Rasputin by Another Name

Webpage Stats :

Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Great Britain, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Maldives, Malaysia, Mauritius, Morocco, Netherlands, Pakistan, Panama, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sweden, Türkiye, Ukraine, Vietnam, United Arab Emirates, United States

Rasputin's Dubai Diaries:
The Ascetic Hypocrite 

Ah, Rasputin, our revered preacher of asceticism, simplicity, 
and the oh-so-humble life. The very man who never misses a 
chance to lecture us on the evils of materialism—whether it's 
special bayaans condemning anniversaries, baby showers, 
Valentine’s Day, Mother’s and Father’s Day, or warning us 
about the moral dangers of keeping up with the Joneses. 

And let’s not forget his passionate tirades against those sinful, 
opulent kitchen extensions! Yet here he is, jetting off to Dubai, 
the Middle East’s glittering capital of vice, excess, and sin. 
Not once, but multiple times this year! How delightfully consistent of him.

Isn’t it just wonderful to know that while we’re dutifully shunning 
Hallmark holidays and keeping our kitchens small and spartan, Rasputin 
is has probably basking in the glow of Dubai’s extravagant luxury? We're sure 
he’s spent his time there reflecting deeply on the virtues of 
simplicity—perhaps while browsing the latest luxury goods in the 
Dubai Mall, or maybe while lounging in one of those ultra-luxurious 
hotels that the city is famous for.

Oh, but we mustn’t be too quick to judge. Perhaps Rasputin’s 
frequent pilgrimages to the land of opulence are simply his 
way of researching the evils of materialism up close. After all, 
how can he truly warn us against the dangers of excess if he hasn’t 
immersed himself in it, time and time again?  
Purely for educational purposes, of course.

And what about those bayaans? Maybe, we’ll now be 
treated to a new series of special lectures—on how to balance 
condemning the world’s temptations while simultaneously indulging 
in them. Because clearly, Rasputin has mastered that delicate art.

So here’s to you, Rasputin. May your next trip to Dubai be as 
enlightening as the latest one, and may we all one day reach the level 
of asceticism that allows for multiple luxury getaways while 
preaching against the very excesses we secretly enjoy. Who needs 
consistency when you’ve got the kind of spiritual flexibility that 
can stretch from the pulpit to the penthouse?

Top

 1. Background and Credibility

I, Altaf Khanjra, am a member of the Masjid e Tauheedul Islam 
association, a charity registered in Blackburn."

Judicial Commentary:

Enter Altaf Khanjra, our noble protagonist, riding 
in on his high horse, proudly waving the banner of “just a member” of the charity. 
We’re all eager to see how this humble, selfless guardian of mosque democracy 
will save us from the perceived tyranny that’s befallen Blackburn. Surely, there’s 
no personal agenda here—just pure, unadulterated altruism!

_________________________________________

2. Allegations of Improper Election Conduct

"The election... was conducted in a manner directly contrary to 
the Charity’s constitution and to all proper standards of electoral conduct."

Judicial Commentary:

Imagine the shock! An election that didn’t follow 
the “Khanjra Protocol.” It’s almost like the universe didn’t get the memo that all 
elections should be tailored to his liking. He may not have brought any real evidence, 
but who needs facts when you have outrage and indignation? It’s the principle of the thing, right?

_________________________________________

3. Financial Mismanagement Concerns

"There are strong suspicions about financial mismanagement at the Charity."

Judicial Commentary:

Ooooh!, “strong suspicions,” that wonderful phrase that 
serves as a catch-all for baseless claims and whispered rumours. It’s like the 
“I read it on the internet” of the legal world. After all, who needs evidence when you’ve
 got a good, old-fashioned hunch? Sherlock Holmes, eat your heart out—Khanjra’s on the case!

_________________________________________

4. Premature Announcement of Election Results

"The results of the election were posted on the mosque’s notice 
board before they were fully known to me and my associates."

Judicial Commentary:

Scandalous! Imagine the nerve—posting results without first 
checking in with the self-appointed election police. It’s almost as if the rest of 
the mosque didn’t realize that Khanjra and Co. are the ultimate arbiters of when 
and how election results should be shared. How dare they bypass the 
all-important “Altaf Approval Process”?

_________________________________________

5. Challenge to the Legitimacy of the Executive Committee

"The Applicants do not accept that the Election was valid... 
the purported new Executive Committee members do not hold office under 
the Charity’s constitution."

Judicial Commentary:

The classic “I don’t like the outcome, so it must be wrong” 
argument. If you didn’t win, it’s only logical to declare the entire election 
null and void. Democracy only works when it works for you, right? Clearly, 
the only legitimate election is the one where Khanjra and his cohorts emerge 
victorious. Anything less is a travesty!

_________________________________________

6. Allegations Against Trustees for Not Updating Land Registry

"The Trustees have failed to update the Land Registry entry for the Mosque."

Judicial Commentary:

The Land Registry—truly the cornerstone of any 
mosque’s operational success. Forget about community service or spiritual 
leadership; it’s the paperwork that really matters. If this doesn’t get updated, 
who knows what could happen? Cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria!

_________________________________________

7. Suspension of the Imam and Its Implications

"The Principal of the Madrasah, Suhel Master, was suspended after he began to 
unearth and make public the mismanagement of the Charity by the Trustees and Committee."

Judicial Commentary:

Suhel Master, the supposed whistleblower, bravely unearthing 
all manner of horrors—or at least that’s the story. The reality might be a tad less 
glamorous. After all, isn’t it convenient how every good drama needs a hero and a 
villain? Unfortunately, this isn’t a Hollywood movie, and there’s no Oscar for 
Best Overblown Narrative.

_________________________________________

8. No AGMs or Elections for a Long Time

"There have been no AGMs and no elections for the Executive Committee for a long time."

Judicial Commentary:

Boohoo, the lament of the absentee voter. Elections not held? 
AGMs skipped? Clearly, this is a crisis of epic proportions—one that could only be 
rectified by the noble efforts of Mr. Khanjra, swooping in to restore order. If only 
someone had thought to, you know, just hold an election and move on. But where’s the drama in that?

_________________________________________

9. Urgency of the Application

"Due to the urgency of the situation... the applicants are bringing 
this application directly to the court."

Judicial Commentary:

Urgency, the last refuge of the desperate. When all else fails, 
just declare everything an emergency and hope nobody notices the lack of substance. 
After all, nothing says “pressing legal matter” like a vague suspicion and a failed power grab. 
Quick! To the courtroom—before anyone realizes what’s really going on.

________________________________________________________________________________

 Conclusion: The Final Act in Khanjra’s Comedy of Errors

In conclusion, Mr. Khanjra’s witness statement is less a coherent legal document and 
more a melodramatic screenplay in desperate need of a rewrite. Filled with overblown claims, 
baseless accusations, and a healthy dose of self-righteous indignation, it’s the kind of 
performance that might earn a standing ovation at a high school play but falls flat in the courtroom.

As the curtain falls on this farce, one can’t help but marvel at the sheer audacity of it all. 
Let’s also not forget the irony—while Mr. Khanjra has never contributed a penny to the mosque’s construction, 
he somehow managed to squander £10,000 on a futile legal challenge. If only he had channeled 
that energy and money into something more productive—like updating that pesky Land Registry 
entry—perhaps he’d have less time to pen these flights of fancy.

Until then, we’ll just have to enjoy the show. It’s a pity that his self-indulgent theatrics 
come at such a high cost to the community—financially and morally. But as they say, every great 
tragedy has its fools. And in this saga, there’s no doubt who’s playing the part.
 

Top

The video below (11 Aug 2024), is a smoking gun, showing Altaf ‘Tommy Robinson’ Khanjra, 
rallying his clueless donkey herd like a wannabe rabble-rouser, as they stampeded 
towards the speaker, turning the masjid into a circus of chaos and confusion.

Possible Consequences for the Brand and Image ?

In the world of business, few things are as critical as brand image. Companies 
spend years, even decades, cultivating a reputation that resonates with customers, 
standing for quality, trust, and reliability. But every so often, a wild card 
comes along—a figure so hilariously out of sync with the corporate ethos that 
you can almost hear the collective facepalms in the marketing department. 
Enter Altaf Khanjra, the Managing Director of Khanjra International Foods, 
a man who seems to be doing his utmost to single-handedly redefine what his 
company stands for—though not in the way anyone would have hoped.

Picture this: a company known for its dedication to providing the finest 
international foods, now inadvertently linked with a figure whose public 
persona is more in line with a certain notorious provocateur of the far-right 
variety. Yes, Altaf Khanjra appears to have taken inspiration from Tommy Robinson, 
trading in the carefully built reputation of his business for a brand of activism 
that can only be described as incendiary, divisive, and ultimately damaging to the 
very brand he represents.

Now, let’s be clear—Tommy Robinson’s approach to activism is hardly a recipe 
for good PR. Yet, Altaf seems to have missed that memo, instead opting to throw 
himself into the fray with all the subtlety of a bull in a china shop. Imagine 
the puzzled expressions of Khanjra International Foods' loyal customers when 
they realize that the man behind their favorite grocery brand is also the man 
behind a series of public outbursts and rabble-rousing antics that would make 
even the most seasoned shock jock blush.

It’s almost as if Khanjra is testing the limits of how much a brand can endure 
before it starts to fray at the edges. Because while most companies strive to 
associate themselves with positive values—community support, integrity, 
inclusivity—Altaf seems hell-bent on dragging his own brand through the mud. 
And what’s worse, he’s doing it all with the conviction of a man who thinks he’s 
leading a noble cause, blissfully unaware of the train wreck he’s steering his 
company towards.

The irony, of course, is palpable. Here’s a man who should be focused on 
expanding his business, building trust with his customers, and ensuring 
that Khanjra International Foods remains a household name for all the right 
reasons. Instead, Altaf seems more interested in emulating the worst aspects 
of Tommy Robinson, alienating not just his potential customers, but likely 
his business partners as well. After all, it’s hard to take a company seriously 
when its MD is more focused on stirring up controversy than selling products.

And let’s not forget the real kicker: in the world of social media, where 
everything you do is amplified a thousandfold, Altaf’s antics are now linked, 
inextricably, with the Khanjra brand. Every misguided outburst, every 
inflammatory statement, every instance where he channels his inner Tommy Robinson, 
chips away at the brand’s reputation. And in today’s marketplace, where 
consumer trust is everything, that’s the kind of damage that no amount of 
marketing dollars can easily fix.

In the end, Altaf Khanjra is a cautionary tale—a reminder that the role of a 
Managing Director is not just to lead a company, but to protect its brand, 
its image, and its future. By embracing the tactics and tone of a figure like 
Tommy Robinson, Altaf is doing just the opposite. He’s steering his company 
into a reputational minefield, where every misstep could have lasting consequences.

So the next time you’re in the aisles of your local grocery store, 
think twice before picking up that product from Khanjra International Foods. 
Because while the label might say “quality,” the man behind the brand seems 
more interested in peddling controversy than food. And if Altaf Khanjra continues 
down this path, he may find that his company’s legacy has less to do with 
international cuisine and more to do with the damage one man can do to a brand 
in the pursuit of a misguided cause.

Top

In the ever-colourful tapestry of public personalities, few threads stand 
out quite like those woven by Altaf Khanjra—a man who seems to have 
taken one too many pages from the Tommy Robinson playbook, though perhaps 
not the chapters that make for a best-seller. If you squint just right, 
you might even see a hint of another British icon—though instead of 
charisma, it’s more like a funhouse mirror reflection of Bruce Forsyth, 
with a face that’s trying to decide whether to host a game show or start a ruckus.

Imagine, if you will, a world where passion for controversy trumps 
logic and where the art of grievance has been perfected to a science. 
Enter Altaf Khanjra, a character so determined to emulate the self-styled 
defender of all things British, Tommy Robinson, that he’s practically a 
carbon copy—albeit one who might need a bit more time in the copier machine to 
get the finer details right. His attempts at rallying the masses are as earnest as 
they are misplaced, much like a Bruce Forsyth impersonator trying to do 
stand-up comedy—amusing for all the wrong reasons.

Khanjra, much like Robinson, has mastered the art of stirring the pot. 
He’s got the bravado, the righteous indignation, and the uncanny ability 
to rile up a crowd faster than you can say "nice to see you, to see you nice!"
 But while Robinson's brand of populism is seasoned with a certain gritty, 
street-level charisma, Khanjra’s approach is more like trying to start a 
fire with damp matches—lots of smoke, but not much heat.

Where Tommy Robinson charges headlong into the fray, often igniting clashes 
and chaos wherever he goes, Khanjra is no stranger to stoking the flames of 
conflict himself. He knows exactly how to whip his followers into a frenzy, 
painting them a picture of imminent danger, usually at the hands of some 
nebulous "enemy." Much like Robinson, he thrives on the tension, the division, 
and the sense that a battle must be fought—preferably right now and with no 
holds barred. It’s almost as if he’s rehearsing lines for his next big performance, 
only the applause never comes.

In his mind, Altaf is a hero—leading the charge against an imagined foe, 
much like Robinson with his shadowy cabal of conspirators. But where 
Robinson's confrontations often play out on the national stage, Khanjra’s 
conflicts tend to simmer closer to home. One might think that such a dedicated 
defender of the faith and community would have generously contributed to the 
local mosque construction, but not Altaf. No, his contributions seem to be 
more of the incendiary variety. 

In a particularly ironic twist, Khanjra managed to waste a cool £10,000 on a 
futile and failed legal injunction to stop a meeting he didn't like. While 
his pockets stayed firmly closed when it came to helping build the mosque—a 
symbol of community unity and faith—they suddenly opened wide to finance his 
personal crusade. It’s almost as if his principles come with a price tag, 
but charity isn’t on the list. 

Yet, perhaps what’s most striking about Khanjra is his unwavering belief 
that he is a man of the people. Never mind that the people in question 
often seem perplexed by his latest provocations. Much like Robinson, he’s 
convinced that he’s speaking truth to power, even if that truth sometimes 
gets a little lost in translation. And in both cases, it seems the audience 
is left wondering whether this is a serious political movement or an 
elaborate performance art piece. Perhaps he’s waiting for someone to shout, 
“Good game, good game!” before realizing the joke’s on him.

But if there's one thing Khanjra has learned from his unintentional mentor, 
it's that controversy is currency. The more outrageous the claim, the better. 
Why debate when you can just declare? Why donate when you can instead squander 
thousands on a legal farce? After all, in Khanjra’s world, it’s not 
about building up the community—it’s about stirring up the drama.

In the end, Altaf Khanjra is like Tommy Robinson’s less successful 
understudy—full of bluster, short on substance, and always ready to incite 
the next conflict, even if nobody’s quite sure what they’re fighting for. 
Whether he’ll ever step out of Robinson’s shadow is anyone’s guess, but 
one thing is for sure: as long as there’s a crowd to rile up and a 
cause to twist, Altaf will be there, valiantly leading the charge into 
yet another manufactured battle—just don’t ask him to chip in for the 
bricks and mortar. And if he does ever manage to win a crowd over, 
one can only hope he’ll leave the Bruce Forsyth impressions at home.
 

Top

Comments on the Rejection of the Injunction: The Case of the Imaginary Constitution Breach

1. Alleged Breaches of the Charity's Constitution in the Election Process

Applicant's Argument: The applicants claim that the election process has violated the Charity's 
Constitution, and in a heroic act of self-righteousness, they are here to save the day with 
an injunction.

Judicial Commentary:
- The Phantom Constitution: Ah, the mysterious Constitution, that elusive document that 
everyone swears by but nobody seems to have actually read. The applicants are convinced it 
was breached, but much like Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster, there's no hard evidence to 
back up their claims. If this Constitution is so sacred, one might expect the applicants 
to produce more than vague allegations, perhaps a signed affidavit from the Constitution 
itself? But alas, it appears the Constitution is staying silent on this one.

___________________________

2. Urgency and Lack of Charity Commission Involvement

Applicant's Argument: The situation is so urgent that the usual requirement to 
get permission from the Charity Commission can be conveniently ignored. Rules, 
after all, are for other people.

Judicial Commentary:
- Urgency, Schmergency: The applicants would have us believe that the sky is 
falling and only they can hold it up with this injunction. They’re in such a rush, 
they skipped that pesky step of involving the Charity Commission—because who needs 
oversight when you’ve got a superhero complex? The court, however, is not in the habit 
of playing along with theatrics. Maybe next time, they should try the Commission first—after 
all, it’s not just there for decoration.

__________________________

3. Interim Relief to Prevent the Removal of an Imam

Applicant's Argument: The removal of an Imam during these tumultuous times would 
be a disaster of epic proportions, second only to the sinking of the Titanic.

Judicial Commentary:
- The Imam-as-Human-Shield Strategy: The applicants seem to be using the Imam as a 
sort of human shield in their legal crusade. “Save the Imam!” they cry, as if this is 
the last stand at the Alamo. Yet, the harm they predict is as hypothetical as a unicorn on a 
skateboard. The court doesn’t hand out injunctions for imaginary disasters, so the applicants 
will have to find a different strategy—perhaps one that involves actual evidence.

___________________________

4. Concerns About the Conduct of the Election

Applicant's Argument: The applicants have serious concerns about the election process—concerns 
so serious that they’ve decided to elevate them from gossip at the local coffee shop 
to a full-blown High Court case.

Judicial Commentary:
- The Gossipy Grievance: It seems the applicants have mistaken this courtroom for a 
complaint box. Their “serious concerns” are as well-founded as a rumour spread by someone’s 
nosy aunt. Without any real evidence to back them up, these concerns are just that—concerns. 
And concerns, last time it was checked, are not legal grounds for an injunction. 
Perhaps a chat over tea would be a more appropriate forum for their grievances.

___________________________

5. Request for a Fresh Election

Applicant's Argument: Let’s just scrap the whole election and start over. 
After all, when in doubt, reboot!

Judicial Commentary:
- The Election Do-Over Request: Ah yes, the old “if you don’t like the result, 
just redo it” approach. While this might work with video games or reality TV shows, 
it’s not how elections—or the law—work. The applicants are asking the court to hit 
the reset button without any real justification, like a child demanding a do-over 
after losing a game of Monopoly. Unfortunately for them, this isn’t a game, and the 
court isn’t here to indulge tantrums.

___________________________

6. Costs and Proportionality

Applicant's Argument: Money, time, and the Charity’s resources be damned—let’s 
get that injunction!

Judicial Commentary:
- The Law of Unintended Expenses: The applicants seem blissfully unaware that 
their little legal adventure could cost a small fortune—money that could perhaps 
be better spent on, I don’t know, charitable work? Instead, they’re proposing to 
burn through cash like it’s Monopoly money, all for the sake of a cause that’s 
shakier than a house of cards. The court prefers to keep the Charity’s funds where 
they belong—serving the community, not padding the pockets of lawyers.

________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion:
In summary, courts are not in the business of indulging in legal fantasies 
or serving as a venue for settling personal vendettas dressed up as constitutional 
crises. The applicants’ case is as solid as a soggy biscuit, and their injunction is 
denied with the fervour it deserves. If they truly care about the Charity, they 
might consider putting down the lawsuit and picking up the Constitution they keep 
talking about—maybe even reading it this time.

Top

Rasputin attempted to file a case in the High Court in London to 
prevent the General Meeting scheduled for Sunday by seeking an injunction.

The judge dismissed the case brought by him and his 
associates, costing them £10,000.

‎السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

أرجو ان تكونوا جميعكم بخير

Respected ulama Kiram and fellow Muslim brothers. 
I hope you all are in best of imaan and health with the 
fadhl of Almighty Allah swt.

Before I write the objective of my message, I would like to
make it clear I will not be writing my name or signing this 
message off as per the Hadith of the prophet (saw) 

“ A time will come when people will honour oppressors and unjust people just 
to be saved from their fitnah and aggression towards them" 

and I strongly  believe we are in that time and I fear that I will 
also be a target of a smear campaign.

I will however say that I am a graduate of Bolton Darul uloom and 
an imaam of a Masjid. I run my own madrassah alhamdulillah, with 
almighty’s grace and fadhl. I have connections with the big Shuyukh 
in the U.K. and abroad namely Mufti Inayatullah Sahib/ Moulana Saleem Dhorat Sahib/ 
Hazrat Moulana Kamrun Zamaan sahib and Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib. 
I have not listed other respected Shuyukhs as I feel listing these Shuyukhs will 
hopefully give an idea to my surroundings and somewhat little I have gained 
in understanding of deen. This is just to point out that I have been 
exposed to great scholars of our time not to boast my connections. 

I first of all would like to express my sadness and utmost 
disbelief to what we are witnessing regarding Masjid Tauheedul Islam.  
I remember I use to frequent this masjid for great programmes delivered by 
great scholars and I have also made few visits through jamaat. This masjid 
always was introduced as one of the pioneering masjids in the western world 
in establishing the great deen of Rasullulah (saw). 

Unfortunately, I have recently received the news that 
the masjid is now النزاع في المحكمة (dispute in court). I have also received 
news this has been filed by individuals wanting to reinstate Ml Suhel and 
wanting a new Trust Board (forgive me of this isn’t the case)

I am not sure if the brothers realise what a grave mistake they are 
making. In no way I expect them to accept or even believe it’s true as per the saying 

‎ لا يمكنك ان تري الأعمي 

It is not possible to make the blind see.

One incident I will relate which I strongly believe is directly 
connected to Ml Suhel’s downfall and the help of Allah swt being  void in his 
cause to which I am an eye witness. 

Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib is one of the most renowned scholars of our times. 
He has been accepted by عجم (non Arabs) and عرب (Arabs) alike and given him 
the title Shaikhul Islam. Whilst sitting in one majlis where Moulana Suhel 
was also present, the discussion around halaal mortgage came up 
and Mufti Taqi Usmani sahibs fatwa on it. The ulamas understand the 
intricacies of the debate. Regardless, Mufti Taqi Usmani sahib (db) has 
his تفردات (individual judgement based on his knowledge). Ulamas can differ and have 
differed but no one in their sane mind has ever insulted Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib or 
even challenged him in a disrespectful way. 

Unfortunately for Moulana Suhel he was the victim of insulting this great 
scholar in the midst of other ulama’s. When this fatwa was discussed and 
Mufti Taqi Usmani sahibs view on it I heard with my own own ears Moulana Suhel 
remarking in gujrati:

“What does that goofy know” (apologies I don’t know the gujrati wording).

Another alim and a teacher of Tirmidhi shareef was sat there also, who at 
this remark in shock said

‘This man’s days are numbered’

I was very much perturbed and disturbed by this remark and to some degree 
it put me in semi shock at the time. But we are now witnessing the effects of 
this statement before our eyes and the teacher of Tirmidhi shareef’s prediction 
coming true I am compelled to believe that Mufti Taqi Usmani Sahib is one of the great 
friends of Allah. As now I have witnessed this Hadith in my lifetime: 

‎قَالَ رَسُول اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه و سلم إنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى قَالَ: "مَنْ عَادَى لِي وَلِيًّا فَقْد آذَنْتهُ بِالْحَرْبِ

The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, 

"Verily Allah ta’ala has said: 'Whosoever shows enmity to a wali (friend)

of Mine, then I have declared war against him.' "

If there is any hope for the individuals involved or rather if Almighty Allah 
has kept any goodness for them, then my advise is move away from this 
fitnah and desist in challenging Allah swt,
 as this can only result in one thing :

Zillat (disgrace) and further Zillat (disgrace) for anyone supporting this cause. 
I for one have already seen the effects of this already.

وما توفيقي إلا بالله

‎السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

‎جزاك الله خيرا واحسن الجزاء

Top

This  from a Maulana who says that, like Rasputin, he 
is a graduate from Azaadville, living in the UK.  Until a few 
years ago, he was in regular contact with Rasputin, even meeting 
up with other Azaadville friends and acquaintance for meals and get togethers.   

He has been observing the sad account of Rasputin's
shameful conduct firstly at Bolton DU and now here at Tauheedul.

He has penned this short piece of naseehah (advice) not only for Rasputin, but
for all those who are given responsibility/leadership of any kind.

_____________________________

Where He Went Wrong:

He was initially blessed with great potential and a position of leadership, 
but he allowed pride, greed, and a thirst for power to corrupt his heart. 
Instead of serving his community with humility and justice, he sought to 
elevate himself above others. His arrogance led him to dismiss wise counsel, 
get rid of people who he thought would get in his way, and his greed drove 
him to exploit the very people he was supposed to protect.

Worse still, he began to misuse the pulpit, a sacred place meant for guiding 
and uniting the community, to settle personal scores. He turned his sermons 
into opportunities to attack those he perceived as enemies, sowing discord 
and division within the community. Rather than using his platform to uplift 
and inspire, he used it to fuel his own ego and to belittle others, betraying 
the trust that had been placed in him.

He surrounded himself with followers who, blinded by loyalty, defended 
his wrongdoings, even resorting to violence. But as his actions grew more 
tyrannical and his intentions more transparent, even his closest allies 
began to see through his deceit. By then, the damage was done—he lost 
everything: his power, his respect, and the trust of his community.

_____________________________

Lessons to Be Learned:

1. Humility in Leadership: Leadership is not about power or control, 
but about serving others with humility. A leader must always remember that 
their role is a trust (Amanah) given by Allah, and they will be held 
accountable for how they fulfill it.
  
2. The Sanctity of the Pulpit: The pulpit is a sacred platform, meant for 
delivering truth, spreading guidance, and uniting the community. Misusing it 
for personal vendettas is a grave betrayal of that responsibility. Islam 
teaches that speech should be kind, just, and aimed at fostering unity, not division.

2. Avoiding Pride and Arrogance: Pride (Kibr) is a dangerous trait that 
can lead to one's downfall. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) warned that even a 
small amount of pride can prevent a person from entering Paradise. A true 
leader listens to advice, acknowledges their own faults, and seeks to improve.

3. Guarding Against Greed: Greed (Hirs) can corrupt the soul and lead to 
unethical behaviour. Islam teaches that contentment (Qana'ah) and gratitude 
for what one has are far more valuable than the pursuit of worldly wealth.

4. Choosing Righteous Companions: The people you surround yourself with can 
influence your actions. His downfall was accelerated by those who encouraged 
his wrongdoing. Islam emphasises the importance of keeping righteous company, 
as the Prophet (PBUH) said, "A person is on the religion of their close friend."

_____________________________

How Not to Fall into the Same Trap:

- Maintain Taqwa (God-consciousness): Always be aware that Allah is watching, 
and strive to act in a manner that pleases Him. This will help keep pride, 
greed, and other harmful traits in check.

- Seek and Heed Wise Counsel: Surround yourself with advisors who are honest, 
knowledgeable, and God-fearing. Listen to their advice, especially when it 
challenges your desires.

- Practice Accountability: Regularly reflect on your actions and intentions, 
and hold yourself accountable. Remember that you will be questioned about 
your leadership on the Day of Judgment.

- Foster a Sense of Responsibility: Recognise that leadership is a 
responsibility, not a privilege. Serve your community with sincerity, 
and always prioritise their well-being over personal gain.

By learning from his mistakes and adhering to these Islamic principles, 
one can avoid falling into the same traps and instead lead
with integrity and righteousness.

Top

1. 30th March - Rasputin started a brawl outside the masjid in Ramadhan 

2. 31st March - Demand  of Trust and Committee stepping down campaign is 
ran by Rasputin. Completely unrelated to the incident day before 

3. 31st March - Rasputin’s son attacks a fellow masjid musallee

4. 3rd April - Rasputin holds an unofficial meeting declaring his supremacy 
and claiming the trust board and committee is dissolved without any consultation 
or right of holding this meeting knowing well his just an employee.

5. 15th May - Rasputin causes another carnage. His brother N Mohammed swings 
baseball bat around to show he's a 'Manya'. The whole mosque was in mayhem

6. 16th May - Rasputin gets his suspension. Another uproar by his gremlins occur. 
Rasputin throws the letter on the floor claiming he'll lead Jummah next day (which he didn't)

7. 18th May - Rasputin directs his cronies to handout letters of disagreement 
outside the mosque

8. 20th May - Rasputin issues orders to Darbar and Wadiwala to get signatures 
for his reinstatement from teachers

9. 21st May - letter from Madrasah is sent out regarding change of holidays 
with Rasputin’s name as signing principal even though he was suspended.

10. 22nd May - Rasputin is given a warning letter of his attendance at his 
suspended place of work and further causing disruption.

11. 22nd May - Rasputin orders Lukman Desai to stand up and make an announcement 
in his favour. Things get ugly again in the masjid

12. 22nd May - Darbar issues a letter trying to entice parents and use them 
as bait, claiming the madrasah has a safeguarding issue. Darbar and Wadiwala 
pass on the responsibility towards the Trustees as they claim they can no longer 
function without Rasputin.

13. 22rd May - Rasputin orders an online petition 

14. 31st May - Rasputin orders Darbar to send Madrasah closure letter.

15. 1st June - Rasputin realises back clash on closing madrasah so claims 
the issue is between teachers and Trustees - claims he had nothing to do with it (which was a lie)

16. 1st June - Rasputin further realised he's not cutting it through with 
the public and decides to order Darbar to make up a story about someone else 
sending letters out on their behalf

17. 3rd June to 14th June - Rasputin and his cronies plan next steps

18. 14th June - Rasputin orders for a WhatsApp broadcast group to be created. 
Darbar breaching GDPR uses madrasah broadcast list.

19. 15th June - PFC (Rasputin's henchmen) introduce themselves and create
unrest in the community on the night of Arafah 

20. 1st Jul-  nominations for applications open up for the new committee.

21. 6th July - Rasputin leads nikah ceremony knowing well he is suspended. PFC 
send a notification out of an SGM demand from trustees.

22. 8th July - Rasputin informs HMRC of madrasah not paying official pay

23. 21st July - nominations window closes for the new committee

24. 22nd July nominees details put on the notice board 

25. 22nd July - Rasputin orders his cronies to bully Trustees and force them 
to terminate the process after seeing no one credible is on the list from their side.

26. 23rd July - Rasputin orders his cronies to go and intimidate trustees at 
their house. Police  called to deter them and protect family of trustee

27. 26th July - PFC announce an emergency meeting for their 3 followers on 
27th July after asar prayers

28. 27th July- PFC decide they are withdrawing their names from the nominee list

29. 28th July - PFC hand in their withdrawal letters to Trustees

30. 29th July - Rasputin orders riots to be caused by PFC now known as RDL, 
as they can’t stand the thought of election going ahead without any of their 
nominees. Police once again called. 

31. 1st August - Maaz Golita and Wadiwala on orders from Rasputin try to gain 
access to the principal's office and are denied.

32. 2nd August - Robbery takes place, items stolen from ex-principal's office.

33. 4th August- PFC don’t hold the meeting they promised, and PFC’s functioning as a 
body is officially dissolved. This further creating speculation why the meeting 
didn’t go after the robbery.

Top

Once upon a time in a serene village nestled between rolling hills and lush meadows, 
there lived a rooster named Rasputin. From a young age, Rasputin was blessed with a melodious 
crow that could wake the entire village at dawn. His crow was so enchanting that the villagers began 
to look up to him, believing that he was destined for greatness.

The wise old owl, who served as the village elder, saw Rasputin’s potential and 
decided to mentor him. Under the owl’s guidance, Rasputin learned the principles of 
harmony and justice, becoming well-versed in the ways of the village’s sacred traditions. 
Soon, Rasputin was appointed as the new village leader, much to the joy of the villagers.

Rasputin's early days as a leader were filled with wisdom and compassion. He led the 
village with kindness, and his decisions were fair and just. However, as time went on, 
the praise and admiration of the villagers began to inflate Rasputin’s ego. He started to see 
himself not as a humble servant, but as a ruler above all others.

One day, Rasputin demanded that the hens provide him with the best grains, claiming 
it was his right as the village leader. The hens, fearing his wrath, complied, even though 
it meant their own chicks went hungry. Rasputin’s greed grew, and soon he began to hoard the grains, 
leaving little for the rest of the village.

Rasputin also became arrogant, dismissing the wise counsel of the old owl and belittling 
those who dared to question his authority. He strutted around the village with a gang of thuggish crows, 
who enforced his will through intimidation and violence. Anyone who dared to stand up to Rasputin 
was swiftly dealt with by the crows, who believed in their leader’s superiority and right to rule.

The once peaceful village was now plagued by fear and resentment. The crows’ loyalty to Rasputin 
blinded them to his faults, and they defended him fiercely, thinking he was the rightful leader. 
But as Rasputin's actions grew more tyrannical and his demands more unreasonable, even the crows 
began to see the truth. They realized that Rasputin was not the wise and just leader they had believed him to be.

One fateful evening, as the sun set and the village gathered for the evening assembly, the 
old owl decided it was time to act. With a heavy heart, he approached Rasputin and said, 
"You were gifted with a rare talent and entrusted with a noble duty, but you have 
allowed pride, greed, and cruelty to corrupt you."

Rasputin scoffed at the owl’s words, but as he looked around, he saw the sad and weary 
faces of the villagers. The crows, seeing their leader’s vulnerability and reflecting on 
their own actions, felt a deep sense of regret. They realized that Rasputin had misled them, 
and they had become instruments of his tyranny.

Realizing the extent of his wrongdoing, a wave of shame washed over Rasputin. The crows, 
understanding their mistake, abandoned him, leaving Rasputin alone. The villagers, 
guided by the wisdom of the old owl, forgave Rasputin but removed him from his position as leader. 
They chose a humble sparrow, known for its fairness and gentle nature, to lead them. Rasputin, 
stripped of his title and power, spent the rest of his days in quiet reflection, working to mend the 
relationships he had broken.

From that day on, the village flourished under the sparrow’s leadership. And Rasputin’s 
story was told to every generation as a reminder of the dangers of pride, arrogance, greed, 
and thuggery. It was said that true leadership is not about power or wealth, but about serving others 
with humility and compassion.

And so, the village thrived, holding fast to the lessons of their past, ensuring that no 
one rooster’s crow would ever overshadow the harmony of their community again.

Top

On Friday after Fajr (2nd),  the EX-imam/principal’s office was broken into
and robbed.  Not of cash or any other liquid assets - but the culprit stole the masjid server.
The same computer that Rasputin worked on, stored his documents and files.

Before we speculate who the thief is and their motive, let's ask who could've
employed him to do the task ? Also ponder over the other occasion similar thing happened ?

Yes, when Rasputin was on his last legs at Bolton DU c2019.

Recap what happened there :

* Rasputin and his merry band of cronies descended into a pit of 
suspicion and mistrust with other teachers and the trust board.

* Rasputin expertly alienated other teachers from any decision-making, 
reserving the reins of power solely for his loyal yes-men.

* Struggling to work harmoniously with the trust board, Rasputin 
ingeniously resorted to forgery, replicating signatures to place 
his lackeys on the board.

* With his newfound power, Rasputin bullied and oppressed 
the entire institution, like a true zaalim/tyrant.

* Sensing the growing rebellion from teachers and former trustees
who dared to challenge his criminal misdeeds, Rasputin was on high alert.

* Legal threats loomed large over Rasputin due to his now exposed fraudulent activities.

* Eventually, Rasputin was ousted by a coalition of over 30 scholars.

* In what seemed to be a last-ditch effort to destroy any incriminating evidence,
Rasputin, Darbar, Wadiwala, Kamboli,  and their motley crew allegedly executed a
brazen office break-in. Arriving in a van, they ransacked the office, taking the
computer hardware to remove any trace of  Rasputin's misdeeds at Bolton DU.

* Rasputin and Darbar then persistently pestered the charity commission making
up false accusations in attempt to get the Darul Uloom shut down.

* Tauheedul, upon discovering Rasputin's fraudulent escapades, 
decided he could no longer serve as an imam.

* Enter Yakub Khanjra, who pleaded for Rasputin's reinstatement. 
A clandestine meeting ensued at "Javsy’s Laundry".

* With Tauheedul showing leniency and allowing Rasputin to stay on.
Rasputin got to work in gaining control of Tauheedul's affairs. 

* And so like he did at the Bolton DU, Rasputin attempted to sneak 
Maaz Golita onto the trustee board through the late President, but failed miserably.

Fast forward to Thursday (1st), Maaz Golita and Asim Wadiwala demanded access to the ex-imam/principal’s office, 
concocting a feeble excuse about needing to print something. Despite owning a business, Maaz Golita 
bizarrely needed to print from the office. They were rightfully denied access.

Next day (Friday), the robbery takes place.  

The thief, ignoring the cash (see pic) but snatching computer hardware.

Who arranged this theft ?

And why rob just computer hardware and leave the cash ?

It was seemingly a targeted robbery. The culprit in the video isn't a local.  

So why would he need to specifically want computer hardware ?  

To be more precise... who hired him to target robbing the hardware which most likely
had all of Rasputin's files, documents and heaven knows other possible incriminating info ?

The trustees and committee had no need to take this as they
already had access to the room and the computer.

Isn't all this a replica of sorts of what happened during Rasputin's last days at Bolton DU ?

Possible Scenario ? :

A plausible and possible deduction is that someone wanted the data, files, documents etc 
that were on the server as it contained incriminating files. Unable to gain access legitimately after
being denied on request of access, they resort to hiring a thug to do the same job
that was executed at the Bolton DU.

The culprit obviously didn't count on a CCTV camera capturing his image and
so hopefully he will be in custody soon enough.  

Then, Insha Allah - he will sing like a canary
and divulge, for once and for all, who the real organ grinders are

CLICK ON ANY IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Top

The Rasputin Defence League

A brand new sister branch of the EDL has been born.

EDL observed and officially commended the childish mayhem caused by the Rasputin mob
on the 29th (see below).  So much so, that they not only decided to do their own
hooligan filled violence (see last nights news in Southport), but have now officially 
given their blessing for the creation of a new sister branch ...
 

All hail the 'new' Rasputin Defence League (RDL), consisting of the self-proclaimed guardians
of an ex-imam whose antics make Grigori Rasputin himself look like a saint. If you thought the 
English Defence League (EDL) was a circus, wait until you get a load of this troupe.

First, let’s introduce the make shift ringleader of this farce, Mr. Bluster aka 
Altaf Khanjra (see the video below, he's the one on the steps recording on his phone 
- yes the one who seems to have this perpetual creepy retarded grin like some wannabe 
Columbine mass murderer). Much like the EDL’s top brass, he’s mastered the art of loud, 
impassioned bakwas that are big on drama but short on facts. Mr. Bluster insists on painting 
their cause as some moral crusade and hailing Rasputin as a martyr, 
conveniently ignoring his knack for causing pandemonium. 
If the EDL can rewrite history, why can’t the RDL?

Next, we have the RDL’s field operations (the ones facing him, in the video), 
which are as organised as a toddler’s tea party. Their latest escapade? Disrupting a voting process at 
the mosque with the grace of a herd of elephants on crack cocaine. Picture this: devout community 
members trying to cast their votes while RDL members block entrances, shout obscenities, 
and one particularly zealous goon tries to steal the ballot box. Their antics were 
so outrageous that the police had to be called in to restore order. Democracy, meet the RDL.

And what about their media and reporting ? It's a treasure trove of unintentional comedy. 
They boast about “fighting for justice” and “defending the faith,” all while glossing over theirs
and Rasputin’s laundry list of offenses. It’s like watching a soap opera where the villain just 
keeps getting more absurd with each episode.

But the real pièce de résistance is their ability to turn every critique into a 
personal vendetta against them and their master Rasputin. Call out their misconduct? 
Clearly, you’re a heretic. Question their actions? Must be part of a vast conspiracy. 
They’ve taken the EDL’s persecution complex and turned it into a full-blown melodrama.

If they were to hold a “solidarity rally” it would morph into an impromptu barbecue, 
complete with chants of “Rasputin forever!” as they grill burgers (Minny "Speedy Gonzales" Khanjra
is getting ideas now). It would be like a surreal version of the EDL’s flag-waving, beer-swilling 
gatherings, minus the nationalism and beer-swilling.

Who knew defending a devious ex-imam could be so festive?

So, hats off to the Rasputin Defence League – the comedic gift that keeps on giving. 
Their misguided devotion to their troublesome ex-imam would be endearing if it weren’t 
so utterly ridiculous. They’ve proven that in the grand circus of religious and 
political absurdity, there’s always room for one more clown car.

Bravo, RDL. Bravo.

Top

As the Olympics kicked off in Paris, we've witnessed Team GB snag 
five medals in the first three days. The nation is buzzing with 
anticipation for the 100 meters heat, especially with the emergence 
of a new sensation who rivals even the legendary Usain Bolt in his golden shoes. 

Enter Minny "Speedy Gonzales" Khanjra, whose speed is so mind-blowing 
that it defies speedometers. In a flash of brilliance, yesterday, he managed to swipe 
the ballot box taking it for a distance of a whole 500,000 Micrometers (don't get too excited, it's only 50cm) 
before getting caught. 

A word of advice, if Speedy wants to go for some sort of record, then sprinting isn't one of them.
Instead stick to working on increasing your love for devouring  burgers - there's a good
chance you will get some sort of recognition you are after.

By the way, the met office recorded a seismic event that occurred at the place and time
Speedy took the ballot box - recording a reading of 5.5 on the Richter scale.  

Coincidence ? you decide 

Top

Top

Only one way!

Suhel Manya has shown his true colours.

Since Ramdhan the masjid has been in turmoil.

Many are not aware of how things actually started. Suhel Manya 
sensed the late president time is up in this world and his 
support (rightly or wrongly) coming to an end.  He tried many times to 
change the trust board and the committee with his evil tactics like 
he did at Bolton DU, But failed miserably.

In Ramdhan, Sufyan Bhopa parked his car blocking Manya. Sufyan 
parked his car always blocking Manya and many others did as Manya never 
came out until after Maghreb. That day Manya was not doing bayaan 
and asked for Sufyan’s car to be moved. Sufyan moved his car and 
Manya went round the block and came back. In the interim the Bhopas 
swore at Manya for which nothing was done by Manya at that point (his lame excuse was he was fasting).

After Maghreb Manya caused a commotion and took this opportunity to 
rile the community up shouting ‘look he swore at your imaam’. 
Well from here the campaign of a takeover started. A car parked by 
one member validated Manya to attempt a takeover.

Fast forward.. all his takeover attempts have failed and his last 
throw of the dice was to force a takeover like we have seen last 
couple of days. He was challenged by one of the members to why he is 
not stopping his disciples from sending messages tarnishing people and 
rather wait for the AGM to express your concerns. 

The reply:
‘We are going to do dhamal before the AGM never mind waiting for it’

Which brings us to only one conclusion, this man who is embodied in 
human flesh is nothing less than a devil, and needs to be sacked

Top

The  intimidation tactics are reminiscent of the Bolton Darul Uloom 
playbook, are being employed here.

Fifteen thugs on the orders of their master, Rasputin, went 
to a trustee's house, prompting him to inform the police. These 
individuals are now provoking trustees and committee members, 
harassing their wives and children. Their aim is  to 
disrupt the election process and prevent a new committee from forming. 
It's crucial not to resort to violence and instead show support for 
those standing against these jahil thugs.

Who were these nasty cowards ? Well among them were: 

Ilyas Darbar
Zakir Kamboli (brother of the adulterous maulwi)
Altaf khanjra
Mehbub khanjra 
Adam khanjara
Idris Manya
Hamza Manya 
Maaz golita 
Haroon janabe 
'Little' Bhikhi 

Notice the trend ?  Darbar, Kamboli, Manyas, Khanjras etc

Pictures of incident where Police were called to protect a trustee from the thugs mentioned above:

Top

This is an email we received yesterday, from a former student of Bolton DU when 
Rasputin was employed as it's head, before he was rightfully booted out with dishonour.

My name is Mufti Salim Nakhuda, and have been tracking your blog detailing the awful
behaviour and actions of Tauheedul Masjid's former Imam (labelled on here as Rasputin).

I finally plucked up the courage to briefly
detail my experiences with the same individual (M. Suhail Manya) when he was the principal 
of the Bolton DaralUlum. I can vouch for the veracity of all the details noted on here 
in relation  to his failed tenure at the DaralUlum.  As would  countless other ex-students, 
who would rather forget their torrid experiences under his failed stewardship.

There were serious issues of verbal abuse, threats, and discriminatory practices 
perpetrated by the then Principal,  S. Manya. These actions were in direct violation 
of the ethical standards and values that the DaralUlum was supposed to uphold.

During my time at the seminary in the Alimiyyah class, I along with other students, experienced severe 
verbal and mental abuse from S. Manya. He frequently used derogatory terms such as "khinzeer" (swine) and 
"iblis" (devil) when addressing specific section of students (see below). Such language was deeply offensive and not in 
keeping with the principles of respect, dignity, and compassion that Islam teaches.

In addition to the verbal abuse, he responded to complaints and concerns raised by students and the 
darsi teachers with threats of fabricating accusations and exposing non-existent misdemeanours. This threatening 
was clearly intended to silence us and prevent any accountability for his persistent gross misconduct.

Moreover, he exhibited blatant racism and bigotry towards students who were not from the same Bharuchi Gujarati 
section of the community as himself. As a Gujrati from the Surti community myself,  along with other students from 
Bangladeshi and Pakistani backgrounds, were made to feel inferior and untrustworthy compared to our 
Bharuchi Gujarati peers. This discriminatory treatment fostered a divisive and hostile environment, 
contrary to the inclusive and respectful community we strived to create. 
We were constantly demeaned and de-humanised, and made to feel insignificant and worthless.

The actions of S. Manya had caused significant emotional distress to many students and  
severely damaged the reputation of the seminary.  Let me cite one example. One fellow student from Bolton,
had almost completed the alimiyyah course. The constant abuse that was dished out by S. Manya 
had an enormous effect on his mental well being. Such an effect was on him, was that he suffered
a mental break down, and his father had to take the heart breaking decision to extract him from the DaralUlum
even though the lad only had 1 year left (dor-e-hadith) for his completion of the course. His father
took the decision after medical advice from their GP as he felt a deterioration of his mental health
could have lasting effects.  

Alhamdolillah, the student, once out of the DaralUlum slowly but surely recovered and eventually 
completed the final year at Blackburn DaralUlum, which incidentally was a totally different uplifting experience for him.

I can vouch for this significant difference of this experience. As I studied at Blackburn DaralUlum  after my alimiyyah
completion. I spent further 18 months there doing my iftah speciality. The professionalism, courtesy and
Prophetic adaab one expects from ulama was self evident there. I regretted that I had not done my alim course
there instead of in Bolton.

It was his behaviour that also lead to so many respected teachers leaving,
and eventually S. Manya being shown the door. Alhamdolillah.

I am not surprised at all that Tauheedul Masjid is going through the same turmoil as was 
experienced by the DaralUlum. The only way to remedy this sad situation, is to
do what was done at the Bolton DaralUlum, and to swiftly remove this fitnah fomenting person, 
otherwise he will drag the whole masjid and madrasah down with him and undo decades
of effort, paid in sweat and blood by elders who are no longer in this mortal world. 
Get rid of him before he ruins the Masjid and Madrasah for good.

Top

In the past couple of days, we have received a somewhat detailed

account of what is actually happening at one of
Rasputin's other swindles, which claims to provide "hope" and "help"
to individuals and couples in various state of distress - from marriage issues to drug related problems.
 

However, as will be gleaned from what this

whistle blower has stated, it is nothing more than
a charade for Rasputin to line his pocket in order to

satiate his never ending appetite for wealth.

Here's the letter verbatim :

______________________________

The charity presents itself as a beacon of hope,

offering assistance in areas such as marriage problems,

social issues, and drug addiction.

However, a closer examination reveals that

this charity is doing more harm than good.

I am writing this report aiming to

uncover the inefficacies, mismanagement, and potential

exploitative practices of the charity, highlighting the

urgent need for accountability and reform.

_______

Lack of Professionalism

One of the most glaring issues is

the absence of qualified professionals.

Effective intervention in areas such as marriage

counseling, social work, and drug rehabilitation

requires the expertise of licensed and

professionally qualified practitioners.

Unfortunately, instead it relies solely on volunteers

and staff with inadequate training and qualifications.

This lack of professionalism

not only diminishes the quality of support provided but also

poses a significant risk to the individuals seeking help. 

I have personally seen many clients leave in a far

worse state than when they came in for counselling.

The attitude of the CEO is nothing short of authoritarian.

There is no counselling in the professional sense -

it's either his way or the highway.

Don't be fooled by the glowing feedback on google reviews,

they were concocted by friends of the CEO at his behest.

_______

Mismanagement of Funds

Financial transparency is crucial for any

charitable organisation. However, the charity

has consistently failed to provide clear and detailed

accounts of how donations are spent. Staff are too scared to

question the CEO on such matters - in fear of being hurled abuse

and being belittled.  Even surreptitiously removed for

even daring to get clarification on issues like income and expenditure.

I have seen internal reports indicating that

a disproportionate amount of funds are

allocated to administrative costs and executive salaries/wages,

with minimal resources directed toward the actual programs

designed to assist those in need. This misallocation of funds raises

serious ethical concerns and undermines donor trust.

This so-called charity, masquerading as

a beacon of hope, is nothing more

than a scheme of deceit and exploitation.

While purporting to raise funds

for noble causes, their true expertise lies in

the art of manipulation and greed.

Behind the facade of philanthropy, they

clandestinely siphon off donations

to inflate executive salary and administrative costs,

leaving mere scraps for the actual

intended beneficiaries. The true reflection of donations

and wages are NEVER disclosed in the official accounts.

For them, cash is king so the real

situation of how much is received

and where it's spent (or pocketed) is never disclosed.

Their opaque financial practices not

only betray the trust of well-meaning donors

but also perpetuate a cycle of disillusionment and

despair among those who give their time for the charity.

This charity's flagrant disregard for transparency

and ethical responsibility underscores

a shameful disregard for the very

people they claim to serve.

_______

Hoodwinking the Charity Commission

The CEO uses false names to make out that there are two different

people operating at the charity. However, both of these

are the same person - himself.  Not only is he

the CEO (using his fake surname 'Manya')

but also is registered as a trustee but under a

different name (using his real surname 'Master').

The commission is being mislead

into believing there are two different people at the charity

each with a different roles.  

Charity commission laws are clear that this has to be declared.

The reason why he does this, will become clear as stated below.

It is also an offence for a trustee to

NOT declare ANY sort of compensation

(either expenses or remuneration or any in-kind payments).

This is clearly happening at the Charity.

The CEO under a different name

is receiving compensation while at the

same time being a trustee, under a different name.

The other trustees (Mr. Ayaz Patel and Mr A. A. Master)

know full well this is the case

yet are either wilfully ignoring it

or unwilling to reprimand the CEO to rectify this breach.

______________

Questionable Methods and Practices

The methodologies employed by the charity in addressing

complex issues like drug addiction and marriage counseling are,

at best, outdated and, at worst, potentially harmful.

There are numerous accounts of participants being subjected

to unproven and controversial techniques, which can exacerbate

their problems rather than resolve them.

For instance, their approach to drug addiction

lacks evidence-based practices, often side lining medically

recommended treatments in favour of unverified methods.

The CEO has no relevant academic or professional

qualification in any subject let alone counselling.

Neither do any of the volunteers - no matter how well intended

their help may be, it is extremely irresponsible to

make out that the help being give is professional and qualified.

There is also the fact that one of the scholars on it's board

is on the Prevent register.  This was messaged to them last year

by a concerned client - I personally read the email.

Nothing was done about it. The charity

commission still do not know of this.

_______________

Lack of Accountability and Oversight

Effective governance is critical to the success

and integrity of any charity. Unfortunately, in this case

the charity operates with minimal oversight,

lacking a robust system for accountability.

This absence of checks and balances has led to numerous instances

of misconduct and negligence, which continue unchecked

due to the lack of external review and regulation.

The CEO of this charity runs it with an iron fist,

treating it as his personal domain rather

than a service-oriented organisation.

His autocratic leadership style stifles

dissent, marginalises accountability,

and prioritises self-interest over the charity's mission, 

casting a dark shadow over its purported altruistic goals -

 suggesting it serves as a means

for the CEO to enrich himself at the

expense of the charity's mission and the trust of its donors.

In light of above, it is evident

that the charity is failing to fulfil

its mission in a meaningful and ethical manner.

The lack of professionalism,

financial mismanagement, questionable practices,

exploitation of vulnerable populations,

and lack of accountability collectively paint a

damning picture of an organisation in chaos.

It is imperative that donors, regulators,

and the general public hold the

charity accountable to ensure that it

either undergoes significant reform

or ceases operations to prevent further harm.

1. A truly independent audit should be

conducted to scrutinise the financial

practices and ensure transparency.

2. Employ licensed professionals to

manage and execute programs effectively.

3.  Implement methodologies that are

backed by scientific research

and have proven efficacy.

4. Establish ethical guidelines for

fundraising to prevent the exploitation

of vulnerable clients.

5.  Develop a governance structure that

includes external oversight to ensure

accountability and ethical operations.

By addressing these critical issues,

the charity can begin to rebuild trust and

genuinely support those in need, fulfilling its

foundational mission with integrity and effectiveness.

 Betrayal of Trust

One of the most egregious aspects of this Rasputin's actions is

the profound betrayal of trust. The madrasah teachers

inherently rely on each other to maintain a level of confidentiality and

solidarity. By reporting his fellow teachers to the HMRC, he has shattered this trust.

This betrayal not only damages personal relationships but also

undermines the cohesive fabric that is essential for any team

to function effectively. Trust, once broken, is exceedingly

difficult to rebuild, and the repercussions of such an act

can ripple through an organisation, leading to a toxic work environment filled with suspicion and fear.

_________________

Devoid of Integrity

Integrity is a cornerstone of professional and personal conduct. It entails

adhering to moral and ethical principles, even when it is inconvenient or challenging.

By throwing his colleagues under the bus, this individual (Rasputin) has demonstrated a

total lack of integrity. Such actions suggest a willingness to prioritize self-preservation

or personal gain over the well-being and life  of others. This lack of ethical backbone

is alarming and raises questions about his reliability and moral

judgment in other areas of his professional life.

______________

 Endangering Lives and Careers

The decision to report the teachers to HMRC is reckless and thoughtless.

It can have devastating consequences for those involved, potentially

leading to job loss, legal troubles, and irreparable damage to their

reputations. In extreme cases, it can also endanger their personal

safety and mental health. A colleague who jeopardizes others’ lives and

careers in this manner exhibits a blatant disregard for the severe

consequences of his actions on real people with families, responsibilities, and futures.

________________

Consequences for the Children
The consequences extend beyond the immediate victims and the madrasah

teaching space. Students are directly impacted by the sudden upheaval.

Consistency and stability are crucial for an effective learning

environment. When teachers are under threat from Rasputin's

cowboy like actions, students lose trusted mentors and educators,

which can disrupt their deeni progress and emotional well-being.

The abrupt absence of a teacher can lead to gaps in the

curriculum, confusion, and a loss of motivation among students.  

The appalling self serving actions of one individual aka Rasputin,

has an enormous effect on the deeni well being of 100s

if not 1000s of children, not only at Tauheedul but

potentially all the masajids in Blackburn.

____________

Erosion of Ustaads Morale
The fallout from such actions extends beyond the immediate individuals

involved. The entire team or organisation can suffer from reduced

morale and increased anxiety. Colleagues may feel insecure, constantly

worrying about being the next target. This creates a hostile

work environment where collaboration and open communication

are stifled. The fear of betrayal can lead to reduced productivity,

higher turnover rates, and a general decline in job satisfaction across the board.

___________

Selfish Motivations
One must consider the motivations behind such a

betrayal. Rasputin's actions are driven by selfish desires for

personal advancement, revenge, or deflection of blame from

oneself. Such motivations reveal a character that is fundamentally

self-serving and manipulative. Madrasah teachers are likely to perceive

this individual as someone who cannot be trusted and who will readily

sacrifice others for personal benefit. This perception can permanently

damage his professional relationships and reputation.

________________

By reporting the teachers to the authorities and thereby endangering their

lives and careers, Rasputin has demonstrated a profound

absence of integrity, empathy, and respect for the principles of trust

that underpin any functional workplace. His actions have far-reaching negative

consequences, undermining not only the immediate victims (including children's deeni ta'leem)

but also the broader team dynamics and organisational culture. It is a stark reminder

of the importance of ethical behaviour and the devastating impact that

betrayal can have on both personal and professional levels.

Top

This is the recording of the shameful violence perpetrated by Rasputin and

his conjoined violent adulterous twin, Salim Kamboli - back in 2019 at the Bolton DU.

It was the final straw that resulted in Mr. Bhailok finally taking action to get rid of these morons for good.

Mr. Bhailok who is in the video, where you can see Rasputin hell bent in 
attempting to physically (and no doubt verbally) abuse him.

These two, plus their other two lapdogs (Darbar and Wadiwala) ruled the DU

as it was their fiefdom - just like the gangster Kray Twins that terrorised London back in the 50s and 60s.

Those of you who couldn't accept what was stated on here as truth,

like an attack on a 70 year old trustee of the DU  by these two shameless thugs,

then watch the video and see the evidence being played out.  

The Maulwi Kray Twins at the time attempted to ban this video from

circulation knowing it would expose them for who they really are and shatter
their charade as some heavenly god fearing sufis.  

In reality, it shows their real selves - hypocrites, and charlatans
taking everyone, who falls for their faux 'hazrat' showmanship, for a one almighty ride.

You decide who is Reggie and who is Ronnie.

Meet Rasputin's inseparable bosom buddy of 30+ years : Salim Kamboli

Another shambolic faux maulwi, just like Rasputin, who also attended DU in South Africa.  

Rasputin has an uncanny talent of being attracted to deviants, as companions and friends.

Those who match his deviancy and evil traits become his partners in crime.  

There's the  wife beater -  Wadiwala, and now meet the wife cheating scumbag -  Salim Kamboli

(again to address him with the title of 'maulana' would be wholly

unjustified, as an adulterous slimeball has no rightful claim to such a title).

 This zaani is just another one is unable to surrender  the trappings of this dunya.

Just like his dear leader and twin, Rasputin,

he loves it's adornments and in a similar fashion chases after it, come what may.

He cheated on his wife to fulfil his corrupt desires,

causing immense pain to both his and his wife’s families.

His son has still not recovered from the acute depression, as a result of his transgression. 

He committed zina, not caring an iota for the marriage

of 20+ years and the children of that marriage.

___________

This is Rasputin's best mate and cojoined twin of 30+ years.

These charlatans, so called alims are narcissistic dregs of society,

who have no regard for anyone except for themselves.

They use their fake 'maulana' titles to snarl the unwary in pursuit of power and capital.

____

Kamboli’s cravings for the worldly riches was known from his

days at the DU in South Africa - yes, like his complicit twin - Rasputin.

Few know of the truth of the alleged ‘car crash’ in South Africa,

where he was left in critical state close to death.  

Well, the truth is, that there was no car crash -

The fact was that he's attempted theft of gold from

a protected are,  in the hope of  smuggle it to another country.

However, local South Africans  caught him red handed and dished out

local 'hudud' justice there and then. He was beaten to a pulp.

Resulting in him being hospitalised with grave injuries. 

Rasputin knew this yet covered it up - as that's conjoined twins do.

All the while they made up the tale that he was injured in a car accident.

__________

One would think he'd learnt his lesson and so rectify his illicit greed for the dunya. 

But no, like his crooked Rasputin twin, that greed was and is still ever present in him.  

Fast forward to his tenure at Bolton DU and together with Rasputin

they caused a total run down of the DU and School and  

then orchestrating theft of the assets by attempting to transfer these same assets

to their own charity  – forging signatures of trustees being one such example. 

As mentioned previously on here, Mr. Y. Bhailock was onto their shenanigans,  

and forcefully put a stop to it, and made sure they were all kicked out.

__________

 Rasputin (and the other two sidekicks – Wadiwala, Darbar) are still at it.

This time trying the same ploy at Tauheedul but thankfully

their devious and malicious actions has once more been halted.  

Rasputin, Kamboli, Darbar and Wadiwala - all evil reprobates who

have no meaningful purpose in life except to

deceive and enrich themselves by hook, or by crook.

_______

More will follow on Kamboli and Rasputin and the innate thuggish hooligan behaviour

they practised for so long at Bolton DU.  Which eventually lead

to them being unceremoniously booted out of the DU/School.

Top

Top

In the 1960s there was the serial murderer who was dubbed the Boston Strangler.

It so happens, during the past Ramadhan, that a new minor strangler appeared in Tauheedul masjid,

who can, by all means, be termed as the "Bicknell Strangler". 

Who was this vile individual? 

Who would dare resort to commit such a violent act in the House of Allah ? 

After salaat, this goon stood up and then headed towards a musalli,

who was also getting up, and without any provocation,

this jackass grabbed hold of the musalli's neck and dragged him all the way to the back wall.  

It was only after the intervention of other musallis that this animalistic knucklehead was

separated from the musalli, who was understandably left dazed. 

For whatever reason this imbecilic airhead did this, it was a vile crime

against the House of Allah - a place which is sanctified and a blessed sanctuary.

Nothing justifies such unprovoked violence in His House.

All this has been documented and recorded in the masjid CCTV cameras.

There are also countless witnesses to the unfortunate event.

So who was this uneducated, uncouth, and illiterate low life

dunderhead that committed this lamebrained act ? 

Lo and behold !!  It was Rasputin's teenage son - yes, HIS SON !!

Seems this is a very good case of, 'like father like son'.

Violence and nasty, devilish akhlaq runs deep in Rasputin,

 and all those he acquaints with.  Whether it's Wadiwala, Darbar,

and his baseball bat wielding meathead brothers - and now his son/s.

Birds of feather, always flock together - as the adage goes.

If his own son, and who like his uncouth dad,  is studying at Azaadville DU,

hasn't taken into practice the high and mighty preaching of his father.

If all the seerah lectures and hours of sermonising about

adopting good akhlaq, like the good character of the

Prophet ﷺ, the Sahaba (rad') etc hasn't sunk into his own son's life -

then what chance that it has for others  ? 

His own son,  for nearly 18+ years was supposed given tarbiyyah at home

for 18+ years - home schooled, home madrasah'd, 24/7

and yet still this same son cannot stop himself resorting to

violent behaviour in the House of Allah.  

Compare that to a muslim boy/girl, who has not been home schooled,

has gone to secular schools, and attended madrasah,

and received ta'leem and tarbiyyah

from their parents about good behaviour. 

How many of these turned out to be so evil that they commit violence

in a sanctified space like the Masjid ? 

Answer = ZERO.

Certainly not in Tauheedul Masjid.

Rasputin's son, was the FIRST to commit such violence, in the history of the masjid. 

With all the arrogant abuse he has dished out to Tauheedul schools,

may be he should ask himself how many of those students (whether  boy or girl)

has gone on to commit such horrendous violent action in the House of the Almighty ?

Spiritual penetration of words can only happen if the

one doing the talking, is himself of upright character and a decent human. 

He is not a hypocrite.

Doesn't cause strife and disunity.

Is averse to causing fitnah.

Doesn’t hurl abuse.

Doesn't shame others at the pulpit.

Doesn't bring harm to others.

Isn't filled with envy, hasad and hatred.

Isnt in love with the  dunya and hankers after materialism etc

No matter how many sermons the person gives, 

in whatever eloquent manner he gives them,

if he possess any of the evil traits mentioned,

the words will have little or no effect.

The talks will be for mere entertainment purposes.

People will listen, say "wah wah",  and once finished, and forget. 

Just another form of merry making bidah party like Rasputin's trip

to the "old boys reunion" in South Africa.

If an example is ever needed then look

no further than Rasputin's son - for all of Rasputin’s efforts

his own son was devoid of receiving any of the

spiritual effects and benefit of his sermons, talks and teachings. Why ?

Those talks were devoid of noor and blessing because the person giving