serve our masjid and our
community—not about who can pull at emotional strings with irrelevant
(to the election) issues. Don’t let political opportunism cloud your judgment.
We owe it to ourselves and to the causes we truly care about to
reject these manipulative tactics and vote based on the actual issues at
hand. If Manya and his team have nothing more to offer than guilt trips
and exploitation, then perhaps that tells us all we need to know about
who really deserves to lead.
A Musalli's Heartfelt Plea
(click the image below, to enlarge)
Rasputin's Disgrace Reaches South Africa
Signs of a Hypocrite
وَإِذَا خَاصَمَ فَجَرَ
"when he argues, he resorts to foul language"
Bukhari - Chapter: The signs of a hypocrite - باب عَلاَمَةِ الْمُنَافِقِ
Talk given by Shaykh Mufti Menk saab in September 2024, Jummah.
at Bedfordview Musalla, Johannesburg
Title of Talk : The BIGGEST Hypocrite! (click here for the full lecture)
Message from a Dewsbury Imam / Maulana
(Posted Verbatim)
بسمه تعالى
As an Imam who has observed with growing concern the shameful
actions of Suhail Manya and his clique, I feel compelled to
address the deep hypocrisy that has come to light in recent
years. It is disheartening to see how someone entrusted with
religious leadership has manipulated both his position and
the teachings of Islam for personal gain. Having followed
Manya’s actions closely, I’ve seen how he preaches one
thing from the mimbar, yet acts in stark contradiction
to those very teachings when it serves his convenience.
It is important that we, as a community, hold our religious leaders
accountable when they stray from the path of righteousness.
Below are deductions from Manya's own words and actions,
which expose the inconsistency and self-serving nature of his
leadership. I hope this serves as a wake-up call
for those who still support him, and a reminder that
true leadership is rooted in humility and sincerity, not arrogance and hypocrisy.
From Suhail Manya's own words, and his subsequent
high court action against the Masjid, several key deductions
can be made about his mindset and the contradictions
he embodies :
Selective Application of Shariah: Manya has openly shown
to seeking worldly courts when the Shariah decision might not
align with his desires. This reflects a manipulative approach
to Islamic law, using it only when it serves his interests.
Hypocrisy in Actions vs. Preaching: He acknowledges that
turning to secular courts, such as the Crown Court, High Court,
and others, is outside the system of Allah and the
Prophet (peace be upon him), yet he still justifies doing so.
This reveals a deep hypocrisy in his character, as he warns
against something and then does the very thing he claims is
wrong.
Contradiction Between Belief and Practice: While Manya is
fully aware that the secular legal system is not in accordance
with the principles of Islam, and in his own words
"outside the system of Allah and His Messenger (peace be upon him)".
yet he chooses to use it when it benefits him. This suggests a lack of
conviction in his own teachings, as he is willing to compromise
his beliefs for personal gain.
Self-Serving Justification: His statement implies that when
Shariah law doesn't offer him the desired outcome, he seeks
refuge in secular courts, which indicates a self-serving
nature—seeking ease and comfort wherever it is most convenient,
rather than adhering to consistent principles.
Manya’s actions reveal a self-serving nature — he knocks on the
doors of respected scholars, including his own Shaykh at Azaadville,
but when their advice does not align with his preferences,
he abandons them. Instead of following the guidance of those scholars,
he sought a more favourable outcome by turning to the
High Court, hoping for a result that suited his personal interests better.
This highlights his willingness to abandon religious counsel when
it becomes inconvenient.
By rejecting the advice of even his own teachers/scholars and
seeking out the secular court system, Manya demonstrates a
disregard for religious authority when it contradicts his
personal ambitions. This further erodes his credibility as a leader who
is supposed to embody Islamic principles.
Moral Inconsistency: Manya’s attitude demonstrates that
his moral compass is flexible when it comes to personal benefit.
His willingness to alternate between Shariah and secular law, depending
on what is more pleasing to him, reveals a lack of moral consistency.
He uses the legal system, whether religious or secular, as a tool to
serve his own ends, rather than adhering to the principles he claims to uphold.
These deductions paint a picture of Suhail Manya as someone who manipulates
religious and legal systems to suit his own convenience, rather than consistently
upholding the values he preaches. His actions betray not only the trust of his
followers but also the religious scholars he claims to respect. His journey to the
High Court is a clear sign of a man who places personal gain above religious sincerity.
From Pulpit to High Court:
Yet More Hypocrisy Exposed
Translation :
"What do we do if there are mistakes in our intentions?
Seek ease and comfort (phowti/bhowti) - where we see benefit in Shariah,
we will knock on Maulana's door and Mufti Sahib's door
and where we see that the decision will be different,
then we will go to Crown Court, High Court, Supreme Court,
Civil Court, Magistrate, although we know that this
system is not the system of Allah and the Messenger of
Allah, this is the system of the Ministry of Justice here."
- Suhail Manya, from one of his sermon's on the pulpit
Wake Up and Smell the Coffee
Shock and disbelief—a preacher who preaches one thing, then
turns around and does the very thing he warned his
congregation not to do.
Will you be the ones whose hearts and ears
remain sealed, even in the face of overwhelming evidence?
To the followers of Rasputin (aka Suhail Manya), if there ever was a time to
pause and reflect, it's now, and, as the saying goes, "wake up and smell the coffee."
For far too long, many of you have rallied behind a man who, by his own actions,
has proven the depths of his hypocrisy. While his sermons were once filled
with pomp and arrogance, painting a grand picture of righteousness, his own
conduct tells a very different story.
Let us take a closer look at what has transpired. Rasputin, while standing at the
pulpit as the Imam of Tauheedul, once thundered about the evils of seeking
justice in "kufr" courts, denouncing anyone who dared to stray from Islamic advice.
He preached that turning to secular courts instead of the Shariah was a betrayal
of Allah's command. His words were full of fire and brimstone, warning that
seeking "ease and comfort" (phowti and bhowti) through worldly systems
was an act of disobedience.
Yet, when the tides turned against him, what did he do? The very same man who
so self-righteously condemned others for turning to secular courts took his
own mosque— yes, his mosque —to the High Court. The shameful irony couldn't be
more glaring. The very system he preached against, he now runs to for relief,
expecting to find justice in the very "kufr" court system he once claimed
was unworthy of believers.
How, then, can you continue to cheer for this man? How can you, with clear
hearts, support someone who has so clearly betrayed his own words, his own
teachings, and, more significantly, the very essence of Islamic principles?
Rasputin Manya has fallen from grace—not because the system or the world
conspired against him, but because of his own actions. It's a
a stark reminder of what happens when hypocrisy overtakes sincerity.
Allah does not overlook the arrogance of those who preach one thing and
practice another. The consequences of such duplicity are not just personal;
they ripple out, affecting the community, the very people who once looked up
to him as a leader.
Now, we ask you, his remaining followers—what will it take for you to see the
truth? Are you willing to risk your own spiritual well-being by continuing to
support a man who has so brazenly went against his own preaching ? Remember,
the deen warns us of hypocrites—those who say what they do not do,
who break trust, and who act against the very teachings they claim to uphold.
The fall of Rasputin aka Suhail Manya is a lesson. A lesson not just for him,
but for all of us who are willing to see it. His disgrace should serve as
a warning: when arrogance blinds us, when we manipulate religion for our own
ease and convenience (phowti and bhowti), Allah will surely expose our hypocrisy.
The choice is now yours. Will you continue to support a man who has lost both
respect and righteousness, or will you awaken to the reality that following
such a leader can lead you down the same path of disgrace? Be cautious, for
the same fate that has befallen him may well await those who blindly support
such hypocrisy.
Reflect, repent, and reconsider where your loyalties lie before it is too late.
The time to wake up and act is now, before the judgment that awaits Rasputin Manya
reaches those who have followed him blindly into the same pit of dishonour.
Rasputin’s Ego vs. Sacred Advice:
A Lesson To Heed
In the world of spiritual guidance and leadership, there are few greater
blessings than the advice and wisdom of our respected ulama. These are
the scholars who have spent their lives immersed in the study of deen,
guiding communities with humility, integrity, and sincerity. Yet, as the
story of Rasputin has tragically shown, even the most respected advice can
fall on deaf ears when arrogance and ego take hold.
This summer, Rasputin, a man who once boasted of his credentials and
clout, approached none other than his own senior teacher from Azadville,
the esteemed Shaykh al-Hadith Hazrat Maulana Shah Abdul Hamid Is'haq Sahib حفظه الله.
This was no ordinary scholar—this was the founder and principal of the very
Darul Uloom where Rasputin studied, a man held in the highest regard not
just in the UK but internationally. In a moment of what many hoped was humility,
Rasputin sought the Shaykh’s advice, a sign that perhaps he was willing to
acknowledge the turmoil and chaos he had stirred within the community.
But what transpired next only deepened the disappointment.
The Shaykh, ever the wise guide, did not mince his words. In no uncertain
terms, he advised Rasputin that his time had come to step aside. He had lost
the trust and confidence of the very community he claimed to serve, and the
dignified thing to do—the action most pleasing to Allah—was to move on.
It was a clear, concise, and heartfelt piece of naseehah (advice), grounded
in the principles of humility and service to the greater good.
Did Rasputin heed this sacred advice from his own teacher, a man who had
mentored him in the ways of deen and tarbiyyah? Sadly, no. Instead of
bowing to the wisdom of his elders, Rasputin chose to follow the dictates
of his ego. Rather than gracefully stepping down, he continued his campaign
of disruption, turmoil, and even violence. In a shocking turn of events,
he didn’t just ignore the advice of his senior ulama—he resorted to taking
his grievances to a kufr court, hoping to manipulate the secular legal
system to his favour. A system that stands in stark contrast to the very
Shariah principles he once claimed to uphold from the pulpit.
What has been the result of this gross defiance? A fall from grace so
profound that Rasputin has become an object of disdain and ridicule not
only among the ulama of the UK, but abroad as well. His name, once associated
with fiery sermons and confident speeches, has now become synonymous with
arrogance, deception, and betrayal of trust. The very people he used
to preach to week in and week out now see him for what he truly is—a man
who placed his own ego and desire for power above the sacred advice of
Allah’s servants.
This is a man who spent two decades pontificating about humility, justice,
and service. Yet all of it has come to nought, undone by his own unchecked
ambition. He imagined himself invincible, cloaked in the guise of piety and
adorned with sweet-talking words. But the façade has crumbled. The same
community that once listened to his lectures with reverence now looks upon
him with scorn, seeing clearly the hollow nature of his actions.
The ego that pushed him to seek power and control has left him exposed
as nothing more than a charlatan in a beard and thobe. He is precisely
the kind of faux alim that the Prophet (peace be upon him) warned
us about—those who mislead the ummah by their outward appearance, while
inwardly they are consumed by pride and self-interest.
This moral collapse is a lesson for all of us. It teaches us that when we
ignore the advice of our respected elders and the scholars who carry the
trust of deen, we stray from the path of righteousness. Rasputin’s fall
from grace is not just a cautionary tale for leaders, but for every one of
us. The words of the Shaykh, his own teacher, were not just personal
advice—they were the voice of Allah’s deen calling him back to humility,
to submission, to service. And when he turned away from that call, he
sealed his own downfall.
Ultimately, Rasputin’s story is a reminder that true strength does
not come from controlling others or clinging to power. It comes from
submission to Allah, from listening to those who have more wisdom and
experience than ourselves, and from knowing when to step aside for the
greater good. Rasputin failed to learn this lesson, and now he finds
himself isolated, ridiculed, and exposed.
May Allah protect us from the arrogance that leads to such ruin,
and may we always heed the sincere advice of those who guide us in
the ways of truth.
Behind the Curtain:
Insider Reveals the Real Reason
for Rasputin's Sudden Sick Leave
For those wondering why the mighty Rasputin has suddenly vanished behind
the veil of a one-month "sick leave" citing mental health and stress, a
little digging reveals a far more intriguing story. Despite the public
narrative of "self-care" and "burnout," it seems the true reason lies in the
crushing blow dealt to Rasputin and his inner circle in court—an outcome that
did not unfold quite as they had hoped.
According to sources close to Rasputin - within his own circle, his sudden retreat has less to do
with mental exhaustion and more to do with a court decision that completely
derailed his grand plan. Rasputin and his allies had been expecting the judge
to rule in their favour, ideally finding constitutional breaches and illicit
actions by the trustees and the existing committee. This, in their minds,
would have been the perfect excuse to push for the removal of the entire
committee and, more importantly, the trustees—positions Rasputin has long
been eyeing for his loyal supporters.
Those in the know will recall Rasputin’s infamous manoeuvre at the Bolton DU,
where he tried a similar takeover, attempting to replace the committee with his
own band of obedient followers. The plan this time around was no different. A
ruling against the trustees and committee would have paved the way for Rasputin’s
allies to swoop in and seize control. In fact, the cherry on top would have been
the judge approving a so-called "Fake TWC" made up of Rasputin’s carefully selected
puppet trustees—people with little experience but maximum loyalty. Rasputin and his
team had their hopes pinned on this outcome, fully expecting the judge to deliver
it to them on a silver platter.
But fate had other ideas.
Instead of handing Rasputin the victory he so desperately craved, the judge
saw through the entire ruse. Rather than dismantling the current committee and
trustees, he actually commended them stating they were doing "what was best for the community".
The judge instead opted for something far more inconvenient for Rasputin and
his cohorts: a rerun of the election under fair terms, precisely the solution
Rasputin and his gang had opposed from the start. And as if that weren't bad enough,
the judge also ordered the reinstatement of the very committee Rasputin had made a
spectacle of getting rid of in the first place. Yes, you read that right—the same
committee that Rasputin and his merry band of goons spent months vilifying
was now back in power.
If that wasn’t enough of a blow, the judge also made it clear that Rasputin’s
request for immunity from being ousted was not even worth considering. In
short, the court had not only blocked his schemes but also left him
more vulnerable than ever.
On the surface, Rasputin and his minions tried to spin this as a victory.
After all, they needed to save face. But those close to him know the truth:
this was a crushing defeat. The dream of a Rasputin-controlled committee, with
his loyalists in key trustee positions, lay in tatters. Worse still, the judge’s
ruling meant that the reinstated committee now had every right to give Rasputin his
marching orders—a decision they could've easily made.
Faced with the humiliation of being sacked by the very people he had tried to oust,
Rasputin’s team devised a clever exit strategy. Enter: the sick note. By claiming
stress and mental health issues, Rasputin bought himself time and, more importantly,
cover. The hope is that by invoking mental health, the committee will be hesitant to
fire him, fearing the public backlash that might arise from dismissing someone on sick
leave. After all, what kind of organisation would fire someone going through such
a "difficult time," right?
In reality, Rasputin’s retreat has nothing to do with mental health and everything
to do with damage control. The man who spent years lecturing others about strength
and resolve in the face of adversity couldn’t stomach the idea of facing the
consequences of his own failed schemes. And so, he’s taken refuge in a self-imposed
sick leave, hoping to dodge the axe long enough to regroup.
But as his inner circle admits, this isn’t a long-term solution. The clock is ticking,
and Rasputin’s political machinations have left him more exposed than ever. Whether
he’ll bounce back or fade into the shadows remains to be seen. For now, though,
his "sick leave" is nothing more than a strategic retreat—a desperate attempt to
avoid the fallout of a plan that backfired spectacularly.
One thing’s for sure: the mighty Rasputin, once the master of the pulpit and puppet
strings, has been brought down not by stress, but by his own overconfidence.
Rasputin the Mighty:
From Jihadi Warrior to Workplace Wimp
The Paper Tiger: Roaring from the Pulpit, Crumbling at the Desk
In a move that has left even the most devoted of his followers scratching their
heads in disbelief, our dear Rasputin, the self-proclaimed Mujahid of the modern
world, the lion of the pulpit, has done the unthinkable: submitted a month-long
sick leave for mental health reasons . Yes, you heard that right. The man who has
spent years thundering down from his lofty mimbar about unwavering strength, the
divine virtues of suffering, and the necessity of resisting life’s temptations has now
succumbed to—wait for it— stress and anxiety .
For someone who has made a career out of reminding everyone else that their faith is
lacking, that the Palestinians wouldn't be in their predicament if only they turned
more fervently to Allah, this... is rich.
Let's recap, shall we? Rasputin's speeches, delivered with such fervour you'd
think he had just returned from the front lines of every battlefield from Gaza to
Kandahar, have long been a masterclass in sanctimonious finger-wagging. Palestinians,
Syrians, Afghans—entire nations under siege? Oh, don’t worry, folks, Rasputin had the
answer! "If only you had faith as strong as mine," he'd say, his voice booming like a war drum,
"you would endure these hardships with a smile. Suffering is a test from Allah, a
path to spiritual fortitude!"
He lectured the downtrodden, the weary, the starving—essentially anyone who didn’t
have the luxury of air conditioning in their prayer room—on how their hardships were
simply a lack of spiritual rigour. "If your iman was stronger," Rasputin preached,
"these trials would be nothing but a breeze."
And yet, here we are. The self-anointed warrior of the pulpit, a man who claimed to
embody the spirit of struggle, is crumbling like a stale piece of bread. After one bad
board meeting, a couple of uncomfortable emails, and—heaven forbid—a misplaced memo, Rasputin
has declared himself too stressed to carry on. Gone is the lion of the mimbar; in his
place, we have a nervous wreck, wrapped in a weighted blanket, sipping herbal tea to
calm his shattered nerves.
Where is that jihadi spirit now, Rasputin? The struggle you always glorified? Where is
that unwavering resolve in the face of adversity, the same one you so mercilessly
demanded of the Palestinians, the Syrians, the Afghans? Apparently, it’s nowhere to be
found when your biggest enemy is... work emails.
The great irony of it all, of course, is that Rasputin’s meltdown is happening over a
matter that, in comparison to the daily struggles of those he lectured, is a mere
storm in a teacup . The man who practically accused the ummah of weakness and
spiritual flabbiness is now writing a doctor’s note because the "stress" of having to
deal with Karen from HR has proved too much for his heroic constitution.
It’s almost as if all that high-and-mighty talk about relying on Allah in the face of
hardship doesn’t quite cut it when it’s your life that’s falling apart, eh Rasputin?
Suddenly, the man who dismissed the struggles of war-torn nations as spiritual
failures is now in desperate need of a month-long Netflix binge and some lavender-scented
candles to recover from the horrors of... well, mild office stress.
So, dear Rasputin, as you settle into your cozy break, remember the words you once
hurled at the rest of us. Perhaps in the solitude of your sick leave, you'll recall
the countless times you belittled those suffering genuine adversity. And maybe—just
maybe—you’ll understand that sometimes, even the mighty need a little compassion, a
little humanity, and, dare we say it, a little less self-righteous pontificating.
Though we're not counting on it.
Rasputin’s Revolution:
How to Lose Power and Call It a Victory
Grand Fizzle - A Masterclass in Winning Absolutely Nothing
Rasputin’s Revolution: How to Lose Power and Call It a Victory
What a triumph for the applicants! Surely, their legal odyssey will be sung through the
halls of Masjid e Tauheedul Islam for generations to come—a textbook case of winning a battle
while setting fire to their own castle.
First, let’s raise a glass to Rasputin and his noble quest to cling to power
like a barnacle on a sinking ship. His wish for the court to decree that he couldn’t
be dismissed? Well, let’s just say the High Court was about as interested in granting
that as it was in adopting Rasputin’s beard oil routine . The judge, with all the tact
and decorum of a seasoned diplomat, politely declined to intervene in such trifling
matters as whether Rasputin could hold onto his little fiefdom. So, Rasputin remains exactly
where he started—on the outside, looking in, and wistfully stroking his metaphorical beard.
Then there’s the coup de grâce: the applicants’ grand vision of an interim working committee
handpicked by their benevolent selves. Alas, what could have been! The golden opportunity to
lord over the mosque, restructuring the very fabric of the community under their enlightened
rule. But alas, the judge had other plans, namely to restore the very Executive Committee they so
desperately sought to unseat. Yes, the very same group they claimed was ruining everything is now back
in the driver’s seat until the next General Meeting. A shocking twist, truly—one that
leaves Rasputin and his comrades wandering the political wilderness, scratching their heads
and asking, “Wait, didn’t we come here to remove them?”
And what of the great victory? The order to re-run the election. But wait—the election
that’s to be re-run is precisely the one the previous committee had already agreed to! You know,
the election plan that Rasputin and his loyalists so vehemently rejected, because it didn’t meet
their exacting standards of self-serving governance? Well, guess what? The High Court has
decreed that the show must go on—in exactly the same manner the previous committee laid out.
It’s almost as if the court said, “You didn’t like that election? Tough luck. You’re
getting it again.” But hey, the paperwork will now be constitutionally airtight, so there’s that.
But let’s not forget the real kicker: the trustees and the new committee ,
who the applicants had painted as a villainous cabal of power-hungry overlords, were
exonerated by the judge in no uncertain terms. The judge went out of his way to
commend them, saying they were acting in “the best interests of the community”
all along. How that must sting! Imagine going to court, expecting to rid the mosque of
this terrible menace, only to have the judge essentially say, “Actually, they seem like good
folks who are doing their best.”
And so, the applicants have achieved… well, another round of voting.
Huzzah! Rasputin and his crew can now sit back and watch the very election process they
rejected unfold—this time with the court’s blessing. No new working committee of their choosing,
no sweeping reforms, and no judge-sanctioned Rasputin dynasty.
To sum it up, the applicants’ grand victory is not so much a triumph as a
resounding echo of ‘please try again later’. Rasputin’s master plan? Well and truly buggered.
Selective Outrage and Shameless Opportunism
The following is a response to the comical, schoolboy-level puff piece and
faux outrage that attempts to stir controversy over events that occurred more
than two decades ago. This laughable attempt at revisionist history,
filled with selective memory and hypocritical accusations, fails to acknowledge
the glaring contradictions in Rasputin's own actions and motives during
that time.
What follows is a much-needed correction to this poorly constructed narrative.
This accusation reeks of hypocrisy and shameless opportunism. Rasputin, who now
pretends to stand on some moral pedestal, was more than eager to host Jack Straw
at Tauheedul Masjid when the Qatari donation worth millions was secured. He didn’t
flinch while standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the very people he now criticises.
Not only did he remain employed at the mosque he and his cronies now smear, but
he also benefitted from the same donation Haji Adam Patel ؒ worked tirelessly to
secure. If Rasputin had any principles, where was his outrage back then?
Why didn’t he speak up against Jack Straw during his appearance at the mosque,
or in the years that followed? The answer is simple: he knew his silence would
guarantee him favour with the Qatari diplomat and prolong his stay as imam.
His sudden moral grandstanding is nothing more than a sham, designed to suit his own agenda.
All this vitriol towards Haji Adam Patel ؒ and Jack Straw, two decades after the fact,
is cowardly and opportunistic. Rasputin was happy to fawn over the Qatari diplomat
like a starstruck fan, basking in the glow of attention as if he was rubbing
shoulders with rock stars. Now, he bashes the same people, knowing full well
that neither Haji Adam Patel ؒ nor Jack Straw can respond, especially Haji Adam Patel ؒ ,
who is no longer with us. His attacks on the man who singlehandedly secured
that Qatari donation are not only disgraceful but reek of bitterness and envy.
Where was this so-called courage when the cameras were rolling, and Jack Straw
was shaking hands in the masjid? Nowhere to be found—because at the time,
Rasputin was too busy enjoying the attention, too focused on his own gain.
As for the claim that anti-Semitism is being used to sack him—Rasputin should
take a long look at his own history before playing the victim card. He has
used his platform to attack people when it’s convenient and silent when
it's to his benefit. Let’s not forget, his current criticism of people
like Haji Adam Patel ؒ and Jack Straw is over two decades too late. His
attempts to rewrite history are nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to save
face and shift blame. The truth is, Rasputin's history of hypocrisy, opportunism,
and self-serving behaviour speaks for itself.
What’s even more galling is Rasputin's hypocrisy towards the awards and
recognitions of others, accusing them of being “sellouts” for receiving MBEs
and knighthoods, while he himself stayed silent when it mattered most. His
tirades are not about principle or justice—they are about resentment and jealousy.
Rasputin's only concern has always been Rasputin. He stands now, railing against
figures like Haji Adam Patel ؒ and the trustees of Star Academies, but back then,
he was more than happy to sit quietly, sucking up to those in power, knowing
it would benefit him. In fact he even applied and failed, to become it's principal.
He also applied and failed an application to teach at the same Tauheedul school
that he has since hurled abuse towards - like a lover scorned.
If he had any real moral convictions,
he would have spoken up when it mattered before he got rejected. Instead,
his silence back then—and his hollow outrage
now—show that he’s nothing more than a man chasing power,
willing to throw anyone under the bus to get it.
Hypocrisy and Spiritual Ruin:
The Dangers of the Non-Mahram
Interactions in the Parents
Madrasah WhatsApp Group
Scathing Report on Parents Using WhatsApp Group in Violation of Islamic Teachings
It is with great concern that we must address the inappropriate behaviour occurring
within a WhatsApp group, where non-mahram men and women are engaging in direct communication,
despite the explicit teachings of Islam forbidding such interactions. This situation is made
even more disturbing due to the involvement of Rasputin's brothers, who are engaging
in inflammatory exchanges with non-mahram women to advocate for the reinstatement of
Rasputin. This hypocrisy is as glaring as it is dangerous.
Violating Core Islamic Principles
Islamic teachings are crystal clear on matters of inter-gender communication.
The Shariah aims to protect one's religious integrity by closing all doors that could
lead to temptation, desire, and sin. Communication between non-mahram men and women,
especially in informal settings like WhatsApp, is one of these doors. The potential for
conversations to devolve into admiration, infatuation, and sinful behaviour is well-documented
in both Islamic texts and real-life cases.
Ibn al-Jawzi, in Dhamm al-Hawa (p. 582), highlights the grave consequences of casual communication
between men and women. He reflects on how even tribes that trusted themselves to refrain
from sinning were eventually led to disaster through these very interactions. When people
are exposed to something their nafs (desires) are inclined towards, they either fall into
sin or suffer from the internal conflict caused by trying to resist it.
In this WhatsApp group, Rasputin’s brothers are violating these very principles,
putting themselves and others at risk of spiritual destruction. Their brazen
encouragement of non-mahram communication, under the guise of protesting for Rasputin’s
reinstatement, is nothing short of a perversion of Islamic values.
Hypocrisy of Rasputin’s Teachings
It is important to emphasise that Rasputin himself has historically been an advocate
for strict separation between non-mahram men and women. He has preached vehemently
against gender mixing in any form. Yet, here we find his own brothers using illicit
communication with non-mahram women for the sake of his personal benefit,
in instigating the women to demonstrate for Rasputin's reinstatement.
This blatant hypocrisy is an affront to the very principles Rasputin claims to uphold.
It begs the question: Is Rasputin unaware of this transgression? Or does he simply
choose to remain silent because it benefits his cause? Regardless of the answer,
the fact remains that this kind of double standard is destructive to the moral
and spiritual well-being of the community. When leaders fail to practice what
they preach, the entire foundation of their credibility crumbles.
Islamic Guidelines on Social Interaction
The teachings of Islam provide clear guidelines on how men and women should interact,
even in the context of announcement, study groups or da’wah. A woman should not participate in social
media groups or WhatsApp forums unless there is a clear benefit, such as religious education or da’wah.
Even in these cases, strict rules must be followed.
The parents madrasah WhatsApp group in question clearly does not adhere to these principles.
Instead, it fosters an environment where inappropriate communication can thrive,
furthering the potential for spiritual harm. Non-mahram addressing and exchanging messaging
in the group with each other. Rasputin's brothers riling the women to demonstrate for his
reinstatement is a prime example. Exchange of such messages is categorically forbidden.
The Responsibility of Parents and Guardians
What is even more troubling is the role that these parents—both mothers and
fathers— are playing in the group. It is the duty of every Muslim parent to ensure that
they be an example for their children and adhere to Islamic principles, especially in
matters of inter-gender interactions. By participating in or allowing themselves to
communicate with each other in such a way, these parents are complicit
in the spread of haram behaviour and are not being the shepherds which
the Prophet ﷺ had commanded parents to be for their children.
This shameful behaviour must be condemned, and parents must take responsibility for
upholding the sanctity of Islamic teachings. Such WhatsApp groups,
where non mahram male and female interact freely, pose a serious problem.
_______________
Mufti Ebrahim Salejee - Khalifah of Maulana Maseehullah Khan Saab (reh)
who in turn was the Khalifah of the Mujaddid, Hakeemul
Ummat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (reh)
fatwa on this matter is unequivocal:
"such behaviour is not acceptable. The casual mixing of non-mahram within these platforms is
contrary to the modesty and separation required by Islam."
_______________
Mufti Ismaeel Bassa - Mufti for the Jamiatul Ulama KZN (SA) Fatwa Department :
"it will not be permissible to include females on a WhatsApp group in order to share general messages."
_______________
In conclusion, the actions of Rasputin's brothers, as well as the parents involved in this WhatsApp group,
represent a significant deviation from Islamic principles. Islam mandates strict guidelines to prevent
temptation and preserve modesty, and the flouting of these guidelines is dangerous both spiritually
and morally. Furthermore, the hypocrisy of Rasputin’s silence on this matter where
his brothers are concerned only deepens the betrayal of Islamic values.
Parents must ensure that interactions, both online and offline,
adhere to the principles of taqwa (God-consciousness). Failure to do so will
lead to spiritual ruin, as the doors to temptation are left wide open,
threatening the faith and integrity of all involved.
May Allah guide us to righteousness and protect us from the evils of temptation.
Whistleblower's Testimony: Rasputin's
Neglect & Self Serving Leadership
What follows is a detailed account from an Ustaad and Alim who taught at
the Bolton DU for nearly 10 years, enduring Rasputin greed filled incompetent
leadership. His experience sheds light on the horrifying conditions
and complete neglect that plagued the institution, exposing a deep-rooted
failure to ensure the safety, well-being, and basic dignity of the pupils
under Rasputin's care. All the while Rasputin and his evil cohorts exploited
students (see previous post) to enrich themselves.
Through this testimony, one can see the shocking truth about
the mismanagement, lawlessness, and intimidation tactics that defined Rasputin's
regime at the school.
The tragic account published on here titled "The Tyranny Within" nudged
me to corroborate what that particular Alim had written regarding the
dire state the Darul-uloom was being run under S. Manya, and the disgusting
exploitation of the talibs, extorting money from them at every opportunity :
As a senior teacher at the Islamic boarding school, I witnessed first-hand
the appalling conditions and complete disregard for student welfare.
The leaders consistently failed to promote the health and well-being of
the pupils and neglected their legal obligations to keep them safe.
Many parts of the school, including the boarding accommodations, were
in a terrible state of disrepair.
I saw peeling paint on walls, caused by damp and mould. Rubbish,
including food waste, was left uncleared, and shockingly, bird faeces
were found in students' bedrooms. The school and boarding premises
were utterly unsuitable for pupils, boarders, and staff alike.
The lack of cleanliness posed a significant risk to everyone's health
and well-being. Toilets and washing facilities were neither clean nor
well-maintained, with no handwash, toilet rolls, or proper hand drying
facilities available. There were no signs to indicate when water was
hot or unsuitable for drinking. Even the water dispensers were filthy,
insufficient in number, and poorly located.
The changing areas and shower facilities were equally appalling. Showers
had been repaired, but the workmanship was so poor that tiles were missing,
sealant was haphazardly applied, and they weren’t even waterproof. These
cubicles quickly began to deteriorate; many were still dirty, with insects
crawling around the shower bases.
There had been no cleaning staff employed for months, and no one was
responsible for the maintenance of the school’s premises. Fire safety
was virtually non-existent. During one inspection, fire doors were
found locked, and after-dark evacuation routes to assembly areas were
unlit. The leadership was woefully unprepared to comply with fire safety laws.
The careless attitude of allowing under and over 18-year-olds to mix
together further added to the list of issues. Despite repeated warnings
from inspectors, the leaders failed to meet the statutory guidance
from the Secretary of State and consistently violated health and safety laws.
Many of the staff members had not completed safeguarding training.
While a health and safety policy had been rewritten to comply with laws,
the leadership blatantly ignored it. The principal and his enablers
acted as though they were above the law, intimidating anyone who questioned
their accountability regarding the students’ welfare and safety.
My experience working there was a constant battle against leadership that
prioritised vile intimidation and neglect over the well-being of the students.
Rasputin's Shameless Fraud Attempt:
Manipulating a Charity for Personal Gain
The following received from an insider who was at the Bolton DU during and at the end of Rasputin's failed reign :
Below are two emails that were sent by Manya and one of his associates during the upheaval at Bolton DU.
Manya dismissed a teacher and when challenged, he lied and like a coward claimed to have resigned as
executive principal and directed the complainant to the trust board.
Note that Barber is writing in the capacity of trustee. He was never a trustee of Bolton Darul Uloom - he was, however,
a trustee of the charity set up by Manya of the same name. Further proof that Manya and his cronies were
transitioning the Bolton Darul Uloom to their charity....and its assets with it!
____________________
From: Arif Baber <ababer@barbercosolicitors.co.uk>
To: ********@yahoo.co.uk' <**********@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2018 11:37:07 BST
Subject: Your resignation
Dear Mr *******
I and the trustees acknowledges receipt of your handwritten letter dated the 19th May 2018 sent by
recorded delivery to the former principle’s home address in Blackburn and to the institute.
The contents have been noted with some dismay and in particular your various threats contained therein.
However we as trustees are not prepared to embroil ourselves in protracted correspondence.
For the record I write not as the appointed solicitor to the institute that is another firm, and I
do not write on behalf of the former learned principal Mr Master who resigned his posts after the
inspection in April 2018.Likwise we accepted your resignation too during the trustees meeting post
inspection.
I write in the capacity of a trustee on behalf of myself and my fellow trustees and to advise you
not to contact Mr Master as he does not have the authority to deal with your emails and or letters.
Should you feel the need to contact us then please free to direct your communication to the trustees
and we will endeavour to reply in a timely manner.
Please bear in mind the current board of trustees do not meet on a daily basis thus there may be delay in replying.
Yours faithfully,
Arif Barber
---------------------
From: suhail <******@hotmail.co.uk>
To: ******* <******@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2018 12:27:09 BST
Subject: Re: Hi.
Good Afternoon ******,
I have since resigned as executive principal, so please contact the Trust Board.
This is a matter for the Trust Board.
Thanks
-----------------------------------------------
Link: Click Here
The first is the one Rasputin and his crooks created to carry out their attempted theft.
The second one is the genuine Bolton DU Charity
___________________
Now let's look at the details of both the fake and genuine charities.
Compare details of both, and see for yourselves the manipulative deceit in play:
Details of the fake one :
Link for the above here : CLICK HERE
____________________________________
Details of the genuine charity :
Link for the above here : CLICK HERE
Rasputin's Final Days in the Bunker
The Shadow of Narcissism:
A Case Study of Suhail Manya
and Abuse of Power
This is another report that was composed at our request by Dr. Jibreel
(see below post for short bio). Dr. Jibreel provides a deep and
insightful analysis of Manya's behaviour, leadership style, and the
disturbing patterns that have emerged throughout his career.
This report offers a unique perspective on the psychological traits
and manipulative tactics employed by Manya, shedding light on the
broader implications for those remaining few who continue to
support him despite his well-documented transgressions.
Posted as received, verbatim :
Comparative Analysis: Narcissistic Traits in Individuals Holding Positions
of Authority - A Case Study of Suhail Manya (Rasputin)
Introduction:
This report aims to analyse the presence of narcissistic personality traits
in individuals holding positions of authority, specifically focusing on the
case of Suhail Manya, also known as Rasputin, who held significant influence
within the Darul Uloom Bolton and Tauheedul institutions. Narcissistic
personality disorder (NPD) is a mental health condition characterized by a
grandiose sense of self-importance, a need for admiration, a lack of empathy, and a
desire for control. We will compare the documented characteristics of NPD with
Manya's observed behaviour within the aforementioned institutions.
______________________
1. Grandiosity and Exaggerated Sense of Self-Importance:
General Traits - Individuals with NPD often demonstrate an inflated sense of
self-importance, believing they are superior to others. They may possess an
exaggerated sense of their accomplishments and abilities, and often require
constant admiration.
Suhail Manya - Manya exhibited a marked sense of grandiosity, viewing himself
as the rightful and ultimate leader of Darul Uloom Bolton. This belief manifested
in his attempt to seize control of the institution through a hostile takeover.
His perceived superiority led him to manipulate and coerce others into
accepting his vision, demonstrating a disregard for the consequences of his actions.
______________________
2. Manipulative and Controlling Behaviours:
General Traits - Individuals with NPD seek to exert control over others
through manipulation. Tactics employed may include gaslighting, isolating
individuals from external influences, and fostering dependence on the individual
with NPD. This manipulation serves to maintain their power and authority.
Suhail Manya - Manya's actions within Darul Uloom Bolton mirrored the manipulative
tactics associated with NPD. He intimidated staff into signing documents without
fully understanding their content, coerced students into making false statements,
and used fear and intimidation to maintain control. His actions underscore his
desire to exert absolute control over those around him.
______________________
3. Lack of Empathy and Exploitation:
General Traits - A key characteristic of NPD is a profound lack of empathy.
Individuals with NPD often view others as tools to be manipulated for personal gain,
disregarding the emotional and psychological well-being of those around them.
This can manifest in financial, emotional, or even physical abuse.
Suhail Manya - Manya's actions demonstrated a lack of empathy and an exploitative
approach towards those under his authority. He was accused of financially
exploiting students, extorting money under false pretences, and creating a
hostile environment where staff felt unable to speak out against his behaviour.
His disregard for the well-being of others highlights his narcissistic tendencies.
______________________
4. Authoritarian Leadership and Demand for Absolute Obedience:
General Traits - Individuals with NPD often exhibit authoritarian leadership
styles, demanding unquestioning obedience and punishing those who challenge
their authority. This desire for absolute control serves to maintain their
power and influence within the group.
Suhail Manya - Manya's leadership style at Darul Uloom Bolton was highly
authoritarian. He ruled with an iron fist, suspending staff who dared to
oppose him, monitoring their movements, and restricting basic freedoms. His
relentless pursuit of absolute control over the institution and its members
is a hallmark of his narcissistic tendencies.
______________________
5. Paranoid Ideation and Persecution Complex:
General Traits - Paranoid ideation is a common feature of NPD. Individuals
with NPD often believe they are being threatened by external forces or internal
enemies, leading to a persecution complex. This allows them to justify their
oppressive actions and rally supporters against perceived threats to their power.
Suhail Manya - Towards the end of his tenure, Manya displayed marked paranoia. He
became increasingly suspicious of those around him, accusing staff and students of
conspiring against him. This paranoia fuelled his oppressive measures, as he
sought to eliminate any potential threats to his authority.
______________________
6. Charisma and Manipulation of Trust:
General Traits - Individuals with NPD often possess a charisma that allows
them to exert influence over others. This charisma can be used to manipulate
individuals into believing in their vision, regardless of its legitimacy or
potential consequences.
Suhail Manya - While Manya may not have possessed the same level of charisma
typically attributed to cult leaders, he did exert a significant influence
within Darul Uloom Bolton. His ability to manipulate and intimidate others
into following his lead suggests a form of charisma rooted in fear and control
rather than admiration and trust.
______________________
Conclusion
A comparative analysis of Suhail Manya's behaviour with the characteristics
of NPD reveals striking similarities. His actions within Darul Uloom Bolton
demonstrate the dangers of individuals with narcissistic personality traits
holding positions of authority. Manya's case highlights the importance of
recognizing and addressing the potential harm caused by such individuals,
particularly in settings where they wield significant power and influence
over others.
A Tragic Tale of Exclusion:
When Rasputin Denied a Child Her Final Wish
Below article reproduced courtesy of Mufti Satia.
The second imam mentioned in the article is referring to Rasputin.
He said that the girl will be a hazard in case of a fire.
Simply put, he refused a disabled girl access to view the masjid.
This girl has since passed away at a tender age.
__________________
I am Gujarati: Hands Off My Mosque
An Eye-Watering Story
by Mufti Ismail ibn Nazir Satia
12 September 2020
ومن أظلم ممن منع مساجد الله أن يذكر فيها اسمه
“And who is more oppressive than he who prevents the mosques
of Allah from mentioning His name.”
I write this with a heavy heart and a tear in my eye, never before
have I written on behalf of someone who is deceased. That’s right,
this message is on behalf of a girl who passed away aged 7.
Before she passed away she desired to visit a Masjid, the house of
Allah, but she was refused from several Gujarati Masjids in Blackburn. Why?
One Masjid said her wheelchair will make our carpets dirty?!
Another Masjid said, if we have a fire she will cause a hazard!
(She wanted a tour, not admission).
The Masjid that finally gave permission said, just look from the
shoe racks??? Which she did and tearfully said, “Mum, is it because I am disabled I didn’t get a proper tour?”
Heartbreaking!
In the end, the Abu Hanifah Foundation gave her a proper tour,
their students sang Nasheeds for her and gave her a crystal frame…
THIS IS ISLAM! Respect to AHF, I salute you.
And shame on the others, you disgust me. I must mention that the girl
was a Pakistani and Pakistani is not a code word for Patels.
Maybe if she was a Patel, she would have been allowed?
Dear Gujarati Masters,
I’ll call you by the title you love, let me massage that
ego for you. I’m happy to be your slave and servant. Your Masjids
are no longer the houses of Allah, they are clubs, where the Gujarati Master
throws his weight around and stamps his authority down.
Perhaps it doesn’t work at home on the wife and kids?
If your heart doesn’t irk with this story you need to do an
“Iman test” toooo many people testing for Corona and not checking that
their Iman is positive. Just because these Imams don’t have disabled
children, that doesn’t mean you don’t care about disabled children.
This family is not related to me, nor do we have disabled children
in the family, Alhumdu lillah… but the story still bothered me for nights.
Before you blame committees of the Masajid… stop right there! The family
approached the Imams who are very outspoken on the Mimbar but fragile on
the inside I guess, it’s easy to talk the talk I guess. Gujaratis are good
for establishing institutions, but not for establishing JUSTICE!
Ulama are incompetent when it comes to these diversity issues. Islam is
not just about Salah and Sawm. Islam is a diverse religion, let Ulama
open their minds, open their hearts and open their Masajid.
Ismail ibn Nazir Satia (one who is in dire need of Allah’s forgiveness, mercy and pleasure)
24 Muharram 1442
Unmasking the Enigma: Understanding the
Few Remaining Supporters of
Narcissistic Leaders
Like Rasputin
This article was composed at our request by Dr. Jibreel, a Muslim scholar and clinical
psychologist who practices at a private Harley Street clinic, London. With extensive
experience in both Islamic scholarship and clinical psychology, Dr. Jibreel brings a
unique perspective to the analysis of why individuals continue to support narcissistic
leaders like Rasputin, despite clear evidence of their detrimental actions. His
insights draw from both Islamic teachings and psychological principles, offering
a comprehensive understanding of this complex phenomenon.
Posted as received, verbatim
_______
Report: Why A Few Continue to Support Narcissists
Like Suhail Manya Despite Exposures
Introduction:
Narcissistic leaders like Mr Manya often manage to retain a small base of loyal supporters
despite significant evidence of their harmful actions. This phenomenon is perplexing,
particularly when their behaviour has been exposed and widely condemned. To understand
why some individuals continue to support such leaders, it’s essential to delve into
the psychological, social, and situational factors that contribute to this loyalty.
1. Psychological Manipulation and Gaslighting:
- Gaslighting: Narcissists are skilled at gaslighting, a form of psychological
manipulation where they make their victims doubt their own perceptions and beliefs.
Supporters may have been subject to continuous gaslighting, leading them to question
the validity of the allegations against the leader and to remain loyal out of confusion
or fear of being wrong.
- Cognitive Dissonance: When confronted with evidence that contradicts their beliefs,
supporters may experience cognitive dissonance—an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding
conflicting ideas simultaneously. To resolve this discomfort, they may choose to dismiss
the evidence and cling more tightly to their support for the leader, rationalizing their
behaviour to align with their prior commitment.
2. Charismatic Authority and Dependency:
- Charismatic Leadership: Narcissistic leaders often possess a strong, charismatic
presence that can be deeply influential. Followers may feel a strong emotional connection
to the leader, who they perceive as uniquely capable of solving their problems or
guiding them to success. This emotional bond can be difficult to break, even in the
face of overwhelming evidence of wrongdoing.
- Dependency and Loyalty: Over time, supporters may develop a dependency on the
leader, believing that their personal or professional success is tied to the
leader’s continued influence. This dependency can lead to a loyalty that persists
even when the leader’s actions are exposed as harmful or unethical.
3. Fear of Retribution and Social Pressure:
- Fear of Retribution: In many cases, supporters may fear the consequences of
abandoning the leader. Narcissists often create an environment of fear, where
dissent is punished and loyalty is rewarded. This fear of retribution, whether social,
professional, or even legal, can prevent supporters from breaking away.
- Social Pressure: Group dynamics play a significant role in maintaining support for
narcissistic leaders. Individuals within a group may feel pressured to conform to
the majority’s views, fearing ostracism or backlash if they express dissent. This
social pressure can reinforce loyalty to the leader, even if privately, individuals harbour doubts.
4. Belief in the Leader’s Vision and Ideology:
- Shared Ideology: Narcissistic leaders often present themselves as the embodiment
of a particular ideology or vision that resonates with their followers. Supporters
may align themselves with this vision, believing that it justifies the leader’s
actions. This ideological alignment can create a strong bond that is difficult to
sever, even when the leader’s behaviour is exposed as inconsistent with the values
they claim to uphold.
- Rationalization of Behaviour: Supporters may rationalize the leader’s negative
behaviour by focusing on the perceived greater good that the leader is striving for.
They may believe that the ends justify the means, and that the leader’s transgressions
are minor in comparison to the larger goals they are working towards.
5. Gradual Indoctrination and Isolation:
- Gradual Indoctrination: Narcissistic leaders often indoctrinate their followers
gradually, making it difficult for them to recognize the manipulation as it occurs.
Over time, followers become more deeply entrenched in the leader’s worldview, making
it challenging to see the leader’s flaws or to accept that they have been misled.
- Isolation: Narcissists may also isolate their followers from alternative perspectives,
cutting them off from dissenting opinions and critical voices. This isolation reinforces
the leader’s narrative and makes it harder for supporters to consider the possibility
that they are being manipulated or deceived.
6. Investment and Sunk Cost Fallacy:
- Sunk Cost Fallacy: Supporters may continue to back a narcissistic leader because
they have invested significant time, energy, or resources into the relationship. The sunk
cost fallacy suggests that people are reluctant to abandon a course of action if they have
already invested heavily in it, even when it becomes clear that continuing is not in their
best interest.
- Identity and Ego Involvement: For some, supporting the leader may have become a
part of their identity. Admitting that the leader is flawed or harmful would require
them to confront their own errors in judgment, which can be psychologically painful. As a
result, they may double down on their support rather than face the cognitive and emotional
turmoil of admitting they were wrong.
Conclusion:
The continued support for narcissistic leaders like Mr Manya , despite the exposure of
their harmful actions, can be attributed to a complex interplay of psychological manipulation,
social dynamics, and personal investment. Understanding these factors is crucial for
addressing the challenges posed by such leaders and helping individuals break free from their
influence. Education, critical thinking, and fostering an environment where dissenting voices
can be safely expressed are key strategies in combating the grip of narcissistic leaders on
their followers.
A Reign of Deceit: The Corrupt
Rule of a Tyrannical Narcissist
Yet, another report received from a former alim/ustaad and employee of Darul Uloom Bolton.
Posted as received, verbatim :
_______________
As I read through these pages and I speak with the people of Blackburn,
it takes me back to the dark days of Bolton DU.
I witnessed MS's oppression and tyrannical rule first hand and seeing
him repeat this type of behaviour pains me deeply.
He needs help. I don't say this to insult him, but out of genuine concern
for his wellbeing in this temporary abode but more importantly, his salvation
in the hereafter. Allah Ta'ala save us all from such personality and character traits.
I don't want to expose his sins, but I will shed more light on some of the
incidents that have been mentioned on this page so the people of Blackburn can
unanimously say in one voice that he is no longer wanted.... hopefully this
will wake him from his delusion of grandeur.
This so called leader was trying to take over Bolton DU. About this, there
is no doubt. He and his associates set up another charity with the same name
and were trying to transfer the assets of Bolton Darul Uloom to his charity.
They forged, lied and manipulated staff and students to achieve their objective.
One such example is intimidating us staff into signing a document against
the actual trustees of the DU. He lied about the purpose and contents of the
document and bullied staff into signing. When we realised what he had done, he
refused to give us back the letter or let us remove our signatures from it.
As things progressed and staff realised what was happening, MS even went to
the extent of suspending ustaads for voicing their concerns - of course, he
and his associates always came up with some delusional tale to justify the suspension.
Relating to the teacher who was suspended - the students were coerced into
making statements against him. Darbar dictated the statements the students
needed to write and even gave them written examples. I know this because the
students, upon realising the consequences of their actions upon the teacher,
were filled with remorse. They came to me and I put them in touch with the
teacher so they could ask for forgiveness. MS put into jeopardy the teachers
entire career just because he suspected the teacher was working to stop him
taking over DU - the fact is, up to the point he was suspended, we had no
contact with him and he wasn't involved in the fight against MS. In his
lust for power, MS and Darbar concocted these 'serious' and 'grave' allegations
against him. Unbeknown to these tyrants, the students had voluntarily withdrawn
the statements they made and had the matter gone to a tribunal, MS would have
been exposed much much sooner. Unfortunately, MS and his associates scuttled
and abandoned ship well before it got to that stage
Another teacher from Blackburn tried to mediate and was told by MS that if the
teacher (who was suspended) met with him (in private) and resigned, he will make
all the allegations go away.......If the allegations were true, shouldn't the
principal have the institution's best interest at heart? The fact that he was
able to make the 'allegations' disappear shows they were just a figment of his
imagination, just like his popularity.
In the last few weeks of his reign, the environment of DU became so toxic
that ustaads were afraid to speak with one another, out of fear of having some
bizarre accusations made against them. MS even went to the extent of stopping
ustaads taking toilet breaks. They were called in for a disciplinary meeting for
leaving their classrooms, even if it was to use the restroom. The Darul Uloom went
from a pleasant place to work to something more like a prison camp where your every
move is monitored and questioned.
The verbal abuse, mocking and belittling we had to put up with was so intense
that, like the school teacher, a valuable member of the madressah handed in his
resignation.
Thinking back to that time, I feel truly saddened that someone with so much
potential used their God given talents to oppress, divide, pillage and
plunder the Darul Uloom.
I hope MS reads this and understands how he is perceived by those that
worked with him and asks himself, why?....
However, narcissists usually don't.
Another Poem, in Urdu
After the USA sister's poem, we were inspired to do one ourselves :
_____________
ظالم کا انجام
،ظلم کی دنیاؤں میں اک نام تھا بڑا
رسپوٹین کے قصے، جن میں وہ جڑا۔
،بولٹن کے مدرسے میں آیا جب
چہرے پر منافقت، دل میں بغض بھرا۔
،دنیا کو دکھانے کو، خود کو رہنما کہا
،دل میں چھپی ہوئی، نفرتوں کی آگ جلتی رہی
،ہر فیصلے میں عداوت، ہر حکم میں ظلم
معصوموں کے دلوں میں، خوف کی سی دیوار گڑتی رہی۔
،طلبا کے خواب چھینے، حق کی بات نہ مانی
،مال و دولت کا نشہ، اس کے سر چڑھتا گیا
،یقین کے نام پر، جھوٹ کے پُل باندھے
دھوکے سے وفاداریاں، خریدتا رہا۔
،ٹوٹتے دل، جھوٹے وعدے، سرابوں کا جال
،تھا ہر قدم پہ ظلم، جو اس نے ڈالا،
،مدرسے کے مستقبل، کو کھوکھلا کرتا گیا
جھوٹ، مکر و فریب سے، قوم کو گھاؤ دیتا گیا۔
،پھر آیا وہ دن، جب نقاب ہٹا
،سچائی کی روشنی میں، جھوٹ کا چہرہ کھلا
،حقیقت کا جب پردہ ہٹا
رسپوٹین کا تخت، ہوا پاش پاش۔
،ٹوہیڈول میں بھی، وہی کہانی چلی
،جہاں ظلم و جبر کا راج چلتا رہا
،لیکن سچائی نے، اس کا حشر کیا
وہی ہاتھ، جو ظلم اٹھاتا تھا، آج ٹوٹ گیا۔
،ظلم کی فطرت ہے، کہ انجام برا ہوتا ہے
،ہر ظالم کو، اپنے کیے کا حساب دینا ہوتا ہے
،رسپوٹین کا سایہ، اب ہوا کی طرح بکھر گیا
اور قوم نے دیکھا، کہ سچ کی جیت ہوتی ہے۔
Beautiful Poem Expressing the
Reality of Rasputin
sent by a Sister who is a Lecturer in English Language
at a University in USA
________________
Rasputin's Shadow
In the corridors of power and control,
Where trust is broken, hearts grow cold,
A man of cunning, cloaked in grace,
Leaves behind a tarnished place.
At Tauheedul, the walls still ring,
With stories dark of suffering,
Where promises of faith and light,
Were buried deep in endless night.
Children left in squalor’s grip,
Extorted for each broken slip,
A lightbulb shattered, pockets drained,
In Rasputin’s reign, few remained.
Phones that vanish without a trace,
While staff and students hide their face,
And shower heads, they charge with glee,
But mercy? Absent, hard to see.
The halls where water's stained and foul,
The rooms where silent students scowl,
Where plates and cups cost more than gold,
And justice's voice is weak and cold.
He mocks their cries, he twists their plea,
A ruler draped in cruelty,
For those who dare to challenge lies,
Are quickly taught where silence lies.
Takfir drips from bitter lips,
As he tears down both faith and ships,
Of hope that once in children dwelled,
Now gone, their dreams expelled.
Behind his smirk, his power glows,
But in the shadows, the story grows,
Of secret schemes and greed obscene,
A leader rotten, yet unseen.
A teacher scorned, unjustly sacked,
Yet forced to return, to fight, intact,
Rasputin's lies twist in the wind,
But soon, his reign would start to bend.
For every time his power surged,
Another tale of darkness merged,
With truth, and light, and righteous rage,
That sought to end his twisted cage.
He bribed, he bullied, he betrayed,
He built a kingdom, then decayed,
At Bolton, Tauheedul, it’s clear,
His legacy is one of fear.
But Rasputin, hear this sound,
The world you built will soon be bound,
To crumble, fall, beneath the weight,
Of justice coming, sure and late.
Two passports hide your many names,
But none can shield you from your shame,
The lies you wove, the trust you broke,
Will rise in flames, will choke and choke.
So let the light of truth burn bright,
Expose your schemes to open sight,
For every child you've made to weep,
Will one day rise from fear so deep.
Your empire's dust, your power’s lost,
For you, Rasputin, bear the cost,
Of greed, of lies, of souls betrayed,
And none will mourn the fall you made.
A Clinical Dissection of Exploitive Leadership
From a Malaysian Behavioural Analyst
This report, titled "A Clinical Dissection of Exploitive Leadership: The Pathological
Traits Driving Suhail Manya's Tyrannical Behaviour," has been meticulously prepared by
a Behavioural Analyst with a Ph.D. from a prestigious Malaysian medical institute. The Muslim Dr.
specializes in clinical psychology and behavioural analysis, with a focus on the study
of leadership pathology and its impact on organizational dynamics. The report aims
to provide an in-depth analysis of the psychological and behavioural tendencies exhibited
by Suhail Manya, shedding light on the underlying factors contributing to his
documented actions and the broader implications of such behaviour in institutional settings.
Posted verbatim, as received :
A Clinical Dissection of Exploitive Leadership:
The Pathological Traits Driving Suhail Manya's Tyrannical Behaviour
A detailed picture of Suhail Manya, also referred to as "Rasputin," emerges as a figure whose
leadership and behaviour at educational institutions have been marked by authoritarianism,
exploitation, and manipulation. Here’s an analysis of the type of person he
appears to be and why he might act in such a manner:
Personality and Leadership Style
1. Authoritarian and Tyrannical Leadership:
- Manya's leadership style is depicted as highly authoritarian, where he
demands absolute control and obedience. His attempts to lay down the law
and expect unwavering agreement from staff members, as noted in the incident
with the teacher who dared to challenge him, reflect a dictatorial approach. He
doesn't tolerate dissent and retaliates against those who oppose or question him.
This behaviour indicates a deep insecurity, where any threat to his authority
is met with disproportionate aggression.
2. Hypocrisy and Manipulation:
- There's a clear pattern of hypocrisy in Manya's actions, where he publicly
upholds certain values, such as Islamic teachings, but privately engages in behaviour
that directly contradicts these principles. For instance, while he preaches from the
pulpit, he allegedly engages in unethical practices, such as financial exploitation,
lying, and even takfir (declaring others as non-believers) without legitimate grounds.
His ability to lie blatantly, even in situations where he knows others are aware of the
truth, suggests a manipulative personality that relies on gaslighting and deception to maintain power.
3. Financial Exploitation:
- Manya’s actions are also characterized by financial exploitation. The
exorbitant and unjustified charges imposed on students for minor damages, confiscation
of their property without return, and the misuse of funds within the institutions point
to a leadership driven by greed. The exploitation of children as "cash cows" and the
misuse of charity funds reveal a deep disregard for ethical boundaries, prioritizing
personal gain over the welfare of the students and staff.
4. Disregard for Human Dignity:
- Manya’s treatment of students and staff, including verbal abuse, discriminatory
behaviour, and the imposition of harsh penalties for minor infractions, shows a
fundamental lack of respect for human dignity. His actions create a toxic environment
where fear and intimidation are tools for maintaining control. The allegations of
bullying and targeting individuals who resist or criticize him further illustrate a
personality that thrives on subjugating others to reinforce his own power.
Why Might He Act This Way?
1. Power and Control:
- Individuals like Manya often act out of a need to maintain control. His actions
suggest a deep-seated fear of losing power, leading him to enforce his will through
intimidation, manipulation, and exploitation. The authoritarian approach ensures that
dissent is crushed and that he remains unchallenged at the top.
2. Insecurity and Ego:
- His behaviour could stem from deep insecurities, where any challenge to his
authority is perceived as a personal attack. To counter this, he engages in excessive
measures to eliminate threats and prove his dominance. His delight in "sacking" a
teacher, only to backtrack when confronted legally, indicates an ego that is fragile
yet aggressive when unchecked.
3. Greed and Corruption:
- The financial misconduct alleged against him suggests a motive rooted in greed.
His disregard for the well-being of students, staff, and the ethical standards expected
of a religious leader points to a person who prioritizes personal enrichment over
any moral or religious obligations.
4. Disregard for Consequences:
- Manya's actions reflect a person who operates with little regard for the
consequences of his actions on others. Whether it's the psychological harm inflicted
on students or the potential long-term damage to the institutions he leads, his focus
appears to be on immediate gains—whether financial, authoritative, or ego-driven—without
considering the lasting impact.
Conclusion
Suhail Manya, as portrayed in these accounts, appears to be a deeply flawed
leader driven by authoritarian impulses, greed, and a fundamental disregard for the
values he publicly espouses. His actions have caused significant harm, not only to
individuals but to the institutions he has been a part of. Such behaviour typically
stems from a toxic combination of insecurity, a desire for control, and a lack of
ethical grounding. Individuals like him often continue their destructive patterns until
they are forcibly removed or until the damage they cause becomes too significant to ignore.
The Tyranny Within: How Rasputin and His *Cohorts
Exploited Students for Personal £ain
* (Kamboli, Darbar, Wadiwala)
The following report was penned back in May 2018 by a senior Alim at the Bolton DU who
had taught there for over 10 years, under Rasputin's failed leadership.
________
Information has been brought to my attention which is extremely upsetting and disturbing.
The activities carried out by some of the staff at darul uloom is unethical and immoral to say the
least. The purpose of the establishment is to nurture a yearning for Islam and imparting of
knowledge about Islam to young people, however, the example being set by the management of the
Darul uloom sends a totally different message to the students. Students openly say that our
management are liars and hypocrites, as they do not lead by example. Some of the staff at the Darul
u loom lie to children and verbally abuse them in order to steal the wealth and property of the
children.
One such example is that when phones are confiscated they are never returned to the rightful
owners. Yes, we understand that children aren’t allowed to have mobile phones, but students
openly say that when they ask for the phone’s back they are given the run around. In many
instances, are simply told that the phone is gone. Islamically speaking, it is still their property and it
is our responsibility to return it back to them and not doing so amounts to theft. How can they then
tell the students that theft is haram?
The children are charged extortionate rates for damage of property. We have a copy of the list of
charges that students incur, and again some chargers are understandable, however, if a light bulb is
broken in a room, each student in that boarding room (8 to 12 students) is charged £10. This equates
to £80 to £120 - I ask you, is this reasonable for a broken light bulb?
Another such example is when a shower head is damaged, every student on that floor is charged
£10, this equates to approximately £800 as there are 80 students approximately on that floor. How
can anyone morally or ethically charge £800 for damage to a shower head, which costs less than
£10?
These are just some examples of the exploitation taking place, and we have many more, and we
have a list of all the extortionate charges. Students are charged 20p per day for a disposable plate so
they can eat their dinner. Without paying this, the students are not allowed to eat. They are charged
10p for a disposable Cup. With this in mind, we ask, for what purpose do parents pay their child’s
fees?
Some other examples of exploitation and abuse are: (these are only a few)
* Paying extortionate prices for stationery and books – some of which are never given.
* A student having £70 deducted from his deposit for losing a key.
* Students not being given access to showers (showers are opened when Ofsted inspection
takes place, then locked immediately after)
* Students having to shower in cold water as hot water is rarely available
* The toilets being in a disgusting state, and when the students complain, they are told that if
they want clean facilities, they must clean it them themselves.
* Students being verbally abused including being referred to as pigs (particularly by the
principal) (aka Rasputin)
* Any student that complains, is bullied to such an extent that they fear speaking out again in
the future.
* Students being charged £10 for not making their bed correctly.
* A medical doctor has not been on site for months. When students are sick, appointments
with GP's, dentists and opticians are not made, even though the students request them.
* Taking on students with special Educational Needs, yet not having any specialist staff,
resources or facilities to meet their needs.
* Absence of soap and toilet paper (except when Ofsted visit)
* The students have no right to complain or raise any sort of grievance, and if they do, they
are bullied, abused and sometimes expelled (for some made up reason), and seen as trouble
makers
* The students are coached when Ofsted come in so that they do not complain, and led to
believe that they will be harming an Islamic establishment if they do.
* Teachers without DBS checks were teaching until the recent Ofsted check.
* Over 21 yr olds were told to hide in a different location as they didn’t have a licence to have
students over the age of 21
* Students live in the basement and living conditions can only be described as living like
refugees
* Students were made to sleep on the floor when the recent Ofsted inspection took place
as they were over crowded
* Drinking water is not drinkable. It comes from old pipes which makes the water murky.
* Trustees take money from the Darul u loom to pay their contacts in India, in the name of
charity
* Most of the trustees have been involved in some sort of criminal activity.
* Children are not called by their name but called other abusive names like soovar (pig) by the
headteacher. (aka Rasputin)
The Darul u loom has millions of pounds in assets, and the reason that management gives for such
poor facilities is lack of funds, when you can see in their financial records (which are available online
for all to see) the darul uloom has enough money and often has a surplus of cash at the end of each
year.
The darul uloom is run as a business and the children are seen simply as cash cows. There is no
spiritual enhancement of the children, in fact quite the opposite, as they’re alienating the children
from scholars and anything Islamic. The children think it acceptable to lie, deceive and abuse others
as this is the example that is being set by their ‘leaders’
Corrective steps need to be taken immediately, as we run the risk of alienating an entire generation
of young Muslims from the beautiful Deen. The damage from such callous treatment will only
manifest it self in years to come.
It is time for change, and this change will only come if all the individuals involved in the current
management are removed and replaced by righteous, caring people.
The management do not only bully the students, but there is a culture of intimidation of staff and
unlawful dismissal. Any member of staff that the management takes a disliking to, is simply
discarded, without any concern for their livelihood. Even the alims.
All I ask is help to get this message out.
My child was victimised and bullied. 75% of the children are going through this. Ofsted and the
relevant authorities have been notified. Children will not speak up. They are scared.
In the name of Islam, Please all I ask is get this message out.
These men need to have accountability.
Rasputin & His Conjoined Accomplice
Twin in Degenerate Immorality
This message received from an ustaad who taught at the Bolton DU,
when Rasputin and Salim Kamboli were looting it to the ground :
___________
Do you know Salim Kamboli married a woman (from Preston I believe), took money
from her and then discarded her?.....guess who performed the nikah? (Rasputin of course)
The woman contacted Yusuf bhailok who then put her in
touch with a crises team to help her through the ordeal.
Salim Kamboli betrayed Moulana Irfan of Bolton for Tens of Thousands of
Pounds (related to South Africa business deal) and when Moulana Irfan
went to Rasputin, Rasputin didn't want to know or help him.
Speak to Moulana Irfan of Tayyabah Masjid in Bolton if you want more info.
Doing Takfir on Ulama, Teachers,
and even their Parents.
Branding them as Munafiqs in
a Shocking Speech
This audio sent by a senior Alim who taught at Bolton DU
during Rasputin's tyrannical reign. This shameful and desperate hyperbolic spiel was given
by Rasputin as he realised his fitnah filled rule was coming to an end (2019).
_______________________________
The sheer gall of Rasputin doing takfir
(labelling a muslim a kafir) on Bolton DU/School's respected ulama,
staff members and even their parents shows his shameless and
total contempt for Prophetic teachings, which he loves to preach from the pulpit
- but that is for others to practise.
He, on the other hand, lives by his own demonic rules.
Rasputin’s Tyranny at Bolton Darul Uloom:
A Senior Ustaad's Report
This report sent to us - detailing the events at
Bolton DU before Rasputin's dishonourable discharge
_______________
I was employed at Bolton DU as a senior ustaad since before Rasputin
was employed. Around 2009 a teacher was employed in the school by the
then headteacher. Almost immediately it became known amongst ustaads
that Rasputin did not agree with his appointment, although we didn't
know why. Later on we found that Rasputin had an outright hatred for
the teacher. Even though the teacher was very popular with the students,
Rasputin tried a few times to accuse the teacher of misconduct to the
headteacher but nothing ever came of it. Later on we figured the reason
for Rasputin's enmity towards this teacher was because he had the audacity
to speak out in meetings when, like a dictator, Rasputin liked to lay
down the law with everyone nodding in agreement. The teacher would
challenge Rasputin and was often critical of the decisions that were
being made about the school.....and he was surti, and we all know
how Rasputin feels about surtis, Bengalis and Pakistanis.
Around Ramadhan 2017 (June 2017) I was approached by Rasputin who
told ustaads that he had telephoned the teacher and sacked him from
his post. He looked truly happy at his decision and there was a sense of
bragging in his telling the staff what he had done.
Two weeks later, I met the same teacher in the corridors of
Bolton Darul Uloom where he was going about his daily duties. Surprised
to see him there, I accidentally let slip that I thought he 'left'
the Darul Uloom. He went on to tell me that following the telephone
conversation where he was 'sacked', he demanded a meeting with the
headteacher and Rasputin (Rasputin had also told the headteacher what
he had done). During the meeting, Rasputin realised that the teacher
was not one to roll over and accept his unprofessional conduct and would
challenge it legally if necessary. Rasputin immediately changed his story
and claimed that he had not sacked him, but had actually called him to discuss
what more the teacher could offer the Darul Uloom as he was a very experienced,
qualified teacher!!!
Rasputin, the teacher in question and the headteacher who were all present
knew that Rasputin was lying, yet he was adamant that he actually wanted
to promote the teacher!!!
I was fully aware of what Rasputin had done as he had told me himself,
but then to lie, knowing full well that everyone knew he was lying
beggars belief. I felt sick to the stomach as this incident took place
in Ramadhan and that meant that Rasputin had not only lied repeatedly,
but did it whilst he was fasting!!
Rasputin left the meeting with his tail between his legs and from
that day forward, the teacher concerned had a target on his back.
This culminated in the suspension of the teacher based on some hocus
pocus allegations, allegedly made by the students. This was towards
the end of Rasputin's tyrannical reign.
By the time Rasputin's tenure was coming to an end, he was brimming
with hatred for anyone who was exposing his grand deception. His hostile
takeover over Bolton Darul Uloom was being exposed and he victimised ustaads
and teachers that were fighting to stop the coup. In a paranoia filled frenzy
he accused one of Bolton Darul uloom's longest serving teachers. This teacher
had given weekends and evenings to help students, for which, they had nothing
but praise and respect for him. Without a shred of evidence, Rasputin
accused the teacher of being in cahoots with the trustees that Rasputin was
trying to oust. The teacher, heart broken, resigned a few weeks
later - a great loss for the Darul Uloom.
In the dying days of his grand scheme, MS had the audacity to give a
speech to the students in which he labelled ustaads and teachers as munaafiqs ......
The students openly called Rasputin and Darbar liars and hypocrites.
They would take money from students to pay for damage but the work was never
carried out.....where that money went, no one knows. They would promise
students rewards for spying on teachers and when they did, Rasputin told
them that their 'reward' would be given in charity. They were financially
exploiting the children and that's why when they left the Darul Uloom they
went on a shredding spree
Also, Rasputin has two passports - Suhail Manya and Suhel Master....
this is worth looking into as it is a criminal offence.
A Sister's Disheartening Experience:
Unprofessional Conduct and Dismissive
Attitudes of Rasputin and Hope & Help
The following was sent by a sister, detailing her torrid experience when
she sought help and so approached Rasputin's so called charity "Hope & Help".
As you will read, it just reinforces everything written about
him on this website. He is nothing more than a narcissistic self
serving hypocrite of the highest order.
_______________________
I would like to make a comment on the complete unprofessionalism I
received by Hope & Help Charity and the lack of professionalism.
I recently contacted Hope & Help with a personal dilemma, the admin staff
named Anas Mayat, has throughout been very rude, unproductive, late to
always reply to messages and voicemail left for him, to pass on a message to MS.
Always very reluctant, excuses always when chasing up a query and a reply back.
Moving on to MS, where do I begin, as a female, where only now I have
decided I do not want him dealing with me. I have to make comment on how
I was initially advised that a female Apa would be sat present, whilst I
attended an appointment with him.
However upon my arrival to my appointment, there was only MS present.
I mentioned to him, that I thought it would not be appropriate for me to
speak whilst a female person was not present. However he stated that someone
would be coming shortly and I should feel comfortable as apparently he's well
known in the community and he's very much respected and people know about him.
I spoke about my personal dilemma and when talking, his constant interruption,
was very rude, him undermining me when I was talking to portray that he knew better
and that I was wrong in explaining my dilemma.
He explained that women in the community do not know how to carry themselves
and this is why the women in the community then complain.
I was very shocked by this.
He carried on to constantly speak about himself and tried to express
that he was doing his work for free.
But we all know that is not true, he is receiving funding where he's also paying
himself a wage.
Why lie?
I explained how I felt the admin was very rude. He replied and
said "he is doing it for free, please be respectful."
He would not take any form of positive criticism and was very defensive
and very intimidating as a male.
At this point I felt very uncomfortable and confirmed I was leaving
and I wanted him to close my file.
His mannerism of trying to show superiority is quite disgusting.
When he tries to create an environment for women to attend if
they are worried.
He picks and chooses who he wishes to reply to, when he wants and
when he chooses is best for him.
Yet is complaining that the Masjid didn't reply to him on time.
He doesn't like it now does he.
I urge women to speak up if they've received ill treatment from
this individual.
He should be ashamed of himself.
Surah Maryam, Verse 75:
Its Application to Rasputin and
his two useful idiots
Surah Maryam (Chapter 19), verse 75, reads:
قُلۡ مَن كَانَ فِی ٱلضَّلَـٰلَةِ فَلۡیَمۡدُدۡ لَهُ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنُ مَدًّاۚ حَتَّىٰۤ إِذَا رَأَوۡا۟ مَا یُوعَدُونَ إِمَّا ٱلۡعَذَابَ وَإِمَّا ٱلسَّاعَةَ فَسَیَعۡلَمُونَ مَنۡ هُوَ شَرࣱّ مَّكَانࣰا وَأَضۡعَفُ جُندࣰا ٧٥
"Say, 'Whoever is in error, let the Most Merciful extend [increase] for him an
extension [ie time, wealth, power etc], until, when they see that which they were promised – either
punishment [in this world] or the Hour [of Resurrection] – they will come to know
who is worst in position and weaker in companions.'"
This verse is a powerful reminder about the transient nature of worldly success and
the ultimate reckoning that awaits everyone. It addresses those who are misguided or
arrogant, believing that their current power or success is an indication of their
righteousness or invincibility. The verse highlights that Allah, in His infinite wisdom,
may allow these individuals to continue in their ways for a time, but this extension
is not a sign of approval or blessing. Rather, it is an opportunity for them to
reflect, repent, and return to the right path before they face the consequences of
their actions.
1. The Temporary Nature of Worldly Success:
The verse emphasizes that any success, power, or influence one holds is temporary.
It is not an indication of divine favour but rather a test. This can often lead to a
false sense of security or arrogance in those who are misguided.
2. Divine Patience and Justice:
Allah, in His mercy, gives people time. This "extension" is a chance for self-reflection
and repentance. However, it also serves as a test, where prolonged perceived success
can either lead to more arrogance or genuine repentance.
3. Inevitable Consequences:
The verse warns of an inevitable day when the truth will be revealed, and those who
were arrogant or unjust will face the consequences of their actions, whether in this
world or in the Hereafter.
Rasputin been embroiled in various controversies and allegations. His public
persona, characterised by a desire for power, influence, and apparent religious
piety, has been contrasted sharply by accusations of hypocrisy, arrogance, and
misuse of his position.
1. False Sense of Security in Power:
Much like the people described in verse 75, Rasputin might have believed that
his rise to power, influence over religious institutions, and material success were
signs of divine favour. However, this verse reminds us that such success can be a
test, and not necessarily a reward. His downfall, seen by many as inevitable, may well
be interpreted as the "promise" mentioned in the verse – a moment where the true nature
of his actions is revealed.
2. The Extension Before the Fall:
According to this verse, Allah's mercy allows individuals time before their eventual
downfall. Rasputin’s ability to maintain his position despite mounting criticism
can be seen as this divine extension. It was a period where he had the opportunity
to reflect on his actions, to repent, and to realign his life with genuine Islamic
principles. However, as his critics suggest, his continued arrogance and failure to
heed warnings have led to his ruin, as exemplified by the verse.
3. Hypocrisy and Divine Justice:
The accusations against Rasputin include hypocrisy – preaching simplicity while
indulging in luxury, using the pulpit to settle personal scores, and leading a life
that contradicts his public teachings. Surah Maryam:75 warns that such hypocrisy
will not go unnoticed, and when the promised time comes, the true state of such
individuals will be laid bare. In Rasputin's case, his loss of influence, respect,
and the exposure of his actions can be seen as the manifestation of this divine justice.
4. The Inevitable Downfall:
Just as the verse predicts that the truth will become evident "either punishment
[in this world] or the Hour [of Resurrection]," Rasputin's (and his two minions) downfall in this life can
be viewed as a fulfilment of this warning. It serves as a reminder to others
that no matter how powerful or influential one becomes, if their actions are rooted
in arrogance, envy, or deceit, they will ultimately face the consequences.
Surah Maryam, verse 75, provides a poignant lesson for all, particularly for those
in positions of power and influence. It warns against the dangers of arrogance and
the false sense of security that worldly success can bring. In the case of Rasputin ,
this verse offers a lens through which his rise and fall can be understood. His story
serves as a reminder that true success lies not in power or wealth, but in humility,
sincerity, and adherence to the principles of the deen. The verse also underscores the
importance of self-reflection and repentance, highlighting that Allah's mercy gives
everyone the time to correct their path before it’s too late.
Parent Responds to the Whining
from Rasputin's Useful Idiots
Darbar and M.Asim still have the audacity to question the committee's decision to
dismiss them. They were directly involved in the closure of the Madrasah without
any authority. They claim they did this with the ustads consent. After speaking
to the majority of the ustads they weren't aware of this. Regardless, to make
such a decision and abusing the broadcast is a cause of concern for us parents
and clearly seen as gross misconduct in any other organisation. Leaving the parents
hanging on a thread. Darbar is poison and toxic, clearly seen in the videos in the
incidents outside the masjid.
His behaviour has been appalling and hence why his title of Moulana hasn't
been included. Is this the behaviour we want our students to learn from. M.Asim
is a grown man and has a brain of his own. Not sure why he doesn't use it and
didn't think about the protection of the Madrasah. As a parent I am completely
with the committee in this decision. Finally somebody is making the right decisions.
I have spoken to numerous parents and they have stated, if Darbar is there my
son is not going back to Bicknell.
Concerned Parent of 3 children at the Madrasah.
The Petty Whining of Rasputin’s Rejects:
Darbar and Wadiwala’s Delusional Defense
Oh, how the mighty have fallen—and by "mighty," we mean a duo of disgraced foot
soldiers in Rasputin's band of merry men, Darbar and Wadiwala. After their
spectacular booting from Tauheedul for what can only be described as behaviour
unbecoming of anyone with a shred of decency, they’ve now taken to penning what
they likely consider a manifesto. Instead, it reads like the whiny last gasps of
those who thought they could rule a kingdom that wasn't theirs to begin with.
Where do we even start with this laughable attempt at self-defense? Darbar and Wadiwala,
two of Rasputin’s most loyal yet woefully inept minions, seem to be under the delusion
that their ousting from Tauheedul was anything other than inevitable. After being
rightfully booted for behaviour that can only be described as a masterclass in skulduggery,
they’ve now crawled out of their metaphorical hidey-holes to pen what they presumably
think is a scathing critique. Spoiler alert: it’s not.
It’s almost heart-warming to see how they cling to their grievances like a
security blanket—if it weren’t so laughable.
Let's dive into this comedy of errors and break down this pitiful excuse
of an outcry, shall we?
Sufyan Copper: The Phantom of the Masjid
Ah, so Sufyan Copper makes a phone call, and suddenly he’s the villain of the story.
According to Darbar and Wadiwala, because he hasn’t been around for two weeks,
he’s unfit to make decisions. But let’s be real: does his brief absence somehow
disqualify him from doing his job? It's amusing that Darbar and Wadiwala are
trying to spin this into a dramatic saga when it’s really just standard protocol.
And the best part? The dramatic claim that Sufyan has been hiding ever since—because
obviously, he must be cowering in fear rather than simply getting on with his
responsibilities. Perhaps he’s just avoiding the melodrama of those who seem
to think they run the place.
Zakir Mitha: A 'Failed' IT Graduate?
Next, we have Zakir Mitha, apparently a "failed" IT graduate who dared to
pursue teaching. Darbar and Wadiwala seem to believe that his career path is
somehow a mark of shame. But here’s a thought: maybe Zakir’s move into teaching is
something to be respected rather than mocked. He found his calling and chose to
contribute to society by educating the next generation. How terrifying that must
be for those who believe only in their own inflated egos.
And let’s not skip over the bizarre conspiracy theory about Star Academies and
military cadet forces. They’re throwing in every wild accusation they can think of,
hoping something will stick. But it’s hard to take these curses seriously when they
sound more like the ramblings of someone who’s watched too many late-night documentaries.
Hanif Chenya: Brother of the 'George Clooney Wannabe'
Finally, we have Hanif Chenya, whose greatest crime, according to Darbar and Wadiwala,
is…reassuring teachers? Truly scandalous behaviour! The real issue seems to be that Hanif
is being accused of lying simply because he had to make some tough decisions. But when
you’ve got nothing better to say, why not call him a liar and throw in a ridiculous
comparison of his brother and George Clooney for good measure? It’s almost as if they’re more upset
about his brother's resemblance to a Hollywood star than his actual actions.
__________________
In the end, it’s clear that this entire diatribe is nothing more than sour grapes
from Darbar and Wadiwala. Unable to handle their own ousting, they’ve resorted to
petty attacks on those who’ve had the audacity to move forward without them. It’s
classic playground behaviour—if they can’t have their way, they’ll just sling mud and
hope something sticks. Unfortunately for them, this latest attempt is more laughable
than anything else.
So here we are. Darbar and Wadiwala, in their desperate attempt to cling to relevance,
have laid bare their incompetence and hypocrisy for all to see. They decry the removal
of certain Ulema while conveniently ignoring their own cronies' underhanded tactics.
And let’s not forget their rants about Tauheedul’s "greed" and "corruption"—all the
while failing to deliver any transparency or ethical governance within their own
pitiful ranks.
Tauheedul, by removing these charlatans, has done a service not just to the madrasah,
but to the community at large. As for Darbar, Wadiwala, and their band of misfits,
perhaps it's time they look in the mirror—though we're not sure they'd like what they see.
Rasputin's Hypocrisy:
Demanding Transparency from Tauheedul
While Failing His Own Charity
Rasputin has been a vocal critic of Tauheedul, calling for greater transparency and ethical
management from the institution. Alongside his supporters, Rasputin has accused Tauheedul of
failing to meet these standards. However, a glaring irony emerges when we consider the
state of Rasputin’s own charity, "Hope and Help." Despite being a relatively small
and recent endeavour, the charity has already shown significant signs of mismanagement,
failing to submit its financial accounts for over 205 days—an alarming oversight for
an organisation that employs only a handful of staff.
A Small Charity, Big Failures
"Hope and Help," under Rasputin’s leadership, should be a straightforward operation,
yet it has failed to meet basic regulatory requirements. The charity’s inability
to submit its accounts on time suggests a profound lack of organisational competence.
If Rasputin cannot manage the affairs of such a small charity, one must question
his and his cohorts' ability to oversee an institution as large and complex as Tauheedul,
which employs a substantial number of staff and manages significant funds.
Demanding Accountability Without Providing It
The public campaign led by Rasputin and his allies against Tauheedul centers on
demands for transparency and ethical governance. Yet, their own organisation’s failures
expose a troubling double standard. How can they credibly demand such standards from
others when they cannot provide them within their own charity? The delay in account
submission hints at either gross negligence or potential financial irregularities
within "Hope and Help," both of which should be of grave concern to donors
and the community.
A Warning to the Trustees of "Hope and Help"
The trustees of "Hope and Help" must now ask themselves a critical question
(apart from Rasputin himself, who appointed himself as a trustee - see previous post):
what are they doing to ensure compliance with the Charity Commission’s regulations?
The prolonged delay in submitting financial accounts not only jeopardises the charity’s
reputation but also puts it at risk of regulatory action. Trustees have a legal duty
to ensure that the charity is well-run and financially accountable. Failure to meet these
obligations could result in fines, increased scrutiny from the Charity Commission,
or even deregistration—a fate that would be disastrous for the charity and its beneficiaries.
The trustees should take immediate steps to rectify the situation, including conducting a
thorough review of the charity’s financial practices and ensuring that all future
submissions are made on time. They must also address any internal issues that may be
contributing to these delays, whether they stem from incompetence, lack of resources,
or other underlying problems.
The Double Standard
This situation casts a shadow over Rasputin’s credibility. While he criticises
Tauheedul for perceived ethical shortcomings, his own charity is failing to meet
the most basic standards of transparency and governance. The public is beginning to
see through this hypocrisy, which undermines the legitimacy of his demands for
greater accountability from others.
A Call for Introspection
Before Rasputin and his group continue their public campaign against Tauheedul,
they must first address the glaring deficiencies within his own organisation.
The values they preach — transparency, accountability, and ethical management—must
be reflected in his own actions. Only then can he and his cohorts credibly begin a call for
these standards from others. Until "Hope and Help" gets its house in order,
any demands for accountability from Tauheedul will be met with the contempt it deserves.
“Hope and Help” or Hope Deferred? :
The Unanswered Questions Behind
Rasputin’s Charity Accounts
The charity "Hope and Help," led by Rasputin has raised eyebrows due to its
inexplicable delay in submitting its financial accounts. With over 205 days
having passed since the legal deadline, the lack of transparency is increasingly
concerning and reflects poorly on the organisation’s management.
Financial Mismanagement or Something More?
The prolonged delay raises serious concerns about the charity’s financial health.
Are we witnessing a case of financial mismanagement, or is there something more
sinister at play? The absence of timely accounts suggests either an alarming
lack of competence within the organisation or a potential cover-up of financial
irregularities. Either scenario is deeply troubling, especially for a charity
that is supposed to be dedicated to providing hope and help to those in need.
Fraud or Concealment?
More troubling is the possibility that the delay is a deliberate attempt to
conceal financial discrepancies. Charities are supposed to be bastions of
transparency and trust, yet "Hope and Help" has provided no reasonable
explanation for its failure to meet this critical obligation. This raises
the spectre of potential fraud or misuse of funds—accusations that are hard
to dismiss given the length of the delay.
A Breach of Trust
Charities rely heavily on the trust of the public, donors, and regulatory
bodies. The fact that "Hope and Help" has not been able to produce its accounts
on time for such a prolonged period is a severe breach of this trust. Donors
expect their contributions to be handled with integrity and transparency,
and this delay casts doubt on whether the charity is fulfilling its obligations.
Regulatory Implications
The Charity Commission takes the timely submission of accounts very seriously,
as it is a key indicator of a charity’s transparency and accountability. Continuous
failure to comply with these requirements not only tarnishes the reputation
of "Hope and Help" but also puts the charity at risk of regulatory action,
including potential fines or even deregistration. This would be a disastrous
outcome for any organisation, especially one that claims to be a lifeline
for the vulnerable.
The Question of Leadership
Rasputin, the man behind "Hope and Help," now faces significant scrutiny, and not
in a good way. His leadership is being questioned like never before, not only because
of the delay in submitting accounts but also due to past controversies surrounding his
management style and public image. The current situation only adds to the
growing list of concerns about his ability to run a charity effectively.
Known for his fiery sermons and public persona, Rasputin's inability to steer
his charity through this basic requirement calls into question his competence as a leader.
This isn’t the first time his leadership has been questioned; his tenure at Tauheedul
mosque and Bolton DU was also marred by similar controversies, marked by his craving for
power and influence.
Hope and Help, or Smoke and Mirrors?
Is "Hope and Help" truly providing the support it promises, or is it
merely a facade to distract from the organisation’s internal dysfunction?
The lack of transparency in financial reporting, coupled with the extended
delay, only fuels suspicions that the charity may be more about maintaining
appearances than actually delivering on its mission.
The delay in submitting accounts by "Hope and Help" is not just a minor
administrative oversight—it is a glaring red flag that should not be ignored.
Whether this stems from incompetence, mismanagement, or something more troubling,
the charity’s leadership owes the public a full and transparent explanation.
Until then, the integrity and future of "Hope and Help" remain in serious doubt.
Altaf "Tommy Robinson" Khanjra’s Public Outburst:
Thuggish Behaviour and the Erosion of a Brand
Lancashire Telegraph (article here) hints at Altaf "Tommy Robinson" Khanjra's thuggery.
No doubt he thinks it'll do wonders for the "Khanjra" brand.
The Lancashire Telegraph newspaper report highlighted the incident (see previous post on here)
involving Altaf "Tommy Robinson" Khanjra, who was caught on camera by fellow worshippers at the
masjid entrance. The footage shows Khanjra making various claims before aggressively shouting "come on,"
all while filming the scene himself. This kind of behaviour is disturbingly similar to the tactics
used by figures like EDL's Tommy Robinson — individuals who resort to intimidation and confrontation
rather than constructive dialogue.
Khanjra’s public challenge, captured in this footage, paints a troubling picture of a man
who confuses aggression with leadership. His actions suggest a desire to incite and provoke rather
than to lead or unite. For someone positioning himself as a leader within his community,
this outburst only serves to highlight a lack of genuine leadership qualities, instead revealing
a tendency toward thuggish posturing.
Moreover, this incident has broader implications for the "Khanjra" brand, particularly the food store
associated with his name. Once a respected name within the community, the Khanjra brand is now
being dragged through the mud, as previously predicted on here. The more Altaf "Tommy Robinson" Khanjra engages
in such public displays of hostility, the more he erodes the values of respectability and trust
that are essential to maintaining a successful brand and a positive community presence.
Khanjra's shout of "come on" is more than just a call to confrontation—it symbolizes the
decline of both his personal reputation and the business empire associated with his name.
The Khanjra brand is increasingly becoming synonymous with controversy and divisiveness,
rather than quality and community service. This incident marks yet another step in the downfall
of a once-respected name, as Altaf "Tommy Robinson" Khanjra's actions continue to tarnish the brand he represents.
Judicial View on the Witness Statements:
A Barrister and Mufti’s Perspective
(posted verbatim - as received)
As both a barrister practicing in one of the esteemed chambers in London and
a traditionally trained Mufti (Deoband under, among others, the late Shaykh
and Principal Mufti Saeed Ahmed Sahab Palanpuri رحمه الله سبحانه), I am well-versed in the
intricacies of both secular and Islamic legal principles. Having been
asked by a brother to provide my professional assessment of the judicial
commentary concerning the three witness statements in this case,
I find myself compelled to offer a candid critique of the matter.
It is my considered opinion that the case, as it stands, is exceedingly
weak in both its substantive content and evidentiary support. Had I
been instructed to represent these individuals, I would have strongly
advised them against proceeding further, thereby sparing them the inevitable
financial burden and emotional toll that accompany such a misguided legal endeavour.
The witness statements in question are, quite frankly, riddled with
conjecture and subjective opinion, none of which meet the rigorous standards
required for credible evidence in a court of law. These statements fail
to present concrete facts or corroborative details necessary to substantiate
the claims being made. In essence, they amount to little more than personal
narratives lacking any objective proof. This glaring absence of credible
evidence would undoubtedly lead to the swift dismissal of the case, should
it have been brought before a judge.
Furthermore, the claims appear to be rooted in assumptions rather than
demonstrable realities, a critical flaw that would undermine any legal
argument. The reliance on hearsay and unsubstantiated assertions renders
the case not only weak but wholly untenable. No prudent legal advisor
would recommend proceeding under such circumstances, where the likelihood
of success is minimal at best, and the potential for reputational and
financial damage is significant.
In conclusion, this case, built on the foundation of these witness
statements, is fundamentally flawed. It is constructed on conjecture
without solid evidence to support the claims. Had I been consulted
at an earlier stage, my advice would have been unequivocal: to abandon
the pursuit of this matter and avoid the unnecessary expenditure of
time, effort, and resources on a case that, in my professional judgment,
was destined to fail.
Rasputin and Trump:
A Tale of Two Megalomaniacs
In the world of power-hungry personalities, few characters stand out
as much as Donald Trump and our very own Rasputin. Despite occupying
very different realms—one in the political arena, the other in the
spiritual—they share a remarkable number of similarities that make
them both larger-than-life figures, albeit not necessarily for the
right reasons.
Addiction to Power:
Let’s start with their shared addiction to power. Both Trump and
Rasputin have an insatiable hunger for control. Trump’s obsession
with maintaining his grip on the White House mirrors Rasputin’s
relentless quest to remain at the helm of the Masjid. Neither seems
capable of stepping down or sharing power gracefully. For Trump,
losing the presidency was an unthinkable affront, while for Rasputin,
the very idea of being sidelined from his position is met with the
same level of denial and outrage.
Megalomania:
Next up, megalomania. Trump, with his golden towers, constant need
for adoration, and self-proclaimed genius, exhibits classic signs
of a man who believes he’s bigger than the office he held. Rasputin,
in his own way, mirrors this with his belief that he alone is the
spiritual beacon of light for the youth, the one true leader who can
guide the masses. The grandiosity in both men’s self-perception is
staggering. They aren’t just leaders—they’re saviours in their own eyes,
and everyone else is merely playing catch-up.
Inability to Accept Removal from Office:
When it comes to being removed from power, both Trump and Rasputin
exhibit the same level of denial and fury. Trump’s refusal to concede
the 2020 election and his subsequent attempts to undermine the results
are eerily similar to Rasputin’s refusal to accept being sidelined
from the Masjid. Both see themselves as irreplaceable and react to
any challenge to their authority with outrage, accusations, and a
desperate attempt to cling to power at all costs.
Abuse of Opponents:
Then there’s their shared love for lashing out at anyone who
dares to stand up to them. Trump’s Twitter tirades against anyone
who crossed him are legendary, from political rivals to former allies.
Similarly, Rasputin isn’t shy about using his position to belittle
and abuse those who challenge him, whether they’re fellow clerics,
committee members, or even members of his congregation. Both men
see any opposition as a personal attack and respond with vitriol,
seeking to crush their opponents rather than engage in any meaningful dialogue.
Cult of Personality:
Both Trump and Rasputin have built cults of personality around themselves.
Trump’s rallies, filled with fervent supporters chanting his name, bear an
uncanny resemblance to the devoted following that Rasputin cultivates
among his congregation. Both men thrive on the adoration of their base,
using it to bolster their egos and reinforce their belief that they alone
are the chosen ones.
In the end, while their domains are different—one political, the
other spiritual—Trump and Rasputin share a deep-seated need for power,
control, and adulation. Their refusal to accept limits on their authority,
coupled with their disdain for anyone who opposes them, paints a picture
of two men who are, in essence, cut from the same cloth. Whether in the
White House or the Masjid, the world is simply not big enough for their
outsized egos.
Letter from Tauheedul's Real Youngsters,
Not Made Up Propagandists
(posted verbatim)
We do not have an issue with programmes not taking place
in the mosque at the moment as we understand that
the masjid is under considerable constraints due to
legal cases and trying to put things in order, after
MS has ruined our mosque.
What programmes are you talking about? Everyone
just came for food. The jamaat khana only got
filled 10 mins before the programme was due to end.
We help out on Thursdays to clean up and we are the
youngsters who go jamaat. Knock on peoples doors to
bring them to the mosque. Whist you fake youngsters
or party goers just want a carnival every month. How
many of you remember what and was said in his bayaan.
But I’ll bet you remember what burgers you had in his programmes.
Rasputin's Dubai Diaries:
The Ascetic Hypocrite
Ah, Rasputin, our revered preacher of asceticism, simplicity,
and the oh-so-humble life. The very man who never misses a
chance to lecture us on the evils of materialism—whether it's
special bayaans condemning anniversaries, baby showers,
Valentine’s Day, Mother’s and Father’s Day, or warning us
about the moral dangers of keeping up with the Joneses.
And let’s not forget his passionate tirades against those sinful,
opulent kitchen extensions! Yet here he is, jetting off to Dubai,
the Middle East’s glittering capital of vice, excess, and sin.
Not once, but multiple times this year! How delightfully consistent of him.
Isn’t it just wonderful to know that while we’re dutifully shunning
Hallmark holidays and keeping our kitchens small and spartan, Rasputin
is has probably basking in the glow of Dubai’s extravagant luxury? We're sure
he’s spent his time there reflecting deeply on the virtues of
simplicity—perhaps while browsing the latest luxury goods in the
Dubai Mall, or maybe while lounging in one of those ultra-luxurious
hotels that the city is famous for.
Oh, but we mustn’t be too quick to judge. Perhaps Rasputin’s
frequent pilgrimages to the land of opulence are simply his
way of researching the evils of materialism up close. After all,
how can he truly warn us against the dangers of excess if he hasn’t
immersed himself in it, time and time again?
Purely for educational purposes, of course.
And what about those bayaans? Maybe, we’ll now be
treated to a new series of special lectures—on how to balance
condemning the world’s temptations while simultaneously indulging
in them. Because clearly, Rasputin has mastered that delicate art.
So here’s to you, Rasputin. May your next trip to Dubai be as
enlightening as the latest one, and may we all one day reach the level
of asceticism that allows for multiple luxury getaways while
preaching against the very excesses we secretly enjoy. Who needs
consistency when you’ve got the kind of spiritual flexibility that
can stretch from the pulpit to the penthouse?
The "Grave Concerns" of the
Youngsters (Yes, We're Serious)
Assalamu'alaykum (because, you know, we’re polite like that).
We hope this letter finds you living your best life, full of health
and iman, because we've got a few things to get off our chests. The
youth—yes, those mysterious creatures lurking around the edges of your
Masjid—have decided to drop some truth bombs. Buckle up.
It seems our beloved Masjid has been on a downward spiral since the
16th of May. Why, you ask? Well, our "saintly" Imam, Moulana Suhail Sb—whom we
affectionately refer to as Rasputin—has been unceremoniously sidelined.
And guess what? Ever since, the once-enlightening English bayaans and
Quran Tafseer sessions have been Missing In Action. Yep, the Masjid has gone from
"spiritual haven" to "where enthusiasm goes to die" faster than you can say,
"Rasputin's reign."
Ah, the days when programs actually happened—daily, mind you! And let's
not forget those monthly Seerah bayaans, which were a real hit in Moulana Manya's mind,
(though we suspect some folks were just there to bask in the glow
of Moulana Suhail Sb’s towering ego, and the food). Now? The Masjid is as lively as a
silent retreat - ok we admit, even if it's of the spiritual kind. Three whole months without
hearing Moulana Suhail Sb’s voice—how are we even surviving? He was our
beacon, our guiding light, our... well, our Rasputin.
Let’s talk about your own Masjid website, which proudly declares that Moulana
Suhail Sb’s "primary responsibility is to develop and organise Youth and
Social Development activities for the Masjid community." That’s rich,
considering the committee has done everything short of chaining him to a
radiator to keep him from fulfilling that very duty.
Yes, he could've spent 4 months, even 40 days in
Tabligh as he was on full pay - to carry out his much vaunted da'wah duties.
But then we suppose that would require some form of sacrifice, inconvenience and the ability
to listen and obey the amir - something our Rasputin isn't accustomed to in doing
as he is more used to demanding that he is the 'amir' for everything and anything.
And yes, no one in the whole of the UK has approached him or even poached him to
have a slice of his bayaans and seerah talk, all for themselves.
But that's not the point (as we don't have a response to such valid observations).
We’ve heard from many of the "once-in-a-blue-moon" masjid-goers
(who miraculously appeared for those English programs) that
Moulana Suhail Sb was their “beacon of light.” Really? Moulana Suhail, just a beacon?
More like a blinding supernova that outshines the sun itself!
So here we are, with all the grace and humility of youth, writing this slightly
exaggerated letter, hoping the committee and trustees—who surely know what's
best—actually read it. After all, whether you like it or not, the youngsters are
the future of this Masjid, —teach them well and let them lead the way. Show
them all the beauty they possess inside. Give them a sense of pride to make it easier
- apologies, got a bit carried away there with the soppiness.
Maybe, just maybe, the community can pull itself together and reinstate Moulana Suhail Sb,
our very own Rasputin, the self-proclaimed 'one and only true Imam' of our Masjid.
Jazakallahu Khairun (because, despite everything, we still care).
P.S. This letter may seem like it was penned by Rasputin himself, what
with all the self-aggrandizing and inflated praise, but we assure you—it wasn’t. Honest.
What Happened During a Visit
To Rasputin's HQ Bunker
£10k Down the Drain,
Not a Dime for the Dome:
Altaf Khanjra's Priorities in Action!
The Tommy Robinson Wannabe Who Traded Charity
for Blowing Thousands on Vengeful Legal Fights!
Meet Altaf Khanjra, the illustrious Managing Director of Khanjra International Foods,
a multi-million pound turnover business that supplies everything from spices to
samosas—basically, the guy who makes sure your curry night doesn’t turn into a disaster.
You’d think with all that success, he’d know a thing or two about wise investments.
But alas, when it comes to playing the hero, Altaf seems to have swapped his business
savvy for something a bit more... let's say, Robinson-esque.
Altaf recently made headlines not for his business acumen, but for blowing a cool
£10,000 on a legal case so pointless that even the most clueless of judges couldn't
help but kick it out the door. This isn't just a man throwing money at a lost cause—this
is a man catapulting it into the abyss with the gusto of a kid launching a rock at a
hornet’s nest. He led his legal donkeys, much like his hero Tommy Robinson leads his
rabble, into a fray that was doomed from the start. But here's the kicker: while he was
happy to splurge thousands on this futile courtroom drama, he didn’t spare a
single quid for the mosque’s construction fund. Not one penny. Nada. Zilch.
Yes, this is the same mosque he now claims to care about, pretending to be a stalwart
protector of the institution. But where was this sudden burst of loyalty when the
mosque needed funds to actually, you know, exist? It seems that Altaf is more
interested in playing the part of a self-styled crusader, trying to stir up a bit of
Tommy Robinson-esque drama in his community rather than making any real contribution.
And let’s talk about that image he’s so carefully cultivating. Altaf struts around
like he’s some kind of local hero, but really, he’s just a guy who's more interested
in instigating chaos than actually building something meaningful. It’s a classic case
of style over substance—except, in this case, the style is less “respected community leader”
and more “wannabe rabble-rouser.” It’s almost as if Altaf took one look at Tommy Robinson and
thought, "Hey, I could do that, but with less sense and more money to burn!"
So, while Khanjra International Foods continues to rake in the profits, its MD seems
hell-bent on squandering his personal wealth on lost causes and futile battles. Maybe he
should stick to stocking shelves, where at least he knows what he’s doing. Because when
it comes to being a community leader, Altaf Khanjra is about as effective as a spice rack
in a tornado. Here’s hoping his son is taking notes—just not from his father’s playbook.
Witness Statement of Altaf Khanjra :
1. Background and Credibility
I, Altaf Khanjra, am a member of the Masjid e Tauheedul Islam
association, a charity registered in Blackburn."
Judicial Commentary:
Enter Altaf Khanjra, our noble protagonist, riding
in on his high horse, proudly waving the banner of “just a member” of the charity.
We’re all eager to see how this humble, selfless guardian of mosque democracy
will save us from the perceived tyranny that’s befallen Blackburn. Surely, there’s
no personal agenda here—just pure, unadulterated altruism!
_________________________________________
2. Allegations of Improper Election Conduct
"The election... was conducted in a manner directly contrary to
the Charity’s constitution and to all proper standards of electoral conduct."
Judicial Commentary:
Imagine the shock! An election that didn’t follow
the “Khanjra Protocol.” It’s almost like the universe didn’t get the memo that all
elections should be tailored to his liking. He may not have brought any real evidence,
but who needs facts when you have outrage and indignation? It’s the principle of the thing, right?
_________________________________________
3. Financial Mismanagement Concerns
"There are strong suspicions about financial mismanagement at the Charity."
Judicial Commentary:
Ooooh!, “strong suspicions,” that wonderful phrase that
serves as a catch-all for baseless claims and whispered rumours. It’s like the
“I read it on the internet” of the legal world. After all, who needs evidence when you’ve
got a good, old-fashioned hunch? Sherlock Holmes, eat your heart out—Khanjra’s on the case!
_________________________________________
4. Premature Announcement of Election Results
"The results of the election were posted on the mosque’s notice
board before they were fully known to me and my associates."
Judicial Commentary:
Scandalous! Imagine the nerve—posting results without first
checking in with the self-appointed election police. It’s almost as if the rest of
the mosque didn’t realize that Khanjra and Co. are the ultimate arbiters of when
and how election results should be shared. How dare they bypass the
all-important “Altaf Approval Process”?
_________________________________________
5. Challenge to the Legitimacy of the Executive Committee
"The Applicants do not accept that the Election was valid...
the purported new Executive Committee members do not hold office under
the Charity’s constitution."
Judicial Commentary:
The classic “I don’t like the outcome, so it must be wrong”
argument. If you didn’t win, it’s only logical to declare the entire election
null and void. Democracy only works when it works for you, right? Clearly,
the only legitimate election is the one where Khanjra and his cohorts emerge
victorious. Anything less is a travesty!
_________________________________________
6. Allegations Against Trustees for Not Updating Land Registry
"The Trustees have failed to update the Land Registry entry for the Mosque."
Judicial Commentary:
The Land Registry—truly the cornerstone of any
mosque’s operational success. Forget about community service or spiritual
leadership; it’s the paperwork that really matters. If this doesn’t get updated,
who knows what could happen? Cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria!
_________________________________________
7. Suspension of the Imam and Its Implications
"The Principal of the Madrasah, Suhel Master, was suspended after he began to
unearth and make public the mismanagement of the Charity by the Trustees and Committee."
Judicial Commentary:
Suhel Master, the supposed whistleblower, bravely unearthing
all manner of horrors—or at least that’s the story. The reality might be a tad less
glamorous. After all, isn’t it convenient how every good drama needs a hero and a
villain? Unfortunately, this isn’t a Hollywood movie, and there’s no Oscar for
Best Overblown Narrative.
_________________________________________
8. No AGMs or Elections for a Long Time
"There have been no AGMs and no elections for the Executive Committee for a long time."
Judicial Commentary:
Boohoo, the lament of the absentee voter. Elections not held?
AGMs skipped? Clearly, this is a crisis of epic proportions—one that could only be
rectified by the noble efforts of Mr. Khanjra, swooping in to restore order. If only
someone had thought to, you know, just hold an election and move on. But where’s the drama in that?
_________________________________________
9. Urgency of the Application
"Due to the urgency of the situation... the applicants are bringing
this application directly to the court."
Judicial Commentary:
Urgency, the last refuge of the desperate. When all else fails,
just declare everything an emergency and hope nobody notices the lack of substance.
After all, nothing says “pressing legal matter” like a vague suspicion and a failed power grab.
Quick! To the courtroom—before anyone realizes what’s really going on.
________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion: The Final Act in Khanjra’s Comedy of Errors
In conclusion, Mr. Khanjra’s witness statement is less a coherent legal document and
more a melodramatic screenplay in desperate need of a rewrite. Filled with overblown claims,
baseless accusations, and a healthy dose of self-righteous indignation, it’s the kind of
performance that might earn a standing ovation at a high school play but falls flat in the courtroom.
As the curtain falls on this farce, one can’t help but marvel at the sheer audacity of it all.
Let’s also not forget the irony—while Mr. Khanjra has never contributed a penny to the mosque’s construction,
he somehow managed to squander £10,000 on a futile legal challenge. If only he had channeled
that energy and money into something more productive—like updating that pesky Land Registry
entry—perhaps he’d have less time to pen these flights of fancy.
Until then, we’ll just have to enjoy the show. It’s a pity that his self-indulgent theatrics
come at such a high cost to the community—financially and morally. But as they say, every great
tragedy has its fools. And in this saga, there’s no doubt who’s playing the part.
Witness Statement of Ilyas Darbar:
1. Employment and Role at the Charity
Ilyas Darbar, the Charity’s self-proclaimed long-serving martyr, tells
us he’s been toiling away since 2009 without a contract—because who
needs paperwork when you’re saving souls?
Judicial Commentary:
So, Mr. Darbar, you’ve been happily flying under the radar
for over a decade without a contract, and only now, amidst the drama, you’ve
decided to raise the red flag? Sounds more like a plot twist in a soap opera
than a serious legal revelation. Perhaps your invisible contract got lost in
the mail along with your sense of timing.
_________________________________________
2. Salary and Payment Method
Our heroic whistleblower earns a princely sum of £75 a week,
handed over in a neat little envelope—cash, of course, because bank
transfers are so passé.
Judicial Commentary:
Ah, the sweet smell of freshly minted cash, slipped to
you like a back-alley deal. And you’re only just now realizing that
this might be a tad bit shady? What tipped you off, Ilyas—the lack of a
receipt or the sound of the HMRC knocking on your door? A decade-long
game of hide and seek with taxes doesn’t exactly scream “victim” here.
_________________________________________
3. Volunteer Status and HMRC Investigation
Ilyas suspects that the sudden downgrade to “volunteer”
status is somehow linked to an HMRC investigation. Who would’ve thought?
Judicial Commentary:
Of course, it’s always the volunteer status
switcheroo! Classic. It’s as if one day you’re a valued employee, and the
next, you’re an honorary volunteer—because nothing says charity like unpaid labour.
The real mystery here is why you didn’t see this coming from miles away, especially
after years of ‘mystery money’ showing up in your pay packet.
_________________________________________
4. Allegations of Evidence Destruction:
Ilyas claims that a committee member, let’s call him “The Shredder,”
instructed him to rip up letters—because nothing screams innocence like a good
old-fashioned paper shredder party.
Judicial Commentary:
Ah yes, the foolproof plan of evidence destruction by
verbal command. I mean, who needs witnesses or cameras when you’ve got a guy
telling you to “just rip it up”? And you, Ilyas, you’re the paragon of virtue
for not going along with it—except for the fact that you only mentioned this now,
after the fact. Bravo!
_________________________________________
5. Request for Financial Transparency:
In a bold move, Ilyas asked to see the books and, surprise surprise,
was shown the door instead. Shocking, isn’t it?
Judicial Commentary:
The audacity of it all! Asking for transparency in a
charity’s finances? How dare you, Ilyas! We can only imagine the horror on
their faces when you asked for receipts instead of just pocketing your weekly
cash envelope. But alas, no books were forthcoming—just like no solid evidence
in this entire statement.
_________________________________________
6. Statement of Truth:
Our noble truth-teller assures us that every word in his
statement is the gospel truth. Because, obviously.
Judicial Commentary:
Of course, we believe you, Ilyas. Just as we believe
in the Easter Bunny and that a decade of cash-in-hand payments doesn’t raise
any red flags. After all, what’s a little creative accounting among friends?
But just in case, you might want to start practicing the phrase, “I solemnly swear…”
________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion:
If this were a TV show, we’d be tuning in for the next episode of Ilyas and
the Invisible Contract, where our protagonist continues his quest for truth, justice,
and maybe a tax rebate. But as it stands, this witness statement reads more like a
script for a legal comedy than a serious document. Mr. Darbar, your timing, and
your tales might be better suited for prime-time entertainment rather than a courtroom drama.
A heart rending letter just received, written by a former teacher of Rasputin
while he was at the Madrassah Arabia Islamia Darul Uloom, Azaadville 20+ years ago.
(The teacher has requested anonymity)
Text in blue is verbatim from the letter.
________________________
My dear student,
I write to you today with a heavy heart, troubled by the reports
that have reached me regarding your actions and the discord you
have sown. It is difficult for me to reconcile the young man who
once walked the halls of Azaadville with the figure who now stands
at the center of such turmoil. As your former teacher, it is my
duty to offer you counsel in these trying times, in the hopes that
you will find your way back to the principles that once guided you.
During your time at Azaadville, you were not only taught the intricacies
of Islamic jurisprudence but also the values of humility, integrity,
and service to the community. These lessons were meant to shape your
character and actions, yet it pains me to see how far you have strayed
from them. The position you hold now is not a platform for self-aggrandizement
but a trust—an amanah—from Allah and the community. It is a responsibility
that requires humility and a deep sense of service, not arrogance or a
desire for control.
I have heard of the conflicts you have incited, the divisions you have
deepened, and the way you have used your influence to silence those
who disagree with you. This is not the behaviour of a true leader or a
scholar who seeks the pleasure of Allah. The Prophet (peace be upon him)
taught us to lead with justice, compassion, and a desire for reconciliation,
not to use our positions to create discord and strife.
Greed and the pursuit of worldly gain are temptations that even the
most learned can fall into if they are not careful. It seems you have
allowed these temptations to cloud your judgment. Remember the lessons of
zuhd—detachment from the material world—that we taught you. Wealth and power are
fleeting, and the damage they cause when sought for the wrong reasons can last
a lifetime. Reflect on what truly matters and do not let your desire for wealth
or influence lead you away from the path of righteousness.
What troubles me even more is the thought of your son, who is now a student
here at Azaadville, walking in your footsteps. What example are you setting
for him? Do you want him to grow up believing that power and influence are
tools to be used for self-serving purposes, or do you want him to learn the
true essence of leadership—service, humility, and sincerity? Your actions
are not only shaping your own legacy but also the path your son may choose
to follow. Consider the impact you are having on his future, and ask yourself
if this is the legacy you wish to leave behind.
I urge you, as your former teacher and someone who still cares deeply for
your well-being, to pause and reflect on the consequences of your actions.
Return to the principles you were taught at Azaadville. Seek the forgiveness
of those you have wronged and strive to rebuild the trust and respect that
has been lost. The path of repentance is always open, and it is never too late
to change course.
Remember, my dear student, that true success lies not in the accolades of this
world but in the pleasure of Allah. Your legacy will be defined not by the power
you held or the wealth you accumulated but by the lives you touched and the example
you set for the next generation, especially your son. Return to the path of humility,
service, and sincerity, and you will find peace once more.
May Allah guide you and grant you the wisdom to make the right choices, for your
sake and for the sake of your son.
With sincere concern and du'as,
Your Teacher from Azaadville
The video below (11 Aug 2024), is a smoking gun, showing Altaf ‘Tommy Robinson’ Khanjra,
rallying his clueless donkey herd like a wannabe rabble-rouser, as they stampeded
towards the speaker, turning the masjid into a circus of chaos and confusion.
Possible Consequences for the Brand and Image ?
In the world of business, few things are as critical as brand image. Companies
spend years, even decades, cultivating a reputation that resonates with customers,
standing for quality, trust, and reliability. But every so often, a wild card
comes along—a figure so hilariously out of sync with the corporate ethos that
you can almost hear the collective facepalms in the marketing department.
Enter Altaf Khanjra, the Managing Director of Khanjra International Foods,
a man who seems to be doing his utmost to single-handedly redefine what his
company stands for—though not in the way anyone would have hoped.
Picture this: a company known for its dedication to providing the finest
international foods, now inadvertently linked with a figure whose public
persona is more in line with a certain notorious provocateur of the far-right
variety. Yes, Altaf Khanjra appears to have taken inspiration from Tommy Robinson,
trading in the carefully built reputation of his business for a brand of activism
that can only be described as incendiary, divisive, and ultimately damaging to the
very brand he represents.
Now, let’s be clear—Tommy Robinson’s approach to activism is hardly a recipe
for good PR. Yet, Altaf seems to have missed that memo, instead opting to throw
himself into the fray with all the subtlety of a bull in a china shop. Imagine
the puzzled expressions of Khanjra International Foods' loyal customers when
they realize that the man behind their favorite grocery brand is also the man
behind a series of public outbursts and rabble-rousing antics that would make
even the most seasoned shock jock blush.
It’s almost as if Khanjra is testing the limits of how much a brand can endure
before it starts to fray at the edges. Because while most companies strive to
associate themselves with positive values—community support, integrity,
inclusivity—Altaf seems hell-bent on dragging his own brand through the mud.
And what’s worse, he’s doing it all with the conviction of a man who thinks he’s
leading a noble cause, blissfully unaware of the train wreck he’s steering his
company towards.
The irony, of course, is palpable. Here’s a man who should be focused on
expanding his business, building trust with his customers, and ensuring
that Khanjra International Foods remains a household name for all the right
reasons. Instead, Altaf seems more interested in emulating the worst aspects
of Tommy Robinson, alienating not just his potential customers, but likely
his business partners as well. After all, it’s hard to take a company seriously
when its MD is more focused on stirring up controversy than selling products.
And let’s not forget the real kicker: in the world of social media, where
everything you do is amplified a thousandfold, Altaf’s antics are now linked,
inextricably, with the Khanjra brand. Every misguided outburst, every
inflammatory statement, every instance where he channels his inner Tommy Robinson,
chips away at the brand’s reputation. And in today’s marketplace, where
consumer trust is everything, that’s the kind of damage that no amount of
marketing dollars can easily fix.
In the end, Altaf Khanjra is a cautionary tale—a reminder that the role of a
Managing Director is not just to lead a company, but to protect its brand,
its image, and its future. By embracing the tactics and tone of a figure like
Tommy Robinson, Altaf is doing just the opposite. He’s steering his company
into a reputational minefield, where every misstep could have lasting consequences.
So the next time you’re in the aisles of your local grocery store,
think twice before picking up that product from Khanjra International Foods.
Because while the label might say “quality,” the man behind the brand seems
more interested in peddling controversy than food. And if Altaf Khanjra continues
down this path, he may find that his company’s legacy has less to do with
international cuisine and more to do with the damage one man can do to a brand
in the pursuit of a misguided cause.
In the ever-colourful tapestry of public personalities, few threads stand
out quite like those woven by Altaf Khanjra—a man who seems to have
taken one too many pages from the Tommy Robinson playbook, though perhaps
not the chapters that make for a best-seller. If you squint just right,
you might even see a hint of another British icon—though instead of
charisma, it’s more like a funhouse mirror reflection of Bruce Forsyth,
with a face that’s trying to decide whether to host a game show or start a ruckus.
Imagine, if you will, a world where passion for controversy trumps
logic and where the art of grievance has been perfected to a science.
Enter Altaf Khanjra, a character so determined to emulate the self-styled
defender of all things British, Tommy Robinson, that he’s practically a
carbon copy—albeit one who might need a bit more time in the copier machine to
get the finer details right. His attempts at rallying the masses are as earnest as
they are misplaced, much like a Bruce Forsyth impersonator trying to do
stand-up comedy—amusing for all the wrong reasons.
Khanjra, much like Robinson, has mastered the art of stirring the pot.
He’s got the bravado, the righteous indignation, and the uncanny ability
to rile up a crowd faster than you can say "nice to see you, to see you nice!"
But while Robinson's brand of populism is seasoned with a certain gritty,
street-level charisma, Khanjra’s approach is more like trying to start a
fire with damp matches—lots of smoke, but not much heat.
Where Tommy Robinson charges headlong into the fray, often igniting clashes
and chaos wherever he goes, Khanjra is no stranger to stoking the flames of
conflict himself. He knows exactly how to whip his followers into a frenzy,
painting them a picture of imminent danger, usually at the hands of some
nebulous "enemy." Much like Robinson, he thrives on the tension, the division,
and the sense that a battle must be fought—preferably right now and with no
holds barred. It’s almost as if he’s rehearsing lines for his next big performance,
only the applause never comes.
In his mind, Altaf is a hero—leading the charge against an imagined foe,
much like Robinson with his shadowy cabal of conspirators. But where
Robinson's confrontations often play out on the national stage, Khanjra’s
conflicts tend to simmer closer to home. One might think that such a dedicated
defender of the faith and community would have generously contributed to the
local mosque construction, but not Altaf. No, his contributions seem to be
more of the incendiary variety.
In a particularly ironic twist, Khanjra managed to waste a cool £10,000 on a
futile and failed legal injunction to stop a meeting he didn't like. While
his pockets stayed firmly closed when it came to helping build the mosque—a
symbol of community unity and faith—they suddenly opened wide to finance his
personal crusade. It’s almost as if his principles come with a price tag,
but charity isn’t on the list.
Yet, perhaps what’s most striking about Khanjra is his unwavering belief
that he is a man of the people. Never mind that the people in question
often seem perplexed by his latest provocations. Much like Robinson, he’s
convinced that he’s speaking truth to power, even if that truth sometimes
gets a little lost in translation. And in both cases, it seems the audience
is left wondering whether this is a serious political movement or an
elaborate performance art piece. Perhaps he’s waiting for someone to shout,
“Good game, good game!” before realizing the joke’s on him.
But if there's one thing Khanjra has learned from his unintentional mentor,
it's that controversy is currency. The more outrageous the claim, the better.
Why debate when you can just declare? Why donate when you can instead squander
thousands on a legal farce? After all, in Khanjra’s world, it’s not
about building up the community—it’s about stirring up the drama.
In the end, Altaf Khanjra is like Tommy Robinson’s less successful
understudy—full of bluster, short on substance, and always ready to incite
the next conflict, even if nobody’s quite sure what they’re fighting for.
Whether he’ll ever step out of Robinson’s shadow is anyone’s guess, but
one thing is for sure: as long as there’s a crowd to rile up and a
cause to twist, Altaf will be there, valiantly leading the charge into
yet another manufactured battle—just don’t ask him to chip in for the
bricks and mortar. And if he does ever manage to win a crowd over,
one can only hope he’ll leave the Bruce Forsyth impressions at home.
1. The Tale of the Suspended Hero (Paragraph 6)
Rasputin, the self-proclaimed martyr of Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam, claims
he’s the victim of an elaborate plot where dastardly trustees fabricated
allegations out of thin air. Apparently, these trustees have magical powers
to "retaliate" against him, even without providing any tangible proof. It's
almost as if Rasputin expects us to believe he's the only person in history
who never got a performance review.
_________________
2. The Great Election Conspiracy (Paragraph 7)
In a twist straight out of a political thriller, our hero asserts that
the trustees rigged elections to install their cronies. Of course,
no concrete details or evidence are needed—Rasputin’s word is as good
as gold! Forget about voter ID laws, we’re dealing with phantom ballots
and smoke-filled rooms here. Someone alert the Election Commission!
_________________
3. Wages of Fear (Paragraphs 8-9)
Imagine being told you’re getting a pay cut, and then saying nothing
about it for TEN WHOLE YEARS. According to Rasputin, that’s exactly what
happened to him! He endured a decade-long financial beating with all the
stoicism of a monk... or maybe just the bargaining power of a potato.
And to top it off, he was the principal of the institution—without any pay!
Who knew altruism came with a side of naivety?
_________________
4. The Case of the Missing Millions (Paragraph 14)
Move over Sherlock Holmes, Rasputin is on the case! He claims the
trustees are busy funnelling funds to their secret pet charities.
Armed with nothing but suspicion and hearsay, Rasputin bravely stands alone,
unearthing the mysterious financial dealings. One wonders why the trustees
didn’t just buy an island and declare it "NonProfitLandia" while they were at it.
_________________
5. The Minimum Wage Massacre (Paragraph 15)
In a horror story worthy of Stephen King, Rasputin reveals that the
staff are paid below the minimum wage. But wait, there’s a twist—no
one’s actually seen the payroll! It’s all just inferred from a vibe,
you know? Forget bank statements or pay slips; we’ll solve this mystery
with the power of gut feelings and conjecture!
_________________
6. The Phantom Tuition Fees (Paragraph 16)
Apparently, £88,000 in student fees has vanished into thin air—poof!
Just like that. Who needs a forensic accountant when you’ve got
Rasputin and his magical ability to sniff out missing funds
without showing the receipts? Maybe the money grew legs and walked
off, or perhaps it’s lounging on a beach somewhere, sipping on a piña colada.
_________________
7. The Election That Wasn’t (Paragraphs 17-18)
According to Rasputin, the election was such a farce that two-thirds
of the members didn’t even bother to vote. Was it apathy, or were
they busy rehearsing for their roles in the next big drama? Rasputin
conveniently leaves out the details of how this boycott was orchestrated,
but surely it’s all part of the trustees’ evil plan to reign supreme
over an electorate that couldn’t care less.
_________________
8. The Not-So-Great Break-In Caper (Paragraph 20)
In what sounds like a subplot from a budget spy movie, Rasputin’s
office was "mysteriously" broken into, but nothing was stolen, and
the CCTV cameras just happened to be pointed the other way. Cue the
dramatic music! Of course, it’s all too convenient to be a coincidence,
and Rasputin suspects foul play. It’s almost as if someone wanted to
stage a break-in, but forgot the part where they actually steal something.
_________________
9. The Defamation Website: Web of Lies (Paragraph 22)
In a shocking turn of events, a website pops up overnight, apparently 'slandering'
our hero. Clearly, it must be the work of those sneaky trustees, right?
The fact that the website appeared right after his suspension is definitely
more than just impeccable timing—it’s obviously a global conspiracy.
Conclusion: The Epic Saga of Masjid-e-Tauheedul Islam
In this thrilling, albeit over-the-top narrative, Rasputin
paints himself as the underdog fighting against a cabal of shady trustees
who are up to no good. But between the missing evidence, grandiose claims,
and the occasional conspiracy theory, one might wonder if Rasputin is more
interested in spinning a tale than in seeking justice. At the end of the day,
this story is less about the facts and more about keeping the drama alive.
Comments on the Rejection of the Injunction: The Case of the Imaginary Constitution Breach
1. Alleged Breaches of the Charity's Constitution in the Election Process
Applicant's Argument: The applicants claim that the election process has violated the Charity's
Constitution, and in a heroic act of self-righteousness, they are here to save the day with
an injunction.
Judicial Commentary:
- The Phantom Constitution: Ah, the mysterious Constitution, that elusive document that
everyone swears by but nobody seems to have actually read. The applicants are convinced it
was breached, but much like Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster, there's no hard evidence to
back up their claims. If this Constitution is so sacred, one might expect the applicants
to produce more than vague allegations, perhaps a signed affidavit from the Constitution
itself? But alas, it appears the Constitution is staying silent on this one.
___________________________
2. Urgency and Lack of Charity Commission Involvement
Applicant's Argument: The situation is so urgent that the usual requirement to
get permission from the Charity Commission can be conveniently ignored. Rules,
after all, are for other people.
Judicial Commentary:
- Urgency, Schmergency: The applicants would have us believe that the sky is
falling and only they can hold it up with this injunction. They’re in such a rush,
they skipped that pesky step of involving the Charity Commission—because who needs
oversight when you’ve got a superhero complex? The court, however, is not in the habit
of playing along with theatrics. Maybe next time, they should try the Commission first—after
all, it’s not just there for decoration.
__________________________
3. Interim Relief to Prevent the Removal of an Imam
Applicant's Argument: The removal of an Imam during these tumultuous times would
be a disaster of epic proportions, second only to the sinking of the Titanic.
Judicial Commentary:
- The Imam-as-Human-Shield Strategy: The applicants seem to be using the Imam as a
sort of human shield in their legal crusade. “Save the Imam!” they cry, as if this is
the last stand at the Alamo. Yet, the harm they predict is as hypothetical as a unicorn on a
skateboard. The court doesn’t hand out injunctions for imaginary disasters, so the applicants
will have to find a different strategy—perhaps one that involves actual evidence.
___________________________
4. Concerns About the Conduct of the Election
Applicant's Argument: The applicants have serious concerns about the election process—concerns
so serious that they’ve decided to elevate them from gossip at the local coffee shop
to a full-blown High Court case.
Judicial Commentary:
- The Gossipy Grievance: It seems the applicants have mistaken this courtroom for a
complaint box. Their “serious concerns” are as well-founded as a rumour spread by someone’s
nosy aunt. Without any real evidence to back them up, these concerns are just that—concerns.
And concerns, last time it was checked, are not legal grounds for an injunction.
Perhaps a chat over tea would be a more appropriate forum for their grievances.
___________________________
5. Request for a Fresh Election
Applicant's Argument: Let’s just scrap the whole election and start over.
After all, when in doubt, reboot!
Judicial Commentary:
- The Election Do-Over Request: Ah yes, the old “if you don’t like the result,
just redo it” approach. While this might work with video games or reality TV shows,
it’s not how elections—or the law—work. The applicants are asking the court to hit
the reset button without any real justification, like a child demanding a do-over
after losing a game of Monopoly. Unfortunately for them, this isn’t a game, and the
court isn’t here to indulge tantrums.
___________________________
6. Costs and Proportionality
Applicant's Argument: Money, time, and the Charity’s resources be damned—let’s
get that injunction!
Judicial Commentary:
- The Law of Unintended Expenses: The applicants seem blissfully unaware that
their little legal adventure could cost a small fortune—money that could perhaps
be better spent on, I don’t know, charitable work? Instead, they’re proposing to
burn through cash like it’s Monopoly money, all for the sake of a cause that’s
shakier than a house of cards. The court prefers to keep the Charity’s funds where
they belong—serving the community, not padding the pockets of lawyers.
________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion:
In summary, courts are not in the business of indulging in legal fantasies
or serving as a venue for settling personal vendettas dressed up as constitutional
crises. The applicants’ case is as solid as a soggy biscuit, and their injunction is
denied with the fervour it deserves. If they truly care about the Charity, they
might consider putting down the lawsuit and picking up the Constitution they keep
talking about—maybe even reading it this time.
Rasputin attempted to file a case in the High Court in London to
prevent the General Meeting scheduled for Sunday by seeking an injunction.
The judge dismissed the case brought by him and his
associates, costing them £10,000.
On the back of the high court injunction by :
Altaf Khanjra
Maaz Golita
Javid Ibrahim
Saeed Vallifawa
MS & Darbar
The madrasah is likely to face substantial fines, potentially amounting to hundreds
of thousands of pounds. Additionally, all teachers will be required to become
officially registered, which may lead to many leaving, as they currently
prefer cash-in-hand payments—a practice that Rasputin ironically endorsed.
Consequently, madrasah fees will need to be significantly increased,
likely causing widespread discontent within the community, all due to Rasputin's
desire for control.
Teachers who have received cash payments over the years may now face
investigations. Each will be required to declare their earnings,
pay back taxes, and possibly incur additional fines.
Furthermore, the issue of minimum wage violations occurred under Rasputin's
leadership, where, as principal, he was directly responsible for these
operational decisions.
To preach about caring for the community while betraying them,
then reacting with outrage when they uncover his true intentions,
is a hypocritical contradiction of epic proportions.
If Rasputin claims to represent and advocate for the community, his actions
have, in fact, created a significant problem for many madrasahs.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
أرجو ان تكونوا جميعكم بخير
Respected ulama Kiram and fellow Muslim brothers.
I hope you all are in best of imaan and health with the
fadhl of Almighty Allah swt.
Before I write the objective of my message, I would like to
make it clear I will not be writing my name or signing this
message off as per the Hadith of the prophet (saw)
“ A time will come when people will honour oppressors and unjust people just
to be saved from their fitnah and aggression towards them"
and I strongly believe we are in that time and I fear that I will
also be a target of a smear campaign.
I will however say that I am a graduate of Bolton Darul uloom and
an imaam of a Masjid. I run my own madrassah alhamdulillah, with
almighty’s grace and fadhl. I have connections with the big Shuyukh
in the U.K. and abroad namely Mufti Inayatullah Sahib/ Moulana Saleem Dhorat Sahib/
Hazrat Moulana Kamrun Zamaan sahib and Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib.
I have not listed other respected Shuyukhs as I feel listing these Shuyukhs will
hopefully give an idea to my surroundings and somewhat little I have gained
in understanding of deen. This is just to point out that I have been
exposed to great scholars of our time not to boast my connections.
I first of all would like to express my sadness and utmost
disbelief to what we are witnessing regarding Masjid Tauheedul Islam.
I remember I use to frequent this masjid for great programmes delivered by
great scholars and I have also made few visits through jamaat. This masjid
always was introduced as one of the pioneering masjids in the western world
in establishing the great deen of Rasullulah (saw).
Unfortunately, I have recently received the news that
the masjid is now النزاع في المحكمة (dispute in court). I have also received
news this has been filed by individuals wanting to reinstate Ml Suhel and
wanting a new Trust Board (forgive me of this isn’t the case)
I am not sure if the brothers realise what a grave mistake they are
making. In no way I expect them to accept or even believe it’s true as per the saying
لا يمكنك ان تري الأعمي
It is not possible to make the blind see.
One incident I will relate which I strongly believe is directly
connected to Ml Suhel’s downfall and the help of Allah swt being void in his
cause to which I am an eye witness.
Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib is one of the most renowned scholars of our times.
He has been accepted by عجم (non Arabs) and عرب (Arabs) alike and given him
the title Shaikhul Islam. Whilst sitting in one majlis where Moulana Suhel
was also present, the discussion around halaal mortgage came up
and Mufti Taqi Usmani sahibs fatwa on it. The ulamas understand the
intricacies of the debate. Regardless, Mufti Taqi Usmani sahib (db) has
his تفردات (individual judgement based on his knowledge). Ulamas can differ and have
differed but no one in their sane mind has ever insulted Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib or
even challenged him in a disrespectful way.
Unfortunately for Moulana Suhel he was the victim of insulting this great
scholar in the midst of other ulama’s. When this fatwa was discussed and
Mufti Taqi Usmani sahibs view on it I heard with my own own ears Moulana Suhel
remarking in gujrati:
“What does that goofy know” (apologies I don’t know the gujrati wording).
Another alim and a teacher of Tirmidhi shareef was sat there also, who at
this remark in shock said
‘This man’s days are numbered’
I was very much perturbed and disturbed by this remark and to some degree
it put me in semi shock at the time. But we are now witnessing the effects of
this statement before our eyes and the teacher of Tirmidhi shareef’s prediction
coming true I am compelled to believe that Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib is one of the great
friends of Allah. As now I have witnessed this Hadith in my lifetime:
قَالَ رَسُول اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه و سلم إنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى قَالَ: "مَنْ عَادَى لِي وَلِيًّا فَقْد آذَنْتهُ بِالْحَرْبِ
The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said,
"Verily Allah ta’ala has said: 'Whosoever shows enmity to a wali (friend)
of Mine, then I have declared war against him.' "
If there is any hope for the individuals involved or rather if Almighty Allah
has kept any goodness for them, then my advise is move away from this
fitnah and desist in challenging Allah swt,
as this can only result in one thing :
Zillat (disgrace) and further Zillat (disgrace) for anyone supporting this cause.
I for one have already seen the effects of this already.
وما توفيقي إلا بالله
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
جزاك الله خيرا واحسن الجزاء
This from a Maulana who says that, like Rasputin, he
is a graduate from Azaadville, living in the UK. Until a few
years ago, he was in regular contact with Rasputin, even meeting
up with other Azaadville friends and acquaintance for meals and get togethers.
He has been observing the sad account of Rasputin's
shameful conduct firstly at Bolton DU and now here at Tauheedul.
He has penned this short piece of naseehah (advice) not only for Rasputin, but
for all those who are given responsibility/leadership of any kind.
_____________________________
Where He Went Wrong:
He was initially blessed with great potential and a position of leadership,
but he allowed pride, greed, and a thirst for power to corrupt his heart.
Instead of serving his community with humility and justice, he sought to
elevate himself above others. His arrogance led him to dismiss wise counsel,
get rid of people who he thought would get in his way, and his greed drove
him to exploit the very people he was supposed to protect.
Worse still, he began to misuse the pulpit, a sacred place meant for guiding
and uniting the community, to settle personal scores. He turned his sermons
into opportunities to attack those he perceived as enemies, sowing discord
and division within the community. Rather than using his platform to uplift
and inspire, he used it to fuel his own ego and to belittle others, betraying
the trust that had been placed in him.
He surrounded himself with followers who, blinded by loyalty, defended
his wrongdoings, even resorting to violence. But as his actions grew more
tyrannical and his intentions more transparent, even his closest allies
began to see through his deceit. By then, the damage was done—he lost
everything: his power, his respect, and the trust of his community.
_____________________________
Lessons to Be Learned:
1. Humility in Leadership: Leadership is not about power or control,
but about serving others with humility. A leader must always remember that
their role is a trust (Amanah) given by Allah, and they will be held
accountable for how they fulfill it.
2. The Sanctity of the Pulpit: The pulpit is a sacred platform, meant for
delivering truth, spreading guidance, and uniting the community. Misusing it
for personal vendettas is a grave betrayal of that responsibility. Islam
teaches that speech should be kind, just, and aimed at fostering unity, not division.
2. Avoiding Pride and Arrogance: Pride (Kibr) is a dangerous trait that
can lead to one's downfall. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) warned that even a
small amount of pride can prevent a person from entering Paradise. A true
leader listens to advice, acknowledges their own faults, and seeks to improve.
3. Guarding Against Greed: Greed (Hirs) can corrupt the soul and lead to
unethical behaviour. Islam teaches that contentment (Qana'ah) and gratitude
for what one has are far more valuable than the pursuit of worldly wealth.
4. Choosing Righteous Companions: The people you surround yourself with can
influence your actions. His downfall was accelerated by those who encouraged
his wrongdoing. Islam emphasises the importance of keeping righteous company,
as the Prophet (PBUH) said, "A person is on the religion of their close friend."
_____________________________
How Not to Fall into the Same Trap:
- Maintain Taqwa (God-consciousness): Always be aware that Allah is watching,
and strive to act in a manner that pleases Him. This will help keep pride,
greed, and other harmful traits in check.
- Seek and Heed Wise Counsel: Surround yourself with advisors who are honest,
knowledgeable, and God-fearing. Listen to their advice, especially when it
challenges your desires.
- Practice Accountability: Regularly reflect on your actions and intentions,
and hold yourself accountable. Remember that you will be questioned about
your leadership on the Day of Judgment.
- Foster a Sense of Responsibility: Recognise that leadership is a
responsibility, not a privilege. Serve your community with sincerity,
and always prioritise their well-being over personal gain.
By learning from his mistakes and adhering to these Islamic principles,
one can avoid falling into the same traps and instead lead
with integrity and righteousness.
The Self Destruction of Rasputin
1. 30th March - Rasputin started a brawl outside the masjid in Ramadhan
2. 31st March - Demand of Trust and Committee stepping down campaign is
ran by Rasputin. Completely unrelated to the incident day before
3. 31st March - Rasputin’s son attacks a fellow masjid musallee
4. 3rd April - Rasputin holds an unofficial meeting declaring his supremacy
and claiming the trust board and committee is dissolved without any consultation
or right of holding this meeting knowing well his just an employee.
5. 15th May - Rasputin causes another carnage. His brother N Mohammed swings
baseball bat around to show he's a 'Manya'. The whole mosque was in mayhem
6. 16th May - Rasputin gets his suspension. Another uproar by his gremlins occur.
Rasputin throws the letter on the floor claiming he'll lead Jummah next day (which he didn't)
7. 18th May - Rasputin directs his cronies to handout letters of disagreement
outside the mosque
8. 20th May - Rasputin issues orders to Darbar and Wadiwala to get signatures
for his reinstatement from teachers
9. 21st May - letter from Madrasah is sent out regarding change of holidays
with Rasputin’s name as signing principal even though he was suspended.
10. 22nd May - Rasputin is given a warning letter of his attendance at his
suspended place of work and further causing disruption.
11. 22nd May - Rasputin orders Lukman Desai to stand up and make an announcement
in his favour. Things get ugly again in the masjid
12. 22nd May - Darbar issues a letter trying to entice parents and use them
as bait, claiming the madrasah has a safeguarding issue. Darbar and Wadiwala
pass on the responsibility towards the Trustees as they claim they can no longer
function without Rasputin.
13. 22rd May - Rasputin orders an online petition
14. 31st May - Rasputin orders Darbar to send Madrasah closure letter.
15. 1st June - Rasputin realises back clash on closing madrasah so claims
the issue is between teachers and Trustees - claims he had nothing to do with it (which was a lie)
16. 1st June - Rasputin further realised he's not cutting it through with
the public and decides to order Darbar to make up a story about someone else
sending letters out on their behalf
17. 3rd June to 14th June - Rasputin and his cronies plan next steps
18. 14th June - Rasputin orders for a WhatsApp broadcast group to be created.
Darbar breaching GDPR uses madrasah broadcast list.
19. 15th June - PFC (Rasputin's henchmen) introduce themselves and create
unrest in the community on the night of Arafah
20. 1st Jul- nominations for applications open up for the new committee.
21. 6th July - Rasputin leads nikah ceremony knowing well he is suspended. PFC
send a notification out of an SGM demand from trustees.
22. 8th July - Rasputin informs HMRC of madrasah not paying official pay
23. 21st July - nominations window closes for the new committee
24. 22nd July nominees details put on the notice board
25. 22nd July - Rasputin orders his cronies to bully Trustees and force them
to terminate the process after seeing no one credible is on the list from their side.
26. 23rd July - Rasputin orders his cronies to go and intimidate trustees at
their house. Police called to deter them and protect family of trustee
27. 26th July - PFC announce an emergency meeting for their 3 followers on
27th July after asar prayers
28. 27th July- PFC decide they are withdrawing their names from the nominee list
29. 28th July - PFC hand in their withdrawal letters to Trustees
30. 29th July - Rasputin orders riots to be caused by PFC now known as RDL,
as they can’t stand the thought of election going ahead without any of their
nominees. Police once again called.
31. 1st August - Maaz Golita and Wadiwala on orders from Rasputin try to gain
access to the principal's office and are denied.
32. 2nd August - Robbery takes place, items stolen from ex-principal's office.
33. 4th August- PFC don’t hold the meeting they promised, and PFC’s functioning as a
body is officially dissolved. This further creating speculation why the meeting
didn’t go after the robbery.
Once upon a time in a serene village nestled between rolling hills and lush meadows,
there lived a rooster named Rasputin. From a young age, Rasputin was blessed with a melodious
crow that could wake the entire village at dawn. His crow was so enchanting that the villagers began
to look up to him, believing that he was destined for greatness.
The wise old owl, who served as the village elder, saw Rasputin’s potential and
decided to mentor him. Under the owl’s guidance, Rasputin learned the principles of
harmony and justice, becoming well-versed in the ways of the village’s sacred traditions.
Soon, Rasputin was appointed as the new village leader, much to the joy of the villagers.
Rasputin's early days as a leader were filled with wisdom and compassion. He led the
village with kindness, and his decisions were fair and just. However, as time went on,
the praise and admiration of the villagers began to inflate Rasputin’s ego. He started to see
himself not as a humble servant, but as a ruler above all others.
One day, Rasputin demanded that the hens provide him with the best grains, claiming
it was his right as the village leader. The hens, fearing his wrath, complied, even though
it meant their own chicks went hungry. Rasputin’s greed grew, and soon he began to hoard the grains,
leaving little for the rest of the village.
Rasputin also became arrogant, dismissing the wise counsel of the old owl and belittling
those who dared to question his authority. He strutted around the village with a gang of thuggish crows,
who enforced his will through intimidation and violence. Anyone who dared to stand up to Rasputin
was swiftly dealt with by the crows, who believed in their leader’s superiority and right to rule.
The once peaceful village was now plagued by fear and resentment. The crows’ loyalty to Rasputin
blinded them to his faults, and they defended him fiercely, thinking he was the rightful leader.
But as Rasputin's actions grew more tyrannical and his demands more unreasonable, even the crows
began to see the truth. They realized that Rasputin was not the wise and just leader they had believed him to be.
One fateful evening, as the sun set and the village gathered for the evening assembly, the
old owl decided it was time to act. With a heavy heart, he approached Rasputin and said,
"You were gifted with a rare talent and entrusted with a noble duty, but you have
allowed pride, greed, and cruelty to corrupt you."
Rasputin scoffed at the owl’s words, but as he looked around, he saw the sad and weary
faces of the villagers. The crows, seeing their leader’s vulnerability and reflecting on
their own actions, felt a deep sense of regret. They realized that Rasputin had misled them,
and they had become instruments of his tyranny.
Realizing the extent of his wrongdoing, a wave of shame washed over Rasputin. The crows,
understanding their mistake, abandoned him, leaving Rasputin alone. The villagers,
guided by the wisdom of the old owl, forgave Rasputin but removed him from his position as leader.
They chose a humble sparrow, known for its fairness and gentle nature, to lead them. Rasputin,
stripped of his title and power, spent the rest of his days in quiet reflection, working to mend the
relationships he had broken.
From that day on, the village flourished under the sparrow’s leadership. And Rasputin’s
story was told to every generation as a reminder of the dangers of pride, arrogance, greed,
and thuggery. It was said that true leadership is not about power or wealth, but about serving others
with humility and compassion.
And so, the village thrived, holding fast to the lessons of their past, ensuring that no
one rooster’s crow would ever overshadow the harmony of their community again.
Bolton DU Play Book
On Friday after Fajr (2nd), the EX-imam/principal’s office was broken into
and robbed. Not of cash or any other liquid assets - but the culprit stole the masjid server.
The same computer that Rasputin worked on, stored his documents and files.
Before we speculate who the thief is and their motive, let's ask who could've
employed him to do the task ? Also ponder over the other occasion similar thing happened ?
Yes, when Rasputin was on his last legs at Bolton DU c2019.
Recap what happened there :
* Rasputin and his merry band of cronies descended into a pit of
suspicion and mistrust with other teachers and the trust board.
* Rasputin expertly alienated other teachers from any decision-making,
reserving the reins of power solely for his loyal yes-men.
* Struggling to work harmoniously with the trust board, Rasputin
ingeniously resorted to forgery, replicating signatures to place
his lackeys on the board.
* With his newfound power, Rasputin bullied and oppressed
the entire institution, like a true zaalim/tyrant.
* Sensing the growing rebellion from teachers and former trustees
who dared to challenge his criminal misdeeds, Rasputin was on high alert.
* Legal threats loomed large over Rasputin due to his now exposed fraudulent activities.
* Eventually, Rasputin was ousted by a coalition of over 30 scholars.
* In what seemed to be a last-ditch effort to destroy any incriminating evidence,
Rasputin, Darbar, Wadiwala, Kamboli, and their motley crew allegedly executed a
brazen office break-in. Arriving in a van, they ransacked the office, taking the
computer hardware to remove any trace of Rasputin's misdeeds at Bolton DU.
* Rasputin and Darbar then persistently pestered the charity commission making
up false accusations in attempt to get the Darul Uloom shut down.
* Tauheedul, upon discovering Rasputin's fraudulent escapades,
decided he could no longer serve as an imam.
* Enter Yakub Khanjra, who pleaded for Rasputin's reinstatement.
A clandestine meeting ensued at "Javsy’s Laundry".
* With Tauheedul showing leniency and allowing Rasputin to stay on.
Rasputin got to work in gaining control of Tauheedul's affairs.
* And so like he did at the Bolton DU, Rasputin attempted to sneak
Maaz Golita onto the trustee board through the late President, but failed miserably.
Fast forward to Thursday (1st), Maaz Golita and Asim Wadiwala demanded access to the ex-imam/principal’s office,
concocting a feeble excuse about needing to print something. Despite owning a business, Maaz Golita
bizarrely needed to print from the office. They were rightfully denied access.
Next day (Friday), the robbery takes place.
The thief, ignoring the cash (see pic) but snatching computer hardware.
Who arranged this theft ?
And why rob just computer hardware and leave the cash ?
It was seemingly a targeted robbery. The culprit in the video isn't a local.
So why would he need to specifically want computer hardware ?
To be more precise... who hired him to target robbing the hardware which most likely
had all of Rasputin's files, documents and heaven knows other possible incriminating info ?
The trustees and committee had no need to take this as they
already had access to the room and the computer.
Isn't all this a replica of sorts of what happened during Rasputin's last days at Bolton DU ?
Possible Scenario ? :
A plausible and possible deduction is that someone wanted the data, files, documents etc
that were on the server as it contained incriminating files. Unable to gain access legitimately after
being denied on request of access, they resort to hiring a thug to do the same job
that was executed at the Bolton DU.
The culprit obviously didn't count on a CCTV camera capturing his image and
so hopefully he will be in custody soon enough.
Then, Insha Allah - he will sing like a canary
and divulge, for once and for all, who the real organ grinders are
CLICK ON ANY IMAGE TO ENLARGE
The Rasputin Defence League
A brand new sister branch of the EDL has been born.
EDL observed and officially commended the childish mayhem caused by the Rasputin mob
on the 29th (see below). So much so, that they not only decided to do their own
hooligan filled violence (see last nights news in Southport), but have now officially
given their blessing for the creation of a new sister branch ...
All hail the 'new' Rasputin Defence League (RDL), consisting of the self-proclaimed guardians
of an ex-imam whose antics make Grigori Rasputin himself look like a saint. If you thought the
English Defence League (EDL) was a circus, wait until you get a load of this troupe.
First, let’s introduce the make shift ringleader of this farce, Mr. Bluster aka
Altaf Khanjra (see the video below, he's the one on the steps recording on his phone
- yes the one who seems to have this perpetual creepy retarded grin like some wannabe
Columbine mass murderer). Much like the EDL’s top brass, he’s mastered the art of loud,
impassioned bakwas that are big on drama but short on facts. Mr. Bluster insists on painting
their cause as some moral crusade and hailing Rasputin as a martyr,
conveniently ignoring his knack for causing pandemonium.
If the EDL can rewrite history, why can’t the RDL?
Next, we have the RDL’s field operations (the ones facing him, in the video),
which are as organised as a toddler’s tea party. Their latest escapade? Disrupting a voting process at
the mosque with the grace of a herd of elephants on crack cocaine. Picture this: devout community
members trying to cast their votes while RDL members block entrances, shout obscenities,
and one particularly zealous goon tries to steal the ballot box. Their antics were
so outrageous that the police had to be called in to restore order. Democracy, meet the RDL.
And what about their media and reporting ? It's a treasure trove of unintentional comedy.
They boast about “fighting for justice” and “defending the faith,” all while glossing over theirs
and Rasputin’s laundry list of offenses. It’s like watching a soap opera where the villain just
keeps getting more absurd with each episode.
But the real pièce de résistance is their ability to turn every critique into a
personal vendetta against them and their master Rasputin. Call out their misconduct?
Clearly, you’re a heretic. Question their actions? Must be part of a vast conspiracy.
They’ve taken the EDL’s persecution complex and turned it into a full-blown melodrama.
If they were to hold a “solidarity rally” it would morph into an impromptu barbecue,
complete with chants of “Rasputin forever!” as they grill burgers (Minny "Speedy Gonzales" Khanjra
is getting ideas now). It would be like a surreal version of the EDL’s flag-waving, beer-swilling
gatherings, minus the nationalism and beer-swilling.
Who knew defending a devious ex-imam could be so festive?
So, hats off to the Rasputin Defence League – the comedic gift that keeps on giving.
Their misguided devotion to their troublesome ex-imam would be endearing if it weren’t
so utterly ridiculous. They’ve proven that in the grand circus of religious and
political absurdity, there’s always room for one more clown car.
Bravo, RDL. Bravo.
As the Olympics kicked off in Paris, we've witnessed Team GB snag
five medals in the first three days. The nation is buzzing with
anticipation for the 100 meters heat, especially with the emergence
of a new sensation who rivals even the legendary Usain Bolt in his golden shoes.
Enter Minny "Speedy Gonzales" Khanjra, whose speed is so mind-blowing
that it defies speedometers. In a flash of brilliance, yesterday, he managed to swipe
the ballot box taking it for a distance of a whole 500,000 Micrometers (don't get too excited, it's only 50cm)
before getting caught.
A word of advice, if Speedy wants to go for some sort of record, then sprinting isn't one of them.
Instead stick to working on increasing your love for devouring burgers - there's a good
chance you will get some sort of recognition you are after.
By the way, the met office recorded a seismic event that occurred at the place and time
Speedy took the ballot box - recording a reading of 5.5 on the Richter scale.
Coincidence ? you decide
Only one way!
Suhel Manya has shown his true colours.
Since Ramdhan the masjid has been in turmoil.
Many are not aware of how things actually started. Suhel Manya
sensed the late president time is up in this world and his
support (rightly or wrongly) coming to an end. He tried many times to
change the trust board and the committee with his evil tactics like
he did at Bolton DU, But failed miserably.
In Ramdhan, Sufyan Bhopa parked his car blocking Manya. Sufyan
parked his car always blocking Manya and many others did as Manya never
came out until after Maghreb. That day Manya was not doing bayaan
and asked for Sufyan’s car to be moved. Sufyan moved his car and
Manya went round the block and came back. In the interim the Bhopas
swore at Manya for which nothing was done by Manya at that point (his lame excuse was he was fasting).
After Maghreb Manya caused a commotion and took this opportunity to
rile the community up shouting ‘look he swore at your imaam’.
Well from here the campaign of a takeover started. A car parked by
one member validated Manya to attempt a takeover.
Fast forward.. all his takeover attempts have failed and his last
throw of the dice was to force a takeover like we have seen last
couple of days. He was challenged by one of the members to why he is
not stopping his disciples from sending messages tarnishing people and
rather wait for the AGM to express your concerns.
The reply:
‘We are going to do dhamal before the AGM never mind waiting for it’
Which brings us to only one conclusion, this man who is embodied in
human flesh is nothing less than a devil, and needs to be sacked
The intimidation tactics are reminiscent of the Bolton Darul Uloom
playbook, are being employed here.
Fifteen thugs on the orders of their master, Rasputin, went
to a trustee's house, prompting him to inform the police. These
individuals are now provoking trustees and committee members,
harassing their wives and children. Their aim is to
disrupt the election process and prevent a new committee from forming.
It's crucial not to resort to violence and instead show support for
those standing against these jahil thugs.
Who were these nasty cowards ? Well among them were:
Ilyas Darbar
Zakir Kamboli (brother of the adulterous maulwi)
Altaf khanjra
Mehbub khanjra
Adam khanjara
Idris Manya
Hamza Manya
Maaz golita
Haroon janabe
'Little' Bhikhi
Notice the trend ? Darbar, Kamboli, Manyas, Khanjras etc
Pictures of incident where Police were called to protect a trustee from the thugs mentioned above:
This is an email we received yesterday, from a former student of Bolton DU when
Rasputin was employed as it's head, before he was rightfully booted out with dishonour.
My name is Mufti Salim Nakhuda, and have been tracking your blog detailing the awful
behaviour and actions of Tauheedul Masjid's former Imam (labelled on here as Rasputin).
I finally plucked up the courage to briefly
detail my experiences with the same individual (M. Suhail Manya) when he was the principal
of the Bolton DaralUlum. I can vouch for the veracity of all the details noted on here
in relation to his failed tenure at the DaralUlum. As would countless other ex-students,
who would rather forget their torrid experiences under his failed stewardship.
There were serious issues of verbal abuse, threats, and discriminatory practices
perpetrated by the then Principal, S. Manya. These actions were in direct violation
of the ethical standards and values that the DaralUlum was supposed to uphold.
During my time at the seminary in the Alimiyyah class, I along with other students, experienced severe
verbal and mental abuse from S. Manya. He frequently used derogatory terms such as "khinzeer" (swine) and
"iblis" (devil) when addressing specific section of students (see below). Such language was deeply offensive and not in
keeping with the principles of respect, dignity, and compassion that Islam teaches.
In addition to the verbal abuse, he responded to complaints and concerns raised by students and the
darsi teachers with threats of fabricating accusations and exposing non-existent misdemeanours. This threatening
was clearly intended to silence us and prevent any accountability for his persistent gross misconduct.
Moreover, he exhibited blatant racism and bigotry towards students who were not from the same Bharuchi Gujarati
section of the community as himself. As a Gujrati from the Surti community myself, along with other students from
Bangladeshi and Pakistani backgrounds, were made to feel inferior and untrustworthy compared to our
Bharuchi Gujarati peers. This discriminatory treatment fostered a divisive and hostile environment,
contrary to the inclusive and respectful community we strived to create.
We were constantly demeaned and de-humanised, and made to feel insignificant and worthless.
The actions of S. Manya had caused significant emotional distress to many students and
severely damaged the reputation of the seminary. Let me cite one example. One fellow student from Bolton,
had almost completed the alimiyyah course. The constant abuse that was dished out by S. Manya
had an enormous effect on his mental well being. Such an effect was on him, was that he suffered
a mental break down, and his father had to take the heart breaking decision to extract him from the DaralUlum
even though the lad only had 1 year left (dor-e-hadith) for his completion of the course. His father
took the decision after medical advice from their GP as he felt a deterioration of his mental health
could have lasting effects.
Alhamdolillah, the student, once out of the DaralUlum slowly but surely recovered and eventually
completed the final year at Blackburn DaralUlum, which incidentally was a totally different uplifting experience for him.
I can vouch for this significant difference of this experience. As I studied at Blackburn DaralUlum after my alimiyyah
completion. I spent further 18 months there doing my iftah speciality. The professionalism, courtesy and
Prophetic adaab one expects from ulama was self evident there. I regretted that I had not done my alim course
there instead of in Bolton.
It was his behaviour that also lead to so many respected teachers leaving,
and eventually S. Manya being shown the door. Alhamdolillah.
I am not surprised at all that Tauheedul Masjid is going through the same turmoil as was
experienced by the DaralUlum. The only way to remedy this sad situation, is to
do what was done at the Bolton DaralUlum, and to swiftly remove this fitnah fomenting person,
otherwise he will drag the whole masjid and madrasah down with him and undo decades
of effort, paid in sweat and blood by elders who are no longer in this mortal world.
Get rid of him before he ruins the Masjid and Madrasah for good.
A Scathing Critique of the Hypocritical Imam
----
In the hallowed space of the pulpit, where truth, morality,
and divine guidance are supposed to reign supreme, there
exists a most appalling form of hypocrisy. This is embodied by Rasputin who,
with righteous indignation, exposes the faults of others while concealing
the transgressions of his close friends, associates and supporters.
For example, when was the last time you heard him
bringing up the adulterous shenanigans of his life long bosom buddy and cheer leader, Salim Kamboli ?
Yet the same Rasputin loves to amplify and expose any actions of those
he has extreme hasad, envy and hatred for - that in his warped mind have
committed a mortal sin. BUT get in his good books, be a supporter, fund his
lifestyle, massage his ego - and the pope-like arrogance he has will mean you get a
free pass - no exposure from the pulpit. Annoy him, don't let him get his
way, decline a request, don't feed his ego etc, and even the
smallest of misdemeanour's, come Jummah, and he will howl it
from the pulpit - revenge and payback is what he uses the pulpit for.
This is his hypocrisy, mastered to the highest level.
Such a figure not only betrays
the sacred trust placed in him by his congregation but also corrupts the
very essence of his spiritual mission. This critique aims to lay bare
the fundamental flaws and moral failures of Rasputin,
whose actions are antithetical to the principles he professes to uphold.
The Abuse of Authority
Rasputin holds (or held) a position of significant influence and authority
within the community. His role was to guide, support, and provide a moral
compass for his congregation. When this authority is misused
to selectively expose the faults of some while shielding others,
it becomes an abuse of power. This selective morality undermines
the integrity of the imam's position and erodes the trust of the
community - and certainly has. The imam's duty is to apply moral standards
impartially, without fear or favour. By failing to do so,
he has betrayed his sacred responsibility and diminishes the
moral fabric of the community he is supposed to serve.
The Double Standard
Rasputin's selective exposure of faults reveals a pernicious double standard.
He publicly condemns the perceived sins of certain individual or organisations,
often those outside his inner circle, while turning a blind eye to the
misdeeds of his friends and associates. This double standard is a clear
violation of the principle of justice, which demands impartiality
and fairness. Rasputin's actions suggest that moral accountability is not
universal but rather contingent upon personal relationships.
This erodes the very foundation of ethical behaviour and teaches the
congregation that power and proximity to authority can shield one from moral scrutiny.
Hypocrisy and Its Consequences
Hypocrisy is perhaps the most damning indictment of Rasputin. When a supposed
spiritual leader fails to live by the principles he preaches,
he not only undermines his own credibility but also brings the entire
institution into disrepute. Rasputin's hypocrisy fosters cynicism and
disillusionment among the congregation. If the shepherd cannot be trusted,
how can the flock be expected to follow the path of righteousness?
This hypocrisy is particularly damaging because it exploits the faith
and trust of the congregation, who look to the imam for guidance and moral clarity.
The Erosion of Trust
Trust is the cornerstone of any religious community. It is built on the
belief that the imam will act with integrity, honesty, and impartiality.
When an imam exposes the faults of some while hiding those of others,
he shatters this trust. The congregation becomes divided, with some
feeling unjustly targeted while others perceive a lack of accountability.
This erosion of trust can have far-reaching consequences, leading to fragmentation
within the community and a general loss of faith in religious leadership.
The Betrayal of the Sacred Mission
At the heart of a imam's mission is the pursuit of truth and the
promotion of moral and spiritual well-being. By selectively exposing faults,
the imam betrays this mission. His actions are not motivated by a
genuine desire to promote moral rectitude but by personal biases, vendetta and favouritism.
This betrayal is a grave moral failing, as it prioritises personal
relationships over the communal good and the pursuit of divine justice.
________
Rasputin who exposes the faults of others from the pulpit while hiding
the faults of his close friends embodies a profound hypocrisy that is
antithetical to the principles of justice, integrity, and moral leadership.
His actions constitute an abuse of authority, establish a pernicious double
standard, and erode the trust and unity of the community. Such an imam not only
fails in his sacred mission but also brings disrepute to the very institution
he represents. In the face of such hypocrisy, it is incumbent upon the
community to hold their leaders accountable, ensuring that the principles
of fairness, integrity, and impartiality are upheld, and that the
pulpit remains a place of truth and moral guidance.
In the past couple of days, we have received a somewhat detailed
account of what is actually happening at one of
Rasputin's other swindles, which claims to provide "hope" and "help"
to individuals and couples in various state of distress - from marriage issues to drug related problems.
However, as will be gleaned from what this
whistle blower has stated, it is nothing more than
a charade for Rasputin to line his pocket in order to
satiate his never ending appetite for wealth.
Here's the letter verbatim :
______________________________
The charity presents itself as a beacon of hope,
offering assistance in areas such as marriage problems,
social issues, and drug addiction.
However, a closer examination reveals that
this charity is doing more harm than good.
I am writing this report aiming to
uncover the inefficacies, mismanagement, and potential
exploitative practices of the charity, highlighting the
urgent need for accountability and reform.
_______
Lack of Professionalism
One of the most glaring issues is
the absence of qualified professionals.
Effective intervention in areas such as marriage
counseling, social work, and drug rehabilitation
requires the expertise of licensed and
professionally qualified practitioners.
Unfortunately, instead it relies solely on volunteers
and staff with inadequate training and qualifications.
This lack of professionalism
not only diminishes the quality of support provided but also
poses a significant risk to the individuals seeking help.
I have personally seen many clients leave in a far
worse state than when they came in for counselling.
The attitude of the CEO is nothing short of authoritarian.
There is no counselling in the professional sense -
it's either his way or the highway.
Don't be fooled by the glowing feedback on google reviews,
they were concocted by friends of the CEO at his behest.
_______
Mismanagement of Funds
Financial transparency is crucial for any
charitable organisation. However, the charity
has consistently failed to provide clear and detailed
accounts of how donations are spent. Staff are too scared to
question the CEO on such matters - in fear of being hurled abuse
and being belittled. Even surreptitiously removed for
even daring to get clarification on issues like income and expenditure.
I have seen internal reports indicating that
a disproportionate amount of funds are
allocated to administrative costs and executive salaries/wages,
with minimal resources directed toward the actual programs
designed to assist those in need. This misallocation of funds raises
serious ethical concerns and undermines donor trust.
This so-called charity, masquerading as
a beacon of hope, is nothing more
than a scheme of deceit and exploitation.
While purporting to raise funds
for noble causes, their true expertise lies in
the art of manipulation and greed.
Behind the facade of philanthropy, they
clandestinely siphon off donations
to inflate executive salary and administrative costs,
leaving mere scraps for the actual
intended beneficiaries. The true reflection of donations
and wages are NEVER disclosed in the official accounts.
For them, cash is king so the real
situation of how much is received
and where it's spent (or pocketed) is never disclosed.
Their opaque financial practices not
only betray the trust of well-meaning donors
but also perpetuate a cycle of disillusionment and
despair among those who give their time for the charity.
This charity's flagrant disregard for transparency
and ethical responsibility underscores
a shameful disregard for the very
people they claim to serve.
_______
Hoodwinking the Charity Commission
The CEO uses false names to make out that there are two different
people operating at the charity. However, both of these
are the same person - himself. Not only is he
the CEO (using his fake surname 'Manya')
but also is registered as a trustee but under a
different name (using his real surname 'Master').
The commission is being mislead
into believing there are two different people at the charity
each with a different roles.
Charity commission laws are clear that this has to be declared.
The reason why he does this, will become clear as stated below.
It is also an offence for a trustee to
NOT declare ANY sort of compensation
(either expenses or remuneration or any in-kind payments).
This is clearly happening at the Charity.
The CEO under a different name
is receiving compensation while at the
same time being a trustee, under a different name.
The other trustees (Mr. Ayaz Patel and Mr A. A. Master)
know full well this is the case
yet are either wilfully ignoring it
or unwilling to reprimand the CEO to rectify this breach.
______________
Questionable Methods and Practices
The methodologies employed by the charity in addressing
complex issues like drug addiction and marriage counseling are,
at best, outdated and, at worst, potentially harmful.
There are numerous accounts of participants being subjected
to unproven and controversial techniques, which can exacerbate
their problems rather than resolve them.
For instance, their approach to drug addiction
lacks evidence-based practices, often side lining medically
recommended treatments in favour of unverified methods.
The CEO has no relevant academic or professional
qualification in any subject let alone counselling.
Neither do any of the volunteers - no matter how well intended
their help may be, it is extremely irresponsible to
make out that the help being give is professional and qualified.
There is also the fact that one of the scholars on it's board
is on the Prevent register. This was messaged to them last year
by a concerned client - I personally read the email.
Nothing was done about it. The charity
commission still do not know of this.
_______________
Lack of Accountability and Oversight
Effective governance is critical to the success
and integrity of any charity. Unfortunately, in this case
the charity operates with minimal oversight,
lacking a robust system for accountability.
This absence of checks and balances has led to numerous instances
of misconduct and negligence, which continue unchecked
due to the lack of external review and regulation.
The CEO of this charity runs it with an iron fist,
treating it as his personal domain rather
than a service-oriented organisation.
His autocratic leadership style stifles
dissent, marginalises accountability,
and prioritises self-interest over the charity's mission,
casting a dark shadow over its purported altruistic goals -
suggesting it serves as a means
for the CEO to enrich himself at the
expense of the charity's mission and the trust of its donors.
In light of above, it is evident
that the charity is failing to fulfil
its mission in a meaningful and ethical manner.
The lack of professionalism,
financial mismanagement, questionable practices,
exploitation of vulnerable populations,
and lack of accountability collectively paint a
damning picture of an organisation in chaos.
It is imperative that donors, regulators,
and the general public hold the
charity accountable to ensure that it
either undergoes significant reform
or ceases operations to prevent further harm.
1. A truly independent audit should be
conducted to scrutinise the financial
practices and ensure transparency.
2. Employ licensed professionals to
manage and execute programs effectively.
3. Implement methodologies that are
backed by scientific research
and have proven efficacy.
4. Establish ethical guidelines for
fundraising to prevent the exploitation
of vulnerable clients.
5. Develop a governance structure that
includes external oversight to ensure
accountability and ethical operations.
By addressing these critical issues,
the charity can begin to rebuild trust and
genuinely support those in need, fulfilling its
foundational mission with integrity and effectiveness.
Betrayal of Trust
One of the most egregious aspects of this Rasputin's actions is
the profound betrayal of trust. The madrasah teachers
inherently rely on each other to maintain a level of confidentiality and
solidarity. By reporting his fellow teachers to the HMRC, he has shattered this trust.
This betrayal not only damages personal relationships but also
undermines the cohesive fabric that is essential for any team
to function effectively. Trust, once broken, is exceedingly
difficult to rebuild, and the repercussions of such an act
can ripple through an organisation, leading to a toxic work environment filled with suspicion and fear.
_________________
Devoid of Integrity
Integrity is a cornerstone of professional and personal conduct. It entails
adhering to moral and ethical principles, even when it is inconvenient or challenging.
By throwing his colleagues under the bus, this individual (Rasputin) has demonstrated a
total lack of integrity. Such actions suggest a willingness to prioritize self-preservation
or personal gain over the well-being and life of others. This lack of ethical backbone
is alarming and raises questions about his reliability and moral
judgment in other areas of his professional life.
______________
Endangering Lives and Careers
The decision to report the teachers to HMRC is reckless and thoughtless.
It can have devastating consequences for those involved, potentially
leading to job loss, legal troubles, and irreparable damage to their
reputations. In extreme cases, it can also endanger their personal
safety and mental health. A colleague who jeopardizes others’ lives and
careers in this manner exhibits a blatant disregard for the severe
consequences of his actions on real people with families, responsibilities, and futures.
________________
Consequences for the Children
The consequences extend beyond the immediate victims and the madrasah
teaching space. Students are directly impacted by the sudden upheaval.
Consistency and stability are crucial for an effective learning
environment. When teachers are under threat from Rasputin's
cowboy like actions, students lose trusted mentors and educators,
which can disrupt their deeni progress and emotional well-being.
The abrupt absence of a teacher can lead to gaps in the
curriculum, confusion, and a loss of motivation among students.
The appalling self serving actions of one individual aka Rasputin,
has an enormous effect on the deeni well being of 100s
if not 1000s of children, not only at Tauheedul but
potentially all the masajids in Blackburn.
____________
Erosion of Ustaads Morale
The fallout from such actions extends beyond the immediate individuals
involved. The entire team or organisation can suffer from reduced
morale and increased anxiety. Colleagues may feel insecure, constantly
worrying about being the next target. This creates a hostile
work environment where collaboration and open communication
are stifled. The fear of betrayal can lead to reduced productivity,
higher turnover rates, and a general decline in job satisfaction across the board.
___________
Selfish Motivations
One must consider the motivations behind such a
betrayal. Rasputin's actions are driven by selfish desires for
personal advancement, revenge, or deflection of blame from
oneself. Such motivations reveal a character that is fundamentally
self-serving and manipulative. Madrasah teachers are likely to perceive
this individual as someone who cannot be trusted and who will readily
sacrifice others for personal benefit. This perception can permanently
damage his professional relationships and reputation.
________________
By reporting the teachers to the authorities and thereby endangering their
lives and careers, Rasputin has demonstrated a profound
absence of integrity, empathy, and respect for the principles of trust
that underpin any functional workplace. His actions have far-reaching negative
consequences, undermining not only the immediate victims (including children's deeni ta'leem)
but also the broader team dynamics and organisational culture. It is a stark reminder
of the importance of ethical behaviour and the devastating impact that
betrayal can have on both personal and professional levels.
Last Ramadhan, when Rasputin and his thugs including his baseball
bat wielding brothers caused shameful violence in the
masjid and outside - Among other vile village mob like rhetoric,
Rasputin threatened the masjid that he would report them
to HMRC in relation to all the ustaads that teach at the madrasah.
In response, an individual rebuked him saying this would shut down
the ta'leem of the children. Rasputin harped back saying, he didnt care.
Those who are in doubt about this, should ask witnesses who were there when this happened.
Well, if that was not enough, we have now had multiple reports
from various masajids that Rasputin has been so treacherous
in committing what would only be counted as treason against
the deen of Allah. He, like the snake in grass he is, has informed the HMRC
about the teachers at Tauheedul madrasah. This has resulted in
not only Tauheedul being investigated, but virtually EVERY madrasah
in the Blackburn region coming under the HMRC spotlight.
Every masjid is now being investigated by HMRC - they are now
running over the tax affairs of the madrasahs
and its teachers in every masjid in Blackburn.
_______________
Furthermore, this has been corroborated by a muslim
brother who works at HMRC in the North West. He has informed us
that any telephone conversation and/or correspondence would
have been recorded/stored, and so will be used in evidence
should this end up on legal terrain - where Rasputin will be exposed as the
one whose malicious hate resulted in the HMRC taking action.
______________
This is the so called imam and apparent 'alim' who has
done this atrocious act that now endangers every madrasah
in the north west, not only its teachers but also
the children that receive deeni knowledge.
As a reminder, Rasputin, did exactly the same thing
when he was ousted from Bolton DU. He was hell
bent in getting the DU into trouble every which way - even phoning up
the DU's bank telling them nasty lies that the DU was committing
fraud in some vengeful attempt to have it investigated and
closed down – even though he had been at the
helm of the same DU for nearly 10 years.
____________
For the remaining few who are still left in giving this “ghaddar” (traitor) and
treasonous evil monk, support - may Allah's wrath
also be upon you. You are supporting someone who
through his vengeful hatred is going to such lengths to satiate his
hate, hasad and jealousy - so much so that he couldn’t care less about the
future of 1000s of childrens deeni knowledge and the risk to their teachers.
This is the recording of the shameful violence perpetrated by Rasputin and
his conjoined violent adulterous twin, Salim Kamboli - back in 2019 at the Bolton DU.
It was the final straw that resulted in Mr. Bhailok finally taking action to get rid of these morons for good.
Mr. Bhailok who is in the video, where you can see Rasputin hell bent in
attempting to physically (and no doubt verbally) abuse him.
These two, plus their other two lapdogs (Darbar and Wadiwala) ruled the DU
as it was their fiefdom - just like the gangster Kray Twins that terrorised London back in the 50s and 60s.
Those of you who couldn't accept what was stated on here as truth,
like an attack on a 70 year old trustee of the DU by these two shameless thugs,
then watch the video and see the evidence being played out.
The Maulwi Kray Twins at the time attempted to ban this video from
circulation knowing it would expose them for who they really are and shatter
their charade as some heavenly god fearing sufis.
In reality, it shows their real selves - hypocrites, and charlatans
taking everyone, who falls for their faux 'hazrat' showmanship, for a one almighty ride.
You decide who is Reggie and who is Ronnie.
Meet Rasputin's inseparable bosom buddy of 30+ years : Salim Kamboli
Another shambolic faux maulwi, just like Rasputin, who also attended DU in South Africa.
Rasputin has an uncanny talent of being attracted to deviants, as companions and friends.
Those who match his deviancy and evil traits become his partners in crime.
There's the wife beater - Wadiwala, and now meet the wife cheating scumbag - Salim Kamboli
(again to address him with the title of 'maulana' would be wholly
unjustified, as an adulterous slimeball has no rightful claim to such a title).
This zaani is just another one is unable to surrender the trappings of this dunya.
Just like his dear leader and twin, Rasputin,
he loves it's adornments and in a similar fashion chases after it, come what may.
He cheated on his wife to fulfil his corrupt desires,
causing immense pain to both his and his wife’s families.
His son has still not recovered from the acute depression, as a result of his transgression.
He committed zina, not caring an iota for the marriage
of 20+ years and the children of that marriage.
___________
This is Rasputin's best mate and cojoined twin of 30+ years.
These charlatans, so called alims are narcissistic dregs of society,
who have no regard for anyone except for themselves.
They use their fake 'maulana' titles to snarl the unwary in pursuit of power and capital.
____
Kamboli’s cravings for the worldly riches was known from his
days at the DU in South Africa - yes, like his complicit twin - Rasputin.
Few know of the truth of the alleged ‘car crash’ in South Africa,
where he was left in critical state close to death.
Well, the truth is, that there was no car crash -
The fact was that he's attempted theft of gold from
a protected are, in the hope of smuggle it to another country.
However, local South Africans caught him red handed and dished out
local 'hudud' justice there and then. He was beaten to a pulp.
Resulting in him being hospitalised with grave injuries.
Rasputin knew this yet covered it up - as that's conjoined twins do.
All the while they made up the tale that he was injured in a car accident.
__________
One would think he'd learnt his lesson and so rectify his illicit greed for the dunya.
But no, like his crooked Rasputin twin, that greed was and is still ever present in him.
Fast forward to his tenure at Bolton DU and together with Rasputin
they caused a total run down of the DU and School and
then orchestrating theft of the assets by attempting to transfer these same assets
to their own charity – forging signatures of trustees being one such example.
As mentioned previously on here, Mr. Y. Bhailock was onto their shenanigans,
and forcefully put a stop to it, and made sure they were all kicked out.
__________
Rasputin (and the other two sidekicks – Wadiwala, Darbar) are still at it.
This time trying the same ploy at Tauheedul but thankfully
their devious and malicious actions has once more been halted.
Rasputin, Kamboli, Darbar and Wadiwala - all evil reprobates who
have no meaningful purpose in life except to
deceive and enrich themselves by hook, or by crook.
_______
More will follow on Kamboli and Rasputin and the innate thuggish hooligan behaviour
they practised for so long at Bolton DU. Which eventually lead
to them being unceremoniously booted out of the DU/School.
In the 1960s there was the serial murderer who was dubbed the Boston Strangler.
It so happens, during the past Ramadhan, that a new minor strangler appeared in Tauheedul masjid,
who can, by all means, be termed as the "Bicknell Strangler".
Who was this vile individual?
Who would dare resort to commit such a violent act in the House of Allah ?
After salaat, this goon stood up and then headed towards a musalli,
who was also getting up, and without any provocation,
this jackass grabbed hold of the musalli's neck and dragged him all the way to the back wall.
It was only after the intervention of other musallis that this animalistic knucklehead was
separated from the musalli, who was understandably left dazed.
For whatever reason this imbecilic airhead did this, it was a vile crime
against the House of Allah - a place which is sanctified and a blessed sanctuary.
Nothing justifies such unprovoked violence in His House.
All this has been documented and recorded in the masjid CCTV cameras.
There are also countless witnesses to the unfortunate event.
So who was this uneducated, uncouth, and illiterate low life
dunderhead that committed this lamebrained act ?
Lo and behold !! It was Rasputin's teenage son - yes, HIS SON !!
Seems this is a very good case of, 'like father like son'.
Violence and nasty, devilish akhlaq runs deep in Rasputin,
and all those he acquaints with. Whether it's Wadiwala, Darbar,
and his baseball bat wielding meathead brothers - and now his son/s.
Birds of feather, always flock together - as the adage goes.
If his own son, and who like his uncouth dad, is studying at Azaadville DU,
hasn't taken into practice the high and mighty preaching of his father.
If all the seerah lectures and hours of sermonising about
adopting good akhlaq, like the good character of the
Prophet ﷺ, the Sahaba (rad') etc hasn't sunk into his own son's life -
then what chance that it has for others ?
His own son, for nearly 18+ years was supposed given tarbiyyah at home
for 18+ years - home schooled, home madrasah'd, 24/7
and yet still this same son cannot stop himself resorting to
violent behaviour in the House of Allah.
Compare that to a muslim boy/girl, who has not been home schooled,
has gone to secular schools, and attended madrasah,
and received ta'leem and tarbiyyah
from their parents about good behaviour.
How many of these turned out to be so evil that they commit violence
in a sanctified space like the Masjid ?
Answer = ZERO.
Certainly not in Tauheedul Masjid.
Rasputin's son, was the FIRST to commit such violence, in the history of the masjid.
With all the arrogant abuse he has dished out to Tauheedul schools,
may be he should ask himself how many of those students (whether boy or girl)
has gone on to commit such horrendous violent action in the House of the Almighty ?
Spiritual penetration of words can only happen if the
one doing the talking, is himself of upright character and a decent human.
He is not a hypocrite.
Doesn't cause strife and disunity.
Is averse to causing fitnah.
Doesn’t hurl abuse.
Doesn't shame others at the pulpit.
Doesn't bring harm to others.
Isn't filled with envy, hasad and hatred.
Isnt in love with the dunya and hankers after materialism etc
No matter how many sermons the person gives,
in whatever eloquent manner he gives them,
if he possess any of the evil traits mentioned,
the words will have little or no effect.
The talks will be for mere entertainment purposes.
People will listen, say "wah wah", and once finished, and forget.
Just another form of merry making bidah party like Rasputin's trip
to the "old boys reunion" in South Africa.
If an example is ever needed then look
no further than Rasputin's son - for all of Rasputin’s efforts
his own son was devoid of receiving any of the
spiritual effects and benefit of his sermons, talks and teachings. Why ?
Those talks were devoid of noor and blessing because the person giving
them is devoid of حـسـن الـخلق husn-khalq (good and upright character/akhlaq)
With all the baggage and ill repute Rasputin has garnered, how on earth
can his words or teaching have any effect, not only on the public,
but on his own kith and kin.
____________
Nice rhetoric and sweet talks are never ever
a sign of spiritual knowledge.
Even Adolf Hitler's speeches filled the masses with hypnotic trances and cheer.
Yet, look at what he was and turned out to be.
Here is a rule by Imam Ash-Shatibi who said:
“Evil scholars are those who are dangerous to mankind.
They are a disease to mankind, and they are those who do not act on their knowledge.”
____________________
In his book Al-Fawa’id, Ibnul Qayyim gave a parable. He said:
“Evil scholars are like people sitting on the gates of Paradise (Jannah) and
calling people to come on in. With their tongues they are saying come on in,
come on in, but their actions are saying do not come in.
The more they talk to people and tell people to come in,
the more their actions say do not listen to us, because if we were
indeed truthful then we would have been the first to apply it…”
Imaam Ibn al Qayyim [rahimahullaah] said:
Allah likened him to a dog because he was given
knowledge of the Book and taught what was not given to others,
but he abandoned it, followed his desires and
preferred the Anger of Allah over the Pleasure of Allah,
preferring the worldly life over the afterlife and preferred the created beings over the Creator
(like hankering after luxurious cars, expensive holidays to sin city,
wasting £1000s in taking part in merry making parties,
chasing relentlessly after an opulent lifestyle, demanding salary of £35k+ to feed that greed etc)
_____________
A dog is considered to be among the meanest animals, the greediest and most
eager [for food]. And due to this eagerness, it does not roam about except
that its nose is placed on the ground, whilst sniffing greedily and eagerly.
When it takes possession of a dead animal enough for a hundred dogs, it would
not allow another dog to eat anything from it, except whilst
growling and seeking to gain the upper hand due to eagerness, greed and covetousness.
This deviant alim - the one who abandoned the
verses of Allah and followed his desires -
did so out of severe eagerness for the worldly life and due to his heart
being disconnected from Allaah and the afterlife.
He is extremely eager for the dunyah and his eagerness is
similar to the constant eagerness of a dog whether it is troubled or left alone.
________________
Ibn Jurayj [rahimahullaah] said:
A dog is among those animals with the least patience when it is thirsty.
It lolls its tongue out the most, whether it is standing,
sitting, moving or not moving. Its intense desire [i.e. greed]
necessitates that it will always loll its tongue.
Likewise, this is the affair of that person likened to the
dog because the extreme eagerness and burning desire in his
heart necessitates that he will always exert himself [for the worldly goods at the expense of the Aakhirah].
He still exerts himself whether he is admonished or not.
__________________
Mujaahid [rahimahullaah] said:
This is similar to the one given knowledge of the Book, but he does not act upon it.
____________
Ibn Abbaas [radiyallaahu-anhumaa] said:
If you direct him towards wisdom, he does not follow it,
and if you leave him alone he is not guided towards good,
just like the dog that lolls its tongue out whether it is taking a rest or driven away.
__________
Al-Hasan [rahimahullaah] said:
It is the Munaafiq. He does not remain firm upon the truth
whether he is called or left alone,
whether he is admonished or not admonished,
just like the dog that lolls its tongue out whether driven away or left alone.
_______________
So Allah [The Most High] gave an example of the one who abandoned His Aayaat, saying:
He is misguided, whether he is admonished or left alone, just like the dog that lolls its tongue out,
whether driven away or left alone.
This Ayah [Al-A’raaf 176] is similar to the saying of Allah [The Most High]:
وَإِن تَدۡعُوهُمۡ إِلَى ٱلۡهُدَىٰ لَا يَتَّبِعُوڪُمۡۚ سَوَآءٌ عَلَيۡكُمۡ أَدَعَوۡتُمُوهُمۡ أَمۡ أَنتُمۡ صَـٰمِتُونَ
And if you call them to guidance, they follow you not.
It is the same for you whether you call them, or you keep silent [7:193]
For those deviant alims like Rasputin;
Contemplate on the [statements] of wisdom and [significant] meanings found in this parable!
How Rasputin disregards noble Prophetic teachings
He is not one of us .... who does not show respect to elders. (At-Tirmidhi)
If a young man honours an elderly on account of his age,
Allah appoints someone to honour him in his old age. (At-Tirmidhi)
link : Mosque's £1.5m royal boost - 10th July 2007
MOSQUE leaders are celebrating a £1.5million windfall after their
ambitious rebuilding scheme was adopted by the royal family of Qatar.
The money, pledged by Emir His Highness Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, has provided a vital boost
to £3million plans to replace the outdated worship centre in Bicknell Street, Blackburn.
The offer came after Lord Adam Patel, chairman of the mosque board, visited Qatar three months ago.
Lord Patel, who represents Blackburn at Westminster, said:
"I visited the Emir and his wife when they held a conference I was invited to.
"They are really courteous and down-to-earth people, and we asked if a donation was possible
for our new multi-purpose building. We were delighted when they very
generously promised to donate £1.5million towards the project." -
The respected marhoom Adam Hafejee Patel نورالله مرقده , was
Tauheedul's honoured president for many years and imparted
selfless service. He was from the first generation of elders that came to Blackburn and together with other
marhoomeen elders, founded the masjid and madrasah. May Allah reward them all the highest place in Jannah. Aameen
His crowning achievement for the community in 2007, was his initiative
and single handed influence in convincing the then, amir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani رحمة الله عليه,
to donate over £1.5m (£2.5m in today's money) towards the complete reconstruction
of the masjid and madrasah as it stands today.
____________________
With Allah's grace, the marhoom will continue to reap immense rewards till the day of Quiyaamah.
Every musalli that reads their salaat, every child, and every deed performed in the masjid and madrasah
will also be recorded in his book of good deeds.
As without his wise intervention while visiting the
Qatari ruler at the time, the funding to develop
the masjid and madrasah in the grand form as it stands now, would most likely
never had happened or at least not in the scale it was done.
Yet the ungrateful tyrant Rasputin, has had a tyrannical crusade against
the marhoom and his family members, not only when he was alive but
still continues to do so, some 5 years after his demise.
The nasty verbal abuse, cursing, expletive filled slander he has hurled
at the late marhoom and his family members would
put the most hard hearted person to shame. But not him.
He seems to forget, that without the immense contribution of marhoom Adam نورالله مرقده,
he wouldn't have had the opportunity to have been the imam (now ex-imam) in the first place.
__________________
When the Qatari delegation came to the UK, as guests of the masjid and marhoom Adam نورالله مرقده,
Rasputin was like a fawning love sick youngster.
Like a love sick puppy, Rasputin couldn't help himself being enamoured towards the Qatari
diplomat - the embarrassing show of him trying so desperately to curry
favour with him was sickening. Witnesses back then saw with sheer
embarrassment how badly he carried himself, making a mockery of diplomatic protocol.
Furthermore, Rasputin made a very awkward speech, where he
attempted to read from a prepared script in Arabic,
which he no doubt angst over the night before - and was so filled with grammatical errors
that the Qatari diplomat told him bluntly to speak English, as Rasputin
was showing himself as an inept maulwi, who claimed to be 'fluent' in Arabic.
In fact, a few arabs who were present then, stated
that his Arabic was so grammatically poor that they wondered what sort
of Islamic scholar he was, as his mastery of the Arabic language
was worse than a 7 year old arab child just getting to grips with the Arabic language .
If that wasn't enough, when he proceeded
to speak English, his ignorance of protocol was demonstrated by him
when he referred to the diplomatic guest as his "friend".
The diplomat obviously annoyed, interrupted him and told him in no uncertain words,
yet politely.. "I am not your friend, I don't know you !".
This is the sort of idiocy that perfectly exemplifies him.
He couldn't help himself trying to cling to the Qatari's coat tails, believing may be
the diplomat would offer him some rich
employment post in return for his desperate obedient dog like behaviour.
___________________
How unfortunate is he who has no consideration and
respect for those who did so much for the masjid and madrasah -
especially if he himself has for decades
enjoyed the fruits of
and then continues to hurl curses and vile abuse to the marhoom and his family.
The same marhoom whom which Allah chose to be a means
for allowing the masjid and madrasah
to stand in its current grandeur.
WOE TO SUCH AN UNFORTUNATE HUMAN BEING
Rasputin's addiction of wanting to be revered
'Hazrat Worship'
What sort of alleged Alim calls himself "Hazrat" and has posters printed stating so ?
Rasputin portrays the noxious state of the so-called ‘shaikhs’ of tasawwuf of this era.
________________________________
As stated by the respected Mufti Sadaq Desai, South Africa :
They indulge in haraam and bid’ah which are regarded as constituents of Tasawwuf.
Tasawwuf is practically dead today.
Both these types of ‘hazrats’ and their ‘mureeds’ are juhala – ignoramuses –
who have polluted the pure Ilm and Amal of Tasawwuf.
These semi-qabar pujaaris do not have the haziest idea of the meaning of Tasawwuf.
The actions mentioned in the under mentioned letter have no relationship with Tasawwuf.
They are the prelude to Qabar Puja (Grave-Worship).
Riya and Takabbur have made the ‘shaikhs’ of today, bandits.
They ruin and rob the juhala of their Akhlaaq and Imaan.
__________________________________________
The letter :
I do not understand the actions of certain Hazrats.
They come in to the Masjid with mureeds walking in behind them.
Everybody gets to know who is the important man and, in some instances,
people have to, or are made to move so that Hazrat can get to where he wants. (like parking space ?)
Hazrat can walk round or sit where he is, but no, he must walk
through the Masjid so that everybody sees him.
Many times he will walk in one minute before Salah and the layman will be expected
to make a path and give way to Hazrat in the first saff.
This is classed as respect, obedience to Shaykh in order to obtain Fana Fillah.
Carrying of Hazrat’s shoes and placing them on the rack also takes place,
yet Hazrat has no known medical condition and is able to pick up
the shoes himself. Does this not create pride in him?
Then prior to a talk, the Molvi Mureed of Hazrat will praise Hazrat for a full
2 or 3 minutes with tears welling up in his eyes.
Is such excessive praise, particularly in the presence of Hazrat, justifiable?
If a lay man not endowed with knowledge and therefore manners approaches
Hazrat to ask a question or to make Salam, Mureeds fiercely usher him
away saying Hazrat is busy or is going to rest.
If the Molvi Mureed is giving a talk, he will talk excessively saying Hazrat
said this and Hazrat said that. In fact the words of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam and the
blessed name of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alahyi Wasallam is given less of a mention than Hazrat’s name and words.
When any bid’ah or wrongful actions of Hazrat are pointed out,
Mureeds take offence and even threaten to harm the person.
One person directly stated to me that if my Hazrat is offended I
do not want to see the face of the person that offended him,
yet Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam forgave the majority at the
time of Conquest of Makkah and these disbelievers did far worse to Him.
Furthermore, we now have to listen to the dreams of Hazrat through Molvi Mureeds,
who educate the masses to think that Hazrat’s dreams are a Shar’i proof for an action.
On one occasion we were told when Laylatul Qadar occurred due to Hazrat’s dream.
People create Twitter accounts exclusively dedicated to Hazrat’s words.
The words of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam and Sahabah (May Allah Be Pleased With Them)
are redundant from these accounts.
When Hazrat becomes ill we are bombarded with SMS to make Du’a for Him by Mureeds,
sometimes at midnight, yet the known Muslim layman in their own
community does not get the benefit of even one SMS sent on his behalf.
Is this all part of Tasawwuf or am I right to suspect that
this is bordering on Hazrat worshipping, which is detrimental to one’s faith?
What awaits the hypocrites of
Ulama-e-soo (deviant ulama)
that do not practise what
they preach !
Abu Uthman al-Hindi reported:
Umar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said,
“Verily, what I fear most for this nation is a learned hypocrite.”
It was said, “How is he a learned hypocrite?”
Umar said, “He is learned with his tongue,
but he is ignorant of the heart and good deeds.”
Source: al-Aḥādīth al-Mukhtārah 236
In the Quran, Allah states that the lowest and the most horrific pit of fire
will not be filled with those who denied God and His blessings, rather it will be for hypocrites –
those who are two-faced and preach what they do not practice.
The traits of hypocrites and warnings to them are found throughout the Quran.
In one such passage, Allah chastises a group of people who claimed to be the
most dear to Allah saying :
أَتَأۡمُرُونَ ٱلنَّاسَ بِٱلۡبِرِّ وَتَنسَوۡنَ أَنفُسَكُمۡ وَأَنتُمۡ تَتۡلُونَ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَۚ أَفَلَا تَعۡقِلُونَ
"Do you enjoin upon people godliness and virtue but forget your own selves, even
while you recite the Book (and see therein the orders, prohibitions, exhortations and warnings)?
Will you not understand and come to your senses”
al-Baqarah v 44
This was directed toward the learned people among the Israelites
but is a warning to all of who claim to be from the people of knowledge.
The most ironic thing is that these people were the learned scholars
who used to read the scripture to the people and interpret what
Allah wanted them to do, while neglecting to do so themselves.
The esteemed Mufti Sadeq Desai writes :
The calamity is that the majority of the
`Ulama today are `Ulama-e-Soo’ in the true sense of the word.
They are the kind of `Ulama that Hudhoor (Sallallaahu `Alayhi wasallam) feared for his Ummat.
They are the Aimmah-e-Mudhilleen (deviant ulama).
The job of these Aimmah-e-Mudhilleen is only to cause Fitnah
amongst the Muslimeen in their vileness, through
obscuring the true Deen of Islaam from them.
Their job is to slander, criticise, defame, and insult any true Muslim who
takes it upon himself to carry out the Fardh (Obligatory)
duties which Allah Subhanahu wa Ta`ala has placed upon him.
حُبُّ الدُّنْيَا وَكَرَاهِيَةُ الْمَوْتِ
“Love of the world and hatred of death”
“The nations are about to come for you, just as guests come for their meal.”
Someone said, “Will that be because of our small numbers at that time?”
He replied, “Nay, on that day you will be many,
but you will be scum and rubbish like that is carried down by a torrent.
And God will remove fear from the breasts of your enemy,
and God will cast wahm (weakness) into your hearts.
Then someone asked , “O Messenger of God, and what is wahm ?”
He replied , “Love of the world and hatred of death”.
_______________________________________________________
The following is a letter from a Brother who justifiably voices his indignation and consternation:
Sept 2019
Assalamu Alaikum
Recently Madressa Arabia Islamia published a poster advertising for a merrymaking party.
This party, the first of its kind since no one else introduced such a thing before!!!
I don’t even think the Qabr Pujaari -agents of iblees – have stooped down so low to this level !!!
The poster is an invitation from the Madressa to all Hifz chaps, Qari “Sahebs” and Molvis who
had completed their studies there to have a reunion merry making party
and also together talking about the challenges of the Ulema and other topics they
still have no idea what to talk about! (it’s mentioned in the poster!)
– ALL THIS WILL TAKE 3 DAYS – SUBHANALLAH! – at the end of this September.
Unfortunately this stupid advert has began circulating around
these dumb and silly “Ulema & Jamiat” “Watsapp Groups”
One of these dumb molvis from Jamiat KZN accidentally sent me the poster on WhatsApp.
As I was casually browsing the poster I realised that it was the
most stupid and idiotic thing I’ve ever read and I would be honest to say
that no one would expect such NONSENSE AND UTTER THRASH
to ever be published and advertised by one of OUR established so-called Madressahs’.
Anyway, the contents of the poster together with MY CONCERNS are as follows:
Abna e Qadim (“Special Madressa Reunion Programme“) – As far as the SHARIA IS CONCERNED,
there never was any such thing called Madresah Reunion! I’m almost certain that this is a new bidah.
Did Rasulullah(SallalhuAlyhi Wasallam) by any chance hold any “Special Reunion” with the Sahaabah(RadiyallahuAnhum).
During the time of Imaam Ahmed bin Hambal (Rahmatullah Alayhi) there was a lot of fitna.
Did he hold “reunion” conference programmes with his students?!! Of course not!!!
In fact reunions are the way and customs of the Kuffar!!!
Reunions have no place in Islam right? However, It is possible that this soon to be Evil Bidah
could be nipped in the bud so to speak.
If it’s not taken care of now and the Ulema e Haq don’t speak about this
then it’s quite possible that it will become widespread like the evil satanic seerat jalsa’s etc…
(End of the Brother’s valid lament)
___________________
____________________
A perfect example of such a hypocrite :
Mufti Sadeq Desai - Majlis-al Ulama, South Africa,
the distinguished Mufti is the senior Khalifah of
Maulana Maseehullah Khan Saab (reh)
who in turn was the Khalifah of the Mujaddid, Hakeemul
Ummat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (reh),
had this to say on the "jahaalat" event :
________________
Sept 2019
abna-e-qadeem merrymaking function
THE JAHAALAT OF AZAADVILLE’S OLD BOYS FUNCTION
The Azaadville Madrasah in emulation of the Zanadaqah ‘Old Boys of Aligarh University’, is organizing a silly, wasteful,
proudful function of laghw and fudhool to show off its accomplishment in the sphere of Shar’i Uloom.
This function is the very antithesis of the Maqsad (sacred objective) for which a Madrasah is established.
The Maqsood of a Madrasah should be nothing other than the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala by way of
reviving and implementing the Sunnah which the Madrasah is supposed to impart.
For achieving this objective, it is imperative that the Madrasah increasingly
and progressively adorns itself with the humility, simplicity, total lack of ostentation and
the ghurbat which were the hallmarks and attributes of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah.
Indeed, shaitaan has engarlanded Muslims of this era, including the Darul Ulooms and Khaanqas,
with the epidemic of merrymaking functions where they all specialize in eating and
excreting whilst millions of the Ummah are languishing in extreme poverty and ignorance all over the world.
What has happened to the brains of these Azaadvile molvies?
They are supposed to teach Hadith and practice the commands presented in the Qur’aan and Ahaadith.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“The Muslimoon are like a single person. If the eye pains, the whole body is affected.
If the head pains, the whole body is affected.”
Today millions and millions of Muslims of this Ummah are suffering
and starving while others professing love for Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and
His Deen are lost in nafsaani enjoyment and shaitaani israaf, riya, and takabbur.
With what calibre of Imaan do these molvis indulge in feasting,
excreting, merrymaking, entertaining, riya and israaf when the
Ummah is ablaze with heart-rendering sufferings and misery?
And, while Allah’s ‘lesser punishment’ in the form of widespread
violence and looting has already been decreed, these
molvis find leisure and the pleasure for their khuraafaat!!!
How many thousands of rands will be gushed down the toilet
and sewer drains at the three-day old boys merrymaking function
whilst the Ummah is suffering and while millions are scrounging for food?
Does the Hadith teach such israaf and callousness?
Does the Qur’aan teach this?
Is there anywhere in the Qur’aan and Sunnah examples and permission for such waste and bid’ah functions?
With their old boys merrymaking functions and sportsfields, the Darul Uloom are aping
the Yahood and Nasaara right into the “lizard’s hole.”
Indeed this fallen Ummah has become the RUBBISH stated by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam):
“The time will soon dawn when the nations of the world will gobble you (Muslims) with their coalitions.”
Someone asked: ‘O Rasulullah! Will we be few in number on that day?’
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “On the contrary, you will be abundant.
But you will be ghutha (rubbish / flotsam / jetsam / chaff).
Allah will remove from the hearts of your enemies fear for you, and He will cast Wahan in you.”
Someone asked: ‘O Rasulullah! What is wahan?’
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Love for the dunya and aversion for Maut.”
Leave alone the masses (awaamun naas), the molvis suffer more
from this disease of hubbud dunya (love for the world) which is being
manifested in these functions of waste, pride, show, merrymaking and satanism.
They should hang their heads in shame. They teach Hadith, but
their hearts are like stone or harder than stone. Their hearts are
bereft of the slightest vestige of mercy and feeling for their suffering
brethren in Syria, Burma, Kashmir, Palestine, and elsewhere.
Their hearts are rotten with the diseases of the nafs.
They all come within the scope of the Hadith in
which are mentioned some Signs of Qiyaamah:
“Knowledge will be imparted for reasons other than the Deen,
and with the amal of the Aakhirat the dunya will be pursued.”
This is today the condition of the Madaaris and Khaanqahs.
The dunya and the nafs reign supreme in these institutions,
hence all this haraam merrymaking, entertainment and satanic waste.
There is no goodness in Azaadville’s Old Boys merrymaking function.
It is not permissible. It is bid’ah. It is a ploy of shaitaan in which he has
harnessed molvis to execute his pernicious plot of undermining
the Deen and to sever the bond with Allah Ta’ala.
This Bond can be strengthened only by reverting to the Sunnah,
not by aping the Yahood and Nasaara, and by innovating practices,
functions, etc. which are in total conflict with the Shariah and the spirit of Islam.
To the Illustrious Interim Working Committee
CLAIMING TO WORK TIRELESSLY FOR THE MEMBERS (OR SO THEY SAY)
Alhamdulillah, after a mere 36 years, we have finally received your letter.
A document so profoundly insightful, it’s a wonder it didn’t come with a Nobel Prize attached.
Your opening line truly sets the stage for what can only be described as a literary marvel.
Following this, the declaration of your tireless efforts leaves us in awe—if only effort translated directly into competence.
Your dramatic proclamation about the notice board, after 36 years, is truly the stuff of legends.
One can only imagine the sleepless nights spent in anticipation of such a monumental event.
A missed signature here, a procedural misstep there—these are clearly matters of life and death.
Surely, the world’s finest investigative minds should be summoned to tackle these alleged errors.
The entire letter is peppered with such insights that even a child would find them amusing.
The level of outrage over minutiae is truly commendable;
it’s a wonder how we’ve survived all these years without your meticulous oversight.
Your demands for immediate answers and signed documents
evoke a sense of urgency that would be more fitting in a spy thriller than an AGM notice.
Your dedication to following every possible rule, no matter how obscure or pedantic,
is a shining example to us all. Perhaps we should introduce a new role in the committee
for someone to count the grains of sand on the beach, just to ensure they comply with our high standards.
And then, there’s the showstopper: your impassioned plea for Rasputin's reinstatement.
One can almost hear the swelling orchestral music in the background as you make your case.
It’s touching to see such devotion; truly, Shakespearean in its drama.
For future reference, when crafting such masterpieces, perhaps consider running them by a 10 year old schooler.
Their grasp of common sense might help avoid some of the more laughable errors.
For all further whimsical communications, please continue to brighten our days
With bemused regards,
The Board of the Bored
-------------------------------
### Further Remarks ###
Your letter reads like an over-the-top soap opera script,
with each sentence dripping with melodrama.
If only your enthusiasm could be matched by a
basic understanding of effective communication.
Your fixation on procedural minutiae would be charming if it weren’t so comically misplaced.
The breathless urgency over a notice that has been
36 years in the making is akin to panicking over a misplaced comma in a novel —
perhaps only a toddler would appreciate the excitement.
The insistence on immediate answers and documented evidence
makes one wonder if you believe we are operating in
some imminent nuclear meltdown. Spoiler alert: we're not.
Your convoluted demands for compliance with a series of obscure
provisions suggest you have mistaken our AGM for a treasure hunt,
with the hidden prize being a grasp on reality.
The theatrics surrounding the audit and AGM linkage are particularly amusing.
Finally, your heartfelt plea for Rasputin's reinstatement is the pièce de résistance.
The passion with which you present this demand is nothing short of operatic.
One can almost see the stage lights dimming as you make your case.
In the future, perhaps consider simplifying your communication.
A bit of clarity and a dash of realism might go a long way.
And remember, a sense of proportion is invaluable—
something even children grasp with ease.
For all future communications, whimsical or otherwise, please continue
to reach out at: mtiworkingcommittee@yahoo.com.
With bemused regards,
The Board of the VERY Bored
Nov 2020 (during Covid)
In a long moronic tin foil conspiracy filled rant,
he talks about the restrictions on madrasah classes, Rasputin asks :
"representatives had the right intentions ?"
“And this is my question.... Whose agenda are they following?"
“Whose interests are they keeping in mind?"
"Do they have mine and your interests at heart?"
“Do they have the interests of our children at heart? ”
“There should be certain questions arising in
your minds as to why is this happening."
“When you come to the bottom of that you will come to
realise that the people they are colluding with and
sitting with they are not of the same imaan, faith as us.”
source : AsianImage
_____________________
The above quotes, made during the
covid era, from a mega rant
filled conspiracy b/s typically emanating
from a rust filled empty vessel
Now, turn the tables, and ask the same questions to
Rasputin and his 2 lackeys (aka Dopey Muggins Brothers; Darbar & Wadiwala)
who want to SHUTTER madrasah classes :
Whose agenda are they following?
Whose interests are they keeping in mind?
Do they have mine and your interests at heart?
Do they have the interests of our children at heart?
Should there be certain questions arising
in your minds as to why this is happening ?
Since they are hell bent in wanting to CLOSE the
madrasah classes, should we then logically also deduce this ? :
“When you come to the bottom of that you will come to realise
that the people they are colluding with and sitting with
they are not of the same imaan, faith as us.”
Or is this another example of two faced hypocrisy by
Rasputin and his 2 Dopey Muggins Brothers
that is now so well known to one and all ?
Making KFC 'halal' just because his owner mates at Eurogarages asked him (they
owned a KFC franchise in B/Burn) - he now bears
responsibility for thousands eating doubtful / haram food.
This by Mufti Sadeq Desai - Majlis-al Ulama, South Africa
The distinguished Mufti is the senior Khalifah of
Maulana Maseehullah Khan Saab (reh)
who in turn was the Khalifah of the Mujaddid, Hakeemul
Ummat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (reh) :
COMMENTS ON STUNNING – THE SLAUGHTER OF IBLEES
– HALAALIZED BY ZIGZAG MAULWIS & MUFTIS
In the ideology of today’s maajin (crazy) maulwis and muftis, ‘Taqwa’ is antique.
For them Taqwa has no relevance in the practical lives of Muslims.
Thus, they frown when they hear someone speaking about Taqwa.
Their attitude towards Taqwa is one of Istikhfaaf (disdain), if not outright rejection.
Furthermore, they believe that Ulama who blend their fataawa
with Taqwa are ‘mad’ as the kuffaar believed about the Ambiya.
Yet, the Qur’aan Majeed commands the cultivation of Taqwa from
page one to the last page. The Qur’aan Majeed is replete
with the command of Taqwa. The maulwis & muftis of today do not have the
haziest idea of the meaning of Taqwa. That is why they zigzag and
blunder like drunken persons when issuing zigzag fatwas.
The dunya has made their brains groggy. They are unable to understand the
kutub beyond the ink shadows of the words.
These ulama-e-soo’ (evil ulama) have ruined the Akhlaaq and even the
Imaan of the Ummah with their zig zag haraam
fatwas which halaalize practices which are blatantly haraam.
Just imagine! A slaughtering system branded by
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as ‘Shareetatush Shaitaan’
is able to produce ‘halaal-tayyib’ meat and chickens in the
understanding of the vermiculated (worm eaten) brains
of the maajin muftis and maulwis of today.
How is it possible for Ulama who have Imaan to ever
condone and promote a system which is brutal (eg stunning) and HARAAM
from A to Z, then with their condonation they actively promote the
haraam halaalization certification of human shayaateen
by the Carrion Cartel of Iblees?
While the function of the Ulama is to defend and safeguard
the purity of all Islamic institutions, systems and practices,
these zigzagging maulwis & muftis do the exact opposite. With technicalities
whose application they do not understand, they promote
the haraam wares of the Agents of Iblees.
That is why Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that
“a time will dawn when the worst of the people under the
canopy of the sky will be their ulama from whom will
gush fitnah and the fitnah will rebound on them.”
Ever since Rasputin was made principal of the DU/School,
NOT one OFSTED report gave any rating
that was something to be proud about.
Always concluding that the DU/school was
woefully inadequate and fell shamefully short of even
the lowest of standards that parents rightfully expect for their children.
Here is the summary of the last report before the wannabe dictator
was finally and unceremoniously BOOTED out
of the institution after years of shambolic failure :
__________________
Concerns for safety of pupils at Bolton boarding
school after 'inadequate' rank from Ofsted
source : Bolton News
Students at a school in Bolton are deemed to be 'at risk' after
it was rated 'inadequate' by inspectors.
The school also failed to meet a host of
health and safety standards set to protect both pupils and staff, said the authorities.
Concerns around the safeguarding of pupils at the independent
Al Jamiatul Islamiyah school in Deane were raised by regulator Ofsted
The school also failed to meet a host of
health and safety standards set to protect both pupils and staff, said the authorities.
In particular, the school has no safeguarding policy for students boarding.
" This potentially places other children in
boarding at serious risk of harm."
Fire safety was also highlighted as an issue at the school, said the report
These are a few of the first hand reports given to us by some of the ulama,
teachers and students from the time Rasputin caused havoc at Bolton DU :
1) telling staff and students not to trust "surtis"
_____
2) also not to trust Bengali and Pakistani students
(even though they made a large part of the DU fees and so his WAGE)
____
3) Verbally abuse, with extreme profanities, any staff
(school teachers and ulama) who raised concern about his behaviour
_____
4) Deliberately running the school to the ground - on paper they were
supposed to teach many core subjects, but in reality he purposedly made only
a couple of subjects to be taught. And even then it was deduced
as "inadequate" at best (OFSTED's own deduction)
_____
5) Any ulama/staff who he thought was to take matters to external officials,
he would threaten them with blackmail with made up stories. Even threatening
the staff member that he would tell students of these (made up) lies.
____
6) Concerned parents being hurled nasty abuse simply because their
children reported his vile behaviour towards them. His bigotry towards 'surtis',
Bangladeshi and Pakistani children - and the disgusting racism he met out to them.
One mother, who confronted him with his bigoted behaviour,
was reduced to tears by his crass verbal abuse towards her.
See details below about the Police being involved. Parents and staff had, had enough of him.
___
7) Because of the above, OFSTED made a uncalled inspection and
found massive failures in student care - both health and mental well being.
OFSTED issued final warning of closure - ALL this was under his watch.
It was then that a responsible and concerned elder, Y. Bhailok, decided
enough was enough and made the decision to remove him.
___
8) Under his abysmal watch, in the years he was there - NOT one
student academically achieved any sort of worthy qualification to
further his progress in the real world. NOT one student went onto university.
Compare that to other DUs, and one can see what an abject failure he was.
A reflection of massive failure he was at any sort of academic level.
He was/is plain THICK.
Obviously, someone who is absolutely clueless about academic
importance - after all he barely passed his GCSE’s and would
NOT be even able to do basic geometry or algebra, even if his life
depended on it (something that not only Muslims invented,
but our great ulama of the past were masters of). Heck, his written
English is worse than a 10 year old. He once wrote a teaching booklet
for the madrassa kids - hoping it would be used in Tauheedul madrasah
classes - and so make a name for himself, as well as few £££s
On checking by those that were proficient in the language - they were
gob smacked at the illiteracy portrayed in his writings. One person
involved in the checking of the booklet confirmed to us that
"his 10 year old laughed at it, and could write infinitely better".
This racist, bigoted and illiterate so called maulvi has
no place in a teaching institution let alone be an imam.
Rasputin is nothing more than a "penny shop maulvi".
Together with his 2 stooges, they complete the circle of ignorance par excellence.
His atrocious behaviour at Bolton DU is a perfect example.
Which lead to his rightful booting out of that institution.
His current failed antics are deja vue of the above - lead by him,
the three are using the same text book of fitnah they
tried to use at the Bolton DU.
Just like then, they've FAILED here too.
ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّٰهِ
POLICE officers were called to a Bolton school over a dispute between staff.
Three police vans and a marked car were sent to the Al-Jamiatul Islamiyah boarding
school based at Mount St Joseph’s Convent in Deane, yesterday morning.
Officers arrived at noon and spent about an hour at the the scene. No arrests were made.
It is understood police were responding to a dispute
between members of staff and the school’s principal Suhail Manya.
The school declined to comment and the headteacher could not be reached.
The illiterate fools that came up with the idea of conducting a rebellious petition
did so on a platform that is actively supporting and promoting LGBTQ. Hence they are implicitly
showing their own indirect support. Any muslim who has a modicum of shame and intelligence
would immediately think again in doing a petition on such a LGBTQ promoting platform.
ALL THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED SUPPORT FOR THE PETITION
ARE AS MUCH GUILTY OF DOING HARAAM AS THOSE
MORONS THAT STARTED THIS HARAAM REBELLIOUS ACT -
THEY HAVE, WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT,
TACITLY PROMOTED LGBTQ BY JUST USING IT
FOR THEIR REBELLIOUS NAFSANI ENDS
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته,
I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits.
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the recent
incidents at Masjid e Tauheedul Islam in Blackburn.
As a graduate from Bolton Darul Uloom, I feel compelled to share my
experiences and observations, as they may shed some light on the current situation.
Seven years ago, I had the privilege of studying at Bolton Darul Uloom,
where I witnessed similar issues caused by certain individuals who claimed
to be devout and religious. These individuals, led by Maulana Suhail Manya
and his associates Maulana Asim Wadiwala and Maulana Ilyas Darbar, took control
of the institution and began engaging in bullying and intimidation tactics. Even our
elderly trustee was not spared from their bullying tactics. It was disheartening to
see this behavior within an institution that is meant to foster spiritual growth and unite the community.
I urge you to take these concerns seriously and investigate the matter thoroughly.
The incidents at Bolton Darul Uloom escalated to a point where legal action had to be
threatened by our elder, Yusuf Bhailok, in order to restore peace and harmony.
I fear that if left unaddressed, these individuals will continue to cause
divisions within the community, as they did in Bolton.
As a graduate of Bolton Darul Uloom, I feel a strong sense of responsibility
to warn parents and community members about these individuals.
Maulana Asim Wadiwala and Maulana Ilyas Darbar have shown no hesitation in
causing divisions and inflicting harm on others. It is crucial for parents to exercise
caution and remain vigilant in safeguarding their children's education and well being.
I kindly request that you take appropriate measures to ensure the
safety and harmony of Masjid e Tauheedul Islam and its community. By promoting
unity and addressing issues of bullying and intimidation, we can prevent further harm
and maintain a peaceful environment within our religious institutions.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will handle it
with the utmost seriousness and work towards resolving the issues at hand. Together, we
can create a community that upholds the values of compassion, respect, and inclusivity.
Wassallam
Moulana Muhammad
In light of the recent unauthorised letter sent out by TWO Madrasah 'teachers', namely :
Asim Wadiwala in conjunction with Ilyas Darbar - two of Rasputin's chief lackeys
(they like to claim to be maulana's but it would be treacherous to honour them with such a title)
No doubt all this is being instigated and directed by the disgraced ex-imam.
It’s a shame they have decided to take this despicable stance and once again bring
up the ta'leem of the children as a tool/weapon in their, so far,
failed efforts to bring back the ex-imam.
Now let's think about their actions and what it tells us about
their (in)capabilities and resulting ineptness.
Consider this : As they've been under the guidance of
their commander in chief for so many years,
it would be quite logical to deduce that they must have
acquired the skills set and know how, from
being guided by their master/principal's decades of tutelage, and
so would've learnt a thing or two in the running of the madrasah ?
But NO, the events of the last 3 weeks, have suddenly caused them to be
shocked and awed and so much disorientated that are now unable to
carry out their duties, which they are PAID to do.
This implies either or both of 2 things :
1) They are completely inept in their duties as teachers
and learnt ZERO under their now ex-principal
2) Their ex-principal imparted little or no skills which leads one to accept that his ousting as
ex-imam here, and from Bolton DU before that, was wholly justified.
Also, how did they operate the madrasah when Rasputin took
his oft outings and breaks to foreign lands like Dubai ?
Did they fall apart and become disorganised , like headless chickens ?
and halt / cancel the classes until their masters return ?
The concerning factor is that operational management is not their duty and
this in turn does not stop them from carrying out their duties in teaching the children in their classes.
Do these lackeys need to be motivated daily from their master in order to get them through the teaching day ?
To now use their master's absence as an excuse to stop classes is enormously embarrassing (for them).
Any other employer, no matter in what sector, would not tolerate such a situation - so why here ?
Further, the illegal use of mosque letterhead (which has NOT been authorised) shows a level of
illiteracy and ineptness one sees in those that are devoid of any sense of shame and good character.
The culprits desperation to attain credibility via the letterhead indicates to one and all, that they
themselves have no authority or influence among the public and so have the need to resort to illicitly "copy/pasting"
the Mosque letterhead , in some lame attempt to garner any sort of attention and credibility.
More telling, there are no signatures or names (like the previous correspondence from them)
which implies, they are too cowardly to show their identities, for all to see AND / OR
no other teachers were consulted or gave permission to put their signatures/names
Was the real notion of being put to shame by the parents too much for them ?
What's the reality here ?
It's childish to think there has been a sudden loss of direction and so use this as a lame excuse.
If their years of experience and teaching, has still not made them prepared for such an occasion
and so continue with their duties then, by Allah, any parent would not want their children
to be taught by such inept, lazy and self serving so called maulanas/teachers
Our forefathers not only founded madrasahs but also ran them diligently without any worldly motive.
They taught us and those before us, through thick and thin.
They weren't maulanas - yet their dedication and time produced all
the scholars we see today.
SO to the fitnah khor teachers who think the childrens' ta'leem hinges on them
think again - the community will move forward just fine without them as
when our parents, grand parents arrived in this country - they faced
tests infinitely more taxing than the current miniscule bump.
If you don't want to serve Allah's deen, the move over - Allah will put in place
others that will discharge the duties far better than your
devious selves, and with selfless devotion.
Exposing the deceitful ex-imam.
"He who deceives is not of us.'' - Sahih Muslim
Exposing the deceitful ex-imam.
The so called charity "Hope & Help"
On the "About Us" page : https://www.hopeandhelp.uk/about-us/
So Rasputin has the title of "CEO" for this apparent charity.
Yet, look who are the trustees ?
https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-search/-/charity-details/5163810/trustees
HE HIMSELF is on the trustees board under his REAL name "Suhel Master".
So he has LIED to the Charity Commission by stating a
NON EXISTENT "Suhail Manya" being the CEO of the alleged charity "Hope & Help"
His actual name is "Suhel Adam Master".
Look at this :
This from companies house - he is the director/owner of perfume business :
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/OWKGkvOAbnC2tWj6a-5y3F7LI1Y/appointments
And this, director of another company :
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/V_U5FvktewoWlQw5visrxo4239k/appointments
Why the deception of masquerading as "Suhail Manya",
and even signing off letters, financial accounts etc as "Suhail Manya" ?
YET no such person exists, as his REAL documented name is "Suhel Adam Master"
What is he hiding ? Why the deception ?
"He who deceives is not of us.'' - Sahih Muslim
FATAWA by Mufti Sadeq Desai - Majlis-al Ulama, South Africa
The distinguished Mufti is the senior Khalifah of Maulana Maseehullah Khan Saab (reh) who in turn was
the Khalifah of the Mujaddid, Hakeemul Ummat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (reh)
Question :
Is it permissible to have reserved parking bays in a Musjid which is Waqf property?
We do understand that the Musjid is Waqf. We also understand and will respect that if there is a handicapped
parking area close to the entrances or exits that would be respected for convenience of the disadvantaged brothers.
The clarity we require is regarding the reserved parking bays for the Imaam etc
______________________
Answer by Mufti Sadeq
Naseehat will not penetrated the clogged brains of these villains... and fake Moulanas.
The Musjid along with its environs are Waqf property.
All the Musallis have equal right to the space inside the Musjid, in its Sehen, the Wudhu Khaanah, the shoe racks,
its amenities, and its yard space where the parking bays are located.
The one who occupies any of these spaces first has the prior right to its use for the purpose for which it has been made waqf.
No one has the right or authority to debar any Muslim from this inalienable right without valid Shar’i reason.
It is haraam to have reserved parking for the imaam and for so-called ‘guests’.
Guests of people cease being guests in relation to the Waqf property of the Musjid.
In the Musjid there are no guest facilities.
The same applies to the parking area. The one who comes first has the prior right of parking his vehicle in any parking bay.
This reservation practice has been acquired from the mutakabbireen and mutrafeen juhala.
It is the practice of the arrogant and proud to usurp Waqf premises for their own convenience.
It is obscene, zulm and haraam to block off parking bays...
They are treating the Waqf Musjid property as if they are the owners. This is zulm.
The imaam.. have no greater right to the Musjid facilities than every other Musalli.
The builder of the Musjid, the Waaqif (donor) and the trustees are all on
the same level as other Musallis regarding the facilities of the Musjid.
Donors enjoy no special treatment. Their donations are supposed to be for their own benefit in the Aakhirat,
not for buying privileges in the Musjid. So it does not matter who the person may be.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Khulafa-e-Raashideen were not accorded
special privileges in the Musjid. So who are these Toms, Dicks and Harries who usurp
Musjid space for themselves? Then they aggravate their usurpation with zulm.
The first culprits for this haram practice are the molvis.
We are in the era in close proximity to Qiyaamah, hence the fitnah is incremental.
Among the signs of the Approaching Hour is: “The dunya will be pursued with the amal of the Aakhirat.”
The Deen will be presented as a front and cover for the attainment of worldly and nafsaani objectives.
In the forefront are the ulama-e-soo’ who are experts in presenting ‘deeni’
colour and cover for their haram activities.
No amount and no type of explanation will penetrated their sealed hearts.
They belong to the category of villains about whom the Qur’aan Majeed says: “They are deaf, dumb and blind.”
Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said,
“I saw some men on the night of my ascension, whose lips were being sheared by scissors of fire.
I said: O Gabriel, who are these people?
Gabriel said: Preachers from your nation who commanded people to be righteous but they
forgot it themselves, yet they recited the Book. Will they not reason?”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad
Jundub ibn Abdullah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said,
“The parable of the scholar who teaches people virtue, but forgets it himself,
is that of a lamp giving people light while it burns itself.”
Source: al-Mu’jam al-Kabīr lil-Ṭabarānī
Rasputin is so predictable - he has once more dashed off and enjoying himself in Dubai.
That same Dubai that has earned the reputation of being The Middle East capital of Fahishah !!
Israeli men going in droves to UAE to "sleep with prostitutes"
How did Dubai become the largest prostitution center
Look at what happened to قَوْم لُوْط, (people of Lut); Allah's wrath and punishment descended on them
for the same reasons as Dubai has become so infamous for.
And this supposedly holy man in the eyes of the gullible, has again
taken a trip to that vile centre of Satanic activities... All funded from the FULL PAY he is getting even when suspended.
This is the sort of faux "alim" the Prophet (s) warned about - ulama soo' (evil ulama)
Rasputin's moto : "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO !!"
He gets a 2nd letter, warning him of his conduct, and disseminating what
was a private letter regarding his initial suspension and
no sooner he gets this 2nd letter spelling out his folly, he decides to share it !!
And so like a consummate FOOL he is, breaking his employment contract AGAIN.
A helpless mega MORON who simply hasn't developed the simplest of a thinking brain.
Fancy cars, opulent lifestyle, expensive tastes, routine holidays to haraam
locations etc are all signs of the alim
who has entangled himself in the love of dunya.
Hadhrat Shaykh-ul-Hadlth Mawlana Muhammad Zakariyya (Rahmatullah Alayh)
Hadhrat Malik bin Dinar (Radiallahu anhu) said:
I have read in ancient books that Allah says. “When an Aalim begins to love this world,
the least that I can do to him is that from his heart I take away the pleasure of his conversing with Me in prayer.” [Ihya]
__________________________________
Sayyidina Umar (Radiallahu anhu) observed:
“When you see any Aalim who loves worldly riches, consider him to
be a suspect (and guard your Deen) for whosoever loves a thing becomes entangled with it ”
________________________________________
Sayyadina Hasan (Radiallahu anhu) also said:
“The torment of the Ulama will be the death of the heart. The death of the heart is
seen in this that with which the deeds of the Hereafter he earns the benefits of this world”
________________________________________
Sayyidina Umar (Radiallahu anhu) said:
“On behalf of this Ummat I am most fearful of the Aalim who is a hypocrite”
people asked: “Who is a hypocritical Aalim?”
Hadhrat Umar(Radiallahu anhu) replied:
“He is one who by tongue is an Aalim but in his heart he is ignorant.”
________________________________________
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) also said:
“Whoever acquired knowledge for the purpose of attracting people to be
inclined towards him, will be cast into Jahannam” [Targheeb]
and also “The worst of people have the worst Ulama” [Targheeb]
Rasputin and his sycophants unable to handle the truth
More comments coming in from people who know him :
This from a classmate in South Africa :
MESSAGE 1-Concerned ParentAs a concerned parent I received a letter today on the whats app tauheedulmadrasahs broadcast a letter stating the welfare of the children.My children have attended the madressah for the last 10 years. When questioning my childrenabout the welfare and speaking to other parents, no concerns have been raised in relation to their welfare.However what was concerning is that conversations have been heard by children in the class rooms.Usthaads discussing this letter to other usthaads on the phone about then advising them to tell the childrenthey won’t come to the madressah till the Moulana is back. Is this is my children’s welfare or theirs ?Also why are my children and other children now being bought into this matter ?The usthaads should not be bringing political and personal issues into themadressah regardless how they feel about the situation.In relation to the passing of personal contact numbers isclear breach of GDPR and DPA and needs to be tackled swiftly.Lastly, if the usthaads have took time to write a letter a sign it then itnwould be good to clearstate the welfare concerns - from the looks of it they are the concerned ones not thechildren and maybe my children should look after them.Please keep these matters out of the madressah and pleasedon’t discuss these matters in front of my children.Response :MESSAGE 2-We would like to thank the ustaads for their concernregarding the madressa and the absence of the ex principal.It is very nice of them to pass on the responsibility to the Trustees.Maybe this should’ve been done every time the ex-principal made trips to Qatar and Dubai.How conveniently the staff operated in the excessive absence of the principal on thoseoccasions and now when it comes to uphold their integrity for thesake of their hereafter and the students.We are seeing the disease manifesting in the teachers as well in the formthat they are removing them selves from bearing any responsibility.Does this mean all these years they have been teaching to please the principal?It would’ve been more responsible to say that we are going to teachfor the sake of islam regardless if the principal is here or not.But when a disease spreads it touches everyone whohas worked for a contagious individual.More P45s being printedFurthermore :MESSAGE 3-Ladies and Gentlemen we have found the culprit.It seemed like this was a joint decision and all the teachers wereunanimously agreed upon the letter signed in the madrassa.We the new ‘concerned members’ quizzed one teacher to what the game is and why he is protesting.It so transpires that we have an instigator who has been leading on this mission,pressurising the other teachers to sign .. introducing Ilyas Darbar.. why are we not surprised!!This is the same person who was also kicked out of Bolton Darul Uloom with his master.So, in reality what seems like a problem is in fact the EX-Imaam's side kick trying to stir unrest in the community.If he had any brains he could’ve sat on that office chair he so longed for all these years..but of course he can’t be seen being disloyal to his master !
Top
How conveniently the author sidesteps the rather inconvenient truth of over £50,000 in court costs that the masjid was forced to shoulder—thanks to none other than Manya and his gang of self-proclaimed mosque mafia wannabes. It's almost poetic, isn’t it? The very zealots who claim to be guardians of the masjid's sanctity are the ones who dragged it through a costly legal quagmire, burning through funds faster than they can spell “accountability.”